Re: Stack instrumentation for kernel.

2014-06-06 Thread Yuri Gribov
>>> I propose to add -fsanitize=kernel-address when the first patch is >>> committed. Now it will just enable "-fsanitize=address >>> -asan-instrumentation-with-call-threshold=-1" internally. But later we >>> will be able to change instrumentation for kernel under the hood w/o >>> disturbing users.

Re: Stack instrumentation for kernel.

2014-06-06 Thread 'Dmitry Vyukov' via address-sanitizer
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Yuri Gribov wrote: > Dmitry, > >> I propose to add -fsanitize=kernel-address when the first patch is >> committed. Now it will just enable "-fsanitize=address >> -asan-instrumentation-with-call-threshold=-1" internally. But later we >> will be able to change instrum

Re: Stack instrumentation for kernel.

2014-06-06 Thread Yuri Gribov
Dmitry, > I propose to add -fsanitize=kernel-address when the first patch is > committed. Now it will just enable "-fsanitize=address > -asan-instrumentation-with-call-threshold=-1" internally. But later we > will be able to change instrumentation for kernel under the hood w/o > disturbing users.

Re: Stack instrumentation for kernel.

2014-06-06 Thread 'Dmitry Vyukov' via address-sanitizer
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Yuri Gribov wrote: > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 7:57 PM, 'Dmitry Vyukov' via address-sanitizer > wrote: >> What exactly do you want to write? We need to coordinate. > > From compiler's side we'll probably start experimenting with stack > instrumentation. Provided tha