re clutter in
the policy than strictly required.
Erik Bais
s is about transfers should this also cover returning
> resources to ripe NCC so all types of transfers be included
The text is pretty clear imho on what it covers.. any number resource to and
from the RIPE NCC service region ...
Both TO and FROM the RIPE region ...
> - broadly support the unification of transfer policy into a single
> document, just things bits are missing or muddy
I hope that we made a good start here :)
Erik Bais
the
transfer statistics ...
- Whether it was a transfer or merger/acquisition
As it will also make a slight change in the transfer restrictions .. as it
closes the 'loophole' to have transfers now also restricted after M&A's and not
only after allocation by RIPE NCC or transfers.
The point 2.2 wording ( cannot be transferred by the resource holder within 24
months from the date the resource was received. ) is the cause of that.. and as
such the statistics should reflect that info.
Hence that update there..
Regards,
Erik Bais
Hi Sascha,
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 12:37:22AM +0200, Erik Bais wrote:
>>To clarify here ... although all types of number resources can
>>be transferred.. ( AS, IPv4, IPv6 ) there are some specific
>>resources ( like v4 for IXP usage ) are not allowed to be
>>trans
f one were looking to find out whether a
> resource is eligible for transfer.
I see your point and I think that we need to have a look if that wouldn't
just be re-stating what is already in the policy earlier..
Erik Bais
|185.1.10.0|512|20130403|assigned
ripencc||ipv4|185.1.39.0|256||reserved
It would be my wild guess that we are talking about the 185.1.x.y range :)
Erik Bais
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net] Namens
Nick Hilliard
Verzonden: woensdag 2
/proposals/2015-04
Regards,
Erik Bais
Thanks for the update Nikolas.
Erik Bais
Van: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net] Namens
Nikolas Pediaditis
Verzonden: donderdag 1 oktober 2015 11:16
Aan: Erik Bais - A2B Internet
CC: address-policy-wg@ripe.net
Onderwerp: Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal
> first, i think all LIRs with POCs whose family name begins with B should get
> a /16
I fully agree on that..
Erik
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net] Namens Randy
Bush
Verzonden: dinsdag 20 oktober 2015 16:27
Aan: James Blessin
policy and this line of thinking asap.
Regards,
Erik Bais
dy beyond the point of handing out 1* 16b ASn to each
LIR and there isn't that much left in the free pool I'm guessing .. ( that is
my gut feeling .. )
But the NCC should be able to answer the total number in the RIPE pool ...
Erik Bais
member
in accordance with the RIPE Policy, Contractual Requirements for Provider
Independent Resource Holders in the RIPE NCC Service Region.
I would like to ask the community to review the text and provide feedback on
it.
We will upload the new version soon.
Regards,
Erik Bais
Hi Marco,
Thanks for the update and the work.
Regards,
Erik Bais
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net] Namens Marco
Schmidt
Verzonden: woensdag 3 februari 2016 14:59
Aan: address-policy-wg@ripe.net
Onderwerp: [address-policy-wg
ingly..
And as that is a policy change, it should go through the PDP process.
I think that what you are asking is what is already in the proposal and what
you are looking for in a procedure, is already what is the used process ...
If not, what are we missing ?
Regards,
Erik Bais
Hi Sander,
You have my vote and support as AP-WG Chair :)
+1
Erik Bais
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net] Namens
Sander Steffann
Verzonden: maandag 8 februari 2016 21:24
Aan: RIPE Address Policy Working Group
Onderwerp
quick view of where I
think we are ... And if Sander and Gert don't mind, I would like to ask to
extend the discussion period for 2 weeks to allow for additional comments on
this email and perhaps other insights.
Regards,
Erik Bais
Author of 2015-04 ... aka ... The mad hatter ...
direction will need to be.
Having a policy that is different than the others, might in fact be the
accelerator for the discussion that it could be done different and that a
refresh of the other policies might be required. . .
Regards,
Erik Bais
Van: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy
y by saying, no
transfers done in the past, not more than 4k IPv4 etc etc.. but that is just
semantics.. it won’t fix the overall policy you are trying to implement.
So perhaps a long answer to say that I won't support it.
Regards,
Erik Bais
ended use, it will never be
enough and you will always feel incorrectly treated …
This policy proposal (with all respect to you and Radu and good intentions)
needs to stop as it gives people hope on something that isn’t there ...
Regards,
Erik Bais
Van: address-policy-wg [mailto
ake-over … unless one is trying to game the
system.
To give an indication, the damage of a diner with 7 people at the MASH
Penthouse at the RIPE72 venue can be more expensive ...
Thanks for the feedback.
Regards,
Erik Bais
Van: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@
Thanks Remco.
We'll take your suggestion in mind before moving to last call.
Regards,
Erik Bais
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Remco van Mook [mailto:remco.vanm...@gmail.com]
Verzonden: woensdag 25 mei 2016 9:53
Aan: address-policy-wg@ripe.net
CC: Erik Bais
Onderwerp: oppositi
ull proposal and the impact analysis at:
> https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-04
I'm looking forward to see you all in Madrid.
Regards,
Erik Bais
ut that in policy.
Regards,
Erik Bais
already addressed when it was brought up
by Elvis 2 RIPE meetings ago .. and it was addressed at that point.
Regards,
Erik Bais
Van: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net] Namens
Ciprian Nica
Verzonden: woensdag 19 oktober 2016 19:10
Aan: address-policy-wg
.
But don’t let my opinion on that keep you from writing your own policy
proposal.
Regards,
Erik Bais
Van: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net] Namens
Ciprian Nica
Verzonden: zondag 23 oktober 2016 16:40
Aan: Erik Bais
CC: address-policy-wg@ripe.net
it doesn't prevent future M&A's .. as that is not possible to restrict and
not the intention ...
The intention is to avoid speculation by hoarding and combining LIR's and
transferring IP space out.
Regards,
Erik Bais
---
Van: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-w
o.. )
Good luck on the migration.
Kind regards,
Erik Bais
A2B Internet
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net] Namens
ANGEL MARTINEZ SANCHEZ
Verzonden: donderdag 24 november 2016 1:07
Aan: address-policy-wg@ripe.net
Onderwerp: [add
Dear Marco & Gert,
Thanks for monitoring the process and the assistance in getting this sorted.
Looking forward to the implementation.
Kind regards,
Erik Bais
A2B Internet
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net] Namens
M
ek and today if
needed.
As on your remark on the services WG as the Go-To WG for LHR .. that might
swing both ways.. as most Transfer policy discussions have been done here. But
I'm not arguing that you are incorrect on the point.
Regards,
Erik Bais
A2B Internet & Prefix Broke
s to LRH’s
..
Perhaps we should see first what the RIPE NCC will implement with the
2015-04 … before we go look into additional policy …
Regards,
Erik Bais
A2B Internet
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net] Namens
Marco
> Now everyone will have to figure out if that's enough or not. :)
That is clearly not enough... you are asking the obvious here Jan... ;-)
Erik
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net] Namens Jan
Zorz - Go6
Verzonden: dinsdag 26 se
n in the routing table will come
from imho ..
I do think that a proposal to change the PI v6 requirements should be a
separate discussion and policy proposal.
Regards,
Erik Bais
On 08/11/2017, 17:14, "address-policy-wg on behalf of Gert Doering"
wrote:
Hi,
On Wed
Hi Gert, Sander & AP-WG members,
Thank you for the email and I would like to formally put my name in the
hat.
For those that don't know me personally, my name is Erik Bais, Dutch, I'm
45, married for 16 year with my wife Wilhelmina and we have 2 sons.
The question that came to mind was ...
Is the IANA transition done yet ? Good. Let's start another one ...
/ponder ...
On 16/03/2018, 12:49, "address-policy-wg on behalf of Marco Schmidt"
wrote:
Dear colleagues,
We would like to make you aware of a policy proposal that is be
Hi Sean,
Thank you for your support.
Looking forward to see you in Marseille.
Regards,
Erik Bais [signature_1256050601] <http://www.linkedin.com/in/erikbais>
[signature_1459106859] <http://www.twitter.com/erikbais>
Erik Bais | A2B Internet | +31 85 902 0410 ( Office )
that you might have regarding this policy
proposal, please ask them on the ML.
And if you (still) agree with the policy moving forward, please state your
support here on our ML.
Kind regards,
Erik Bais
APWG Chair
ou to have a quick read and provide some feedback on it
before Thursday.
On behalf of the AP-WG Chair collective,
Kind regards,
Erik Bais
On 29/08/2018, 13:29, "address-policy-wg on behalf of Marco Schmidt"
wrote:
Dear colleagues,
RIPE Policy proposal, 2018-
about certain things (Address Policy related) or like to
present something, please let us know and we will see if and where we can
reserve some time for it on the agenda.
We hope that we can put out the agenda itself on this ML before this Friday.
Kind regards,
Gert Döring & Erik
genda, or if we need
to change anything, please let us know.
Regards,
Gert Döring & Erik Bais,
APWG chairs
--
Wednesday, 09:00-10:30
--
A. Administrativ
:
https://apps.db.ripe.net/db-web-ui/#/lookup?source=ripe&key=178.249.152.0%20-%20178.249.152.127&type=inetnum
Regards,
Erik Bais
From: address-policy-wg on behalf of
Martin Tonusoo
Date: Tuesday 13 November 2018 at 13:42
To: "address-policy-wg@ripe.net"
Subject:
Hi Martin,
If you think it would make sense, feel free to submit a policy proposal.
Please let Gert and myself know if you want to do that and we or Marco can
assist if needed.
Regards,
Erik Bais
Co-chair for the AP-WG
From: Martin Tonusoo
Date: Monday 17 December 2018 at 16:20
To: Erik Bais
g the policy as documented.
Regards,
Erik Bais
On 17/12/2018, 19:22, "address-policy-wg on behalf of Aleksey Bulgakov"
wrote:
Hi.
Regarding our situation. We have 3 accounts opened this year (for
different legal entities). We provided the oficial government
..@ripe.net, or discuss this or any other any
relevant topic on this mailing list.
On behalf of your co-chairs Gert Doering and Erik Bais,
Kind regards,
Erik Bais
In line with this question …
The RIPE NCC still has a working fax machine that prints the SSA’s for those
that want to speed up their processing of the membership sign-up process.
I hope that the articles of association gets updated soon for this to include a
scanned version as well.
Erik
Dear working group,
We have received one reply to the call for volunteers for the election.
I proudly present to you Gert Döring. For those that are new to the working
group :
On 04/04/2019, 20:06, "Erik Bais" wrote:
Dear working group,
In
nsensus has been reached.
And if that isn't somehow possible, a secret ballot will be done by
attendees IN the room and counted by the RIPE NCC staff.
There will be an agenda topic for the topic on the next AP-WG meeting in
Iceland.
Kind regards,
Erik Bais
Address Policy Wor
.
Kind regards,
Erik Bais
Co-Chair AP-WG
On 06/05/2019, 13:10, "address-policy-wg on behalf of Marco Schmidt"
wrote:
Dear colleagues,
Policy proposal 2019-02, "IPv4 Waiting List Implementation" is now in the
Review Phase.
This proposal aims at cre
Sander.)
Marco,
If you could push this into last call, that would be great.
On behalf of the AP-WG Chair collective,
Erik Bais
Co-Chair of AP-WG
On 06/05/2019, 13:10, "address-policy-wg on behalf of Marco Schmidt"
wrote:
Dear colleagues,
Policy proposal 2019
be outside ( no contract ) the rir status .. or by their own
choice inside the system ..
Hope this explains a bit.
Regards,
Erik Bais
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone
Op 13 jul. 2019 om 14:49 heeft JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg
mailto:address-policy-wg@ripe.net>> het vo
between RIR's (ARIN to RIPE for instance) for cost, policy, tools or rights
acceptance reasons .. or just because their HQ is moving from the ARIN region
to RIPE region.
Why should they be stripped of their current status ? what is the intention
here ?
Regards,
Erik Bais
On 15/07/2
all participants for their input and view in this discussion.
Kind regards (on behalf of the AP-WG chair collective)
Erik Bais
From: address-policy-wg on behalf of Hans
Petter Holen
Reply-To: "h...@oslo.net"
Date: Sunday 21 July 2019 at 23:20
To: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Cc: "ad
ctual implementation of
2019-05, making sure that we are not left empty handed when the last call ends.
For now, we will wait for Marco to do the formal announcement of the start of
Last Call and I wish you, on behalf of the AP-WG Chair collective, a nice
weekend.
Regards,
Erik Bais
Co-Chair AP-WG
Thanks for the update Marco.
And thanks to all the WG members and the proposal authors for making this
happen for the community.
Regards,
Erik Bais
Co-chair AP-WG.
On 10/10/2019, 12:01, "policy-announce on behalf of Marco Schmidt"
wrote:
Dear colleagues,
Consensu
ng padiwan that we can help settle into the WG collective would
be highly appreciated.
Kind regards,
Erik Bais
Co-chair for Address Policy WG - RIPE
after the formal announcement for Last Call by Petrit.
And if you do agree with the policy moving forward, please let it know in the
Last Call phase as well, as it is easier for us as Chairs to call consensus or
not, if we have some response.
Regards,
Erik Bais
On behalf of the AP-WG Chair
glist anyway,
we don’t have any presentations scheduled on new policy proposals.
If you have anything else you want to see on the agenda, or if we need
to change anything, please let us know.
Regards,
Gert Döring & Erik Bais,
AP
sending replies to this.
Regards,
Erik Bais
Co-Chair AP-WG
Op 3 mei 2020 om 00:09 heeft Elad Cohen het volgende
geschreven:
Cynthia,
The coconut was called an antisemitic person and a racist person not by me, but
by many other people in Nanog.
I didn't call him a coconut becau
Dear WG,
I want to bring the following email and questions of our PDO - Petrit Hasani to
your attention that might have slipped over the vacation period.
Please have a look at this discussion again and provide input if you can.
Regards,
Erik Bais
Co-chair AP-WG. ( on behalf of the AP-WG
istration of IPv4 Addresses” for the Recovery of Money.
As WG Chairs we thought it would be a good topic to discuss in the AP-WG.
So make sure you are present for the session.
Regards,
Gert Döring & Erik Bais
the
receiving RIR to apply their own Legacy ‘policy’
Regards,
Erik Bais
Co-chair of AP-WG
https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-682 - RIPE Transfer
policy ( including intra and inter-rir transfers )
https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-639 - RIPE NCC Services
Thanks Jim,
I couldn't have said it better myself.
Also, with the Legacy transfers, there needs to be proper documentation to make
sure all records from the past match up AND there is going to be an update in
the RIR registry that will make sure the records are up to date.
Updating the regis
y: Resource Certification for non-members :
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2013-04
2013-04 provided a way to include legacy holders into the RPKI system, by
requirement that there is a contractual agreement in place with the RIPE NCC.
Regards,
Erik Bais
On 21/10/2020, 13:
s, please let us
know via the mailing list or to myself directly.
We will send out the AP-WG RIPE82 agenda shortly.
Regards,
Erik Bais
On behalf of the AP-WG chair team.
icies.
So yes, let's take this into the discussion, and pick this up on the RIPE82
AP-WG meeting after that discussion about the above topic.
Regards,
Erik Bais
PS. I'm glad that the RIPE-733-61 document does have the requirement in there
to return the space ...
On 06/04/2021,
on various topics with this format, along with the
information of the NCC about various topics.
--- Draft agenda AP-WG session - RIPE82
A. Administrative Matters - Gert Döring
Welcome, thanking the scribe, approving the minutes, etc.
B. WG Chair selection / appointment - Erik Bais
C. Current
through the PDP, meaning
that a policy change would be required.
As WG chairs we would like to see the position of the WG on the topic and what
could be seen as a possible solution.
Regards,
Erik Bais
On behalf of the AP-WG Co-Chair collective.
On 07/12/2021, 10:23, "address-policy-
always room for improvement .. and we pick our battles.
I'll be more than happy to provide you some insight on transfers from various
type of resources and how the LIR portal options work with it. If you don't
have access to an LIR, to see how that looks these days.
This can be via Z
e requests and they are not bound by policy restrictions that we
are discussing here.
It could fix your specific case .. and that is why these orgs are actually
doing what they are doing ..
Regards,
Erik Bais
On 25/01/2022, 18:34, "address-policy-wg on behalf of Randy Bush"
w
the AP-WG members could provide some insight if the would
support (or not) a policy proposal as suggested.
Regards,
Speaking as one of the Co-Chairs,
Erik Bais
From: address-policy-wg on behalf of Edwin
Verheul
Date: Thursday, 17 November 2022 at 16:24
To: "address-policy-wg@ripe.net"
This is a small reminder that we are looking forward to you see online and your
input on the review for the IPv6 policy this afternoon.
Regards,
Erik Bais
On behalf of the AP-WG Chair collective.
On 21/03/2023, 22:48, "address-policy-wg on behalf of Leo Vegoda"
mailto:address
ek in Rotterdam.
Regards,
Erik Bais
Co-Chair AP-WG
--
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your
subscription options, please visit:
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg
are not only looking for objections .. but also for
support of the community and this is a request to speak up.
So even if you voiced support in previous phases, let us know again in the Last
Call phase as well.
Have a nice day,
Erik Bais
On behalf of the AP-WG Chairs, co-Chair
From: address
your support and feedback on the
approach.
Also if you are considering joining, do have a chat with either Leo or myself
during the meeting.
Kind regards,
Erik Bais
On behalf of the AP-WG-Chairs
On 18/09/2023, 15:25, "address-policy-wg on behalf of Leo Vegoda"
mailto:address
minutes for us.
Please review the minutes and provide feedback if you think there is something
missing or incorrect.
https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/wg/active-wg/ap/minutes/ripe-87-address-policy-working-group-minutes
Regards,
Erik Bais
On behalf of the AP-WG Chairs.
--
To unsubscribe
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 10:03:00AM +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
> > +1 - on the condition that Erik will clean up after himself when he's
> > done. ;-)
> Noted, and since he promised in public, we won't let him off the Hook :-)
I knew what I got myself into here ... and yes, I will clean up.
T
ommunity.
Reality today is that this particular lack within the policy is blocking some
things people want to do for very valid reasons.
Regards,
Erik Bais
posals/2014-12
> We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to
before 28 November 2014.
Regards,
Erik Bais
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: policy-announce-boun...@ripe.net
[mailto:policy-announce-boun...@ripe.net] Namens Marco Schmidt
Verzonden: donderdag 30 oktober 2
clean.
Regards,
Erik Bais
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Radu-Adrian Feurdean [mailto:ripe-...@radu-adrian.feurdean.net]
Verzonden: maandag 10 november 2014 9:44
Aan: Erik Bais; ipv6...@ripe.net
CC: address-policy-wg@ripe.net
Onderwerp: Re: [ipv6-wg] FW: [policy-announce] 2014-12 New Policy
Hi Aleksi,
I haven't seen an updated / new version of the policy text of 2014-04.
Did you already forwarded that to p...@ripe.net (Marco) and the AP-WG-chairs
(Gert and Sander) ?
Regards,
Erik Bais
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net
[mailto:ad
it into the LIR portal with the same authentication as that they use for RPKI
setup for PI holders.
I would see that as a Services-WG request and not a AP-WP discussion.
Regards,
Erik Bais
Van: address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net
[mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net] Namens
Support +1
discussion in coop-wg ?
Regards,
Erik Bais
Van: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net] Namens Hans
Petter Holen
Verzonden: donderdag 8 januari 2015 23:02
Aan: address-policy-wg@ripe.net
Onderwerp: [address-policy-wg] Internet Number Community IANA Stewardship
Proposal: Final
n after someone decided he wanted to request the
complete number pool ...
And he didn't even wanted to do so.. he just played with the idea that it
would be possible ...
This complete theoretic possible abuse for this specific policy has been
entertained long enough I would say .. time to move forward.
Regards,
Erik Bais
Thanks for the summary Gert.
Regards,
Erik Bais ( proposer of the policy )
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net] Namens
Gert Doering
Verzonden: donderdag 5 februari 2015 21:12
Aan: address-policy-wg@ripe.net
Onderwerp: Re: [address
via a IPv6 PI transfer ...
without documentation ...
And anyone can request a /48 PI IPv6 if they like, without documentation ...
And every PI assignment will cost you a yearly maintenance fee as a
sponsoring LIR of at least 50 euro ...
I hope that I've addressed the points ( a bit late I admit..)
Hi Nick,
> the issue that concerns me is that creating a requirement for a contract
> means that there is a requirement for legal people to be involved in the
> transfer process. Whatever about legal wording in civil law countries
(NL,
> most of europe), common law countries (ie/uk/us, etc) gene
oker market ... Because the real IP
brokers with actual inventory, can really do without these small prefixes in
the sales sheets for inventory ..
The idea to close this, is because that flipping of the /22's of the final
/8 goes against the intent of the initial policy.
Having said that, it is a Support +1 from me on this.
Regards,
Erik Bais
IPE meeting in Amsterdam.
Regards,
Erik Bais
Hi Gert,
Are you going to formally introduce yourself to the mailing list for those
that might not know who you are and what your shoe size is ?
And can we expect the usual election talks / promises on where we are going
in the next period with you at the helm ...
Personally I would like to
t this proposal will stop you from
starting new LIR’s in dummy companies .. to be able to transfer the space to
other LIR’s .. ?
I think that your comments make it very clear why this proposal should be
implemented .. But maybe I’m missing something …
Regards,
Erik Bais
Van: address-
closed
just to get cheap IP’s … And I’m pretty sure that if that was foreseen at
the time, that the respective author would have closed that gap at the time
…
As that is in the past … and this is currently being abused .. It is time to
fix this and close this gap.
Regards,
Erik Bais
Van
You are my hero!
>I support the spirit of the proposal, but I haven't read the text yet.
Especially that last bit :)
Regards,
Erik Bais
Hi Milton,
> Erik:
> Have you responded to the analysis of Vladimir Andreev which shows that
the impact of this practice is minimal?
> From: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net] On
Behalf Of Erik Bais
> The goal of this proposal is to stop the abuse of o
Hi Randy,
> i really missed being there
> we can blame serge, who shifted the meeting left one week from it's
> traditional time, and thus conflicted with our tenth wedding anniversary :)
You can't blame Serge for your poor planning in a wedding date ... You knew 10
years ago that there is a RI
ding' ... which makes it
a lot less attractive to do it..
This policy change will make it a lot more expensive for the current 'abusers
of the intent of the policy' to see this as a viable business model..
Regards,
Erik Bais
* "Marco Schmidt"
> The draft document for the proposal described in 2015-01, "Alignment of
> Transfer
> Requirements for IPv4 Allocations" has been published.
Support +1
Erik Bais
ll handing
out /22's similar as RIPE is to new LIR's ... Technically, it is not depleted
.. As they still have it ... So there the specific transfer policy couldn't be
activated ...
Regards,
Erik Bais
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
> Op 3 sep. 2015 om 21:22 heeft Geo
this year ...
Regards,
Erik Bais
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
> Op 30 sep. 2015 om 16:51 heeft Nikolas Pediaditis
> het volgende geschreven:
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> We are pleased to announce that we have implemented the policy proposal
> 2014-05, "Policy for Inter
at 1:24 upto 1:35 at the mic on the topic.
Regards,
Erik Bais
> Op 30 sep. 2015 om 21:05 heeft Erik Bais - A2B Internet
> het volgende geschreven:
>
> Hi Nikolas,
>
> Thank you for the work and this update.
>
> Could you or Marco perhaps provide a quick update on
s. All
RIPE NCC issued IPv4 and 16bit ASNs.
That means indeed as the IA states : PI IPv4 and IPv4 PA space and 16 bit ASNs
..
Is there something missing ?
Regards,
Erik Bais
> Op 6 feb. 2016 om 19:57 heeft Sascha Luck [ml] het volgende
> geschreven:
>
>> On Sat, Feb 0
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
