No.
That´s why I perform incremental db backups
to a disk (on another server).
regards
juraj salak
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Gill, Geoffrey L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 25. April 2001 22:15
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Incremental DBbackups
Hello all,
A qu
Ya, stg is set much higher.
Thanks,
Salam
> -Original Message-
> From: Chibois, Herve [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 10:39 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Server out of data storage space
> Importance: High
>
> Hi Abdu
>
> Ok you have scrat
Hi Abdu
Ok you have scratch tapes, but does your STG have the permissions to
allocate
one more ? Check the MAXSCRATCH param for your sequential STG.
rv
> -Message d'origine-
> De : ABDULSALAM ABDULLA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Envoyé : jeudi 26 avril 2001 07:47
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
can anybody tell me how I get rid off duplicate archive directory's.
I wanted to use the clean archdir command, but I think i don't use the right
syntax.
When I enter the command on the server;
CLEAN ARCHDIR nodename
then I get ONE OR MORE PARAMATERS ARE MISSING.
What is the right syntax
Why it's giving [Server out of data storage space] error and skipping for
some files.
I have more than 8 tapes as scratches. Surprisingly the next schedule went
through with no problem!!
Appreciate your help,
Salam
Followings are the type of messages I'm getting
04/25/01 12:57:28 Normal File
I will be out of the office starting 04/25/2001 and will not return until
04/30/2001.
I will respond to your message as soon as I return.
The network between a HP client and a SUN server was recently changed from ATM to GB
ethernet.
Since that conversion the rate of transfer for the backups has become ridiculously
slow.
We have yet to prove that the change of network topology is the cause though it is
the obvious place to sta
"Thomas A. La Porte" wrote:
> Is anybody else a little bit distressed that Tivoli's TSM
> administrator needs to seek this advice from the list, rather
> than from the developers of the product?
I think I've read just about enough whining in this thread about how
Tivoli 'distresses' people by not
Hi Joe,
We run it but its not very good.
it not as good as TDS (Tivoli Decision Support) for TSM, which can be
configured to retrieve different information from the TSM Server.
we have outstanding issues with sams where it will just lock up, blue screen
or
stop collecting information from TSM, w
This is one of those "classic" situations where you just gotta listen to
elevator music... call Tivoli for support.
It may be as simple as upgrade to a module (there's been some history of
problems with the dsmperf.dll, could be you just have a down-level version,
due to the sequence of your up
Ok, so the implication here is that there should be multiple Archive management
classes named for say each application, rather than a single set on Archmcs for all
applications.
I currently have set up arch_1y, arch_9m, arch_6m, arch_3m etc
if anyone archives something to say arch_1Y and then w
No.
Each DB backup, full or incremental, starts a new tape.
-Original Message-
From: Gill, Geoffrey L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 4:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Incremental DBbackups
Hello all,
A question about incremental DBbackups. If I run 10
We have been discovering, on a somewhat infrequent basis,
tapes that go physically to read-only onthe tab in our 3494.
And yet each time I can produce logs that show the file was
written on since the last time the robot door was opened/closed.
In other words I can only believe that the tab is m
Hello all again,
It's come to my attention that the lease on out RS/6000 will end next May.
While it's still early and I have time I'd like to get some suggestions. I'm
currently on an H50, but obviously will be upgrading to something else. Does
anyone know what kind of migration path I should ta
I have. I exported some ADSM 2.? users on VM
then binary ftp to aix
then imported there on a 3.1 ADSM
and it worked!! but they were small 1 to 2 gig users.
the critical point is to be sure its a binary ftp.
...joe.f.
Joseph A Faracchio, Systems Programmer, UC Berkeley
Private mail on any top
Joe,
I've done this but never with the amount of data you mention. It's rather
simple to set up.Set up a device w/DEVTYPE=FILE. When you EXPORT to
this device it creates a file(in our case with a mainframe hi-lev-qualifier
of ADSM) and then I ftp it to my other server, /tmp directory, and
Has anyone ever exported a node to a file(disk) instead of tape? I'm moving
about 700 gig of data.
joe
Hi all,
We did a selective backup to test performance. The environment is:
TSM server 3.7.3.0
SUN TSM Client 3.7.2.0
Network 100Mb Ethernet
Test data size 17MB.
Here is the result:
Final Detailed Instrumentation statistics
Elapsed time: 7.873 sec
Section
Hello all,
A question about incremental DBbackups. If I run 10 incremental backups on
the database per day will they all be written to the same tape, provided
there is room, as long as the tape remains in the library?
Thanks for the info,
Geoff Gill
TSM Administrator
NT Systems Support Engineer
If the tape is experiencing 'excessive media failures', meaning that
the tape can possibly be damaged, it will continue to change status of said
tape into 'readonly' state (write protected).
Larry Way <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
04/25/2001 02:06 PM
Please respond to "A
Have you checked the write-protect settings on the physical media?
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/25/01 03:06PM >>>
What determines if a tape is write protected? Had discovered that tape were in a
status of Private but not being used. I updated the volume and placed in scratch but
when TSM attempts
The tape has a physical write protect mechanism. On 3490s there's a thumbwheel on the
tape and if you turn it until the flat surface shows, then it's write protected. Other
types of tapes such as 8mm Exabytes may have break-off tabs like those on music
cassettes.
Also check the access of the t
What type of tape?
The "write protected" error is because someone has physically flipped the
write-protect tab on the tape cartridge.
But the tab is in a different place depending on the tape type...
-Original Message-
From: Larry Way [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25,
What determines if a tape is write protected? Had discovered that tape were in a
status of Private but not being used. I updated the volume and placed in scratch but
when TSM attempts to use as scratch he says that the volume is write protected ?
Can't explain why this is happening...
Larry
make the management class the data has been archived with not the default
management class, then make a new default management class.
Then change the retention as needed.
Jeff Bach
> -Original Message-
> From: Boireau, Eric (MED) [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001
Try to do an export of the node and those tape you will kept then 730 days.
It is not very useful for restore but it will works I think
Regards,
Salutations / Best Regards
gGE Medical Systems
___
Eric Boireau Global
I think you are on the right track by using the "grace" retention period.
To insure that will work right, I'd set up a domain with say a default
archive of a couple of days, archive some data and then roll that node over
into this "new" domain and wait a week and view things to ensure the data
wil
Paul,
I recently needed this same info, so I wrote a Rexx program to take the results of a
TSM SQL command and use the data to graphically plot tape drive utilization for all
drives across a given span of time. Although we use Aix for our TSM server, the Rexx
program runs on our OS/390 mainfr
Folks,
I know its not possible to rebind previously archived files to a new
management class, but I want to try it anyway. My customer has been using the
default management class when archiving in the past, but wants to increase the
retention period from 180 to 730 days. I can't do th
One thing I know about from 3.1 that will cause problems on 3.7 and 4.1 for a CLIENT
is the FSTYPES in dsm.opt. This is no longer used and will cause a DR. Watson. I
think there maybe one or 2 other obsolete variables that can cause problem. Probably
as a Server also.
David B. Longo
System
Paul,
I tried:
dsmadmc -id=id -pa=password -comma -out=x:\tempdir\mountlog.mount q act
begind=-1 endd=-1 begint=00:00 endt=23:59 msg=8337
dsmadmc -id=id -pa=password -comma -out=x:\tempdir\mountlog.dismount q act
begind=-1 endd=-1 begint=00:00 endt=23:59 msg=8468
I then opened both files with Ex
Uh I would "guess" so... I don't run raid configurations but the install
manual (that I wired from) doesn't put any stipulations on the use.
I ran in the "higher availability configuration for years, then with all the
dasd additions I've ended up going back to straight single cards (since I've
Hi ,
About 3 weeks ago we made the upgrade from ADSM 3.1.2.90 to TSM Server
4.1.3 on a Win NT 4.0 - Build 1381: SP6.
The Server is a IBM Netfinity 5500 with 2 procs:
0: x86 Family 6 Model 5 Stepping 2 GenuineIntel ~398 Mhz
1: x86 Family 6 Model 5 Stepping 2 GenuineInte
We, as well have experienced this. I have an environment I can
occasionally test issues out on and did some research on browsers
running on MacOS X and Solaris. Not sure if other platforms experience
the same problems with the same browsers, but FYI this is what I found:
The correct behavior can
This is cool. But only works in 4.1.x (4.1.2.0) and not in 3.7.3.0 for me.
And most of my servers are still 3.7.
>This might get you some useful information
>from TSM about tape mounting activity:
>
>tsm> select * from summary where activity='TAPE MOUNT'
>START_TIME: 2001-03-26 00:01:00.
HI
Pl see the mannual to set up clients.
there is an example
u need to start the service also.
I think it adsmutil cmd.
BALANAND PINNI.
PHONE 314-206-5911.
EM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PG:1-800-451-6897.
-Original Message-
From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25,
Have you set up a TSM "scheduler service" on the NT client and is it running? This
has to happen for server to contact client to start schedule.
David B. Longo
System Administrator
Health First, Inc.
3300 Fiske Blvd.
Rockledge, FL 32955-4305
PH 321.434.5536
Pager 321.634.8230
Fax:321
hello all,
I have several NT servers (with different TSM client versions 3.1 and 3.7)
for which the backup server is not able to prompt them to start the backup.
What happens is that the client can push a filesystem backup to the server
so the network is OK and the client is known to the TSM serv
SURE !
We use two (or more) subnets in most of our tsm servers... always best to
have minimal hops.
Our larger clients have multiple interface cards (to multiple subnets)
also...
We run with a production network for user traffic and a backup network (for
backups)
On some of the clients we have to
From: Matthew Glanville
This might get you some useful information
from TSM about tape mounting activity:
tsm> select * from summary where activity='TAPE MOUNT'
START_TIME: 2001-03-26 00:01:00.00
END_TIME: 2001-03-26 00:12:30.00
ACTIVITY: TAPE MOUNT
NUMBER: 0
Look closely at the "q volhist t=dbb" and the libvols that show DbBackup !
you'll probably find the two lists don't match ! ! ! !
I've noticed that IF anything happens during the DB backup (that is, an
abnormal termination) that the libvol is left as private with last use of
DbBackup BUT the v
> I need to see if I can determine:
> - # of mounts per individual tape drive
> - drive useage - would like to be able to compare when all drives
>are in use, for how long, etc,
Harold - I'm not aware that TSM tracks such information; but advanced
tape drives like the 3590 themsel
I am NOT using it, but here is more info...
http://www.cai.com/products/sams/ca_vantage_tsm.htm
Joseph Dawes
cc:
Sent by: Subject: Sams Vantage??
"ADSM: Dist
S
Now that you mention it... I have an open incident with the manufacturer of
our tape library about mount errors during load/unload on two of the drives.
To date, I have been worried about data loss and have been amazed that I am
not experiencing any. Then, I notice this Well, at least the tap
>Has anyone seen the following error:
>ANS9281E Space management kernel extension is downlevel from the user
>program.
>This error occured after upgrading from Adsm 3.1.8 to Tsm 3.7.2 IP21929 -
>which is the latest fix level on the 3.7 code.
>Where does the Space mgmt kernel extension come from -
Is anyone using this product ? And are you happy with it?? please advise,
thanks
joe
Sam,
We had the exact same problem - caused by Win95 or WinNT desktops accessing the TSM
web admin interface using Microsoft InternetExplorer 5.0. Each login spawned at least
2 "phantom" ? sessions, and 3 or more of these would drive our AIX system to 100% and
leave it there. Upgrading to IE
Hi,
Has anyone seen the following error:
ANS9281E Space management kernel extension is downlevel from the user
program.
This error occured after upgrading from Adsm 3.1.8 to Tsm 3.7.2 IP21929 -
which is the latest fix level on the 3.7 code.
Where does the Space mgmt kernel extension come from - A
Hello,
from what I know about currently available tape technologies
I guess that AIT-2 technology might be best for TSM,
because its performance strongly relies on short search times
and on short tape load/unload cycles.
Tis technology seems to be reliable and durable enough as well.
Can anybo
Shawn,
with the database of this size
you might evenconsider splitting it on two TSM instances.
There are advantages and drawbacks coupled with that,
but it works.
>> - Migrate all the client nodes one by one to other machines with
>> import/export.
I did it when I moved from OS/2 to NT Server,
Hi Mahes,
just few thoughts:
>> 1. With the RAID 5 at AIX level, should a second, synchronized copy
of DB volumes is required.
It had been argumented on this forum that TSM mirroring has
some advantages over OS-based Raid system.
Anyway, an OS-based RAID and only single database vol
51 matches
Mail list logo
