Regards
...OLE_Obj... indy Crawford
BoE Corporate IT
Tel: 031-3642185 Fax: 031-3642946
Cell: 083 632 5982
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WARNING:
Any unauthorised use or interception of this email is illegal. If this email
is not intended for you, you may not copy, distribute nor disclose the
SQL server 6.5
What parameters must I put into the Tivoli SQL 1.1 bat file so that the
logs get truncated
Thanks for your reply's.
But the proper atape and atldd drivers were installed of course.
Using the mtlib command showed the desired response.
After the manual libtype restore, the system operated like it used
to. This indicated that the drivers were functioning OK.
To be complete i
Not quite sure how to post a message to this list so I have just hit
reply on a post. Please advise me of the correct method.
A question on performing a restore.
How does one determine what tapes (volumes) are required when a restore
is initiated.
Thanx in advance.
Regards
Gary Swanton
If you have an onsite tapepool then the tapes should mount automatically.
Otherwise try 'q req' from the TSM server session.
Gary Swanton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
06-Feb-2002 08:47
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
I have very strange behaviour during backup of NetWare 5.1 servers. I have
got TSM server on NT - version 4.1.4. The client version is 4.2.1.0. I try
to backup 100 MB file from SYS: filesystem and everything goes fine (about
3-4 MB/s), if I have only SYS: filesystem mounted. When I mount
Hi
Has anyone out there experienced the following error :
ANRD asvol.c(2737): Volume RO0711 cannot be deleted to
SCRATCH - it still has SEGMENT references.
IF so could you please help
Thanking you in advance.
Sean Ramnarayan
MMS caltex.com made the following
annotations on
Thank you Alex,
I will follow this up.
For large scanning I use CA BrightStore/SRM. For smaller tests I use the Windows 2000
Explorer. There you can right click the header line and chose accessed. Then you
have the access dates in an own column. The source is not updated as far as I can see.
Hi,
I want to delete the invalid data inside the tapes of my storage pool. How
do i do it?
Is there a way to do it manually?
Thanks in advance,
Nazir
Hi all,
on Unix-Systems a running dsmcad-process is necessary to work with the
web-client.
On one of my systems (Solaris 5.7; TSM 3.7.2) I work with two
TSM-client-nodenames.
In the dsm.sys file i have two sections with different servername-entries
and different nodename-entries.
How can I
Thanx Tony,
If I kick off a restore from a client using the GUI, how
do I append the Preview to see the required volumes? Do I have to kick
off the restore from a command line?
Gary
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
I believe that is a known problem with a fix available.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Thida Chin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 3:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Anybody can help me on this?? Please help dbbackup does not
help to reduce log pct
I have noticed that when TSM starts backing up, that the processor(s) will max out on
my NetWare servers (both 5.1 SP3 and 4.11 SP9). Are there any setting that can reduce
the processor utilization? Maybe something in the DSM.OPT file? Some of these are even
dual processor and they still get
You can either set-up a server/node group via the server group option.
This will allow you to have a generic name for both Nodes i.e. (test) This
will allow you to query the 2 nodes at the same time via either the web
browser or dsmadmc:
Test: q actlog etc etc.
the other is to type the other
I meant that how do you know what tapes are required before the restore
has started? I am happy with 'q req' but you have to watching the
console for each requested volume to be asked for. I want to know what
volumes I will need when I want to carry out a restore - A Preview if
you will.
Gary
One thing I noticed in your post is that you are running the 4.2 client on a
Netware 4.11 server. It is my understanding that the 4.2.x client only runs
on Netware 4.2 up. This is from the readme:
Software Requirements
-
- Tivoli Storage Manager for NetWare
You have answered your own question
append preview=yes to your command (the format is different on platforms)
this will tell you what you need to know.
-Original Message-
From: Gary Swanton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 February 2002 11:37
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Do you have the latest TSAs installed and what kind of volume is the other
volume (traditional NetWare or NSS)? If it is a NSS volume, have you
performance tuned it? Novell handicapped NSS volumes to prevent any
degradation in speed to traditional NetWare volumes. Out of the box, storage
Hi everyone,
I would just like to pick every ones brains.
I have the following environment
Source Environment.
TSM 3.1 running on AIX 4.2.1
IBM 3494 Library with IBM3590 Drives.
Server NamesServer1, Server2, Server3, Server4, Server5
TSM 4.1
StorageTek L700 SCSI attached.
Fibre-attached
Hi
ADSM would not allow me to change the volume mode from offsite and
therefore when I try
to run an Audit of the volume is complains to info me that the volume
is in an offsite mode.
How do I fix this problem?
Thks
-Original Message-
From: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [mailto:[EMAIL
Ah! The re-occuring segment references message!
Do a AUDIT VOLUME RO0711 FIX=YES and it solved!
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Ramnarayan, Sean A [EDS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 11:44
To: [EMAIL
I'm presuming I wasn't the only one that got the spam for a ficticious
'project' from 'Tina'.
I'm kinda curious as to how many others received the same message because
they appeared to have great communication skills. (Translation: I
haven't read any of your postings, but it sounds flattering
Hi
Try maybe to do a checkin of this volume from offsite and then run the audit
process
:-)
Ouzen Robert
Helpdesk Manager
Computing Division
Haifa University
Israel
-Original Message-
From: Ramnarayan, Sean A [EDS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002
Arnaud,
Before I answer this question, I would have to know the bandwidth of your
data link between the two sites. The implementation would be different for
a slower link than a faster link.
Regardless, I've found that in every situation such as this, it is
beneficial to build two TSM server
Hi TSM-ers,
I've got a 3590 cartridge that gave me read errors so I couln't copy the
data to a
copy storage pool.
What do you do with such tapes?
Do you throw them away? Do initialize them? If yes how?
Kind regards
Thomas Rupp
Vorarlberger Illwerke AG
MAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TEL:
Hi Gurus !
I have a question concerning security : we currently have one TSM server
(H80 AIX server) connected to a 3584 library. As our library reaches
it's capacity limit, we plan to buy a new one, and possibly another
server, to build a double server and library solution. I'm looking for
an
One of the settings in the DSM.opt file is resourceutilization and
PROCESSORutilization. I have mine set to 1 and 5 respectively and
expeience about %50 load on my machines which are dual P-III 600's with
Netware 5.1.
Hope this helps.
Brandon Eckmann
Network and Technology Services
Wayne State
Hi Sean!
You really have to send us more information! Send us the output from the
following commands:
q vol RO0711 f=d
q libvol libname RO0711
q drmedia RO0711 f=d
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Ramnarayan, Sean A [EDS] [mailto:[EMAIL
I got it too
I bet it went out to almost everyone on the list.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Justin Derrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 7:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Who else got 'Job Spam'?
I'm presuming I wasn't the only one that got
Hi thomas,
I would advise you to do an audit vol x fix=yes to check if it is
ok, and eventually repair it. If not, you can still do a move data to
copy usable data on another tape, and therefore not loose precious
backup data. (the original tape will then return to scratch, if
originally
Hi
I have done a checkin of the volume successfully with a status
of private as ADSM would not allow me to make it a status of SCRATCH.
I have tried running an audit but ADSM informs that the volume is
offsite.
Thks
-Original Message-
From: Robert Ouzen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Throw 'em away. Data is more valuable than tape.
_
William Mansfield
Senior Consultant
Solution Technology, Inc
Rupp Thomas
(Illwerke) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thomas.rupp@ILLW
Just one perspective... How about linking the whole thing together with a
SAN, so that both TSM servers can see both libraries. You could then
create storage pool, TSM DB backups from each servers into the remote
library. The DR plan could be created in an NFS mounted volume on the
remote
Me too. Pretty tough to police an unmoderated list. Perhaps if Tina
gets enough negative feedback she'll think twice next time.
_
William Mansfield
Senior Consultant
Solution Technology, Inc
Justin Derrick
Well try the move drmedia to courier state and leave the volume offsite, if
you
want to reuse the physical tape, it would have to be relabled using the
overwrite option.
The only way to really clear the segment references is to apply the latest
level of
the server or audit your db which could be
Hi
I have tried the move drmedia command but ADSM would not allow myself
to change the status.
Thks
-Original Message-
From: Malbrough, Demetrius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 3:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cart Error Message
You may have
Hi Bill,
And thanks for the info ! In fact our two sites are relatively close
(one street between them), and I believe we could relatively easily have
a pretty large pipe between them, let's say fiber channel !
But if you have enough time to describe two solutions (huge bandwith,
and small),
Can this also be done with archives ?
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Cassimatis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DB Backups to specific tapes
Just list the volumes in the database backup command:
backup db
Look for adsmpipe at ftp://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/SG244335/. It's
an old, unsupported utility that allows this.
_
William Mansfield
Senior Consultant
Solution Technology, Inc
630 718 4238
Justin Bleistein
Hi again
Did you try just to update vol r0711 access=readw and or whereaccess=readw
. Type help upd vol for correct syntax.
Regards Robert Ouzen
-Original Message-
From: Ramnarayan, Sean A [EDS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:25 PM
To: [EMAIL
Hi all,
On a Windows workstation or server if you start the GUI you can tell if your
include exclude list is set up properly, little red x's on files that are
excluded. Does this hold true for Unix as well?
Geoff Gill
TSM Administrator
NT Systems Support Engineer
SAIC
E-Mail:mailto:[EMAIL
Hi all,
Has anyone seen something like this?
wau026:/home/root ps -ef|grep dsm
root 5364 1 0 Feb 1 ?1120:55 ./dsmserv -quiet
root 6597 0 0 09:40:55 ? 0:00 ./dsmserv -quiet
www 6714 6713 0 09:41:58 ? 0:00 dsmadmc -server=localsrv
-id=admin
Hi Nick,
yes, if you omit the scratch= parameter (default is YES) on the command
line TSM will use scratch tapes (if available).
But in contrast to the TSM documentation which says that tapes that were
acquired as private volumes will return to this state after being deleted
from the volume
Sean,
What error is message is generated when you try to do this? What commands
are you issuing? Can you show an output of q vol or q drmedia ?
All of these things would be very helpful in trying to assist you.
Thanks,
Jon M
-Original Message-
From: Ramnarayan, Sean A [EDS]
but, from what I have read on the Tivoli web site, you can only get
NDMP support if your tsm SERVER is on Windows, and if your tape drives are
direct attached to the NAS device, which means you have to be SAN.
Am I reading that correctly, or am I missing something here?
-Original
I'm running the 4.1.2 client on AIX 4.3.3
Instead of a red X, what I get is different colors for the file names.
The eligible filenames show up in white letters, the exluded file names show
up in red letters.
-Original Message-
From: Gill, Geoffrey L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
This is a generic error message that doesn't tell you anything but the
obvious, that something killed the session.
Can be caused by a network error, or a timeout, or a client problem.
Look at the TSM server log.
Match up the timestamps and find the matching error message on the server
end.
That
I believe everyone go a copy.
Gene Greenberg
Lead System Adm/DBA
Round Rock ISD
|+---
|| Bill Mansfield |
|| WMansfield@SOLUTIONTECHN|
|| OLOGY.COM |
||
My understanding is that NDMP support will be added to the AIX
server in TSM version 5. Don't know if that version changes the
requirements of direct-attached.
Why Tivoli chose to start with the Windows platform for an
enterprise-level protocol like NDMP is still beyond me. We are
eagerly
If you have a copy storage pool you should try to get the data back from the
copy storage pool to the primary pool. If this is a copy storage pool
volume just delete it and run a new backup stg command from the primary to
the copy pool and it will resync.
Let's see what everyone says.
Hi Geoff
Yes, we have client running on Solaris, and that is how I check the correct
includes and excludes.
Thanks
Farren Minns
Trainee Solaris System Admin
TSM ADMINISTRATOR
Gill, Geoffrey L. [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 06/02/2002
14:41:34
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor
Yes, I do.
Now system is up and running but still do not understand why sometimes
backup database help to reduce pct log but sometimes not.
The log mode is rollforward and versions of TSM is 4200
-Original Message-
From: Gill, Geoffrey L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday,
When a long-running transaction starts, it can pin data in the log.
Then even a DBBACKUP cannot clear the log until that long-running
transaction completes.
Look in your server activity log and see what OTHER activity is going on at
the time your DB backup runs. Look for:
- EXPIRATION
-
Call the vendor and get a replacement tape.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Mansfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 3590 Cartridge with Write Errors
Throw 'em away. Data is more valuable than tape.
Thida,
That is a known problem with a known fix. I see it in the
readme.txt at the ftp site.
IC30181 ROLLFORWARD RECOVER LOG PERCENT UTIL DOES NOT DROP AFTER A DATA
SYSROUTES:
IC30181 5698TSMAX R410 R420 IC31968 5698TSMHP R410 R420
IC31969 5698TSMSU R410 R420 IC31970 5698TSMNT
There is a bug in 4.2.0 (APAR IC30181) - if you do a query log after a full
db backup, it will not show the utilization reset. After a while it will
show it as being reset. According to Tivoli this is just a reporting
issure, the log is really being reset. If you issue a COMMIT command you
Hi Dean!
Do a MOVE DRMEDIA RO0711 TOSTATE=ONSITERETRIEVE
This will make the volume available so you can preform the audit.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Ramnarayan, Sean A [EDS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06,
This is interesting.
Someone else reported this to the list on Jan. 16 of this year, in reference
to Type=ACS libraries. (STK libraries run via ACSLS). I have included the
post below, because I saved it.
He said also that ACS librares are no longer supported for DB restore, he
had to define
Wanda,
Funny, isn't it? During an evening at home last week I was reading about
this (yeah, I know, get a life). And then when you do this you have a hell
of a time restoring a single file! This is a DR backup, not a file backup.
Therefore, how useful is it? IMHO, obviously.
Kelly J. Lipp
Yeah, it's sure not what I had in mindlet us hope this is just the
first-release-blues, and the next release will be more TSM-like.
-Original Message-
From: Kelly Lipp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 11:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Network
Oh my god. Toxic, hazardous waste.
James, Doug [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 02/06/2002 09:32:22
AM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Disposal of bad tapes
We
Interesting, but not new. I ran into it moving a V3R7.4 server. The
support person's recommendation was that I not loose my special DEVC file
that I used to create the manual library needed to do the restore, just in
case I had to do it again, whatever that might have meant.
At 11:11 AM
Help, how do I get off of this mailing list??
I always throught that Tivoli said the tape(s) could not be read by anyone
without a viable DB tape.
Is this right or wrong?
Ken Sedlacek
AIX/TSM/UNIX Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IBM Certified Specialist: RS/6000 AIX v4.3 Support; RS/6000 SP PSSP 3
Tivoli Certified Consultant - Tivoli
We use 9840 cartridges manufactured by Imation, similar to IBM 3590 tapes.
For our company, Imation will replace the cartridges that are defective as a
result of Imation processing; on average, this was true for half of the
cartridges that failed. The only sticking point is that we must send the
Never is a long time. TSM writes bitfiles on tapes. To the extent these
files are clear text, they could be read. One would have to write code to
do it, but it can be done. To easily read the tapes you need the db.
Is this a huge concern? If it is, degauss the tapes when you are finished
And here I've been letting my kid play with the things.
_
William Mansfield
Senior Consultant
Solution Technology, Inc
Liudyte Baker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OM
Hi,
I want to delete the invalid data inside the tapes of my storage pool. How
do i do it?
Is there a way to do it manually by command line?
Thanks in advance.
I don't have access to these here so I'm asking again for feedback. We have
a lot of True64 clients and the guy who administers them says you CAN'T tell
what's excluded when you use the GUI. Seems awful odd to me but then I don't
have access so I can't argue with it. Anyone running True64 that
I don't have a True64 client to test, but FYI I have had weird results in
the past with the AIX gui if you don't have enough colors available for
your session. It's an X thing ...you would have to ask a UNIX heavy for
more info about how X works, I've never understood it (and hope I never have
This is a primary storage pool tape (all of our TDP for SAP R/3 backups go
directly to tape). The backup was successful but making a copy to the
copy storage pool resulted in a read error.
I moved all other data to a different tape volume, deleted the faulty tape
and discarded the remaining data.
We just had a problem with Netware 5.1 with SP3.
We have an RS6000 running AIX 4.3.3 TSM Server code 3.7.4 soon to be 4.2
Our Netware clients are all on client code 4.1.2
Under SP2 this was no problem. But when we upgraded Novell Servers to SP3.
The schedule, won't run correctly.
What was
The TSM Admin Guide says that the SET AUTHENTICATION option, as used in the
server option file, is used to
specify whether admins and client nodes need a password to access the
server... the value is set to ON at install.
I and one other person are the only admins. The servers typically back up
I have only one Netware client and little experience setting up options.
That boxes option file uses the NWUSER option as follows:
NWUSERCN=ADSM_LONESTAR.OU=SAT-LONESTAR.O=AFC:password
I noted in the 4.1 NW client guide that there is another option that might
be used called:
Started a thread last week regarding a problem we were having with an NT4
client not completing in a timely fashion if we contacted it via the TSM
Scheduler service. Got lots of ideas from the list on things to check but
have not been able to nail this down yet.
Surprise...Surprise - We now see
These 2 options should be used in common
Using TDP for MS SQL v2.2.0.0
Running SQL server v7 on NT4
Need to restore a database intranet into another database restore.
Found the APAR= IC23902 :
Existing DB is d:\mssql\data\intranet_data.mdf
Created new database called restore file D:\mssql\backup\intranet_data.mdf
Set new
One additional note on disposal: the tapes
contain chromium, a carcinogenic heavy metal that must be disposed of as
hazardous waste in the United States.
I just took a look at the storage products section of IBM's Web site. This
includes softcopy of G225-6759-02, a brochure on 3590 media.
We just started using a couple of SDLT drives, and have had 4 bad tapes out of our
first pack of 10 (still have a couple that haven't been written to yet)
This occurs on two separate drives, one running NT the other running 2000.
All the failed tape are close in serial numbers and from the same
Good morning,
Since we upgraded our 3590B's to 3590E's, whenever all the drives in the library
are full, we get these errors, under ADSM 3.1, AIX:
02/06/2002 11:13:43 ANR8447E No drives are currently available in library MAGSTOR1.
This causes restore/retrieves to fail, rather than queue,
George,
If you use the nwpwfile yes option in conjuntion with password generate then
there is no need for the nwuser option. Obviously, the user ID needs admin
priviledges.
George Lesho wrote:
I have only one Netware client and little experience setting up options.
That boxes option file
Marc,
Are you saying that upgrading the nlms cleared up the problems?
I've always found it's a good idea to have the latest tsa5 patches.
Marc David wrote:
We just had a problem with Netware 5.1 with SP3.
We have an RS6000 running AIX 4.3.3 TSM Server code 3.7.4 soon to be 4.2
Our
Make certain that you get all the way out of SQL Enterprise Administrator.
If you have any reference to the database from having edited it from the SQL
Enterprise GUI, you will continue to get this error.
Bill Smoldt
STORServer, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Tried that now I get the following error:
02/06/2002 14:04:08 [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]The file
'd:\MSSQL7\backup\Intranet_Data.MDF' cannot be used by RESTORE. Consider
using the WITH MOVE option to identify a valid location for the file.
02/06/2002 14:04:08 [Microsoft][ODBC
Jim,
Yes, your right the latest nlms should be applied. An did work. But one of
the TSA500's we used
was a beta version and hung the Novell server as soon as we loaded it. So
be careful.
I have the link to Novell's latest TSA500.NLM . If anyone needs it.
Mike,
I found the same issue. It can be reproduced on ADSM version 3 and
4.1. I do not think it is limited to 3590E drives though. Tivoli people,
have you found a solution to this problem yet?
Jeff Bach
-Original Message-
From: Mike Crawford [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I've some TSM 4.2.1 nodes to move from one storage pool to another.
I've created a new Policy Domain with a new Storage Pool and I've moved one
node from a PD to the new one, but the data remains on the old storage pool.
There is a way to move only selected filesystem from one STG to another?
Great. Now I feel left out. sniffle
-Original Message-
From: Gene Greenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 7:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Who else got 'Job Spam'?
I believe everyone go a copy.
Gene Greenberg
Lead System Adm/DBA
Round Rock
Initially I felt left out but I received a copy later...have time you will
probably get yours too. She is great for the ego though
-Original Message-
From: Alex Paschal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 2:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Who else got
Due to other issues I deleted all of my lto drives and library and am
redefining them. I am following through multiple redbooks and manuals that
say
def library ltolib libt=scsi device=/dev/smc1
and then for the drive
def drive ltolib ltormt17 device=/dev/rmt17 element=257
but when I do a q dr
Not just you, Alex. I didn't get it either. And I really want to know what
all the hype is about! Anybody care to send it to me directly?
Thank You,
Hana Taha
Systems Analyst
Parker Drilling
1401 Enclave Suite 600
Houston, Texas 77077
281-406-2486
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
I don't recall Tivoli saying it that way.
Of course, the data can be read. It's just 1's and 0's. The problem lies
in making any sense out of the data that you read. You can, in fact see
data on the tape and sometimes get information off the data tapes without a
DB tape. Text files will come
Not in this version.
Bill Smoldt
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Marco Bianchi
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 12:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Moving filespaces between Storage Pools
I've some TSM 4.2.1 nodes to move
Becky,
Did you define your device class properly
def devclass LTO_TAPE devtype=LTO format=. library=ltolib
Regards,
Mike DeMuse
DeMuse Consulting Inc.
(651) 686-5015
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Davidson, Becky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I have 2 Windows domains: domainA(win2k), domainB(NT4). My TSM
Servers(2) are RS/6000's running TSM 4.1.4.1, and AIX 4.3.3. Currently,
I have only been backing up clients within domainA. I have been posed
with the question, can I backup clients within domainB and provide
security for the data
I felt good for about 10 seconds until I looked at the vague,
non-committal, brown-nosed wording. Sorry to burst your collective bubbles.
I'm going to be giving 'Tina'* a call tomorrow and let her know what I
think of her spam. I suggest the rest of you who received her message to
call and
You may leave the list at any time by sending a SIGNOFF ADSM-L
command
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
George Cardoza wrote:
Help, how do I get off of this mailing list??
Read up on 'reclamation' which is controlled by a storage pool option. If
you are running the most current TSM server version, check the 'move data'
command options.
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Nazir wrote:
Hi,
I want to delete the invalid data inside the tapes of my storage pool. How
do i do it?
According to Tivoli, this should be available with version 5.1.
Andrea Mac Murray
-Original Message-
From: Bill Smoldt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 2:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Moving filespaces between Storage Pools
Not in this version.
A second hand warm-fuzzy is better than the no-warm-fuzzies we
consistently get from management, is that it? Grin
-Original Message-
From: Taha, Hana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 12:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Who else got 'Job Spam'?
Not
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
