Or maybe DirectoryInsight :-)
-Original Message-
From: Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 2:15 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Home Labs Interconnected
This sounds like a job for Directory Lockdown!
Toddler
Sounds like a good idea Mark.
Creation of a private VPN over the internet to form the larger Lab would
take care of the external security problems, but not the internal ones
(ie do you trust the other people).
the main issues I can see with doing this is exactly what people want to
test, and
PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Home Labs Interconnected
What happens in the real world when this happens? With message boards,
chat rooms, and instant messengers configuration changes could be
documented and discussed. Your question goes back to trust, Is someone
going to make changes
back the way it was? (I guess remotely deployable VMWare is the obvious
answer to this last issue.)
-g
-Original Message-
From: Cary, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 1:44 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Home Labs Interconnected
What
?
-Original Message-
From: Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 2:44 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Home Labs Interconnected
Interesting idea I would think that trust isn't so much of an issue as
configuration management. If you have 20
Interesting idea I would think that trust isn't so much of an issue as
configuration management. If you have 20 people link their 100 servers into
a couple of AD forests (for instance), how do you make sure no one
reconfigures the replication topology right when you're in the middle of
testing
. This would require some
troubleshooting.
Thanks for your input, I am trying to figure out if it's a feasible idea.
-Original Message-
From: Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 4:06 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Home Labs Interconnected
