RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation

2005-09-22 Thread Roger Seielstad
with you guys in Redmond next week J C From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony MurraySent: 20 September 2005 10:50 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation Hi Carlos As I said, I'm just starting to look at Kerberos

RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation

2005-09-22 Thread Roger Seielstad
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken SchaeferSent: 21 September 2005 03:17 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation Odd. If you use WFetch (its in the IIS6 Res Kit) or just plain telnet, and request a page, what WWW-Authenticate headers are coming back

RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation

2005-09-22 Thread Ken Schaefer
Could I ask why hed need to do that? Cheers Ken From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Thursday, 22 September 2005 4:23 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation So have you granted

RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation

2005-09-22 Thread Carlos Magalhaes
Hmmm, explain a little more where you would grant this access . Thanks Carlos From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: 22 September 2005 08:23 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation

RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation

2005-09-22 Thread Roger Seielstad
. Roger SeielstadE-mail Geek From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken SchaeferSent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 11:45 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation Could I ask why hed need to do that? Cheers Ken From: [EMAIL

RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation

2005-09-22 Thread Roger Seielstad
] Kerberos Delegation Hmmm, explain a little more where you would grant this access . Thanks Carlos From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger SeielstadSent: 22 September 2005 08:23 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation

RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation

2005-09-22 Thread Brian Desmond
. Thanks, Brian Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] c - 312.731.3132 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 9:57 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation By default, the IIS

RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation

2005-09-22 Thread Carlos Magalhaes
of Brian Desmond Sent: Thu 9/22/2005 4:17 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation Sharepoint will unless you ignore the recommendations in the setup wizard run under a service account you create for it. You can however ignore the recommendations to make

RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation

2005-09-22 Thread Carlos Magalhaes
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Roger Seielstad Sent: Thu 9/22/2005 3:56 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation By default, the IIS app pool and (I believe) sharepoint both run under Network Service. Therefore, when Sharepoint makes

RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation

2005-09-22 Thread Ken Schaefer
Seielstad Sent: Thursday, 22 September 2005 11:57 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation By default, the IIS app pool and (I believe) sharepoint both run under Network Service. Therefore, when Sharepoint makes the request outbound, it will be making

RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation

2005-09-21 Thread Ken Schaefer
Of Carlos Magalhaes Sent: Wednesday, 21 September 2005 10:39 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation Yeah Im not sure about that either at the moment IIS is REALLY ACTING WEIRD, KEN where are you :P - . I had the Share Point website in the IIS MMC

RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation

2005-09-21 Thread Carlos Magalhaes
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Schaefer Sent: 21 September 2005 03:17 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation Odd. If you use WFetch (its in the IIS6 Res Kit) or just plain telnet, and request a page, what WWW-Authenticate headers

RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation

2005-09-20 Thread Carlos Magalhaes
Of Tony Murray Sent: 20 September 2005 01:17 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation Hi Carlos I'm just starting to look at Kerberos delegation for something myself,but wouldn't you also need an SPN for the web service on the ISA Server? And then specify

RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation

2005-09-20 Thread Tony Murray
SharePoint server itself I don't know. Cheers Tony PS. See you next week :-) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carlos MagalhaesSent: Wednesday, 21 September 2005 1:38 a.m.To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation Hey Tony,

RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation

2005-09-19 Thread Tony Murray
Hi Carlos I'm just starting to look at Kerberos delegation for something myself,but wouldn't you also need an SPN for the web service on the ISA Server? And then specify that serviced in the delegation tab on the user object? Cheers Tony From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation

2005-09-19 Thread frank . carroll
Carlos, If I understand the situation correctly you are going client - Sharepoint IIS server - ISA server. It sounds like you need to pass the client's kerberos credentials all the way to the ISA box. If that is correct, here is what I would try... Client Browser: IE6SP1 will not negotiate

RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation

2005-09-19 Thread Ken Schaefer
September 2005 12:26 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation Carlos, If I understand the situation correctly you are going client - Sharepoint IIS server - ISA server. It sounds like you need to pass the client's kerberos credentials all the way

RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation

2005-08-09 Thread Bernard, Aric
Assuming that you are aware of what constrained delegation is, how it operates, and what it should be used for... Anytime you allow someone or something to impersonate, err, act on behalf of another security principal, there is always cause for concern. Constrained delegation certainly provides

RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation

2005-08-09 Thread Rick Kingslan
Bob, Make no mistake - I'm really not a fan of allowing Act as part of the operating system or the Impersonation privilege. That being said - from the work that I have done with other web developers needing access to SQL or application servers, constrained delegation is the best method that I

RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation

2005-08-09 Thread joseph.e.kaplan
Do you have details on the accounts that will be delegated? With constrained delegation, it is pretty straightforward to limit which accounts can delegate to which other services, but you might want to be very careful about limiting who gets delegated. One really good idea is marking all the

RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation

2005-08-09 Thread Free, Bob
: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation Assuming that you are aware of what constrained delegation is, how it operates, and what it should be used for... Anytime you allow someone or something to impersonate, err, act on behalf of another security principal, there is always cause for concern. Constrained

RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation

2005-08-09 Thread joseph.e.kaplan
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Kingslan Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 4:00 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation Bob, Make no mistake - I'm really not a fan of allowing Act as part of the operating system or the Impersonation

RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation

2005-08-09 Thread Bernard, Aric
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Free, Bob Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 2:33 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation Assuming that you are aware of what constrained delegation is, how it operates, and what it should be used for... That's the point of my query

RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation

2005-08-09 Thread Rick Kingslan
] Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 4:30 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation Rick, I agree with your points on CD, but what are you talking about here with Act as part of the operating system? That doesn't need to get enabled anywhere to use constrained

RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation

2005-08-09 Thread Free, Bob
at this can of worms, that occurred to me immediately. Thanks again Bob -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bernard, Aric Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 3:01 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation Bob

RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation

2005-08-09 Thread Ken Schaefer
. Cheers Ken www.adOpenStatic.com/cs/blogs/ken/ : -Original Message- : From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir- : [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Free, Bob : Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2005 7:33 AM : To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org : Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation : : Assuming

RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation

2005-08-09 Thread joseph.e.kaplan
. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Schaefer Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 6:44 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation You may want to have Kerberos authentication all the way through, rather than using

RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation

2005-08-09 Thread joseph.e.kaplan
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Free, Bob Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 6:11 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation Aric- (Also trying to answer Joe K's questions) The developer owns all 3 of the SQL servers involved so he definitely has a vested

RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Delegation

2004-06-12 Thread Carlos Magalhaes
Yeah Sure, since i have been dealing with Kerberos Delegation issues for the past week non stop here is a good link. http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windowsserver2003/technologies/security/tkerbdel.mspx And oh yeah --- GOOD LUCK :P ADSI or System.DirectoryServices programmin? -