[mailto:MTucker;aelita.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC
Gil, you are correct. I think Roger is confusing not having
a the client's subnet defined in AD with auto-site coverage.
If the client's subnet is not defined in AD
. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:gilk;netpro.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:11 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC
But NETLOGON does
, Mark [mailto:MTucker;aelita.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 3:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC
I would agree that you want to register the subnets in Sites and
Services.
If a client attempts to authenticate from a subnet
]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 7:43 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC
If you decide to create an empty site (no DCs)for you subnets, the
autosite coverage algorithm will ensure that clients in that site are
authenticated with a DC in a nearby site
. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:gilk;netpro.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 12:27 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC
Really
[mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 11:19 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC
Site coverage works exactly as Stuart Kwan explained - without manual
intervention of the RR records, the actual logins are processed fairly
randomly - they don't
/29/2002 1:10 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc:
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC
But NETLOGON does create SRV recs to cover DC-less sites if
there are sites
and subnets defined, which is what the original post indicated
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 7:39 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC
Oh, and this all does assume that YOUR network engineers TELL you when
they put in a whole 'nother group
You need to create a subnet, but not a discrete site.
We tend to run a hub and spoke WAN layout - a small number of larger
offices, each with a full infrastructure, all interconnected. The smaller
offices are spoked off one of the larger offices. In the case of small
offices without domain
- MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Garello, Kenneth [mailto:KGarello;worcester.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:07 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC
How much
;mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of
Roger Seielstad
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 6:59 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC
From experience, I wouldn't trust the locator to get 'close' very
often.
During our initial deployment, the WAN team changed the IP
pools
.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Rick Kingslan [mailto:rkingsla;cox.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC
in the closest site
based on cost will register site-specific SRV records for the empty
site.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:39 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC
Oh
Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 4:59 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC
From experience, I wouldn't trust the locator to get 'close' very
often.
During our initial deployment, the WAN team
Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 7:39 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC
Oh, and this all does assume that YOUR network engineers TELL you when
they put in a whole 'nother group of networks
Title: Message
Hey
Don,
Is
this your first post to the list? If so, welcome.
To
answer your question, no you don't have to create a site for each subnet. You
can associate multiple subnets with a single site. Or you can leavethe
subnets unassigned, and the DC locator will do its best to
Title: Message
How much overhead does leaving it up to
the locator incur?
Ken
-Original Message-
From: Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002
4:37 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites
with no DC
Hey Don
17 matches
Mail list logo