I first noticed this on an iPhone running iPhone OS 3.1.2:
ActiveScaffold is issuing an SQL request (according to the log file)
of
SELECT "foo".* FROM "foo" ORDER BY foo."id" ASC LIMIT 9 OFFSET
0
and this causes something to occur internally that results in a 406
Not Acceptable response.
On Jan 1, 7:59 am, Jim wrote:
> I first noticed this on an iPhone running iPhone OS 3.1.2:
> ActiveScaffold is issuing an SQL request (according to the log file)
> of
>
> SELECT "foo".* FROM "foo" ORDER BY foo."id" ASC LIMIT 9 OFFSET
> 0
Time to beg ;-) Anyone else experiencing this issue? My "fixes" had
undesirable side effects... most controller actions are defaulting to
the respond_to of xml, and controllers that are being handled by
ActiveScaffold are defaulting to the iphone respond_to unless I
specifically tell an action to
r a nested options list display, merely the form
override for the edit form.
Thanks in advance for any ideas.
Jim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group.
To post to this group, send email to activescaff
I forgot to mention that this is using Rails 3.0.10 with the
active_scaffold gem from a week ago.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group.
To post to this group, send email to activescaffold@googlegroups.com.
To u
> It should work with 3.0.23. You can try with attribute_form_column too.
It did work with the attribute_form_column format. Thank you very
much!
Jim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group.
To
On Sep 20, 11:32 am, Jim wrote:
> It did work with the attribute_form_column format.
This did work, but now that I have another model that is optionable,
I'd like to differentiate the options available. Unfortunately, the
other helper is loaded so the same options show for both mod
On Sep 21, 7:35 pm, Jim wrote:
> Is there any way to prevent other helpers from being loaded?
A bit of googling pointed out that I can call
clear_helpers
in the controller to prevent helpers from other controllers from being
loaded. This works very well.
Jim
--
You received this mess
clude a render statement from the index action. Is that no
longer the case?
Jim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/act
Apparently you cannot render an ActiveScaffold table in a 'list' action
either. However, I do have it working now. Thanks for the help.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group.
To view this discussion on the we
onths
ago in Rails3 didn't format numbers by default. What would cause this
behavior to be different from one project to another?
Jim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group.
To view this discuss
ange the
action link and list label.
I have added the action link with the following options:
:type => :collection, :page => false, :position => false, :action =>
'index', parameters = {:show_deleted => 0}
I tried also specifying :inline => true, but that didn't h
same
behavior across both projects.
Sorry for wasting time on a non-issue.
Jim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg
alse}. Inline has to be false or the render :update fails, and any
other kind of rendering embeds the text into the inline adapter.
Jim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group.
To view this discussion
e this stackoverflow.com answer for ideas on how to reliably
execute javascript on page load:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18770517/rails-4-how-to-use-document-ready-with-turbo-links
Jim Crate
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ActiveScaffo
load_embedded(document); would then find that placeholder
and reload it.
It works, but is there a more direct way to refresh an embedded scaffold?
Jim Crate
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails Gem" group.
T
ector for embedded');
embedded.load(embedded.data('refresh'), function() {
$(this).trigger('as:element_updated');
});
Clean and simple! Thanks for your help.
Jim Crate
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails
I just had the opportunity to update my code, this works very nicely. Thank
you very much!
Jim
On Thursday, December 3, 2015 at 6:01:28 PM UTC-8, Sergio Cambra wrote:
>
> I'm adding a ActiveScaffold.reload_embedded('selector') method with your
> code to master.
>
t:
@event.id }, params: {id: nil} ) %>
Jim Crate
On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 8:55:52 PM UTC-5, Jason FB wrote:
>
> I'm having some difficulty adding some namespacing to objects I use with
> ActiveScaffold
>
>
> I have a subview, shown here in haml, that works for a join ta
The bitfield bridge isn't activating in my app. I thought it used to just
work. I don't see anything in the documentation related to specifying a
particular form_ui setting. Any ideas how I can start debugging this?
Jim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
o exclude some columns
depending whether it was displayed nested. If I don't do that, the bitfield
works perfectly. In this case, I don't even need this functionality now so
the fix is easy.
Thanks,
Jim
On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 3:02:01 AM UTC-4, Sergio Cambra wrote:
>
&g
I know I could do what I need using an override, but figured I'd ask and
see if there was a way to update the configuration.
Thanks,
Jim Crate
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails Gem" group.
To unsubscribe
I added a link to a show action view to mark an item as processed. Using
process_action_link_action in the action, the row is updated, but the show
view is not updated and is still showing. Is there an easy way to close the
show view as if the cancel link was also clicked? Alternatively, if the
turned properly.
However, search_sql still has to be set to something in order for the field
to show in the search form.
Jim Crate
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails Gem" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and s
oller, and adding my own views (new and edit). Works
great.
But when I do the same thing for show (show action and show view) AS
takes over and tries to render its own framework. Hence errors like
the below.
What am I missing to provide my own show action/view?? Thank you
heaps in advance!!
Nevermind. I realize how to do it now...Jim.
On Sep 15, 3:57 pm, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is such a beginner question. I'm using the latest AS from github
> with rails 2.1.1. I have a nested model and want to write my own show
> action. I have successfully w
Turns out using edit.html.erb to override the edit.rhtml works just
fine, but show apparently wants to be overridden with show.rhtml.
On Sep 15, 3:57 pm, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is such a beginner question. I'm using the latest AS from github
> with rails 2.1.1
:finder_sql option for the
association? Any idea what might be going on?
Thanks!! Jim.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group.
To post to this gr
Doh. I should have been using :conditions hash instead of :finder_sql.
A_S works just fine! Jim.
On Sep 17, 2:12 am, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a Store model that has_many locations. Locations can also owned
> by other entities, so the Store model qualifies the has_many
I've been an EXTREMELY happy user of Active Scaffold. It's worked
great for three years. I have to move to a new ISP and in the process
upgrade Rails 1.2.3 -> 2.3.5. That's gone well. One remaining bug: the
default AS tiger striping (alternate rows different colors)
disappeared, and now everything
Forgot to mention: I upgraded to the latest AS too.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group.
To post to this group, send email to activescaff...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
act
On Mar 23, 11:42 am, Jim Gagne wrote:
> I've been an EXTREMELY happy user of Active Scaffold. It's worked
> great for three years. I have to move to a new ISP and in the process
> upgrade Rails 1.2.3 -> 2.3.5. That's gone well. One remaining bug: the
> default AS
On Mar 23, 11:42 am, Jim Gagne wrote:
> The default AS tiger striping (alternate rows different colors)
> disappeared, and now everything is the same color as the overall CSS.
I FOUND THE ERROR!!
The stylesheet.css file omits the background-color attribute in two
places:
1. .active-sc
>
> It was changed, I can't remember why, to .active-scaffold tr.record which
> works
> too.
>
> --
> Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::.
You're right I saw that, but the setting a new tr color does NOT
override a global td color set elsewhere on the site.
--
You received this message becaus
On Mar 25, 4:23 am, Ed W wrote:
> On 24/03/2010 02:46, Jim Gagne wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Mar 23, 11:42 am, Jim Gagne wrote:
>
> >> The default AS tiger striping (alternate rows different colors)
> >> disappeared, and now everything is the same color as t
I’m not sure how much of the
styling is linked to the table or higher-level containers
Any pointers would be appreciated.
Jim Crate
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails Gem" group.
To unsubscribe from this grou
ActiveScaffold.remove('<%= element_row_id action: :nested %>');
<% end %>
and it works perfectly.
Jim Crate
> On Nov 28, 2018, at 12:34 AM, Sergio Cambra wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> There is no way inside ActiveScaffold to update show view, if you want to
> update row
37 matches
Mail list logo
