I desperately need firmware level 16EO which cannot be
downloaded from the IBM Website anymore. IBM upgraded one
of my client's drives (4 of them) to level 22UD. I now get
I/O errors after a tape gets mounted.
Any help will be greatly appretiated.
Thanks in advance.
Jacques Butcher
Pre-Sales
I have these files if you want to send it, write you email address ...
it's about 3MB ...
Tom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Jacques Butcher
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 6:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Hi,
We have been using UDB5 backing up online to ADSM 3.1 for the last couple of
years on AIX ... unfortuantly we've just upgraded to TSM 4.2 and UDB 7.2 and
now ir does work (PMR with IBM/Tivoli I type...) ...
so YMMV
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Wöhrle [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi TSM-friends,
we use in our environment TSM-Server 4.1, TSM-Client-api 4.2.1 and
TivoliDataProtectAgent for Informix 4.1.3 !
The backup of our Informix-9.30-databases and logical logs are working
properly. But we have a problem in deleting the TSM-backup-objects. We
use the Informix-utility
My client has a Service Level Agreement with his
customers that assures them of a minimum of one full
(selective) backup of their workstations per year.
There are currently in excess of 1500 workstations and
300 servers that are TSM clients. It is a simple
matter to identify the workstations and
Hi,
How can I determine expired volumes to check-in or private volumes that has no
data in
them? I ask this because I sometimes can not follow-up expired volumes so I can
not easily
find which ones were expired and should be check-ed in to my library. This also
includes
check-ed in
Douglas,
TDS is not so bad but we recommend it for customers having a bunch of
Tivoli products. This is where the product is targeted.
For TSM only reporting try to look at Servergraph/TSM
(www.servergraph.com). It is TSM dedicated tool, less expensive and easier
to install/maintain. Look
Is there a way to archive Domino DBs through the TDP?
Etienne,
TDP for Domino does not support archive.
There are probably a number of different ways to do this.
Some of the customers I have talked to set up a
second NODENAME (like DOMSERV99.MONTHLY) and
run a full selective backup using that
We've done that, we've been having authority type problems as with 3.1 we
were using a seperate user to run the backups and under 4.x its not letting
this user talk over the api ... we've (almost) got it fiex using root now...
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Brenda Collins [mailto:[EMAIL
Any idea why I do not see the two databases I wish to delete on the
client's
TDP GUI ? The databases do show up under a q occupancy on the TSM
server.
Maria,
The main thing to check for is...
Is your copygroup set as Version Data Deleted set to 0 (zero)?
That is, is VERDELETED set to 0?
Use
I believe this is because the directory structure of TSM changed between
versions 3.1 3.7 so you will have to reconfigure the db2 client.
Brenda
HEMPSTEAD, Tim
Due to low bandwidth to a location we think of buying TDP for
Domino (for e-mail)
We have 10 GB total NFS size on the server and every NSF
is just e-mail database.
How should I expect transferred data after TDP comes?
Now 10 GB transferred every night which
kills all other applications
What errors do you experience? Is there any pattern?
We are implementing right now TSM with 3583 for a customer and are
upgrading drives from 18N2 (known bad for TSM) to 22UD. Several people on
the list wrote 22U0 works fine but now 22UD is on the site. On the first
tests it run fine but we are
Michael,
That's why I wrote I am aware of. I have not very close look at PC
servers market - it is moving very fast. So I am asking detailed
specifications on demand.
Will have a look at this ones you point to. I was not precise - in the
past they were secondary, now are primary but small. If we
Hi *SMer !
I can say that 22UD works fine for me on a 3583, I experienced no problems
so far :)
Greetings
Sascha
- Original Message -
From: Zlatko Krastev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: 16EO Firmware for IBM Ultrium Needed
Here are three others that I know of... Servergraph/TSM, CA/Vantage and
StorServer Manager.
We are testing out Servergraph/TSM and we are happy with this one. Most
places will give you 30 days trial.
Dave Pearson
-Original Message-
From: Douglas Currell [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Hi,
After changing an option on dsm.opt I used to restart my scheduler service and
everything
could work. What should I do if I use client acceptor and it starts the
scheduler.
Regards,
Burak
My new TSM server 4.2.1.10 on AIX 4.3.3 ML09 is setup for Shared Memory
communications. I was getting some shared memory errors in actlog.
Changed AIX Max number of processes per user to 1024. Errors
greatly reduced but still getting some. What is the value for MAXUPROC
that is used by most?
Rajesh,
I have performed an unload/reload of our AIX TSM server, and recieved the
following results:
Reduced database utilization by - 21.2%
Reduced used database pages by - 3,114,592
Maximum database reduction increased by - 22,044mb
Our TSM production database is 60gb in size. It took
Interesting, ours went up by 25%, but my colleague did a dumpdb/loaddb, is
there a difference between this and an unloaddb/loaddb? or when should one
be used instead of the other?
John.
I have performed an unload/reload of our AIX TSM server, and recieved the
following results:
Reduced
Recently published on the IBM redbooks site:
Redbook: Implementing IBM LTO in Linux and Windows - this book includes a
chapter on using LTO libraries with TSM - covering the NDMP backup client
as well as LAN-free and library sharing functions. Note this is an updated
version of the previously
make sure and upd all your tape storage pools to recl=100 so no
reclamation will run
also remember that migration reclamation, etc... will wait until it has
finished processing its current file.
#!/bin/ksh
# purge all processes and look for still used tape mounts
dsmadmc -id=blah -pass=blah q
One of the operators here noticed that both of our 3494 library managers
show the wrong time-- like neither of them sprung forward for daylight
savings time.
Its been so long since I've worked with OS/2, I don't remember anything
about time zone or DST changes. I did a search on google, the
Burak,
You can automate the return of volumes using AutoVault. (See
www.coderelief.com and search the adsm.org archives for detailed
information regarding AutoVault's capabilities.) In comparison to
AutoVault, DRM is missing some capabilities, such as automated vaulting of
backupsets and
I have an issue that I am having trouble resolving.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
On one machine (Win2K) we have some large files generated on a directory,
then on occasion they are written to a DVD or two, and are taken offsite for
archive.
I need to
1. backup the machine
2. backup
I'm not all that familiar with running TSM on solaris.. trying to configure
an ATL tape library on a test box I have here. When I define the library it
crashes the TSM server:
05/14/02 17:58:01 ANR2017I Administrator ADMIN issued command: DEFINE
LIBR
lib_tape_1
We have a couple of users here who have tried the Linux 5.1 code, and are
getting an error message, The client code is down-level. Our server is
at 4.2.1, but the README says this should work. Has anyone else seen
this? Anyone have any suggestions? Thanks. ..Paul
--
Paul Zarnowski
are they using virtual node? and the node that they are doing virtualnode
from is at a lower level
of client code??
-Original Message-
From: Paul Zarnowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 2:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Linux - down-level
We have a couple
Hi Tim. No, that's not it. But a good idea. THanks. ..Paul
At 02:05 PM 5/13/2002 -0500, Williams, Tim P {PBSG} wrote:
are they using virtual node? and the node that they are doing virtualnode
from is at a lower level
of client code??
-Original Message-
From: Paul Zarnowski
How long did these benefits last? We are going to do the same thing,
with a 48GB database. On our test system, it was redeuced to 26GB, but
I have no load there to find out how long the benefits will last, and
how often I will have to do this.
Andy Carlson
Problem Description:
Backup images generated by a TSM V5.1.0 client to a TSM V5.1.0 server
cannot
be restored after they have been exported, then imported.
Users Affected:
Customers running TSM V5.1.0 clients and TSM V5.1.0 servers.
Recommendation:
The problem is fixed by APAR IC33533 in
I believe in that case - nothing. When the scheduler is started again,
it should read the new dsm.opt. I would do a manual start/stop of
scheduler just to check syntax etc of any changes I made to dsm.opt.
David Longo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/13/02 10:39AM
Hi,
After changing an option on
Hello,
i have troubles with a 3575 L12 behin a Netfinity 5100 server, attached with a adaptec
2944 UW differential, running TSM 4.1.5. The netfinity reboots with error messages in
the event log AIC78xx. I think this is a driver message. IBM came a lot of time to
try to solve the problem, but
Hi, all,
Can anyone help me to understand what is the major difference between
client poll vs. server prompted and any examples where you typically
would use?
Reason: Some of nodes get logged off after the office hours and they
don't get backed up( msg says scheduled event missed). Currently
I have 3584 with (8) FC-AL drives. Delivered 4 months ago with 18N2
firmware. After started using library, occasionally got error on library
(/dev/smc0) and drive1 - never on any other Drives. Would leave tape
in drive. IBM Tucson says has seen this problem at other sites.
Recommended
I have checked in/out and re-labeled these tapes 3-4 times, no message
available.
Does anyone know what this means and how to resolve?
05/13/02 16:40:43 ANR0197E Removal of extraneous database entries for
volume
D03071 failed due to contention with other server
I was using 3584 with 16E0 firmware. It always caused I/O error and made all
the tape drives offline.
I upgraded to 22U0, it worked fine a 4 weeks. But the same problem happened
again last week.
Regards,
Jason Liang
- Original Message -
From: Burak Demircan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Hi TSMers,
We have a onsite data of more than 60TB on tapepools. We need access to this data all the time.
Currently we backup directly to tapepools without going to diskpool -migration- tapepool.
Reason is to keep similarly named files like file.1,file.2,file.3 file.9 stored on tape
Hi,
18N2 Microcode was a killer botched upquite a fewof our tapes .. we thought we have lost thousands of files ... ( audit vol marked them as bad ). ( before backup copypool could be done.)
Finally we upgraded to 22U0 and all is fine.
By the way, IBM Tucson did data recovery for us and we
dsmserver:234:once:/opt/tivoli/tsm/server/bin/dsmserv /dev/null 21
Put that line into /etc/inittab but on reboot the TSM server doesn't come
up.. I have to cd into the bin directory and manually start it.. I notice
you have to set an environmental variable to start the tsm server from
another
HI Gerald,
That is a very offending line. We've removed it. Not only that,
but Solaris usually doesn't start daemons (except the console)
in that way. Solaris uses run control scripts. We put ours in
/etc/init.d. It is pointed to from /etc/rc3.d which starts up
when the system goes into
I have 4.2.1.10 and message is not on my system or in messages pdf.
Did you try a q vol volname f=d or a content volname to see what
info if any about these available?
You didn't indicate whatb command you issued that gave the errors
listed. Is a reclamation, backup DB or any other process
Zlatko,
Here's the other info you requested. We are still running AIX 4.3.1, ADSM
3.1.2.55. I'm working at upgrading to TSM4.2, then IBM can/will look at
the
problem, if the upgrade itself does not fix the problem.
Thanks,
Mike
$ lsattr -El rmt0
mode yes Use Buffered Writes
Hi,
4.2.1.15 added cleanup utility in its fixtest.
ANR0197E : During volume processing on the server where the server is
updating a volume to indicate that it is empty, it will now verify that
there are no other extraneous references to that volume. If extraneous
references are
Hi all,
Does any body know where I can find information about TSM 5.1 compatibility with
BackTrack/OBSI?
Regards,
Anderson
45 matches
Mail list logo
