@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir][OT] DNS on a DC or NOT
BTW.. to Brett... Joe is like Cher.. he doesn't need a last name - I
think I just had coffee come out my nose and spew across the cubicle and
cover everything within 30 ft. Comparing joe and Cher. What a hoot! I'm sure
Deji is about to cry
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Al
Mulnick
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 9:15 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir][OT] DNS on a DC or NOT
Making it a black box is a strong argument. But it is Microsoft
and if they can't sup
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rimmerman, Russ
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 9:27 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir][OT] DNS on a DC or NOT
What about DHCP on a DC
or not.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Brian Desmond
Sent: Tue 5/23/2006 9:03 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir][OT] DNS on a DC or NOT
Why do you have a weekly reboot task? This isn't NT4 anymore...
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c
@mail.activedir.org; ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir][OT] DNS on a DC or NOT
We deploy Microsoft patches to all servers without a reboot, so we
just
schedule servers to reboot every weekend so the patches finish up the
installs. It's easier to just have them reboot every week then to try
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Al Mulnick
*Sent:* Wednesday, May 24, 2006 9:06 AM
*To:* ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
*Subject:* Re: [ActiveDir][OT] DNS on a DC or NOT
I'm with Brian on this one: why a weekly reboot. Saying that, I just
found out yesterday that the company I'm at now does a weekly
. How does everyone
else do it? Maybe we just need a backup DHCP scope?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of joe
Sent: Tue 5/23/2006 8:13 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir][OT] DNS on a DC or NOT
I think the goal should be to build
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir][OT] DNS on a DC or NOT
What about DHCP on a DC? We just had an issue where our weekly reboot
task to reboot all the DCs failed on one DC and it didn't come back
up.
Any user at the site who rebooted their PC
Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Al
MulnickSent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 9:03 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re:
[ActiveDir][OT] DNS on a DC or NOT
trying this in rich te
I saw the Wizard and got a heart and a can of
oil.
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al
MulnickSent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 9:02 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re:
Correct.
Normally "alwite, me ol
mucker?" though :)
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Dean WellsSent: 17 May 2006 21:35To:
Send - AD mailing listSubject: RE: [ActiveDir][OT] DNS on a DC or
NOT
Try again -
http://www.peevish.co.uk/slang/m.h
what's this? - the 'how many dialects can I squeeze into
one post' competition? :))
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich
MilburnSent: 17 May 2006 22:09To:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir][OT] DNS on a DC
or NOT
Whats all this mucking
. It just seems that if Exchange is SPECIAL
make it feel special..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:21 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir][OT] DNS on a DC or NOT
LOL.
For those
Message- From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of joe Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:21 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir][OT] DNS on a DC or NOT LOL. For those not at the DEC 2006 Dean and joe show presentation, Mark's
'Exchange
@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir][OT] DNS on a DC
or NOT
trying this in rich text from gmail to see if it floats; let me know if
you can't see the text joe :)
Um, no.(Yes, it does have to be a DC to be a
GC.)But other than scalability and simplicity related to
troubleshooting/recoverability
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org mailto:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir][OT] DNS on a DC or NOT
LOL.
For those not at the DEC 2006 Dean and joe show presentation, Mark's
'Exchange is SPECIAL' comment is a direct reference to something I
said when bouncing around
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al
MulnickSent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 9:03 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir][OT] DNS on a DC
or NOT
trying this in rich text from gmail to see if it floats; let me know if
you can't see the text joe :)
U
://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Al MulnickSent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 9:03 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject:
Re: [ActiveDir][OT] DNS on a DC or NOT
trying this in rich text from gmail to see if it floats; let me know
No I save up my D strength so I CAN talk about Exchange. I talk about and
troubleshoot Exchange more than any AD person who hates Exchange that I
know. :o)
Dean and I just had our annual (or is it quarterly) IM debate on ADIDNS. We
apparently have no influence over each other's opinions in this
I think my company users Lotus Notes just because it doesn't integrate with anything so less headaches. :(
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] DNS on a DC or NOT Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 15:32:15 -0400
Ignore Dean. He's going to try and D.O.S. a couple of companies I specified
to him. If you see Dean's name in the papers next to buildings that are
burning to the ground then you can listen to the conspiracy theories that
require running S-DDNS. ;o) How many times was your NT environment DOS'ed
LOL!
--
Dean Wells
MSEtechnology
* Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://msetechnology.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 3:32 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] DNS
org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir][OT] DNS on a DC or NOT Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 15:45:01 -0400 IgnoreDean.He'sgoingtotryandD.O.S.acoupleofcompaniesIspecified tohim.IfyouseeDean'snameinthepapersnexttobuildingsthatare burningtothegroundthenyoucanlistentotheconspiracytheoriesthat requirer
y.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jef
KazimerSent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:24 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir][OT] DNS on a
DC or NOT
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=muckermucker\Muck"er\,
n. A t
BTW, anyone know what a mucker is? I am trying to figure out if I am
supposed to be morally outraged. eg
joe
I use mucker as a compliment, but in my vernacular it's used in
reference to a semi-skilled hockey player whose lack of scoring
ability is balanced by his ability to check an opposing
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jef
KazimerSent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:24 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir][OT] DNS on a DC
or NOT
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=muckermucker\Muck"er\,
n. A term of reproach for
setechnology.comhttp://msetechnology.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jef
KazimerSent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:24 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir][OT] DNS on a
DC or NOT
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=muckermucker\Mu
PROTECTED]
http://msetechnology.com
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jef Kazimer
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:24
PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir][OT] DNS
on a DC or NOT
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=mucker
:43 PMTo: 'Send -
AD mailing list'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir][OT] DNS on a DC or
NOT
Don't back peddle now
ya bloodylimey.
(a)
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
such a wonderful solution. OK, I
should shut up now and go back to my padded cell.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura E. Hunter
Sent: 17 May 2006 21:39
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir][OT] DNS on a DC or NOT
BTW, anyone
it's such a wonderful
solution. OK, I should shut up now and go back to my padded cell.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura
E. Hunter
Sent: 17 May 2006 21:39
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir][OT] DNS on a DC
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir][OT] DNS on a DC or NOT
Laura, a Mucker is, in English, a good friend.
You are probably not to be termed a Mucker, other words might apply,
but Jimmy is one of mine and Dean/Joe is one of yours.
Oh, and Joe is old and smells of wee, so pay no heed to his Exchange
rants
17, 2006 5:29 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir][OT] DNS on a DC or NOT
Laura, a Mucker is, in English, a good friend.
You are probably not to be termed a Mucker, other words might apply, but
Jimmy is one of mine and Dean/Joe is one of yours.
Oh, and Joe is old and smells
33 matches
Mail list logo
