ExMerge allows you to search on certain parameters such
as subject, attachments, date/time, etc. It runs with privileged
credentials to access and search through the mailboxes. Downloadable from
the MS download page
Diane
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan
dusting off old NT 4.0
sectors
Check your WINS database if you are
using WINS. Part of the browsing data comes from WINS and the database
will tell you where those records are coming from. You can address
it viathe hosts if it's coming from there or clean up your WINS
db.
Diane
From:
I'm getting the list at home and at
work. Outlook 2K3 via POP3 is coming in fine. Outlook 2K3 via
Exchange and MAPI is coming in blank. Both the non-SP standard builds of
Outlook. Exchange is still @ E2K...
Diane
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
joeSent:
The POP3 is just via my local Telco
ISP (not a major Telco). I'm not sure what they are using but it's not
Exchange. Mirapoint MOS 3.7.0-GA is what I glean from the headers but I'm
not familiar with it.
Diane
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
joeSent:
Maybe we should ask a question on the
merits of doubling down on an 11 when the dealer has a face card
showing... :-)
Diane
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Almeida Pinto,
Jorge deSent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 9:35 AMTo:
Russ:
We pursuing a "reduced" sign on
environment as opposed to a single sign on. Fortunately we've been able to
leverage AD as our "authoritative source" for IDs and passwords but due to the
plethora of heterogeneous applications, not all of them can leverage AD as the
authentication and
16 more years and we can start drinking... WooHoo..
My cranial capacity on AD has grown immensely through the sharing on the
list. Thanks much to you and the members of the list.
Diane
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Murray
Sent:
Try ADmodify for a GUI
tool...
Diane
http://tinyurl.com/5ruog
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harding,
DevonSent: Monday, December 05, 2005 12:40 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] remove logon
script?
How can I remove the
IIRC in the conversations that I had with MS around MONAD was that one
goal was intended to fix the issue of inconsistencies of the various
command line tools (different switches, piping options, etc.). The
other goal was to ensure that every option that was available via the
GUI was exposed via
You mention that it is a legacy trust. I don't know how far back it goes
legacy wise but I ran into an issue where a legacy trust could not be
upgraded (modified) as the trust existed prior to upgrade (way back in NT
4.0 land) and the solution was to delete the trust entirely and recreate.
here is a script that you can
use. It dumps the group to a spreadsheet with column headers. Modify
as you see fit
Diane
On Error Resume Next
CRLF=CHR(13)+CHR(10)
strADName = InputBox("Enter Complete LDAP DN for desired
group","Group
Title: Schema Updates
You
ever find that often times the products are already bought before your input is
requested?
The better question is when do they
ever check with you before they buy a product? Nope... They usually
ask someone that has no clue of the impact to the production systems
does it work? Do you use LDAP to look at the membership? If so, you
probably have a whole in the implementation.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ayers, Diane
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 2:20 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
We run a simple process that monitors the members of elevated privilege
groups. Any changes trigger a notification. Doesn't address the
prevention but will allow you to capture the occurrence and deal with it
appropriately.
Diane
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom:
I used Robbie Allen's script to do this. You can glean from his script
the techniques for doing this. I sent you a copy under a separate email
Diane
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005
My preferred approach would be to
demote the box to member server and re-promote to a domain controller to ensure
a good fresh copy of the DIT. YMMV as the specific requirements at your
location may prevent this. We have only run into this once early in our AD
days and this was the approach
Not a AD gripe but a tools gripe. The AD Sites and Services snap-in
sucks canal water as Laura sez. MS said they would fix it in Win2K3
but it still sucks.
Diane
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 9:25
Title: Account lockout
Look in the security event logs on the
domain controller and it will tell you what machine the lockout is coming
from. You will have to check all the DCs until you find the one that is
authenticating the account and locking it out. MS has tools to do this for
you.
We use DoubleTake on a number of DAS based File/Print servers in our
distributed environment that are fairly large (~1 TB). We implemented it
when we had some server failures that created extended outages for clients
while we recovered data from backup tapes. Our current implementation is
@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Doubletake(OT)
Can you elaborate further on why you don't feel comfortable using it with
Exchange as well as what you think the limitations are, if you don't mind?
Thanks a lot.
Ayers, Diane wrote:
We use DoubleTake on a number of DAS based File/Print
Not to hijack the thread but has anyone used a hardware based load
balancer such as a BigIP appliance to load balance and/or fail over
LDAP? We have some apps that have to be configured to a specific host
and this was one idea floated up.
Diane
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
If this were the architecture of NT4, the PDC would have burned to the ground
in any decent sized enterprise.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ayers, Diane
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 7:18 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir
In NT4, all updates go up to the PDC. This is why you will get a true last
login report
Not that my small wattage can hold a candle to the brain power for the
others on the list but isn't this incorrect? IIRC, under NT 4.0 the last
logon went to the authenticating DC. That is why you had to
Brenda:
Fire up ADSIedit and take a look at
the Exchange Services container in AD.(CN=Microsoft
Exchange,CN=Services,CN=Configuration,DC=domain,DC=com) and verify that the
Exchange groups have been applied to the container correctly.
Exchange Domain Servers group "should" (don't have
than February to another machine to free
space. If I don't need to ever backup those transaction logs, then I
will just delete them once I have verified that the backups are working
correctly.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ayers
JS/Stealus.gen trojan as well
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Devan Pala
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 3:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Update Your PayPal Account Information
Hi
Not to be nit picky but it means you are not backing it up _correctly_
As Doug mentions, a correct on-line exchange backup will purge the logs
on completion of the backup process.
Diane
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stelley,
Douglas
FWIW, there was a long conversation
covering PRC over HTTP on the security basics mailing list. You can look
at the archives to see if there was anything worth gleaning from the
conversation
Diane
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/105/389606/2005-02-04/2005-02-10/1
From: [EMAIL
The one instance that we had a corrupt database, we used this method as
well. Fortunately we had enough redundancy to allow the demotion of the
server and not affect any services. Is was also fortunate that we had
high connectivity between the DCs to allow a full copy of the directory
to be
We have a very similar situation. The Citrix MetaFrame boxes are the
same OU as other servers. We created two policies for the Citrix
settings. One for the machine policies and one for the user policies.
We also created two groups, one for the Citrix machines and one for the
Citrix users. The
here's my "I'm not a programmer but I
play one on TV" approach... Dumps to an excel spreadsheet. Easily
modifiable to even the programming challenged like me...
Diane
---
On Error Resume Next
CRLF=CHR(13)+CHR(10)
strADName =
One option is to have the users switch
to Outlook 2003 and run it in "local cached mode"
Diane
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan
DeStefanoSent: Monday, December 06, 2004 9:06 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir] Exchange
Latency
A couple of our
You can use Outlook 2003 against
Exchange 2000. The local cached mode is a specific configuration of
the Outlook 2003 on the client side, No server config work is
required.
Diane
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan
DeStefanoSent: Monday, December 06, 2004
Wouldn't this be dependent on the volume of changes that you see in your
environment? With Exchange and its accompanying volume of changes,
moving the log files to separate spindles is as you say, a no
no-brainer. However in our AD environment, we see very low volume of
changes. We get maybe 50
Dusting off the old NT 4.0 memories... Key point is that browsing is
not related to name resolution at all. Browsing is a simple NetBIOS
based directory that allows users to find resources. Conecting to the
resource either by clicking on an object in the browse list or by
manually connecting
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ayers, Diane
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 9:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Master Browser
Dusting off the old NT 4.0 memories... Key point is that browsing is
not related to name
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] 64 Bit?
I guess my questions are
general. I can see some advantages on shifting to a 64 bit platform for AD
services but since the company I work for is definitely not bleeding edge, I was
looking for what the general adoption rate of the 64 bit platform was. Our
All:
Is anyone looking at using the 64 bit platform for their AD domain
controllers? We're doing a life cycle replacement of our hardware next year
and was wondering if anyone has gone down this path. I sat though some of
the Web casts but is there anyone running 64 bit in the real world ;-)
Just to Echo Justin's comment, the BIG difference between NT 4.0 and
Active Directory is the integration/dependence on your DNS environment.
In addition to the integration into your other LDAP sources, DNS is an
area that you should focus some time on before you create your Active
directory
I don't know squat about apple but you probably have
SMB signing set in your domain policies and Apple probably does not support SMB
signing. Once you moved the server into AD, it received the domain
policies and breaking the Apple access.
Diane
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] BDC upgrade
Ditto. Used it once to "demote"
a BDC that was also a time source in the NT 4.0 world. wanted to keep the
server but didn't want it to be a BDC anymore. Best $99 bucks spent as far
as saved time, etc.
Diane
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Your Exchange STMP addresses are assigned separately. Your domain could be
JoeBagOfDoughnuts.com and your email address can be DoughnutHoles.com
Diane
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sveta
Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2004 5:35 PM
To:
Bad idea to place an exchange server
in the DMZ. Better choice would be to use ISA 2004 in the DMZ to publish
OWA. OMA and http over RPC to the external users. See http://www.isaserver.org for more
info.
I was fairly impressed with ISA
2004. Not as a firewall but being able to securely
I'm not a DMZ/firewall person but
generally the shear number of ports, etc that you have to open between the DMZ
and the internal network is not a "good thing".
Additionally for boxes that are in the DMZ, they should be configured as highly
secure boxes and that tends to break Exchange.
I
.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Ayers, Diane
Sent: Wed 10/6/2004 5:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Off-topic sorta
I'm not a DMZ/firewall person but generally the shear number of ports, etc
that you have to open between the DMZ and the internal
It takes a while to take affect (~ 2 hrs). Take a look at the KB
below to see how to modify this behavior
Diane
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;%5bLN%5d;327378
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas M.
LongSent: Thursday, September 23,
Hunter:
With Cisco ACS, how are you going to
deal with non-MS based devices that get DHCP addresses? That's always been
the hang-up for us to shift to a setup like you
describe.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Coleman,
HunterSent: Monday, September 13,
Backup to disks IMHO will become more the norm as the disk capacity
continue to outstrip the tape backup capabilities. We do this for all
our Exchange boxes and has worked very well. We keep 2-3days of backup
files on a secondary server. All backups are sucked off the disks
onto tape(s) for
Unfortunately, I don't know, and the SAP guy who installed it doesn't
remember either.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ayers, Diane
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 7:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Schema Gurus needed - SAP has
Ken:
Do you recall which version of the SAP portal it was that made the
schema changes? I'm asking since we are testing the SAP portal against
AD in our lab with our SAP folks. I know that the initial version that
they came to us with required a schema change (version 5?) and before we
got it
I'm sorry, I must be missing something. Can't you just add them desktop
support team to the local power users group on the servers that you create
the print shares on? That what we do and it seems to work. The only thing
that they can't do is to create new IP ports for shares if they are
My bets are on Sasser. Reapply MS04-011 and reboot.
Diane
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rutherford,
Robert
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 7:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] LSASS.EXE!
What started this? Was it after
It may be more than you want but what the heck. I'm not a programmer so
YMMV
Diane
-
On Error Resume Next
Set Network = WScript.CreateObject(WScript.Network)
strComputer = InputBox (Enter NETBIOS name of computer,
GetComputerLocation In AD,
It seems that outside of the FRS / replication issues, using DFS would
be a good way of virtualizing the storage location of the profiles. If
you used a DFS root to designate your storage location and you needed to
migrate/replace this location, you could update the DFS root without
having to
I'll second Nick's comment to test
your implementation in a lab setup first before doing it live. There are
some subtle (and not so subtle) things that you can do to hose your production
setup. The first lab run we did hosed our lab but we learned. That's
what labs are for
Diane
Don't even get me started on PERC raid
controllers... I'll share my stories after a few "adult
beverages"...
Diane
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brent
WestmorelandSent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 4:02 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Mixed
SWAG but we've run into issues with
the thumbs.db file being corrupted. thumbs.db (hidden system) is created
when you do the thumbnails view. Try deleting that and see if it
helps.
Diane
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael
WassellSent: Tuesday, May 18,
Gee... you givethem remote
access to the company via the internet from anywhere and their complaining about
having to hit cancel? I would tell them to get over it...
:-)
Actually with my client, I can just type in my password in the
ctrl-alt-del login box and just ignore the VPN client if
We wrote a basic one that allows users
to dump DL memberships to a spreadsheet w some of the attributes.
Basically it was for the clerical folks that create phone lists for depts. and
floors. I don't know if we can share. Also It's hard coded to
our domains and OUs
Diane
From: [EMAIL
Unplug a DC before it
replicates
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grantham,
CaronSent: Monday, May 03, 2004 10:05 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir] HELP I just deleted
an OU
How can I
get the OU with all objectes restored
immediately
Title: Message
Have you read the Branch Office
guides?
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/techinfo/planning/activedirectory/branchoffice/default.aspfor
Windows 2000
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=9353a4f6-a8a8-40bb-9fa7-3a95c9540112DisplayLang=enfor
Windows
Also, just as an FYI, If you're on XP, you can use the
Win2K3version ADUC which allows you to build a query in the GUI itself for all
accounts that are configured as you described. It will work aganst both
Win2K and Win2K3 domains.
Diane
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL
Crap. Our bad too. sorry guys...
Diane
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 7:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] [MailServer Notification]To Recipient file blocking
settings matched
We looked at a DFS / FRS combo and quickly rejected it based on the
problems with FRS. For data replication, FRS is a PoS (to be brutally
honest). MS needs to start from scrtach on that one. Any efficient
data replication scheme would utilize a block level or some other low
levelreplication
Title: Message
Yes. FRS today would trigger the
replication of the entire file with a change to that file. There are also
issues with open files. You coulod configure a less frequent replication
schedule but...
Diane
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris
For us, our user management is centralized so the user objects were placed
in a single OU broken into sub OUs by type (users, administrators, service,
restricted). Computer support is more decentralized so we have computer
objects in geographic based OUs with sub OUs by function (servers,
Of Ayers, Diane
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 11:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] Site Configurations and SMS2003
All:
I know that this is somewhat off topic (SMS) but I had a recent conversation with some folks in regards to AD and SMS 2003. We are looking at possibly
All:
I know that this is somewhat off topic (SMS) but I had a recent
conversation with some folks in regards to AD and SMS 2003. We are looking
at possibly deploying SMS 2003 and looking at some deployment scenarios.
Anyway the conversation turn to the AD sites and what is the best
defining a location to be in a separate
site.
Just my $.02. Coming
out of lurking mode. Great list. Thanks for being here.
John McGlinchey, MCSA, MCSE,
CCNA
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Company
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
You have any pointers to info the
"proof of concept"? I'm not interested in code but would like to look at
the info and we may want to pull the trigger at our organization. We're
working the rollout for 007but may want to deployquicker than
we currently have mapped out.
Diane
From:
dope slap to self on
forehead
No wonder I could never make that DLL
work. Ipretty much use the find function exclusively. I
too ass-umed it was me...
Diane
From: deji Agba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 7:21 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir]
Ditto
I dropped all the sunbelt lists due to the high signal-to-noise ratio
Diane
-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 1:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Other Listsrvs
Personally I'm not too fond of the
hope you didn't mean that as arrogantly as it sounds. :) But I do
agree it's a little to much for me sometimes too.
So tell me what lists do you consider the best ones for Exchange?
Thanks,
Julie
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ayers
But they wouldn't be able to shift to
a new paradigm...
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Creamer,
MarkSent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 6:05 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] I: Quest to
aquire Aelita
Wouldnt it be
refreshing just once to
Title: Message
Following this thread, a related
question (taking it even more OT) comes up. Often in email discovery
cases, we use ExMerge to suck the dumpster off a server to look at what's
there. Would DumpsterAlwaysOn on the host that ExMerge is run from have an
effect on what data is
We simply modified the form for address book searches to include phone
number. Individuals can now search one phone numbers for those mail
enabled objects in AD. For us that meet the requirements 99% of the
time.
Diane
-Original Message-
From: Douglas M. Long [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ayers, Diane Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 6:04
PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greetings
In an effort to localize our authentication
traffic, we recently implemented a multi-site configuration moving away from our
single mega-site (single domain). All DCs a
at urgent intersite replication observes the intersite replication
schedule. You can work around this by enabling intersite notifications, but then
that effectively circumvents any replication schedule.
That's my understanding anyway.
-gil
-----Original Message- From:
Ayers, Diane [mailto:
site with the same frequency that they are propagated within the
source site, including changes that warrant urgent replication.
From: Ayers, Diane Sent: Monday,
November 17, 2003 5:02 PMTo:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Inter-site
Urgent replication
We are at SP3. I've gone
Breaking the DB, logs and SysVol into
separate logical partitions on the same physical spindles doesn't buy
youmuch. Your still sharing the same spindles, head and I/O amongst
the three logical partitions. I'd just create a D: volume and be done with
it but that's just my opinion.
Diane
Title: Message
If you want a GUI, I recommend "Security Explorer" from Small
Wonders. I've found it to be very useful at times
Diane
http://www.smallwonders.com/SecurityExplorer.htm
-Original Message-From: Abbiss, Mark
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, September 17,
Title: Message
We use a type of ACL for our Bind stuff. Only our DCs have the
"rights" to do dynamic updates to our AD zoneon the bind server.
Other hosts are updated in DNS via the DHCP server (Cisco) or other
processes. The access rights are based on the source IP address. Not
100% secure
Title: Message
I couldn't help but laugh reading this. How true. In our
internal documentation, we discribe this setting and that they need to change
when setting up computer accounts. We even have a huge screenshot with red
circles and big arrows highlighting the point. I still get calls on
Title: Message
I stil prefer the upgraded version, bIg stIck®
Diane
-Original Message-From: Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 7:37
AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] AD, Logon times Custom messages
I
ordered 10
Jan:
I was browsing the Win2K tools page and saw this. Not sure if you've seen these or
not.
Windows Server 2003 Domain Rename Tools
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/downloads/domainrename.mspx
Diane
-Original Message-
From: Jan Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
thread hijack
H Out of curiosity, has anyone moved their production domains to Win2K Forest
Functional Mode yet?
Diane
/thread hijack
-Original Message-
From: Rick Kingslan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 5:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
IIRC, that is not a writeable attribute. We went through a similar exercise and found
that we could not change that attribute.
Diane
-Original Message-
From: Rex Wheeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 10:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] Updating
Title: OT- Quest Fastlane tools (maybe not OT?)
Stephen:
We have gone through an evaluation of products including the ActiveRoles
and Migrator tools. Contact me off list and I can give you some input on
what we found.
Diane
AyersTeam Lead,
System Server SupportPacific Gas
Electric
One forest = One exchange Org irregardless of the domains within the forest.
Diane
-Original Message-
From: Ellis, Debbie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 6:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] AD/Exchange Question
My company is getting ready to
to it anyway. The controller running the PES must
have the high encryption pack installed.
Tony
-- Original Message --
From: Ayers, Diane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 14:56:56 -0800
Graham:
The password export server is only
Graham:
The password export server is only required for migration of accounts from Win2K to
Win2K. It is not required for NT 4.0 to Win2K migrations.
Diane
-Original Message-
From: Graham Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 10:40 AM
To: [EMAIL
Title: Message
Ditto for us. Heavily mixed environment (~20K users) with no impact
from going native. Go for it :-)
Diane
-Original Message-From: Fugleberg, David A
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003
8:54 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
Is this the only DC you have? If not, why don't you just build a new box and run
DCpromo to make it a DC with new data replicated from your other DCs?
Diane
-Original Message-
From: osman filiz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 5:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Even though ADMT is on the .Net RC CD, the tool itself (IIRC) is not a
beta version.
Diane
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brad
MartinSent: Monday, December 23, 2002 7:55 AMTo: Active
Directory Mailing ListSubject:
Title: Message
How about this?
http://cwashington.netreach.net/depo/view.asp?Index=717ScriptType=vbscript
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Byrne,
SteveSent: Monday, December 16, 2002 6:59 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
We use Ultrabac in our org as our standard backup product for single
server tape backup. We have been pretty happy with it as far as backup to
tape goes. You can email me direct if you want more info.
Diane
-Original Message-
From: Eric [mailto:Eric;ch13-12westtex.org]
Sent: Wednesday,
Our Exchange boxes have 4 GB of memory. Initial plan was to run standard
version. Our first live box began generating memory fragmentation issues.
Supposedly this was fixed in SP3 as per PSS but no go. The only fix was to
upgrade to Advanced and use the /3gb switch in the boot.ini (only
by the time it gets errors
I'll be long gone.
-Original Message-
From: Ayers, Diane [mailto:DMA8;pge.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 2:13 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange install
Our Exchange boxes have 4 GB of memory. Initial plan was to run
Very early in our AD deployment we had one server reporting AD corruption.
The other servers were OK. We simply demoted the server, waited for
replication so that the server was removed from AD and re-promoted the
server. At this point it got a new copy of the database and problem solved.
Not
Are you running NetIQ AppManager agents on this box by chance?
-Original Message-
From: Chris J. Popp [mailto:chris.popp;sharpeengineering.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 12:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] Psched error?
I am constantly getting the following in
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
