RE: [ActiveDir] Attribute for Name Component of userPrincipalName?

2006-10-12 Thread Laura A. Robinson
There's a problem with this idea- the UPN (or, more specifically, the portion before the @) does not necessarily match the CN component of a DN, so there would be no reliability in your approach. Why are you unable to retrieve DNs? Laura -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [ActiveDir] Attribute for Name Component of userPrincipalName?

2006-10-12 Thread joe
Let me start with I am confused by what you are doing. But let me mention thoughts based on what you have written... The userPrincipalName uniqueness is based on the ENTIRE UPN, not just the first component. Unless you are POSITIVE that the UPNs will be unique up to the realm then you may want

Re: [ActiveDir] Attribute for Name Component of userPrincipalName?

2006-10-12 Thread Joe Kaplan
@mail.activedir.org Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 5:30 PM Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Attribute for Name Component of userPrincipalName? There's a problem with this idea- the UPN (or, more specifically, the portion before the @) does not necessarily match the CN component of a DN, so there would

Re: [ActiveDir] Attribute for Name Component of userPrincipalName?

2006-10-12 Thread Michael B Allen
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 18:36:24 -0400 joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The userPrincipalName uniqueness is based on the ENTIRE UPN, not just the first component. Unless you are POSITIVE that the UPNs will be unique up to the realm then you may want to find something else for your key. In ADAM you

Re: [ActiveDir] Attribute for Name Component of userPrincipalName?

2006-10-12 Thread Joe Kaplan
@mail.activedir.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 7:31 PM Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Attribute for Name Component of userPrincipalName? The entries would be under a domain container and therefore they are unique. The organisation might look like the following: DC=example,DC=com