Re: Problems with LTO 3581 - URGENT

2001-12-07 Thread Zlatko Krastev/ACIT
On Windows elements start from 0 for both drives and slots. And because 3581 has only one drive it would be element 0. And you will have drive 0 and slot 0. On UNIX drives and slots have different element numbers. Zlatko Krastev IT Consultant Mauricio Angelino Massa [EMAIL PROTECTED] on

Re: Alternate Pathing Support for for AIX 4.3.3

2001-12-07 Thread Joshua S. Bassi
It is supported via the Atape driver. Take a look at the IBM manual for Atape for info on how to use tape drive multipathing. -- Joshua S. Bassi Independent IT Consultant IBM Certified - AIX/HACMP, SAN, Shark Tivoli Certified Consultant- ADSM/TSM Cell (408)(831) 332-4006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Help with backupset syntax

2001-12-07 Thread John Naylor
Hi all, I am trying to test restoring netware client backupsets to a contingency box. I have created single filespace backup sets and restored them ok by changing the node name in the dsm.opt file of the contingingeny box to the same as the node from which the backup set was generated. the

Re: Problems with LTO 3581 - URGENT

2001-12-07 Thread Mauricio Angelino Massa
Thanks, we used element #82 and it worked fine! Molly YM Pui [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] M.COM cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: Problems with LTO 3581 - URGENT

Re: backup retention

2001-12-07 Thread Martin Trcka
AFAIK, the statement below is not true: Remember the backup copy of what matches what is on your system does not count in the Versions Data Exists. Versions Data Exists applies to inactive backups. The most recent backup is the active backup. So, if you really Versions Data Exists applies

Anyone written their own Client?

2001-12-07 Thread Dave Cramer
Hi Folks, Has anyone on the list written their own version of the client? If so, how much work/cost is involved? Did you/they use the API, or the commandline to communicate with the server Dave

Re: Script to CHECKOUT multiples tapes on SCSI library

2001-12-07 Thread Etienne Brodeur
Thanks for the help, From I have been reading the MOVE MEDIA command is to allow you to move onsite tapes to an overflow location. What I want to be able to do is to identify which tapes I need to send offsite and with one command check them out, instead of having to check the tapes out

Re: Script to CHECKOUT multiples tapes on SCSI library

2001-12-07 Thread Martin Trcka
Doesn't MOVE MEDIA command meet your needs ? Martin Trcka -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Etienne Brodeur Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 9:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Script to CHECKOUT multiples tapes on SCSI

Re: backup retention

2001-12-07 Thread Cory Heikel
We do it like this: Backup Copy Groups : ENT02 ACTIVE STANDARD STANDARD Policy Domain Name ENT02 Policy Set Name ACTIVE Mgmt Class Name STANDARD Copy Group Name STANDARD Versions Data Exists NOLIMIT Versions Data Deleted 2 Retain Extra Versions 33 Retain Only Version 365 Copy Mode

Re: backup retention

2001-12-07 Thread Remeta, Mark
IMHO I agree with Martin, although YMMV. In the end you can always RTFM yourself. Mark -Original Message- From: Martin Trcka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 5:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: backup retention AFAIK, the statement below is not true:

Re: Script to CHECKOUT multiples tapes on SCSI library

2001-12-07 Thread Farren Minns
I use the command move drm * wherestate=mountable tostate=vault remove=bulk That should be the kind of thing you are after. Thanks Farren Minns Etienne Brodeur [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 07/12/2001 14:13:59 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by:

TDP Oracle 2.2 with SAP R/3 on HP-UX

2001-12-07 Thread Robin Sharpe
We are trying to use TDP Oracle 2.2 with SAP R/3 4.5 on HP-UX 11.0 and Oracle 8.0.6. I know this is not the recommended configuration... we will probably look at TDP for R/3 next year. In the meantime, our SAP Basis team wants to get familiar with RMAN, so we're trying TDPO. The problem is in

Re: Script to CHECKOUT multiples tapes on SCSI library

2001-12-07 Thread Ken Long
How many of the various DR commands are usable if we haven't purchased the separate DRM module? Back in the ADSM v2 days, in lieu of purchasing DRM, we developed AIX shell scripts which manage the checkout process. Since then, I've ignored the DR commands as I thought they weren't available for

Re: Reclaim Process

2001-12-07 Thread Joshua S. Bassi
Reclamation is controlled by the utilization of tapes. I believe that if you have 4 or more tapes that are eligible for reclamation it will kick off two separate reclamation processes. -- Joshua S. Bassi Independent IT Consultant IBM Certified - AIX/HACMP, SAN, Shark Tivoli Certified

Re: Reclaim Process

2001-12-07 Thread Remeta, Mark
I think that your thinking of migration. Reclamation only reclaims one tape at a time. -Original Message- From: Joshua S. Bassi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 1:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Reclaim Process Reclamation is controlled by the

Platform question

2001-12-07 Thread Brian L. Nick
We are Looking for some very basic information: I would like information from anyone who has moved their TSM environment from a mainframe to a RS/6000. What we are looking for is the mainframe that you moved from Model and average MIPS for TSM and TCPIP and the RS/6000 that you moved to, model,

Re: Reclaim Process

2001-12-07 Thread Joe Cascanette
Did you adjust the device class to reflect the added drives? Joe Cascanette The Cumis Group Limited -Original Message- From: Bruce Kamp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 12:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Reclaim Process I recently upgraded my 3494 from 2

Moving 2 multiple tape pools

2001-12-07 Thread Bruce Kamp
I'm about to start moving from 1 large tape pool to smaller tape pools. I was told I had to move all the data out of the large storage pool to the smaller ones before I let the current data go there. Is this true? Also if it is how can I ever get all the data moved to the new tape pools? I

Reclaim Process

2001-12-07 Thread Bruce Kamp
I recently upgraded my 3494 from 2 to 4 drives. I wanted to know if there is a way run 2 reclamation processes? When I update the stgpool to run reclamation it only starts 1 process. Thanks, -- Bruce Kamp Exchange Administrator Memorial Healthcare System P:

Re: Reclaim Process

2001-12-07 Thread David Longo
AS I understand it, you can only have ONE reclamation process running at a time for each storage pool. You can have more than one migration or Backup Stgpool processes at once for each storage pool though. David Longo [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/07/01 12:33PM I recently upgraded my 3494 from 2 to 4

Re: ANR8376I Mount point reserved in device class 3584MCLASS, sta tus: RESERVED.

2001-12-07 Thread Selva, Perpetua
We are still experiencing after all the upgrades to the drivers Any ideas? I'm told v4.2.1.8 should fix the problem... -Original Message- From: Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 4:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ANR8376I Mount point reserved in device class

Re: Reclaim Process

2001-12-07 Thread Bruce Kamp
I have the mount limit set to DRIVES if that is what you are talking about -Original Message- From: Joe Cascanette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 1:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Reclaim Process Did you adjust the device class to reflect the

Recovering a damaged volume

2001-12-07 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
OK, guys and gals. Need some assistance, especially since I did RTFM and the book is in error. I have a damaged tape. I went to the TSM manual (even checked the latest CD I received with my 4.2 server) under: Recovering a Lost or Damaged Storage Pool Volume It says to: 1. Determine the copy

TSM not seeing all of SAN drives

2001-12-07 Thread Joe Cascanette
Server : TSM 4.2.1.6 on Windows 2000 sp2 Backing up : Windows 2000 Cluster connected to a SAN Able to see all of the SAN connected drives when backing up at console with TSM client GUI, but the schedule backup does not see all of them. I have CLUSTER NODE YES option (local drives are not

Re: Recovering a damaged volume

2001-12-07 Thread Sean M English
Zoltan, Try using the preview=yes parameter and when the process is done check the activity log for the volumes that are required. Regards, Sean Sean M. English Enterprise Storage Management IBM Global Services, SDC Charlotte, NC Good news is just life's way of keeping you off balance.

Re: Recovering a damaged volume

2001-12-07 Thread Prather, Wanda
restore volume dsm084 preview=yes -Original Message- From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 4:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Recovering a damaged volume OK, guys and gals. Need some assistance, especially since I did RTFM and the

Re: Recovering a damaged volume

2001-12-07 Thread Orville L. Lantto
Try the admin client help. It is always at the latest level, the CDs are the dot-zero. Orville L. Lantto Datatrend Technologies, Inc. 121 Cheshire Lane #700 Minnetonka, MN 55305 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] V: 952-931-1203 F: 952-931-1293 C: 612-770-9166 Zoltan

Re: Recovering a damaged volume

2001-12-07 Thread Malbrough, Demetrius
-Zoltran- That is a typo in the Administrator's Guide as far as I am concerned! Refer to the Reference Manual-- Syntax .-,--. V| -RESTORE Volume---volume_name---+-

Re: Moving 2 multiple tape pools

2001-12-07 Thread Joe Cascanette
Good luck... I tried this with the import/export commands, and it was taking along time. The easiest way is to define the servers into the new pool and let the other data expire on it own. It will take a while depending on how much the data changes, but you will be there for a while anyways to

Recovering a damaged volu

2001-12-07 Thread Sam Sheppard
Top of message -- 12-07-01 13:48 S.SHEPPARD (SHS)Recovering a damaged volu I believe the format is PREVIEW=YES Sam Sheppard San Diego Data Processing Corp.

Re: Recovering a damaged volume

2001-12-07 Thread MacMurray, Andrea (CC-ETS Ent Storage Svcs)
Try the same cmd with Preview=yes -Original Message- From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 3:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Recovering a damaged volume OK, guys and gals. Need some assistance, especially since I did RTFM and the

Re: ADSM Server and Client 4.1 supported on AIX 5L

2001-12-07 Thread Wu, Jie
I would like to get a Fibre Channel Adapter for our F80 TSM server that supports sigle-mode, so that I can put a library into another building for disaster recovery purpose. I checked with IBM and the card I can get from IBM only supports multi-mode. THe emulex LP9000-L1 does support both AIX and

Re: Moving 2 multiple tape pools

2001-12-07 Thread Joy Harrison
We recently installed an IBM3584 using LTO, our old 3575 libraries are using magstar, I moved two tapepools (about 350 tapes) from magstar to LTO using the mov data volume# stg=newstgpoolname, backed up the new tapepool, then deleted the tapecopy pool. Then deleted the old stgpool. It does

Re: Moving 2 multiple tape pools

2001-12-07 Thread Cook, Dwight E (SAIC)
Na (for the most part) it doesn't matter what pool data resides in you could create two new tape pools, point things where they will be used have absolutely nothing point at the old tape pool and all would function just fine. eventually most of the data would expire off the tapes in the

Re: ADSM Server and Client 4.1 supported on AIX 5L

2001-12-07 Thread Kevin Sawyer
I know that EMC has an approved host bus adapter (HBA) fibre channel card for AIX and RS6000. I just can't remember what it is, but if you can, check the EMC Open System Support Matrix (OSSM). I would guess that it's single and multi mode capable, and even though it hasn't been tested in the

Point system has me very confused

2001-12-07 Thread Jeff Rogers
Can somebody help me to understand this point/tier system. It understand that sharing Tivoli pricing information is some kind of no-no, so please feel free to reply off-list. What I think I understand so far. Workstation Clients ??? Tier 1 - 1 ~ 4 processors on Intel 32bit hardware. Tier 2 -

Re: Point system has me very confused

2001-12-07 Thread Cook, Dwight E (SAIC)
The big thing behind the point system is that you buy a bunch of Tivoli points. Now, you have them all sucked up in TSM, TWS (workload scheduler) and software distribution. You now expand your data center but a dozen machines but you've used up all your points and you don't want to buy any more.

Re: TSM not seeing all of SAN drives

2001-12-07 Thread Kelly Lipp
Probably a privilege problem. Make sure that the account the scheduler service is running in has the same privs as the account you are using interactively. Kelly J. Lipp Storage Solutions Specialists, Inc. PO Box 51313 Colorado Springs, CO 80949 [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]