[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828

2009-05-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #51 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-05-19 15:37:19 --- Created an attachment (id=21431) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21431) dmesg results from suspend I figure i need to report, that the

[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828

2009-05-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #52 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-05-19 15:48:50 --- Created an attachment (id=21432) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21432) dmesg results from suspend ( acpi_osi=linux) another log, this

[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828

2009-05-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #53 from Len Brown len.br...@intel.com 2009-05-19 19:49:07 --- With acpi_osi set to either of the suggestions you made: Irq is not disabled This suggest that of the 7 instances of _PSW in the DSDT, the one that is causing the

[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #49 from Len Brown len.br...@intel.com 2009-05-19 01:49:17 --- Please try booting with the following parameters together acpi_osi=!Windows 2006 acpi_osi=!Windows 2006 SP1 and also just for grins, you might also try simply

[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #50 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-05-19 05:03:11 --- I tested it on the official ubuntu 9.04 kernel which is 2.6.28. Default settings for acpi_osi: Irq is ignored. Sleep Special function (FN + F3) tries to

[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828

2009-05-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #48 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-05-11 19:56:36 --- Created an attachment (id=21305) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21305) DMI Decode results. I applied the modifications in the patch

[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828

2009-05-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #46 from ykzhao yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-05-11 03:04:05 --- Created an attachment (id=21300) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21300) try the debug patch, in which the _PSW object will be skipped in course of

[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828

2009-05-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #47 from ykzhao yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-05-11 03:08:19 --- Hi, Kenney From the git-bisect log in comment #39 it seems that the issue is related with the following commit: ACPI : Disable the device's ability to wake the

[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828

2009-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #45 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-05-09 17:13:39 --- Created an attachment (id=21287) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21287) 2.6.30-rc5 dmesg log Another dmesg output, however, this time i

[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828

2009-05-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #44 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-05-05 17:20:32 --- Created an attachment (id=21234) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21234) ACPI Dump from patched kernel. Here's the requested acpidump, when

[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828

2009-05-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #43 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-05-04 15:40:33 --- Yes, The acpidump output most likely hasn't changed, but i do know that it is possible, since this is a laptop that the device which is at fault is PNP0C09,

[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828

2009-05-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #42 from Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-05-04 01:39:02 --- (In reply to comment #41) I looked at my patch, and noticed that it might not be helpful, I'm confused. You said that the issue goes away if you apply the patch in

[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828

2009-05-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #41 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-05-02 19:17:07 --- Created an attachment (id=21189) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21189) 2.6.30-rc4 patched Debug Log of ACPI I looked at my patch, and

[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828

2009-05-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #39 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-05-02 02:52:37 --- I think I found the source of my regression, and here's the bisect for it. git bisect start 'drivers/acpi/scan.c' # bad:

[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828

2009-05-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #40 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-05-02 04:28:33 --- Created an attachment (id=21185) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21185) Results from 2.6.30-rc4 with comparison of results My last

[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828

2009-04-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #38 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-05-01 00:19:47 --- I did a few bisects more bisects in random to narrow down the time frame to a couple of hours now, the break occurs sometime between these 2 commits. #

[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828

2009-04-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #37 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-04-29 19:55:47 --- I ran the Bisection, which produced this as a result: git bisect start 'drivers/acpi/ec.c' # bad: [bce7f793daec3e65ec5c5705d2457b81fe7b5725] Linux 2.6.26

[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828

2009-04-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #33 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-04-28 19:39:12 --- Created an attachment (id=21159) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21159) Dmesg from Kernel version 2.6.25.20. I just got version 2.6.25.20

[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828

2009-04-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #34 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-04-28 19:39:54 --- Created an attachment (id=21160) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21160) /sys/firmware/acpi/interupts/* from 2.6.25.20. -- Configure

[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828

2009-04-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #35 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-04-28 19:40:53 --- Created an attachment (id=21161) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21161) /proc/interrupts from 2.6.25.20. -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828

2009-04-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #36 from Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-04-29 01:40:20 --- as this is a 2.6.26 regression, could you please use git-bisect to find out which patch introduced the bug? BTW, agree with suggestion #2 in comment #25, ec is a

[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828

2009-04-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #27 from Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-04-27 07:56:35 --- ping Kenney -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for

[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828

2009-04-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #28 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-04-28 01:23:41 --- I just tested the debug patch against kernel 2.6.30-rc2, and here's the results. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828

2009-04-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #29 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-04-28 01:24:23 --- Created an attachment (id=21147) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21147) Interupts results with debug patch against 2.6.30-rc2 --

[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828

2009-04-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #30 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-04-28 01:26:53 --- Created an attachment (id=21148) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21148) contents of /sys/firmware/acpi/interupts in 2.6.30-rc2 with patch

[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828

2009-04-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #31 from Len Brown len.br...@intel.com 2009-04-28 01:47:17 --- whelp, the test patch confirmed that indeed, we have a screaming interrupt that is getting vectored through the acpi_irq(). I guess we could have believed

[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828

2009-04-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #32 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-04-28 03:16:24 --- (In reply to comment #31) whelp, the test patch confirmed that indeed, we have a screaming interrupt that is getting vectored through the acpi_irq(). I

[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828

2009-04-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 Len Brown len.br...@intel.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO

[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828

2009-04-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #26 from Len Brown len.br...@intel.com 2009-04-21 04:39:53 --- Created an attachment (id=21064) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21064) debug patch vs 2.6.30-rc2 Please apply this patch and show the the output