Altering the subject a mite:
I've not yet purchased these books and so am not completely familiar
with the content...
Does anyone have a recommendation for AD programming using .NET?
VB is my personal poison of choice.
VBS would probably suffice for my anticipated needs but I do wish to get
Please ignore this post: I just read Joe's other note about
http://directoryprogramming.net/default.aspx
Sorry! So much to read so little time...
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Richard Kline
Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 9:00 AM
To: 'ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org'
Subject:
Take a look at this as well and verify you have set everything up as
it should:
http://msexchange.me.uk/rpchttpsproblems.htm
Cheers,
Victor
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: Ravi Dogra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Datum: zaterdag, september 16, 2006 0:59 am
Onderwerp: [ActiveDir] RPC Over HTTPS
I hope you aren't frustrated by the book being written in C# rather than
VB.NET. That rule was imposed by my coauthor and the publisher. All of the
code samples are re-written in VB.NET and posted on the website, so
hopefully that works for you.
For the most part, the actual VB and C# code
Agreed,And I don't believe somehow policies become easier to troubleshoot with exclusions, specially in a very large environment with high level of delegation coupled with varying level of skill sets.
In fact the way Enforced or Block Policy are visually marked in GPMC console, I wish there was
LOL.
I really actually like LDAP and Win32 API type coding. I do understand
though the draw for some folks for .NET. Just not for me, especially as I
play more and more in the FreeBSD space. ;)
ASP.NET I expect will be the first thing I go into when/if I make a step in
that direction. Something
Well :-)
I suppose, you are looking at tiny figure of 300 users and why not choosing option 1 straight away.
If only every IT manager was as forceful and articulate about danger of short term decisions as you are.
About migrating to corporate domain, that is achievable as both sites are not going
Someday you need to take a spin through System.DirectoryServices.Protocols
(.NET 2.0) in C# and see if you like it. It is a direct interop layer over
wldap32, exposing the entire feature surface. It does impose an OO model on
top of the API, but it is done in a very LDAP-centric way, using
In a moment of aol me too! aol here's the SBS version of how to
setup Outlook over http:
1. Run the connect to Internet and email wizard on the todo list
2. Choose the GUI button that enables Outlook over the Internet
3. Now log into the GUI remote portal http://domainname/remote
4. Click
With the IFM feature in 2003 the promotion issue is not that much of an
issue.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006
Another example of that regional forest type model Ive noticed
dealing in the state/local space is that sometimes you have organizations like
the police/sheriff or an auditor which has to be separate. You end up standing
up a forest for a hundred users or something, but, those groups
Replication is certainly a good reason to separate. Not a common one however from what I've seen. African continentmight be in a similar boat for some international companies. There are some other reasons as well, but they have been very far and few between from my experience. I can't talk to the
Elevating priveledges from DA to EA (or from physical DC access to EA)
is simple
This requires physical access to any DC in the same forest. A cross forest
/ cross domain trust would require some additional configuration done to
the forest to be able to do the same thing.
Regards;
James R. Day
Yeah. See the problem with that policy concept is that in your environment you've already noticed that good ideas are seldom given a chance to live long enough to make it to your level :)
That said, I would think it's extremely dangerous to try and break it like that. Although, it could work, the
14 matches
Mail list logo
