[address-policy-wg] Minutes of the RIPE87 Rome meeting

the minutes for us. Please review the minutes and provide feedback if you think there is something missing or incorrect. https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/wg/active-wg/ap/minutes/ripe-87-address-policy-working-group-minutes Regards, Erik Bais On behalf of the AP-WG Chairs. -- To unsubscribe

Re: [address-policy-wg] Address Policy WG Co-Chair - James Kennedy Steps Down

for your support and feedback on the approach. Also if you are considering joining, do have a chat with either Leo or myself during the meeting. Kind regards, Erik Bais On behalf of the AP-WG-Chairs On 18/09/2023, 15:25, "address-policy-wg on behalf of Leo Vegoda" mailto:address

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2023-02 Last Call for Comments (Minimum Size for IPv4 Temporary Assignments)

are not only looking for objections .. but also for support of the community and this is a request to speak up. So even if you voiced support in previous phases, let us know again in the Last Call phase as well. Have a nice day, Erik Bais On behalf of the AP-WG Chairs, co-Chair From: address

[address-policy-wg] Chair re-appointment - RIPE86

in Rotterdam. Regards, Erik Bais Co-Chair AP-WG -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg

Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 policy - 2nd prioritisation and outcomes discussion webinar

This is a small reminder that we are looking forward to you see online and your input on the review for the IPv6 policy this afternoon. Regards, Erik Bais On behalf of the AP-WG Chair collective. On 21/03/2023, 22:48, "address-policy-wg on behalf of Leo Vegoda" mailto:address

Re: [address-policy-wg] Minimum size for IPv4 temporary assignments

if the AP-WG members could provide some insight if the would support (or not) a policy proposal as suggested. Regards, Speaking as one of the Co-Chairs, Erik Bais From: address-policy-wg on behalf of Edwin Verheul Date: Thursday, 17 November 2022 at 16:24 To: "address-policy-wg@ripe.net"

Re: [address-policy-wg] ripe-587, Temporary Internet Number Assignment Policies

and they are not bound by policy restrictions that we are discussing here. It could fix your specific case .. and that is why these orgs are actually doing what they are doing .. Regards, Erik Bais On 25/01/2022, 18:34, "address-policy-wg on behalf of Randy Bush" wrote:

Re: [address-policy-wg] ripe-682 Transfer Policy Problems

options work with it. If you don't have access to an LIR, to see how that looks these days. This can be via Zoom / Teams, or if you fancy to come over to our office near Amsterdam for a cup of coffee. Regards, Erik Bais On 22/12/2021, 16:01, "address-policy-wg on behalf of denis w

Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv4 waiting list policy

through the PDP, meaning that a policy change would be required. As WG chairs we would like to see the position of the WG on the topic and what could be seen as a possible solution. Regards, Erik Bais On behalf of the AP-WG Co-Chair collective. On 07/12/2021, 10:23, "address-poli

[address-policy-wg] Draft agenda AP-WG RIPE82 - virtual AP-WG

on various topics with this format, along with the information of the NCC about various topics. --- Draft agenda AP-WG session - RIPE82 A. Administrative Matters - Gert Döring Welcome, thanking the scribe, approving the minutes, etc. B. WG Chair selection / appointment - Erik Bais C. Current

Re: [address-policy-wg] Request about homologation of policy documents

. So yes, let's take this into the discussion, and pick this up on the RIPE82 AP-WG meeting after that discussion about the above topic. Regards, Erik Bais PS. I'm glad that the RIPE-733-61 document does have the requirement in there to return the space ... On 06/04/2021, 17:19, "ad

Re: [address-policy-wg] WG chair rotation 2021

ow via the mailing list or to myself directly. We will send out the AP-WG RIPE82 agenda shortly. Regards, Erik Bais On behalf of the AP-WG chair team.

Re: [address-policy-wg] FW: Policy Reciprocity

y: Resource Certification for non-members : https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2013-04 2013-04 provided a way to include legacy holders into the RPKI system, by requirement that there is a contractual agreement in place with the RIPE NCC. Regards, Erik Bais On 21/10/2020, 13:

Re: [address-policy-wg] FW: Policy Reciprocity

Thanks Jim, I couldn't have said it better myself. Also, with the Legacy transfers, there needs to be proper documentation to make sure all records from the past match up AND there is going to be an update in the RIR registry that will make sure the records are up to date. Updating the

[address-policy-wg] FW: Policy Reciprocity

eave it to the receiving RIR to apply their own Legacy ‘policy’ Regards, Erik Bais Co-chair of AP-WG https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-682 - RIPE Transfer policy ( including intra and inter-rir transfers ) https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-639 - RIPE NCC Serv

[address-policy-wg] Draft Agenda RIPE81 - virtual AP-WG

tion of IPv4 Addresses” for the Recovery of Money. As WG Chairs we thought it would be a good topic to discuss in the AP-WG. So make sure you are present for the session. Regards, Gert Döring & Erik Bais, APW

Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv4 status hierarchies

Dear WG, I want to bring the following email and questions of our PDO - Petrit Hasani to your attention that might have slipped over the vacation period. Please have a look at this discussion again and provide input if you can. Regards, Erik Bais Co-chair AP-WG. ( on behalf of the AP-WG

Re: [address-policy-wg] My response to Ronald Guilmette

sending replies to this. Regards, Erik Bais Co-Chair AP-WG Op 3 mei 2020 om 00:09 heeft Elad Cohen het volgende geschreven:  Cynthia, The coconut was called an antisemitic person and a racist person not by me, but by many other people in Nanog. I didn't call him a coconut because he

[address-policy-wg] Draft agenda for the RIPE80 virtual AP-WG session.

anyway, we don’t have any presentations scheduled on new policy proposals. If you have anything else you want to see on the agenda, or if we need to change anything, please let us know. Regards, Gert Döring & Erik Bais, APWG ch

[address-policy-wg] 2019-06 Extended Review Period has ended (Multiple Editorial Changes in IPv6 Policy)

after the formal announcement for Last Call by Petrit. And if you do agree with the policy moving forward, please let it know in the Last Call phase as well, as it is easier for us as Chairs to call consensus or not, if we have some response. Regards, Erik Bais On behalf of the AP-WG Chair

[address-policy-wg] Co-Chair re-election - Address policy WG

that we can help settle into the WG collective would be highly appreciated. Kind regards, Erik Bais Co-chair for Address Policy WG - RIPE

Re: [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2019-05 Proposal Accepted (Revised IPv4 assignment policy for IXPs)

Thanks for the update Marco. And thanks to all the WG members and the proposal authors for making this happen for the community. Regards, Erik Bais Co-chair AP-WG. On 10/10/2019, 12:01, "policy-announce on behalf of Marco Schmidt" wrote: Dear colleagues, Consensu

[address-policy-wg] 2019-05 Policy Proposal (Revised IPv4 assignment policy for IXPs) - Moving to Last Call

implementation of 2019-05, making sure that we are not left empty handed when the last call ends. For now, we will wait for Marco to do the formal announcement of the start of Last Call and I wish you, on behalf of the AP-WG Chair collective, a nice weekend. Regards, Erik Bais Co-Chair AP-WG

Re: [address-policy-wg] question about IPv4 legacy and transfers - should we convert legacy to non-legacy with transfers?

all participants for their input and view in this discussion. Kind regards (on behalf of the AP-WG chair collective) Erik Bais From: address-policy-wg on behalf of Hans Petter Holen Reply-To: "h...@oslo.net" Date: Sunday 21 July 2019 at 23:20 To: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ Cc: "ad

Re: [address-policy-wg] question about IPv4 legacy and transfers - should we convert legacy to non-legacy with transfers?

(ARIN to RIPE for instance) for cost, policy, tools or rights acceptance reasons .. or just because their HQ is moving from the ARIN region to RIPE region. Why should they be stripped of their current status ? what is the intention here ? Regards, Erik Bais On 15/07/2019, 11:39, "ad

Re: [address-policy-wg] question about IPv4 legacy and transfers - should we convert legacy to non-legacy with transfers?

be outside ( no contract ) the rir status .. or by their own choice inside the system .. Hope this explains a bit. Regards, Erik Bais Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone Op 13 jul. 2019 om 14:49 heeft JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg mailto:address-policy-wg@ripe.net>> het vo

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 Review Phase (IPv4 Waiting List Implementation)

Sander.) Marco, If you could push this into last call, that would be great. On behalf of the AP-WG Chair collective, Erik Bais Co-Chair of AP-WG On 06/05/2019, 13:10, "address-policy-wg on behalf of Marco Schmidt" wrote: Dear colleagues, Policy proposal 2019

[address-policy-wg] FW: 2019-02 Review Phase (IPv4 Waiting List Implementation)

. Kind regards, Erik Bais Co-Chair AP-WG On 06/05/2019, 13:10, "address-policy-wg on behalf of Marco Schmidt" wrote: Dear colleagues, Policy proposal 2019-02, "IPv4 Waiting List Implementation" is now in the Review Phase. This proposal aims at cre

Re: [address-policy-wg] AP WG co-chair selection - call for volunteers

n reached. And if that isn't somehow possible, a secret ballot will be done by attendees IN the room and counted by the RIPE NCC staff. There will be an agenda topic for the topic on the next AP-WG meeting in Iceland. Kind regards, Erik Bais Address Policy Working Group Chair

Re: [address-policy-wg] AP WG co-chair selection - call for volunteers

Dear working group, We have received one reply to the call for volunteers for the election. I proudly present to you Gert Döring. For those that are new to the working group : On 04/04/2019, 20:06, "Erik Bais" wrote: Dear working group, In

Re: [address-policy-wg] Contact details for End Users in the RIPE Database

In line with this question … The RIPE NCC still has a working fax machine that prints the SSA’s for those that want to speed up their processing of the membership sign-up process. I hope that the articles of association gets updated soon for this to include a scanned version as well. Erik

[address-policy-wg] AP WG co-chair selection - call for volunteers

, or discuss this or any other any relevant topic on this mailing list. On behalf of your co-chairs Gert Doering and Erik Bais,   Kind regards, Erik Bais

Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy violation

the policy as documented. Regards, Erik Bais On 17/12/2018, 19:22, "address-policy-wg on behalf of Aleksey Bulgakov" wrote: Hi. Regarding our situation. We have 3 accounts opened this year (for different legal entities). We provided the oficial government

Re: [address-policy-wg] definition of "ASSIGNED PA" in IPv4 address allocation and assignment policy

Hi Martin, If you think it would make sense, feel free to submit a policy proposal. Please let Gert and myself know if you want to do that and we or Marco can assist if needed. Regards, Erik Bais Co-chair for the AP-WG From: Martin Tonusoo Date: Monday 17 December 2018 at 16:20 To: Erik Bais

Re: [address-policy-wg] definition of "ASSIGNED PA" in IPv4 address allocation and assignment policy

: https://apps.db.ripe.net/db-web-ui/#/lookup?source=ripe=178.249.152.0%20-%20178.249.152.127=inetnum Regards, Erik Bais From: address-policy-wg on behalf of Martin Tonusoo Date: Tuesday 13 November 2018 at 13:42 To: "address-policy-wg@ripe.net" Subject: [address-policy-wg]

[address-policy-wg] Draft Agenda RIPE77 - Address Policy

, or if we need to change anything, please let us know. Regards, Gert Döring & Erik Bais, APWG chairs -- Wednesday, 09:00-10:30 -- A. Administrative Mat

[address-policy-wg] RIPE77 AP-WG Agenda topics in mind ?

about certain things (Address Policy related) or like to present something, please let us know and we will see if and where we can reserve some time for it on the agenda. We hope that we can put out the agenda itself on this ML before this Friday. Kind regards, Gert Döring & Erik

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2018-02 New Version Policy Proposal (Assignment Clarification in IPv6 Policy)

to have a quick read and provide some feedback on it before Thursday. On behalf of the AP-WG Chair collective, Kind regards, Erik Bais On 29/08/2018, 13:29, "address-policy-wg on behalf of Marco Schmidt" wrote: Dear colleagues, RIPE Policy proposal, 2018-02, &

Re: [address-policy-wg] LACNIC "Proposal to create a Global Internet Registry (GIR)"

The question that came to mind was ... Is the IANA transition done yet ? Good. Let's start another one ... /ponder ... On 16/03/2018, 12:49, "address-policy-wg on behalf of Marco Schmidt" wrote: Dear colleagues,

[address-policy-wg] FW: WG chair change

Hi Gert, Sander & AP-WG members, Thank you for the email and I would like to formally put my name in the hat. For those that don't know me personally, my name is Erik Bais, Dutch, I'm 45, married for 16 year with my wife Wilhelmina and we have 2 sons. I'm the o

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)

tion in the routing table will come from imho .. I do think that a proposal to change the PI v6 requirements should be a separate discussion and policy proposal. Regards, Erik Bais On 08/11/2017, 17:14, "address-policy-wg on behalf of Gert Doering" <address-policy-wg-boun...@r

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2017-03, New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)

> Now everyone will have to figure out if that's enough or not. :) That is clearly not enough... you are asking the obvious here Jan... ;-) Erik -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net] Namens Jan Zorz - Go6 Verzonden: dinsdag 26

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2017-01 New Policy Proposal (Publish statistics on Intra-RIR Legacy updates)

we should see first what the RIPE NCC will implement with the 2015-04 … before we go look into additional policy … Regards, Erik Bais A2B Internet -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net] Namens Marco Schmidt Verzonden: dinsdag

Re: [address-policy-wg] [Ext] Re: 2017-01 New Policy Proposal (Publish statistics on Intra-RIR Legacy updates)

if needed. As on your remark on the services WG as the Go-To WG for LHR .. that might swing both ways.. as most Transfer policy discussions have been done here. But I'm not arguing that you are incorrect on the point. Regards, Erik Bais A2B Internet & Prefix Broker -Oorspronke

Re: [address-policy-wg] Password

Pick one in the list : https://www.random.org/passwords/?num=5=18=html=new Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad > Op 9 apr. 2017 om 18:00 heeft Stephen Balogh het > volgende geschreven: > > Need password >

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)

Hi Gert, I know you well enough to not take this personal and if you are not responding to me on a couple nudges, you must have a good reason for it. Thank you for the work and lets get started on the last call on this. Regards, Erik Bais > Op 7 feb. 2017 om 17:02 heeft Gert Doering

Re: [address-policy-wg] Migration Datacenter

on the migration. Kind regards, Erik Bais A2B Internet -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net] Namens ANGEL MARTINEZ SANCHEZ Verzonden: donderdag 24 november 2016 1:07 Aan: address-policy-wg@ripe.net Onderwerp: [address-policy-wg] Migration

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)

doesn't prevent future M's .. as that is not possible to restrict and not the intention ... The intention is to avoid speculation by hoarding and combining LIR's and transferring IP space out. Regards, Erik Bais --- Van: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net] Namens Cipri

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)

. But don’t let my opinion on that keep you from writing your own policy proposal. Regards, Erik Bais Van: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net] Namens Ciprian Nica Verzonden: zondag 23 oktober 2016 16:40 Aan: Erik Bais <eb...@a2b-internet.com> CC: a

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)

that was already addressed when it was brought up by Elvis 2 RIPE meetings ago .. and it was addressed at that point. Regards, Erik Bais Van: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net] Namens Ciprian Nica Verzonden: woensdag 19 oktober 2016 19:10 Aan: address-policy-wg

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification)

above, the usage should be perfectly within the current policy. Regards, Erik Bais > Op 23 okt. 2016 om 10:11 heeft JORDI PALET MARTINEZ > <jordi.pa...@consulintel.es> het volgende geschreven: > > If I’ve a PI for my company … and I offer WiFi for the laptops or phones

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)

ull proposal and the impact analysis at: > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-04 I'm looking forward to see you all in Madrid. Regards, Erik Bais

Re: [address-policy-wg] opposition to 2015-04

Thanks Remco. We'll take your suggestion in mind before moving to last call. Regards, Erik Bais -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Remco van Mook [mailto:remco.vanm...@gmail.com] Verzonden: woensdag 25 mei 2016 9:53 Aan: address-policy-wg@ripe.net CC: Erik Bais <e...@bais.name> Ond

Re: [address-policy-wg] opposition to 2015-04

one is trying to game the system. To give an indication, the damage of a diner with 7 people at the MASH Penthouse at the RIPE72 venue can be more expensive ... Thanks for the feedback. Regards, Erik Bais Van: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)

intended use, it will never be enough and you will always feel incorrectly treated … This policy proposal (with all respect to you and Radu and good intentions) needs to stop as it gives people hope on something that isn’t there ... Regards, Erik Bais Van: address-policy-wg [mailto:addr

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)

licy by saying, no transfers done in the past, not more than 4k IPv4 etc etc.. but that is just semantics.. it won’t fix the overall policy you are trying to implement. So perhaps a long answer to say that I won't support it. Regards, Erik Bais

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Draft Documents and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)

... And if Sander and Gert don't mind, I would like to ask to extend the discussion period for 2 weeks to allow for additional comments on this email and perhaps other insights. Regards, Erik Bais Author of 2015-04 ... aka ... The mad hatter ...

Re: [address-policy-wg] Working group chair rotation 2

Hi Sander, You have my vote and support as AP-WG Chair :) +1 Erik Bais -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net] Namens Sander Steffann Verzonden: maandag 8 februari 2016 21:24 Aan: RIPE Address Policy Working Group <address-pol

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Draft Documents and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)

ange, it should go through the PDP process. I think that what you are asking is what is already in the proposal and what you are looking for in a procedure, is already what is the used process ... If not, what are we missing ? Regards, Erik Bais

[address-policy-wg] Update on the policy proposal :

member in accordance with the RIPE Policy, “Contractual Requirements for Provider Independent Resource Holders in the RIPE NCC Service Region”. I would like to ask the community to review the text and provide feedback on it. We will upload the new version soon. Regards, Erik Bais

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2014-03 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)

ready beyond the point of handing out 1* 16b ASn to each LIR and there isn't that much left in the free pool I'm guessing .. ( that is my gut feeling .. ) But the NCC should be able to answer the total number in the RIPE pool ... Erik Bais

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)

> first, i think all LIRs with POCs whose family name begins with B should get > a /16 I fully agree on that.. Erik -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net] Namens Randy Bush Verzonden: dinsdag 20 oktober 2015 16:27 Aan: James

[address-policy-wg] 2015-05

and this line of thinking asap. Regards, Erik Bais

Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal Implemented: 2014-05, "Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of Internet Resources"

Thanks for the update Nikolas. Erik Bais Van: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net] Namens Nikolas Pediaditis Verzonden: donderdag 1 oktober 2015 11:16 Aan: Erik Bais - A2B Internet <eb...@a2b-internet.com> CC: address-policy-wg@ripe.net Onderwerp: Re: [a

Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal Implemented: 2014-05, "Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of Internet Resources"

this year ... Regards, Erik Bais Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad > Op 30 sep. 2015 om 16:51 heeft Nikolas Pediaditis > <nikolas.pediadi...@ripe.net> het volgende geschreven: > > Dear colleagues, > > We are pleased to announce that we have implemented the policy proposal >

Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal Implemented: 2014-05, "Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of Internet Resources"

at 1:24 upto 1:35 at the mic on the topic. Regards, Erik Bais > Op 30 sep. 2015 om 21:05 heeft Erik Bais - A2B Internet > <eb...@a2b-internet.com> het volgende geschreven: > > Hi Nikolas, > > Thank you for the work and this update. > > Could you or Marco perhaps

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Policy Proposal (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)

will also make a slight change in the transfer restrictions .. as it closes the 'loophole' to have transfers now also restricted after M's and not only after allocation by RIPE NCC or transfers. The point 2.2 wording ( cannot be transferred by the resource holder within 24 months from the date the resource was received. ) is the cause of that.. and as such the statistics should reflect that info. Hence that update there.. Regards, Erik Bais

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Policy Proposal (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)

es of transfers be included The text is pretty clear imho on what it covers.. any number resource to and from the RIPE NCC service region ... Both TO and FROM the RIPE region ... > - broadly support the unification of transfer policy into a single > document, just things bits are missing or muddy I hope that we made a good start here :) Erik Bais

Re: [address-policy-wg] Fwd: Suggestions on a new asn assignment policy

in the policy than strictly required. Erik Bais

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)

* Marco Schmidt mschm...@ripe.net The draft document for the proposal described in 2015-01, Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations has been published. Support +1 Erik Bais

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published

it a lot less attractive to do it.. This policy change will make it a lot more expensive for the current 'abusers of the intent of the policy' to see this as a viable business model.. Regards, Erik Bais

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2014-03 Review Period extended until 19 May 2015 (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)

can reply to it in their IA .. Just my 2 cents ... Erik Bais. ( now a bit more awake that this morning ) ... Op 16 mei 2015 om 12:26 heeft Opteamax GmbH r...@opteamax.de het volgende geschreven: Erik and all, I think your idea to exclude 16Bit ASN from the proposal brings us much

Re: [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations

? What you are saying here IS the reason why the community is looking at this policy proposal ... If you need more than a /22 the only way is to get this from the market ... I wonder why people still think that they can or will get IPv4 from the Ripe NCC ... Erik Bais Op 25 apr. 2015

Re: [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations

and closed just to get cheap IP’s … And I’m pretty sure that if that was foreseen at the time, that the respective author would have closed that gap at the time … As that is in the past … and this is currently being abused .. It is time to fix this and close this gap. Regards, Erik Bais Van

Re: [address-policy-wg] Working group chair rotation 1

Hi Gert, Are you going to formally introduce yourself to the mailing list for those that might not know who you are and what your shoe size is ? And can we expect the usual election talks / promises on where we are going in the next period with you at the helm ... Personally I would like to

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2014-13 declaration of consensus (Allow AS Number Transfers)

Thanks for the summary Gert. Regards, Erik Bais ( proposer of the policy ) -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net] Namens Gert Doering Verzonden: donderdag 5 februari 2015 21:12 Aan: address-policy-wg@ripe.net Onderwerp: Re: [address

Re: [address-policy-wg] Internet Number Community IANA Stewardship Proposal: Final Call for Comments

discussion in coop-wg ? Regards, Erik Bais Van: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net] Namens Hans Petter Holen Verzonden: donderdag 8 januari 2015 23:02 Aan: address-policy-wg@ripe.net Onderwerp: [address-policy-wg] Internet Number Community IANA Stewardship Proposal: Final

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 timer update?

Hi Aleksi, I haven't seen an updated / new version of the policy text of 2014-04. Did you already forwarded that to p...@ripe.net (Marco) and the AP-WG-chairs (Gert and Sander) ? Regards, Erik Bais -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net [mailto:address

Re: [address-policy-wg] [ipv6-wg] FW: [policy-announce] 2014-12 New Policy Proposal (Allow IPv6 Transfers)

clean. Regards, Erik Bais -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Radu-Adrian Feurdean [mailto:ripe-...@radu-adrian.feurdean.net] Verzonden: maandag 10 november 2014 9:44 Aan: Erik Bais; ipv6...@ripe.net CC: address-policy-wg@ripe.net Onderwerp: Re: [ipv6-wg] FW: [policy-announce] 2014-12 New Policy