Hi all,
W2K server, SP2, TSM client 4.2.1.20
TSM client scheduler crashes at various times during backup due to unknown
reasons, sometimes after 20 minutes, sometimes after 10 hours.
There is last part of dsmsched.log:
08-04-2002 20:23:54 Normal File-- 344
Hi,
we have a server running sun solaris 8 behind a firewall.
Therefore TSM Schedmode is configured for polling (polling intervall 1 h).
DSMCAD is started and configured to start the scheduler.
Something strange happens:
on the console is now a timer counting down every hour and updating every
The switch on which our TSM server (AIX, TSM 4.1.3.0) refreshes his mac
tabel every now and then. The back-up client (mostly NT/Win2000, TSM 4.1.x
and 4.2.x) will sends its data, but the switch doesn't know were to put it.
So it sends it to all its port and the switch will overfloat. Is there
Hi Andy!
As far as I know, only MSMail uses a mspst.ini. It's not used by Outlook,
but please correct me if I'm wrong!
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Raibeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 19:44
To: [EMAIL
Hello TSMers
I wonder if you can help with this one.
TSM server 3.7.3.8 running on Solaris 2.7 box.
TSM client 4.1.0.0 running on windows NT.
The problem occurred a week or so back when the clocks went forward one
hour. We have 28 assorted clients running Windows NT, OS/2 and Solaris and
all
Hi Farren!
This is caused by a bug (APAR IC28544) and was fixed in 4.1.2.0 and higher.
I'm very sorry to say this, but you could have prevented this! People were
warned for this bug by Tivoli through this list and through their webpage
over and over again!
Also, you should NEVER use a base level
can we expect something new in TDP Oracle. a GUI would be nice :)
Kvedja/Regards
Petur Eythorsson
Taeknimadur/Technician
IBM Certified Specialist - AIX
Tivoli Storage Manager Certified Professional
Microsoft Certified System Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nyherji Hf Simi TEL:
Hi all,
does somebody know what the meaning is of the lastsession duration in the
nodes table ?
If the unit is in sec. than the listed client spent 4 days for its last
session, but according to the actlog it spent 3 hours - How do I have to
interpret this value correctly ?
Thank You
Hi,
this kind of pb are due to communications.
If you use the ethernet protocol. You should chechk If
adapter is 100 full duplex and the switch port is 10
full duplex.
--- Toma9_Hrouda [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribis: Hi all,
W2K server, SP2, TSM client 4.2.1.20
TSM client scheduler crashes
Becky,
yes, it does. Data that are backed up either by brbackup or brachive are
stored as archive objects in TSM database
and they are deleted when eligible, thus freeing up the tapes.
I don't know of any issues during disaster recovery, when using TDP
versioning. The only thing that you should
You will not have any issues with DR if you use the same nodename and same
initSID.utl
file when connecting with the DR machine.
Saludos / Regards
Arshad Munir Sharif
-Original Message-
From: Martin Trcka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tue, April 09, 2002 1:55 PM
To: [EMAIL
Hi,
this kind of pb are due to communications.
If you use the ethernet protocol.
--- Toma9_Hrouda [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribis: Hi all,
W2K server, SP2, TSM client 4.2.1.20
TSM client scheduler crashes at various times during
backup due to unknown
reasons, sometimes after 20 minutes,
Hello
I think it is 256 characters
/Niklas
-Original Message-
From: J. Glauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: den 9 april 2002 14:29
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: File length too long
Hi,
Can someone tell me the maximum file length for that ?
04/09/2002 12:30:43
ANE4018E
Hi,
Can someone tell me the maximum file length for that ?
04/09/2002 12:30:43
ANE4018E (Session: 2011, Node: SPRINZ_PC) Error
processing '\\lt18\c$\Documents\Teaching_University\Inte-
rnational Environmental Policy\Sem Advanced IEnvPol\Sem
Climate
My preferred method of providing a safe .pst backup is to put the make the
user responsible. Microsoft provides an Outlook backup utility that makes
this practical because it reminds the user every x days (where x is a user
setting) that they need to do a backup while exiting Outlook.
The
You should upgrade to 4.x serious to support Unicode that has
no such problems.
Regards,
Burak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09.04.2002 15:08
Please respond to ADSM-L
Hi All,
I have a question about the backup dates. I've seen the following behaviour which I
can't explain:
When I make a manual backup of a client, the dat on the filespace gets set. When the
next day a backup is made through a schedule, the filespace date doesn't get updated.
Has anyone seen
Hi all,
I've the same problem present in the archive list, but, can expand the limit of 256
characters to the parameter file name too long ?
---
Regards,
Elenara Geraldo
Analyst Support
MML Systems
Phone: 55 41-342-7864
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See Dave Matthews Band live or win a signed
We saw the same output to screen, you can get around this two ways. One, use
the nohup command as follows:
nohup dsmc sched 2 /dev/null (a nohup output file will be created in
your current location)
or to get away from having nohup output files everywhere, use your existing
method through a
Hi,
Verify the status/scheduler it's finished with sucess.
With the command below:
q even * *
Maybe, appear an error.
---
Regards,
Elenara Geraldo
Analyst Support
MML Systems
Phone: 55 41-342-7864
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002 15:28:37
Denzel, Richard van wrote:
Hi All,
I
It would help to have additional detail about your problem, including (but
not necessarily limited to):
- Operating system name and version of the client
- TSM client and server version
- Complete definition of schedule (Q SCH domain schedname F=D)
- Output from Q FI nodename F=D
- Parts of
The IBM announcement has more details on TSM v5.1
http://www1.ibmlink.ibm.com/cgi-bin/master?xh=Ncc35aWBhPP7Dz1USenGnN9332req
uest=announcementsparms=H+202%2d078xfr=N
Steve Hnath
Code Relief LLC
Makers of AutoVAULT
I tried it a while back, couldn't get it to work, either.
-Original Message-
From: Rushforth, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 5:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mailbox.pst
I think this may have worked with the old Exchange client (not Outlook). I
What is the randomization time u set .Need to look into that I think. What
%age?
Balanand
-Original Message-
From: Denzel, Richard van [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 9:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Date question
No, the schedules are started at the
Thanks Steve that was a good link. Thanks again.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Hnath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 9:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM 5.1 Availability
The IBM announcement has more details on TSM v5.1
Someone posted these differences few weeks back after meeting with IBM
Group.
Should be in archives.
-Original Message-
From: Gerald Wichmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 5:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM 5.1 Differences?
Has Tivoli/IBM released any
I am new to this list, but wanted some insight into a problem I've having. I'm also
very very new to ADSMlearning as I go. It got threw into my lapthe boss
said...here, learn this!. :o)
I am no longer getting tapes to expire from the Vault. Bear with me here. The
Andrew,
My schedule is running again at 18:00 (GMT+1), I will let you know tomorrow.
Richard.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Raibeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 4:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Date question
It would help to have additional
No use. 4.x client has this problem also.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Burak Demircan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Verzonden: dinsdag 9 april 2002 14:16
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Re: File length too long
You should upgrade to 4.x serious to support Unicode that has
no such
send us the output from this command
q stg COPY_DBDAILY_POOL F=D POoltype=copy
Kvedja/Regards
Petur Eythorsson
Taeknimadur/Technician
IBM Certified Specialist - AIX
Tivoli Storage Manager Certified Professional
Microsoft Certified System Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nyherji Hf
Can't you provide the info from last night's backup?
The only reason that I can think of (off-hand) that would explain what you
are seeing is if your schedule definition has an OBJECTS setting for
specific files and/or directories. In such a case, the backup is not
considered to be for the
Dave,
Check the re-use delay parameter on the copy group first and then
check to see if these tapes are actually empty.
You can manually expire them by deleting the data.
Dave JACKSON [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 04/09/2002
10:31:51 AM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Can someone explain this charge unit thing? I am hoping that the
$2800 odd for a client charge unit is for more than one client,
because if not, my 500 nodes would cost me $1,400,000 odd. Thanks for
any info.
Andy Carlson|\ _,,,---,,_
Senior Technical
I also have a problem with filespaces backuped over a fileshare. (Netapp
Filer)
The last backup completed date isn't renewed.
Tivoli says it will be corrected in a later release.
We use TSM 4.2.1.20.
Regards Stefan Holzwarth
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Denzel, Richard van
Are you running the EXPIRE INVENTORY process or using EXPINTERVAL? That is
the first place I would look, although it sounds like there may be more to
it if volumes have been in the vault for years (that should have come back
by now).
Mark Roberts
www.servergraph.com
Office: +512-693-9250
attached is the output of the query.
thanks. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/09/02 11:02AM
send us the output from this commandq stg
COPY_DBDAILY_POOL F=D POoltype=copyKvedja/RegardsPetur
EythorssonTaeknimadur/TechnicianIBM Certified Specialist - AIXTivoli
Storage Manager Certified
You can avoid this behavior by setting environmental variable DSM_LOG (f.e.
in user's profile for particular users, or in system wide profiles like
/etc/environment) pointing to the directory where your (let's say main)
dsmerror.log resides..
Best regards,
Martin Trcka
-Original
It shouldn't. Which 4.x client are you using?
For 4.1, you need to be sure that USEUNICODEFILENAMES NO is in effect. For
4.2 (be sure to use 4.2.1.20 or higher), you shouldn't be seeing the
problem.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
I have an STK9710 library (running as SCSI) on an AIX TSM server at 4.1.3.
The AUDIT LIBRARY either runs in 60 seconds, or sits and doesn't run at all,
as you describe.
The doc for AUDIT LIBRARY says it will prevent other library operations for
completing while it runs, but I have found that
You have to reset the reclamation threshold periodically to something like
50%. That will set the reclamation process going. When all the vaulted
tapes that are less than half full have been reset to empty, put the
threshold back to 100%. Do this on a regular schedule that fits into your
Size of database has nothing to do with Audit Library. Audit depends
on the library and how many tapes/slots are in it. Id you use the
checklabel=barcode option it will only take about a minute or
less in some cases. If you don't use that option, then it actually
mounts EVERY tape in library
Dave,
The volumes in this pool must still have valid data on them. Do you
still have valid data on tapes in the associated primary tape pool?
Maybe you coul consolidate the tape using reclamation?
Dave JACKSON [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 04/09/2002
11:22:24 AM
Please respond to
Hello again TSMers
I am currently in the process of preparing a capacity planning document for
our TSM set-up so that I can at least try to estimate when our Server will
become pushed to its limits.
I was wondering who else has done this recently and if there are any good
sources of inf. on the
I have seen the same thing. Even if a tape is loaded in a drive the audit
will sit there and do nothing. I came across it once when a DLT tape drive
had a broken leader and a tape loaded.
-Original Message-
From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002
We use a 3494 library so there's no need for the checklabel option. There
are four frames with this library...no processes are running yet nothing
appears to be happening on the audit library front?
David Longo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
if you are backing up clients you should not worry the price is 1/3 of the
orginal price for desktop clients. from what i understand.
Kvedja/Regards
Petur Eythorsson
Taeknimadur/Technician
IBM Certified Specialist - AIX
Tivoli Storage Manager Certified Professional
Microsoft Certified System
The audit library function needs to have most all the processes quiet. In
addition, if you let it slap the tapes into drives to read the labels, it
may never finish... I have NEVER gotten that little feature to work (3.7.2
or 4.1.4.5). I do audits using the barcode reader as in: audit library
Please would you mind taking my email out of this mailing-list.
I no longer use it.
Thanks in advance.
Amrhar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don't take this as 'true', it is just a quick guideline to start
doing a sizing
of a library and server. There are more things you need to
consider,
like network bandwidth availability, size of clients (both in files
and gig),
backup windows, special situations or
Hi!
Here are some tips that I received this week from a StorageTek Engineer.
The final recommendation for server size that he made was the same that the
Tivoli Engineer had provided without having to go through the entire
exercise of tracking all servers, their disk size requirements, databases,
$%%^^!!!#!
Anybody found what they have done with the Fixes Downloads page?!?
-Original Message-
From: Rushforth, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 11:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM 5.1 Availability
Do we now call it ITSM?!
See
This?
http://www.tivoli.com/support/downloads/
-Original Message-
From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 2:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM 5.1 Availability
$%%^^!!!#!
Anybody found what they have done with the Fixes Downloads
Wanda,
try this
http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/adsercli.htm
Prather, Wanda wrote:
$%%^^!!!#!
Anybody found what they have done with the Fixes Downloads page?!?
-Original Message-
From: Rushforth, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 11:24 AM
Thanks, found it from there.
It was the downloads and fixes page I was looking for, the link is not on
the ITSM home page anymore.
http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/adsercli.htm
-Original Message-
From: Jolliff, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 3:20
The links are still there as well - go to http://www.tivoli.com/tsm then,
under More Resources click on storage, then scroll down to the Product
Resources box and click on downloads.
Joerg Pohlmann
604-535-0452
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL
Can I take a poll of what people are using for:
versions data exists
versions data deleted
retain extra versions
retain only version
Thanks in advance!
Marc Levitan
Storage Manager
PFPC Global Fund Services
Thanks Eric,
Your suggestion was right on the money!!! Who would of known that something
that was shipped with Tivoli would not give the results I expected. :)
Thanks again,
Mark B.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Gruber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 10:04 AM
Depends on what we're after. Most common ones seemed to be:
Nolimit,nolimit,7,7 - when admin wants to retain a week
Nolimit,nolimit,30,30 - when admin wants to retain a month
2,2,nolimit,nolimit - when admin always wants access to last 2 copies
Gerald Wichmann
650-625-0436
-Original
Mine env:
versions data exists 30
versions data deleted 1
retain extra versions 30
retain only version60
Jason Liang
- Original Message -
From: Marc Levitan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 4:05 PM
Subject: retention policies
Doing a Migrate Install from 3.7 to 4.2.11. Do anyone have any notes on
doing this? Any hang ups that they ran into?
Anyone have issues with the following:
Schedules
Tuning
New features that might be on by default
How much configuration do we lose
Lisenceing
Yes, PENDING means they are effectively empty, but you keep database dumps
for 14 days, and until the last of the dumps
'expires' that references these tapes as having data on it expires, the
tapes are not reusable. They will become reusable automatically when the 14
day timer expires.
What OS?
I just did some 3.7.4 to 4.2.x for AIX.
It's pretty straightforward for the server code itself, but watch out for
changes in the startup scripts if you use an externally managed library.
-Original Message-
From: Craig Simpson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April
Hi, does any one know how to fix the error code: ANR0104E
04/09/02 16:18:06 ANR0802I Delete Filespace * (backup/archive data)
for node
ATMDEV01 started.
04/09/02 16:18:06 ANR0104E imfsdel.c(1425): Error 2 deleting row
from table
Expiring.Objects.
I saved off all config files, the accounting log and a bunch of other
things. I backed up the db and was ready for the worst. I needed nothing...
it was very straightforward. The licesnse files need to be installed
properly. I would highly recommend latest ATAPE driver and that is about
it. I
After the Atape driver (i have to do atape and atldd) did you have to
re-invenory the Librairy after removing and updating the drives?
Craig
--
Craig Simpson
Integrated Storage Management Services
Phone: 303-924-2406
Pager: 800-946-4646 x1109089
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On AIX 4.3.3. Any notes you have would be great. We are running an IBM 3494
Librairy with 3590 drivers.
Craig
--
Craig Simpson
Jolliff, Dale
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM:
Ich werde ab 10.04.2002 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am
19.04.2002.
Ich werde Ihre Nachricht nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten.
Wenn Sie vorher Informationen benötigen, wenden Sie sich bitte
für TSM an Herrn Schmill und
für Web an Frau Krahn.
This will depend on the what level your TSM server is at. We're running TSM
fixtest level 4.2.1.9 on z/OS 1.2. We have to wait on fixtest level
4.2.1.10 or PTF level 4.2.2, according to the feedback I got from IBM.
-Original Message-
From: Fc-Atm-Rck, Tivoli (UNKNOWN) [mailto:[EMAIL
Looks like an internal error in the TSM module that does database updates
for expiration.
Sounds like it is time to call suport on this one.
-Original Message-
From: Fc-Atm-Rck, Tivoli (UNKNOWN) [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 4:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One of my users lost 6 months of work because the adsm backups
(version 3) was not working correctly on his linux redhat 7.1
system but not giving any errors. Since that happened, I
have discovered at least 3 other systems, configured exactly
the same way, that are not working correctly.
What I
George,
I have NEVER gotten that little feature to work (3.7.2 or 4.1.4.5)
Then you might have something wrong with your TSM system.
Like most *SM users, most of the time I use the checkl=bar switch, but on
occasion, I've needed to check the actual tapes, so I used checkl=yes.
In EVERY CASE it
Patricia,
I am not familiar with the problem, but there is an APAR for the 4.2
client, IC31314, that may apply. Here is the description from the APAR
text:
Files may be expired because an OS automounter unmounts a
filesystem before TSM has processed it.
Ours is various, whatever the business requires related to the data.
-Original Message-
From: Marc Levitan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 4:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: retention policies
Can I take a poll of what people are using for:
versions data
Hi Experts,
Has anyone seen in server to server configuration, I get this when backing
primary storage pool
to copy storage pool on remote server.
ANR1181E astxn.c370: Data storage transaction 0:11998767 was aborted
Saludos / Regards
Arshad Munir Sharif
I would like to find the first customer out there with 20 clients (80+GB
servers) that does not lose a full backup at least once a week and exceeds
the backup window time and has no backup of that server. Or similarly on
the incremental that is not restartable.
TSM does checkpointing and
Hello felloe ADSM/TSM'rs,
We are trying DELETE FILESPACES belong to a NODE so that we can REMOVE the
NODE.
Until this last delete /filespace everything went as planned. Now we get
ANR0984I Process started etc then
ANR0800I DELETE FILESPACE: /filespace for node NODE nodename
Arshad,
You have not given additional messages that preceded ANR1181E message.
Please write those messages also. This may give some clue on what might
have happened.
Regards,
Mahesh Prasad
DCM Data Systems Limited
New Delhi, India
Sharif,
Munir
Hot Diggety! Stephen Pole was rumored to have written:
Hello felloe ADSM/TSM'rs,
We are trying DELETE FILESPACES belong to a NODE so that we can REMOVE the
NODE.
One way to delete filespaces indiscriminately if you're just going
to remove the whole node, is to do:
DELETE FILESPACES nodename
78 matches
Mail list logo
