https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203529
--- Comment #61 from Andy Shevchenko (andy.shevche...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Paul Menzel from comment #60)
> Reading my original post again, the USB-C adapter Dell DA200 was inserted
> after boot (90 s).
Yeah, there are two cases when it
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203529
--- Comment #60 from Paul Menzel (pmenzel+bugzilla.kernel@molgen.mpg.de) ---
Reading my original post again, the USB-C adapter Dell DA200 was inserted after
boot (90 s).
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203529
--- Comment #59 from Paul Menzel (pmenzel+bugzilla.kernel@molgen.mpg.de) ---
(In reply to Andy Shevchenko from comment #58)
> (In reply to Paul Menzel from comment #57)
> > Well, then Linux does have a design problem, doesn’t it?
>
> You may
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203529
--- Comment #58 from Andy Shevchenko (andy.shevche...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Paul Menzel from comment #57)
> Well, then Linux does have a design problem, doesn’t it?
You may put it this way, of course...
> At least the log messages for the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203529
--- Comment #57 from Paul Menzel (pmenzel+bugzilla.kernel@molgen.mpg.de) ---
Well, then Linux does have a design problem, doesn’t it?
At least the log messages for the handler could be reworked, so no error level
message is reported.
--
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203529
--- Comment #56 from Andy Shevchenko (andy.shevche...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Paul Menzel from comment #55)
> So the I²C host controller driver needs to be loaded earlier then?
It's not possible (feasible).
--
You may reply to this email
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203529
--- Comment #55 from Paul Menzel (pmenzel+bugzilla.kernel@molgen.mpg.de) ---
So the I²C host controller driver needs to be loaded earlier then?
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203529
--- Comment #54 from Andy Shevchenko (andy.shevche...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Paul Menzel from comment #53)
> Isn’t this a design problem, Linux’ ACPI subsystem (or the firmware) should
> address?
>
> > acpi_mask_gpe= [HW,ACPI]
> >
