Re: [address-policy-wg] 2018-02 Assignment Clarification in IPv6 Policy - comments from today meeting

2018-05-18 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg
2018, 20:37 Para: <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> Asunto: [address-policy-wg] 2018-02 Assignment Clarification in IPv6 Policy - comments from today meeting Hi there, on 16.05.2018 17:33, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg wrote: > So, to make sure I understood

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2018-02 Assignment Clarification in IPv6 Policy - comments from today meeting

2018-05-16 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg
, 16:47 Para: <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> Asunto: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2018-02 Assignment Clarification in IPv6 Policy - comments from today meeting On 16.05.2018 14:19, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been asked to state what is

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2018-02 Assignment Clarification in IPv6 Policy - comments from today meeting

2018-05-16 Thread Kai 'wusel' Siering
On 16.05.2018 14:19, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been asked to state what is the problem. > > I think it was clear in my slides, but anyway, here we go with all the > problems I see: > > 1) The current policy text says "Providing another entity with

[address-policy-wg] 2018-02 Assignment Clarification in IPv6 Policy - comments from today meeting

2018-05-16 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg
Hi all, I've been asked to state what is the problem. I think it was clear in my slides, but anyway, here we go with all the problems I see: 1) The current policy text says "Providing another entity with separate addresses (not prefixes)". To me this is inconsistent addresses instead of an