on the queue. Is that
something I need to be concerned about. Please advise.
Thanks very much,
- Sunil
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Openwire-C-Client.-t1506711.html#a4127417
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
Hi,
When i am trying to build Openwire C client i am getting following errors in
ow_commands_v1.c.
CC -mt -D_REENTRANT -DNO_SSL -DSAPI_LINUX -DOS_LINUX_2_2 -DEFX -DLINUX
-D_GNU_SOURCE -DADDR_SRV -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE=1 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
-DHTREE -I../libactivemq -I../libopenwire -I/usr
Hi Hiram,
5) .NET namespace
Hiram, what rules does Apache imply on this? Is it ok to use the namespaces
your giving examples on? Looking on the Java code all Apache code starts
with org.apache.
As far as I know the org.apache namespace is a Java thing as it's the only
language the
On 3/28/06, David Fahlander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Nathan,
1) Use of smart pointers.
Though the user interface would be cleaner without smart pointers
they
serves a purpose even when the passed in object is not owned by the
client.
As soon as an object is shared between
Nate,
You get no benefits at all by adding smart pointers to the interface.
The user will delete their objects whenever they wish, regardless of
what the openwire library does ... and if it does so, the openwire
library will explode as soon as it tries to reference it. That's the
thing - this is
Please define the interfaces that you want to be SP-free!
I'm with Hiram ... I think the entire API should be SP-free. The less
the users have to see SPs, the better.
It's all about the user and helping them come up to speed and use the
api
as quickly and painlessly as possible. I understand
On 3/28/06, Mats Forslöf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Hiram,
Even so it might be better to be a bit overzealous to prevent namespace
clashes :)
I would like to make this c++ lib, feel very c++ like, I don't want it
to smell like it came from a Java shop. So I think it's better to
have
Hi All,
Thanks everyone for looking at and testing the latest C++ client update. Sorry
if we have not been so clear regarding the stability of the code, the code is
highly untested and as said in the upload mail we will commence
testing/debugging shortly - so expect bugs!!
As we've just
Hi Mats,
On 3/27/06, Mats Forslöf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
Thanks everyone for looking at and testing the latest C++ client update.
Sorry if we have not been so clear regarding the stability of the code, the
code is highly untested and as said in the upload mail we will commence
@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: openwire C++ client
I've taken a closer look at the openwire C++ client this weekend and
noticed
a few things ...
1) I think there are a few cases where we could reduce the usage of
smart
pointers.
One instance where I think smart pointer usage is questionable
On 3/27/06, Mats Forslöf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5) .NET namespace
Hiram, what rules does Apache imply on this? Is it ok to use the namespaces
your giving examples on? Looking on the Java code all Apache code starts with
org.apache.
As far as I know the org.apache namespace is a Java
I've taken a closer look at the openwire C++ client this weekend and noticed
a few things ...
1) I think there are a few cases where we could reduce the usage of smart
pointers.
One instance where I think smart pointer usage is questionable is when
openwire is referencing an object
Hi Nathan,
On 3/26/06, Nathan Mittler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've taken a closer look at the openwire C++ client this weekend and noticed
a few things ...
1) I think there are a few cases where we could reduce the usage of smart
pointers.
One instance where I think smart pointer usage
generation of the commands going.
Regards,
Mats
-Original Message-
From: Hiram Chirino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 10 februari 2006 17:01
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Trouble uploading OpenWire C++ client to mailing list
Hi Mats,
As a work around,
Try putting
februari 2006 16:11
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Trouble uploading OpenWire C++ client to mailing list
Hi Matts!
Awesome work! There's just so much of it! Usually it's no
problem to accept a small patch, but with larger patches Apache
likes to get
a Contributor License
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Trouble uploading OpenWire C++ client to mailing list
Hi,
I've been tryint to send patches to this mailing list but it doesn't seem to
work. Should I put in a Jira isssue instead?
Regards,
Mats
uploading OpenWire C++ client to mailing list
There's been some problems today with jira - but seems to be working ok now.
Attaching the file to jira seems the best thing todo - how big is the patch ?
cheers,
Rob
On 10 Feb 2006, at 08:44, Mats Forslöf wrote:
Great, adding it to Jira doesn't
17 matches
Mail list logo
