[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #51 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-05-19 15:37:19 --- Created an attachment (id=21431) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21431) dmesg results from suspend I figure i need to report, that the system failed to resume on this, but enters suspend properly. This log has the dmesg with boot params of... acpi_osi=!Windows 2006 acpi_sci=!Windows 2006 SP1 major failure is because of corrupted lower memory on resume. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #52 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-05-19 15:48:50 --- Created an attachment (id=21432) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21432) dmesg results from suspend ( acpi_osi=linux) another log, this time with the acpi_osi=Linux (suspend fails due to automatically waking up because of the ignored irq) also, the error does not change from the other one (even though i added fglrx and madwifi to the mix ), so it's known, normally when fglrx is used the graphics driver does not hang. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873
--- Comment #53 from Len Brown len.br...@intel.com 2009-05-19 19:49:07 ---
With acpi_osi set to either of the suggestions you made:
Irq is not disabled
This suggest that of the 7 instances of _PSW in the DSDT,
the one that is causing the failure is the one that
is checking the type of the OS (TPOS) for vista (0x40)
compatibility:
Device (PB6)
{
Name (_ADR, 0x0006)
Name (MPRW, Package (0x02)
{
0x18,
0x05
})
Method (_PRW, 0, NotSerialized)
{
\_SB.QWMI.PHSR (0x11, 0x02)
Store (\_SB.PCI0.LPC0.OWNS, \_SB.QWMI.Q512)
If (LEqual (\_SB.PCI0.LPC0.WOLI, 0x00))
{
Store (0x00, Index (MPRW, 0x01))
}
Else
{
Store (0x05, Index (MPRW, 0x01))
}
Return (MPRW)
}
Method (_PSW, 1, NotSerialized)
{
Store (Arg0, \_SB.PCI0.SMB.WOLE)
If (LEqual (TPOS, 0x40))
{
Store (Arg0, \_SB.PCI0.SMB.WOLF)
}
}
The _PRW for this device says that he should be coming in
on GPE 0x18. Though in the working 2.6.25 kernel,
there are no interrupts recording on gpe-18, and in
the 2.6.30 this GPE is marked as disabled.
Just for grins...
The failing kernel has HPET support, the working kernel does not.
Please verify that you still see the failure with hpet=disable
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables
unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine
for externally facing server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
___
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #49 from Len Brown len.br...@intel.com 2009-05-19 01:49:17 --- Please try booting with the following parameters together acpi_osi=!Windows 2006 acpi_osi=!Windows 2006 SP1 and also just for grins, you might also try simply acpi_osi=Linux -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #50 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-05-19 05:03:11 --- I tested it on the official ubuntu 9.04 kernel which is 2.6.28. Default settings for acpi_osi: Irq is ignored. Sleep Special function (FN + F3) tries to suspend machine. Suspend fails on first try every time and complains about corrupt memory. With acpi_osi set to either of the suggestions you made: Irq is not disabled Suspend Works Sleep Special function (FN + F3) does not try to put machine to sleep, instead generates a keyboard error. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #48 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-05-11 19:56:36 --- Created an attachment (id=21305) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21305) DMI Decode results. I applied the modifications in the patch attached to comment #46 and the issue did not persist. Also, here's the dmidecode with the only 2 things edited out is serial and uuid (Considering those most likely don't matter) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #46 from ykzhao yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-05-11 03:04:05 --- Created an attachment (id=21300) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21300) try the debug patch, in which the _PSW object will be skipped in course of scanning device -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #47 from ykzhao yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-05-11 03:08:19 --- Hi, Kenney From the git-bisect log in comment #39 it seems that the issue is related with the following commit: ACPI : Disable the device's ability to wake the sleeping system in the boot phase Will you please try the debug patch in comment #46 on the latest kernel(2.6.30-rc5) and see whether the issue still exists? In the debug patch the commit 729b2bdb is reverted. Will you please also attach the output of dmidecode? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #45 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-05-09 17:13:39 --- Created an attachment (id=21287) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21287) 2.6.30-rc5 dmesg log Another dmesg output, however, this time i booted with these flags: acpi.debug_layer=0x00f acpi.debug_level=0x00ff At around 300 seconds, i removed the ac adaptor for a little bit, and found a neat set of messages. It appears that ACAD, BAT1 and EHC0 all send events on the GP03 (Although, this also on my patched version which reverts the code in the function, acpi_bus_get_wakeup_device_flags back to what is seen in kernel revisions 2.6.25 and 2.6.24 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #44 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-05-05 17:20:32 --- Created an attachment (id=21234) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21234) ACPI Dump from patched kernel. Here's the requested acpidump, when the irq is not disabled. However, The results do not change between the this one and the last one. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #43 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-05-04 15:40:33 --- Yes, The acpidump output most likely hasn't changed, but i do know that it is possible, since this is a laptop that the device which is at fault is PNP0C09, which is the smart controller for my battery, because the bulk of the interrupt calls on that occur when i unplug and plug the power cord in. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Register Now Save for Velocity, the Web Performance Operations Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry leaders in dedicated Performance Operations tracks. Use code vel09scf and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #42 from Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-05-04 01:39:02 --- (In reply to comment #41) I looked at my patch, and noticed that it might not be helpful, I'm confused. You said that the issue goes away if you apply the patch in comment #40, right? what do you mean by saying it might not be helpful? so i ran the debug statements given earlier, it's interestingly enough a few of the GPE's which should be in their own are getting routed through GPE03. acpi.debug_layer=0x44 acpi.debug_level=0x0804 I'll look at the debug options for ACPI to see if anything else might be useful please attach the acpidump output. so that we can see what GPE03 is used for. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Register Now Save for Velocity, the Web Performance Operations Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry leaders in dedicated Performance Operations tracks. Use code vel09scf and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #41 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-05-02 19:17:07 --- Created an attachment (id=21189) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21189) 2.6.30-rc4 patched Debug Log of ACPI I looked at my patch, and noticed that it might not be helpful, so i ran the debug statements given earlier, it's interestingly enough a few of the GPE's which should be in their own are getting routed through GPE03. acpi.debug_layer=0x44 acpi.debug_level=0x0804 I'll look at the debug options for ACPI to see if anything else might be useful -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Register Now Save for Velocity, the Web Performance Operations Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry leaders in dedicated Performance Operations tracks. Use code vel09scf and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #39 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-05-02 02:52:37 --- I think I found the source of my regression, and here's the bisect for it. git bisect start 'drivers/acpi/scan.c' # bad: [08acd4f8af42affd8cbed81cc1b69fa12ddb213f] Merge branch 'release' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6 git bisect bad 08acd4f8af42affd8cbed81cc1b69fa12ddb213f # good: [ce52ddf58cbc2c40f5f08d37d2217945e4d5adf3] ACPI: EC: Don't delete boot EC git bisect good ce52ddf58cbc2c40f5f08d37d2217945e4d5adf3 # bad: [729b2bdbfa19dd9be98dbd49caf2773b3271cc24] ACPI : Disable the device's ability to wake the sleeping system in the boot phase git bisect bad 729b2bdbfa19dd9be98dbd49caf2773b3271cc24 # good: [5c9fcb5deef4d3a49798d76c48b726d2e3c7df72] ACPI: fix a regression of ACPI device driver autoloading git bisect good 5c9fcb5deef4d3a49798d76c48b726d2e3c7df72 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Register Now Save for Velocity, the Web Performance Operations Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry leaders in dedicated Performance Operations tracks. Use code vel09scf and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #40 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-05-02 04:28:33 --- Created an attachment (id=21185) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21185) Results from 2.6.30-rc4 with comparison of results My last assumption proved true, the acpi issue of it getting ignored held true, the file includes the patch i did to fix my system, but it involed pulling out the other one. So, I'll rework my patch a little bit to help fix this problem, while not voiding out the effects of the previous patch. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Register Now Save for Velocity, the Web Performance Operations Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry leaders in dedicated Performance Operations tracks. Use code vel09scf and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #38 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-05-01 00:19:47 --- I did a few bisects more bisects in random to narrow down the time frame to a couple of hours now, the break occurs sometime between these 2 commits. # good: [c99fcf28b87d8cab592db7571e3164f5cb54c5b3] signals: send_group_sigqueue: don't take tasklist_lock git bisect good c99fcf28b87d8cab592db7571e3164f5cb54c5b3 # bad: [08acd4f8af42affd8cbed81cc1b69fa12ddb213f] Merge branch 'release' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6 git bisect bad 08acd4f8af42affd8cbed81cc1b69fa12ddb213f -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Register Now Save for Velocity, the Web Performance Operations Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry leaders in dedicated Performance Operations tracks. Use code vel09scf and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #37 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-04-29 19:55:47 --- I ran the Bisection, which produced this as a result: git bisect start 'drivers/acpi/ec.c' # bad: [bce7f793daec3e65ec5c5705d2457b81fe7b5725] Linux 2.6.26 git bisect bad bce7f793daec3e65ec5c5705d2457b81fe7b5725 # good: [4b119e21d0c66c22e8ca03df05d9de623d0eb50f] Linux 2.6.25 git bisect good 4b119e21d0c66c22e8ca03df05d9de623d0eb50f # good: [223883b7aafa02410ed2e571d6032c876d0b23b8] ACPI: EC: Switch off GPE mode during suspend/resume git bisect good 223883b7aafa02410ed2e571d6032c876d0b23b8 # good: [ce52ddf58cbc2c40f5f08d37d2217945e4d5adf3] ACPI: EC: Don't delete boot EC git bisect good ce52ddf58cbc2c40f5f08d37d2217945e4d5adf3 # bad: [08acd4f8af42affd8cbed81cc1b69fa12ddb213f] Merge branch 'release' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6 git bisect bad 08acd4f8af42affd8cbed81cc1b69fa12ddb213f -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Register Now Save for Velocity, the Web Performance Operations Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry leaders in dedicated Performance Operations tracks. Use code vel09scf and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #33 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-04-28 19:39:12 --- Created an attachment (id=21159) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21159) Dmesg from Kernel version 2.6.25.20. I just got version 2.6.25.20 to boot, and it didn't generate a error about acpi_irq. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Register Now Save for Velocity, the Web Performance Operations Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry leaders in dedicated Performance Operations tracks. Use code vel09scf and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #34 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-04-28 19:39:54 --- Created an attachment (id=21160) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21160) /sys/firmware/acpi/interupts/* from 2.6.25.20. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Register Now Save for Velocity, the Web Performance Operations Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry leaders in dedicated Performance Operations tracks. Use code vel09scf and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #35 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-04-28 19:40:53 --- Created an attachment (id=21161) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21161) /proc/interrupts from 2.6.25.20. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Register Now Save for Velocity, the Web Performance Operations Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry leaders in dedicated Performance Operations tracks. Use code vel09scf and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #36 from Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-04-29 01:40:20 --- as this is a 2.6.26 regression, could you please use git-bisect to find out which patch introduced the bug? BTW, agree with suggestion #2 in comment #25, ec is a suspect here, and git-bisect drivers/acpi/ec.c would be a better chioce. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Register Now Save for Velocity, the Web Performance Operations Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry leaders in dedicated Performance Operations tracks. Use code vel09scf and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #27 from Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-04-27 07:56:35 --- ping Kenney -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Crystal Reports #45; New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited royalty#45;free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #28 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-04-28 01:23:41 --- I just tested the debug patch against kernel 2.6.30-rc2, and here's the results. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Register Now Save for Velocity, the Web Performance Operations Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry leaders in dedicated Performance Operations tracks. Use code vel09scf and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #29 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-04-28 01:24:23 --- Created an attachment (id=21147) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21147) Interupts results with debug patch against 2.6.30-rc2 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Register Now Save for Velocity, the Web Performance Operations Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry leaders in dedicated Performance Operations tracks. Use code vel09scf and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #30 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-04-28 01:26:53 --- Created an attachment (id=21148) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21148) contents of /sys/firmware/acpi/interupts in 2.6.30-rc2 with patch -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Register Now Save for Velocity, the Web Performance Operations Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry leaders in dedicated Performance Operations tracks. Use code vel09scf and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #31 from Len Brown len.br...@intel.com 2009-04-28 01:47:17 --- whelp, the test patch confirmed that indeed, we have a screaming interrupt that is getting vectored through the acpi_irq(). I guess we could have believed /proc/interrupts on that one... Can you make the interrupt stop by any of the means in suggestions #1 and #2 in comment #25? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Register Now Save for Velocity, the Web Performance Operations Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry leaders in dedicated Performance Operations tracks. Use code vel09scf and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #32 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-04-28 03:16:24 --- (In reply to comment #31) whelp, the test patch confirmed that indeed, we have a screaming interrupt that is getting vectored through the acpi_irq(). I guess we could have believed /proc/interrupts on that one... Can you make the interrupt stop by any of the means in suggestions #1 and #2 in comment #25? I'll start with Suggestion #1, I don't have much experience with the changes to the build configuration, and as thus usually ask for help on this. ( this last build i completely forgot to build all the modules and as thus it didn't even include the sound and video drivers. ) Suggestion #2, I still have not fixed the boot issues surrounding the 2.6.25 kernel Before i can even think about running a git bisect, and i have no clue how to run the git bisect on this. All i know is that the break in acpi occured sometime between 2.6.24 and 2.6.26, but 2.6.25 didn't display the error message about acpi_irq up to the point where it tried to mount the file system. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Register Now Save for Velocity, the Web Performance Operations Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry leaders in dedicated Performance Operations tracks. Use code vel09scf and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 Len Brown len.br...@intel.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Summary|ACPI SCI does not interrupt |irq 9: nobody cared - |- Toshiba Satellite |Toshiba Satellite |P305D-S8828 |P305D-S8828 --- Comment #25 from Len Brown len.br...@intel.com 2009-04-21 03:26:41 --- As the ACPI SCI worked properly in 2.6.24 in its default mode (level, low), and the latest kernel uses the same mode, I don't think that any combination of acpi_sci= is going to fix the issue with the latest kernel. What seems to have changed is that there are now a rash of ACPI SCI interrupts provoked, acpi_irq() does not claim them and so the kernel shuts down IRQ9 as a screaming interrupt. (irqpoll will work around this symptom when IRQ 9 gets shut off. However, it will work only to the extent that there are other interrupts going on in the system to kick off the polling) comment #13 shows that there were 999 invocations of the acpi_sci and that all 999 were GPE's, and all 999 were GPE 03: gpe03: 999enabled ... gpe_all: 999 sci: 999 Was this grep taken after irq 9: nobody cared? What did grep acpi /proc/interrupts show? Unfortunately, /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts is showing handled interrupts only, and not counting all calls to acpi_irq -- I'll send a debug patch to add that shortly... In the mean time, it may be useful to try to isolate this issue in two ways. 1. disable all features possible and see if your interrupt still works. eg. with CONFIG_ACPI=y, disable all the optional acpi drivers (eg. battery, ac etc.) and see if irq9 still gets disabled. If no, add them back, say, starting with button until you see which driver provokes the breakage. 2. git bisect drivers/acpi/ec.c between the working and failing kernels to see if it was an EC specific change that provoked the issue. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12873] irq 9: nobody cared - Toshiba Satellite P305D-S8828
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 --- Comment #26 from Len Brown len.br...@intel.com 2009-04-21 04:39:53 --- Created an attachment (id=21064) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21064) debug patch vs 2.6.30-rc2 Please apply this patch and show the the output from grep . /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/* and grep acpi /proc/interrutps after the failure. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
