2018, 20:37
Para: <address-policy-wg@ripe.net>
Asunto: [address-policy-wg] 2018-02 Assignment Clarification in IPv6 Policy -
comments from today meeting
Hi there,
on 16.05.2018 17:33, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg wrote:
> So, to make sure I understood
, 16:47
Para: <address-policy-wg@ripe.net>
Asunto: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2018-02 Assignment Clarification in IPv6 Policy
- comments from today meeting
On 16.05.2018 14:19, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been asked to state what is
On 16.05.2018 14:19, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been asked to state what is the problem.
>
> I think it was clear in my slides, but anyway, here we go with all the
> problems I see:
>
> 1) The current policy text says "Providing another entity with
Hi all,
I've been asked to state what is the problem.
I think it was clear in my slides, but anyway, here we go with all the problems
I see:
1) The current policy text says "Providing another entity with separate
addresses (not prefixes)".
To me this is inconsistent addresses instead of an