I remember there being a simple upgrade from nt4 standard to nt4
enterprise but don't remember reading of any similar upgrade path for
w2k.
Apparently such an upgrade path *does* now exist once again, for w2k3
(including the R2 edition).
Can anyone confirm or deny that such an upgrade is
Upgrading W2K3 standard to enterprise editionYeah, you can upgrade std. to ent.
One of my implementation guys accidently built a load of boxes for me as Std.,
so I got him to upgrade them to Ent.
Worked fine. He did have issues doing this on a different project where there
was a stupidly
Yes it does work, I have done a few on HP/Compaq here, as a test, but
its not a standard practice, if its built wrong, just wipe it, and
rebuild only takes an hour max.
Z
Edward E. Ziots
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I,M.E,CCA,Network+, Security +
email:[EMAIL
Hi,
Sorry it took me a little bit to answer your questions.
OS version Windows server 2003, standard edition, SP1...
Hardware Intel Xeon cpu 3 Ghz, 3.75 GB or Ram
DNS version W32i APP ENU 5.2.3790.1830 shp442,880 03-24-2005
dns.exe
tcp/ip:
internal dns servers
internal1: private fixed
Upgrading W2K3 standard to enterprise editionWell, the length of time depends
on the type of build used, and the components installed. As an example, on the
last project I worked on we used OpsWare to deploy standard servers based on a
number of templates. A Windows server that matched our
Humm Radia, you got the info on that, is that the next version of there
Smart Start Scripting toolkit? I heard of Opsware but never used it. I
do the server builds and usually only takes about 1-2 hrs for a
bare-metal build and needed customizations. ( Patches, AV, Registry
updates, and Security
Duh!!
You know how it is: too little sleep, too much to do ;)
Thanks a lot for your idea ... I'm pretty sure I fly-read your post
and then I got the idea myself ;)
JJ
On 16/01/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OTOH, I am wondering if it'd be possible to configure the routers so
Hey list
I have been battling with the following issue for what feels like an
age, but I can't seem to get it so I'm hoping someone here could provide
a bit of inspiration for me:
As we are a secondary school (K-12 equivalent), I would like members of
a particular group (namely staff) to
You can run dcdiag on the enterprise which will gather data from every
server. Try doing that and collecting data on the issue. Also, do the
objects exist in Sites and Services for the server to replicate among
its peers?
Try checking out some of that stuff,
Nate
-Original Message-
It may interest you to know that MSFT doesn't really support this
anymore. They've pulled the KB articles on it that used to exist.
Regardless, it still works if you set everything up properly.
1) remove the Everyone and Authenticated Users groups from the
address list that the Default GAL
Upgrading W2K3 standard to enterprise editionHP Open View Radia is HPs
enterprise systems management product. It's like OpsWare.
It's not a replacement for Smart Start.
I've had a quick look on HPs site for you, but can't find it, which suggests
the name's changed again... :P
--Paul
Hi,
My Exchange 2003 server transactional log files are not deleted eventhough I
have taken full backup of information store using ntbackup . Is there any
specific settings in ESM to do that.
Regards,
Senthil
Hi,
Does any body know how to remove lingering objects. When I use repadmin
/removelingeringobjects it returns an error invalid arguments. Can anybody
help me out.
Regards,
Senthil
Ahh, Openview, yeah dont use that just too big of a product. I am happy
with CIM worked right most of the time.
Z
Edward E. Ziots
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I,M.E,CCA,Network+, Security +
email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cell:401-639-3505
Hi Senthil
Please use the [OT] prefix in the subject line when posting off-topic.
Have you looked at the following KB article describing how to manually
remove the transaction log files if they are not successfully removed by a
backup?
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/240145
Tony
_
I did this for a school once.
Basically what you do is create a group for each GAL and put the folks in the
groups, then you create GAL/ALs in System manager and filter on this group
membership. Set the ACLs accordingly and deny access to the default GAL.
--brian
see:
http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/archive/2006/05/08/Lingering-objects.aspx
Met vriendelijke groeten / Kind regards,
Ing. Jorge de Almeida Pinto
Senior Infrastructure Consultant
MVP Windows Server - Directory Services
LogicaCMG Nederland B.V. (BU RTINC Eindhoven)
( Tel :
Even though windows defender is not supported on Windows 2000 any more,
does it still work on windows 2000 and will the adm file that gets added
into Group Policy apply?
Justin A. Salandra
MCSE Windows 2000 2003
Network and Technology Services Manager
Catholic Healthcare System
Hi Michael
Any idea why Microsoft no longer supports this method?
Tony
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
Sent: Friday, 19 January 2007 6:32 a.m.
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Different default GALs for
Folks,
Microsoft has just changed there KB914387 KB document to V7.0 and
rewrote there proceedure on Windows 2000 updates, its much different
from Version 6.0 on Dec 14, 2006. Its going to be another testing, and
deploy. And just when I thought I would be up 1000 workstations to the
good, M$
Hello Tony -
Weren't you around for this argument a few months ago on the Exchange
MVP list? J
I think it's a crock, personally. But we were told that: a) too many
people were shooting themselves in the foot (that is, damaging their
Exchange environment) by attempting to do this, and b)
ESX (VMWare) is good - and pricey. And very strict as to hardware specs. And
complex to setup and administer. And, I could be wrong on this, NOT
(MS)-supported for virtualizing DCs.
Virtual Server, on the other hand, is good, not pricey, less picky, more
supported (I believe it's actually
Thanks Michael
Must have missed it :-)
Neither of those arguments sounds overly compelling, I agree.
Tony
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
Sent: Friday, 19 January 2007 9:12 a.m.
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE:
Side note to VMing. I think your fine going through a static VPN (More V
acronyms!!) but be sure to close off ports: 5700, 5800 and 5900 on your
outside firewall interface as there are a number of different worms
looking for access to machines through those ports. Not nearly as bad as
say Big
IMHO, ESX/VM Infrastructure and Virtual Server are like apples and
oranges. Yes, they are both virtualization environments, but have vastly
different capabilities. VM Infrastructure has a much broader and deeper
feature set that does come with added cost and complexity.
Regardless, in the
Interesting points, Hunter.
Not to engage in a holy war or something, but would you mind mentioning what
makes one of these Orange and the other Apple (the fruit)? No, don't mention
64-bit Guest, thank you very much :)[1]
[1]Grumbling I wish MS will hurry up on this front already. /grumbling
Hello,
How to create an e-mail template using exchange 5.5?
The idea is that when any employee compose a new e-mail, at the bottom of
the message has included a company message that would be the same for all
the employees.
I know that at user level i can create a local signature but I need
On the Virtual Infrastructure side: Moving running guests across hosts
(vmotion), the network configuration options, lower host overhead,
grouping hosts into resource pools and allowing guests to automatically
migrate based on allocation guarantees, 4-way SMP guests, 64-bit guests
:-
Nothing
I agree we use VMware ESX here, and the features and scalability
basically leave Microsoft's Implementation in the dirt. If you want to
do enterprise class service, HA with VM's ESX is a superior product.
Yes it has stringent hard requirements ( Hey VMware/EMC tested the
configs, its like a
:)
Interesting points, again. Did I remember to say that I am biased? I think so.
I expect that I'm going to catch some flaks for what I'm about to write, but
.
These do not make VS and ESX apples and oranges. VMotion, Host clustering.
Different nomenclature, different capabilities, same
Hi Milton
In future, please use the [OT] prefix in the subject line for off-topic
posts such as this.
Have a look at the Exchange 5.5. FAQ here for recommendations for adding
disclaimers to email messages.
http://www.swinc.com/resources/exchange/faq_db.asp?status=questions
I realize this is now getting a bit OT, but.
Deji, I think the fruit distinction is based on the fact that one runs on
bare metal and other runs under a host OS. (Or at least that is how I have
always thought of them.) Beyond that, I agree there are simply feature
comparisons.
That said,
one runs on bare metal and other runs under a host OS
Actually, that's a sleight of hand. ESX runs on a VMware-cooked Linux Kernel.
So, one can argue that, because it is bundled with its own OS, ESX does not
really run on bare metal in the way some people describe it.
Sincerely,
_
Noah,
I initially thought that as well in regards to the video emulation performance.
Now correct me if I'm wrong, but I'll bet that you were using virtualized
Windows Server 2003 operating systems. The default setting in Windows Server
2003 is that your display hardware acceleration is
Hi All,
We are having Exch2K Win 2K Domain. I am facing one strange problem
that while I am configuring exchange account in outlook on a client
machine, it's not asking the user name/password mail is working fine
like user is able to send/receive mail. All clients are on workgroup.
Like all
I would make sure that you do not have any stored credentials on the machine.
You do not mention the version of the OS of the client machine but in Windows
XP and later there is a credential manager that can be used to store
credentials and present them on behalf of the user. Go into control
Steve,
R u taking about User Accounts -- Advanced -- managed password.i
had removed some of them now it's aksing for the password. Now the
second problem is any user is authenticating with other user
name/password...like I am configuring a user account, it's asking for
the user
Redearthsoftware PolicyPatrol.
but (wince) Exchange 5.5? Man I feel for ya...
Tony Murray wrote:
Hi Milton
In future, please use the [OT] prefix in the subject line for
off-topic posts such as this.
Have a look at the Exchange 5.5. FAQ here for recommendations for
adding disclaimers to
38 matches
Mail list logo
