FYI
-- Forwarded message --
From: Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jul 11, 2006 8:04 AM
Subject: Fwd: DOAP files for Podling
To: MyFaces Development
FYI
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jul 11, 2006 3:41 AM
Subj
We can't go with just '-' because a user can use custom properties from
mozilla, like -moz-border-radius.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
-oam- is ok with me, although a simple startWith("-") would have worked
just as well without binding us to any specific prefix. The only danger
would b
Hello,
-oam- is ok with me, although a simple startWith("-") would have worked
just as well without binding us to any specific prefix. The only danger
would be a new style property starting with '-' being added by w3c in the
future, but that seems unlikely.
Simon Lessard
Fujitsu Consulting
I submitted an issue about this.
I wanted to make sure we have consensus on -oam- instead of -ora- before
I implement this.
Key: ADFFACES-56
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-56
Project: MyFaces ADF-Faces
Type: Improvement
Thanks,
Jeanne
John Fallo
Hey, folks - as items come out of this discussion (like a doc generator
for skining, etc.), could you file them in the issue tracker? We don't
want these ideas getting lost!
-- Adam
On 7/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
An automated documentation generator would in
On 7/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello again,
I got some more question regarding coding rules.
For control block with a single line of code, should we use brackets or
not? Currently, I see both, but not using the brackets seems to be the
most common.
It's not a stri
On 7/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmm, I doubt that's his problem. I can compile well using 1.6 beta 2
that's cool :)
Simon Lessard
DMR Conseil Inc. (http://www.dmrconseil.ca)
Téléphone : (418) 653-6881
Sun Certified Programmer for Java 2 Platform 1.4
"Pavitra Subr
Hello,
I posted a patch for this issue, however it hsould not be closed yet as
more validators have the same issues. Basically, I did the following to
fix it:
I added the following to RegExpValidator.java
protected Object getNoMatchMessageDetailNoEval()
{
Object obj =
_facesBean.getLo
Oups, brackets should have been curly braces.
Simon Lessard
Fujitsu Consulting
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2006-07-11 10:04
Please respond to adffaces-dev
To: adffaces-dev@incubator.apache.org
cc:
Subject:Re: Coding conventions
Hello again,
I got some more que
Hello again,
I got some more question regarding coding rules.
For control block with a single line of code, should we use brackets or
not? Currently, I see both, but not using the brackets seems to be the
most common.
Regarding nested classes, are those encouraged when they are strongly
coup
Hello,
Concerning this issue, I found out there is already something existing for
that in MessageFactory, I'll make RegExpValidator uses it.
Simon Lessard
Fujitsu Consulting
- Forwarded by Simon Lessard/NOTES on 2006-07-11 09:11 -
Simon Lessard
2006-07-10 14:02
To: adffa
Hello,
An automated documentation generator would indeed be great.
Simon Lessard
Fujitsu Consulting
Jeanne Waldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2006-07-10 17:59
Please respond to adffaces-dev
To: adffaces-dev@incubator.apache.org
cc:
Subject:Re: Follow-up on s
Hmm, I doubt that's his problem. I can compile well using 1.6 beta 2
Simon Lessard
DMR Conseil Inc. (http://www.dmrconseil.ca)
Téléphone : (418) 653-6881
Sun Certified Programmer for Java 2 Platform 1.4
"Pavitra Subramaniam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2006-07-10 17:48
Please respond to adffaces-dev
13 matches
Mail list logo
