RE: [ActiveDir] Secure DHCP

2005-05-16 Thread Al Mulnick
One way that might work for you is to create a quarantine network similar to what is used for VPN access. To get connected a user has to meet certain criteria before being allowed on thetrusted network (where a browse list could be used/modified etc). Some criteria might be a successful

RE: [ActiveDir] Secure DHCP

2005-05-16 Thread Charlie Kaiser
At the lower layers of the OSI stack, the only way I'm aware of to block computers from getting an IP address is to use port-based authentication if your network hardware supports it. As Al mentioned, quarantine networks are becoming a more realistic solution, but don't address the basics of DHCP.

RE: [ActiveDir] Secure DHCP

2005-05-16 Thread Ruston, Neil
Title: Message MS has an offering named Quarantine Control which can be used to control RAS clients but this (today) does not apply to non-remote clients. The following article implies that plans are in motion to extend this model to include non-remote clients although you'll need to wait

RE: [ActiveDir] Secure DHCP

2005-05-16 Thread Cace, Andrew
: Monday, May 16, 2005 9:40 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Secure DHCP At the lower layers of the OSI stack, the only way I'm aware of to block computers from getting an IP address is to use port-based authentication if your network hardware supports it. As Al mentioned

RE: [ActiveDir] Secure DHCP

2005-05-16 Thread Dan DeStefano
Kaiser Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 9:40 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Secure DHCP At the lower layers of the OSI stack, the only way I'm aware of to block computers from getting an IP address is to use port-based authentication if your network hardware supports it. As Al

RE: [ActiveDir] Secure DHCP

2005-05-16 Thread Fugleberg, David A
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan DeStefano Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 9:59 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Secure DHCP I thought about that, but I think it would quickly become cumbersome to manage. Kind of defeats most of the purpose of DHCP. Dan