Hi Donna,
I followed the link under Self help in hope to get
information about a new ITSM-Server version
on z/OS. But there's *NOTHING*.
I did not found any information about z/OS server updates on 5.1.x.x.
Only w2k, aix, solaris, etc are supported.
I created an PMR at IBM-Germany and asked for
Hi all,
TSM-Server : V.4.1.4 on AIX 4.3.3
TSM-Client : V 4.2.1.27 on Netware 5.00.09 Supp-Pack 02
During restoring of data on a novell server we got the following error for
about 4000 different objects ( of 1.100.000 restored objects) :
10/22/2002 16:40:27 ANS1905E NetWare SMS error
Well you have to change this in the parmlib
Murray, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/24/2002 07:27:57 PM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE)
Subject: Re: Help!!
where do you change this value? I could not
Hi *sm people:
I have an issue with the latest Netware client 5.1.5
I have been waiting for the cluster support in the 5.1.5 client
Now it seems I can not backup all clustered drives and NDS
I see others have used nds: sys: vol1: etc
I can not specify the drives to backup in the option file
Hi Dave,
I don't know the Netware Cluster but AFAIK you should use separate TSM
client nodes for the local drives and each clustergroup (or whatever this
is called in the Netware cluster) and its drives. Each TSM node has its own
dsm.opt and uses as DOMAIN only the drives that are local to him.
Hi *SM'ers,
I'm facing a strange problem, and would like to know if somebody could give me an
explanation ...
The picture :
We had a policy domain, named NT defined for Windows systems, that got only one
mgmt class, called NT-SYSTEMS, copy group looking like that :
NT ACTIVE NT-SYSTEM STANDARD
Dirk,
You are correct the Clustered drive is not an issue as you use a
Clustergroup dsm.opt file
What is still an issue is that to backup the NDS you must enter NDS: SYS:
VOL1: in the DOMAIN statement
As I do not have control of the Netware servers I want to backup any drive
what ever it is
Hi *SM-ers!
Our Oracle department has problems restoring an Oracle database. They are
running into an error which is described by the following Oracle Metalink
article:
Note:181080.1
Error: ORA-19624 occurred during call to
DBMS_BACKUP_RESTORE.RESTOREBACKUPPIECE
Solution: You must limit the
For why MGMT-SQL-META was used before you created the client option set,
see posting http://msgs.adsm.org/cgi-bin/get/adsm0208/1119.html in the
ADSM-L archives for .some thoughts on this. Also, make sure that each
individual node doesn't have DIRMC explicitly coded in it, and make sure
that each
Lars
I had this once on a 3584 when there were used slots replaced for a tape
drive.
I had to fix it by removing the drives and library from TSM. After a
redefinition of the library and drives I could checkin all tapes again.
Jeroen
10/04/2002 16:47:39 ANRD mmsscsi.c(6431): ThreadId21
Hi,
I for one miss the old adsm.org - I enjoyed looking at the scripts, add ons,
and archives in a simple - usable way - I feel as frustrated with the site
now as everyone else does with the IBM/Tivoli site - there are no options
under options - no links to the helpful aids and sites we could
At 6:57 AM +0200 10/25/02, Burak Demircan wrote:
Do you have some small scripts for operator to take tapes in and out easily?
Please sen me directly if you have them.
I would also be interested in seeing any such scripts, and I'll bet a
bunch of other people would, too. Anybody who has scripts
Guys,
Is the issue what you want to back up from the local node vs. the clustered volumes?.
The reason I ask
is the domain all-local nds: statement does work as long as the colon is included. At
least it works on
a standalone box, I need to try an NDS backup on a clustered node.
What I'm still
guess u need this on too
-Original Message-
From: Matt Simpson [mailto:msimpson;UKY.EDU]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 3:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: drm operator scripts
At 6:57 AM +0200 10/25/02, Burak Demircan wrote:
Do you have some small scripts for operator to
what about this?
TEST FIRST ON NON-PRODUCTION MACHINE!
pls do change tehe email adres options etc
mi©helle
-Original Message-
From: Matt Simpson [mailto:msimpson;UKY.EDU]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 3:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: drm operator scripts
At 6:57 AM +0200
Then in that case sounds like the 3 opt files are needed. I haven't
ever
used more than one and all went to one filespace. May have been
more than one DB (I don't know, never asked DBA) but each machine
had ONE application.
May have to make some changes in Oracle RMAN for this too,
DBA should
Does anyone think a computer that has this many files on it, that only
backed up 12,222 files, should take over 10 hours to complete? I'm having a
problem with this node dropping out a couple of times a night for being idle
for more than 60 minutes too.
We've double checked the NIC and switch
Could we get more info on this backup? Client platform? Client level?
Network info?
At 07:04 AM 10/25/2002 -0700, you wrote:
Does anyone think a computer that has this many files on it, that only
backed up 12,222 files, should take over 10 hours to complete? I'm having a
problem with this node
Very easily! The problem is not that you are only backing up 12,222 files, but unless
you are using the Journaling service, TSM has to look at each one of those 4,000,000+
files to see if it needs to back it up or not. The 10 hours is being spent doing
this. We have many clients in this
Andy,
I'm seeing something similar on my system.
I have all my nodes pointing their directories to storage pool
folderdisk. Most nodes do indeed send their directories there, but a
handful continue to send them to the path reserved for our permanent
archives.
I've checked the OPT file and the
Full and Incremental examples would be nice.
If you decide to contribute, please include OS and platform models for
Oracle host and TSM server, with network and library specs, number of
streams, etc.
Thanks in advance for any information.
Check the accounting logs - use our tool if you want at
http://www.servergraph.com/techtip3.htm.
I bet you see a huge amount of idle wait. What may be happening is that the
directory stucture on the client is very deep, and the client is taking a
very long time to walk the tree - 4 million
Hi Andy,
And thanks a lot for your response. I checked dsm.opt on one of the
nodes generating problems, it looks like :
LANG AMENG
tcpport 1500
TCPSERVERADDRESS X
ipxsocket0005
ipxserveraddress 00409512588A
netbiosname client1
netbiosservername ntserver1
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L;VM.MARIST.EDU]On Behalf Of
Matt Simpson
Before I can check a tape back in, (I think) I have to change its
status to ONSITERETRIEVE. This effectively deletes the tape from the
database. It looks like it would be easy for things to fall through
the
How do we turn on Journaling service ?
Is this the storage agents ?
Thanks
Justin Case
Duke University
Durham NC
Miller, Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 10/25/2002
10:16:52 AM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL
Can anyone please explain the disadvantages of using journal-based backup?
-Original Message-
From: Gianluca Mariani1 [mailto:gianluca_mariani;IT.IBM.COM]
Sent: 25 October 2002 15:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Very long backup/So many files
what platform are you running(OS on
No, this is the recent (well, six months old) Journal-based backup
eature - only works on Windows clients so far.
See your new client manual.
-
Mr. Lindsay Morris
Lead Architect, Servergraph
www.servergraph.com http://www.servergraph.com
859-253-8000 ofc
I do apologize, I should have first asked what OS the client was, and what version the
client is. Journaling is only available for Windows clients, TSM client level 4.2 or
higher. If this is a Windows client 4.2 or higher, run the setup wizard and it is one
of the options available for setup.
The only disadvantages we have come across so far are...
If the journaling service is stopped for any reason, the next time a backup is run, it
will be a full incremental, meaning it will once again inspect all of the files on the
client, because it can't determine which ones may have changed
At 9:37 AM -0500 10/25/02, Mark Stapleton wrote:
UPDATE STG stgpool_name REUSEDELAY=number_of_days
Tape volumes in the storage pool will now go to PENDING status when they are
moved to ONSITERETRIEVE status. You won't be able to check them in as
scratch tapes until the reusedelay period
if the percentage of changed files to be backed up from a client is 5%
then traditional incremental is preferrable.
no other big discriminating points.
Cordiali saluti
Gianluca Mariani
Tivoli TSM Global Response Team, Roma
Via Sciangai 53, Roma
phones : +39(0)659664598
After producing the list of VAULTRETRIEVE tapes, move them to
COURIERRETRIEVE instead of ONSITERETRIEVE. When the courier returns
with the tapes, move them to ONSITERETREIVE.
Laura
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L;VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Matt Simpson
I must be missing something here. Why are you moving a tape from VaultRetrieve to
OnSiteRetrieve until you have it in your hand? We move tapes from VaultRetrieve to
CourierRetrieve and then move them (individually) from CourierRetrieve to
OnSiteRetrieve once we have verified that we have
Gee, I'd disagree...
this example has a small percentage: 12,000 files backed up out of 4
million - but it still took a long time because it had to walk through 4
million files to FIND those 12,000 that needed to be backed up.
The walk-through-4-million is exactly what the Journal-based backup
Responded to offline.
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (change eye to i to reply)
The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your
Responded to offline.
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (change eye to i to reply)
The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your
At 9:33 AM -0600 10/25/02, Laura Buckley wrote:
After producing the list of VAULTRETRIEVE tapes, move them to
COURIERRETRIEVE instead of ONSITERETRIEVE. When the courier returns
with the tapes, move them to ONSITERETREIVE.
That's not really solving my dilemma. I'm trying to avoid a lot of
These are all part of the System Files in the System Object - was this
restored?
-Original Message-
From: Anderson, Michael - HMIS [mailto:Michael_Anderson;HMIS.ORG]
Sent: October 24, 2002 9:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 4.2.3 Still missing files?
I tried to restore on a
Hi,
The journaling engine is only a feature on Windows, comes with the
client, I don't think it's available on any other platform (though it
may be usefull)
On vrijdag, oktober 25, 2002, at 04:41 , Justin Case wrote:
How do we turn on Journaling service ?
Is this the storage agents ?
At 11:32 AM -0400 10/25/02, Nelson, Doug wrote:
We move tapes from VaultRetrieve to CourierRetrieve and then move
them (individually) from CourierRetrieve to OnSiteRetrieve once we
have verified that we have received them. It only takes a minute
(literally).
I don't like the process of
Hi,
I know that our DBA's have coded the name of the filespace in their
RMAN scripts.
It's the environment variable DSMO_FS.
See TDP for ORACLE Installation Users Guide - Chapter Defining
Environment Variables. An example is on page 16.
HTH
Kind regards
Thomas Rupp
Vorarlberger Illwerke AG -
Matt,
I know that it's bad form for me to tout my own product, but STORServer
Manager (the TSM operational interface) may help you to solve this
problem. It is a GUI to your tapes at the vault, in the library, in
scratch etc. It was designed to make TSM media management a little
easier. You
You know, it occurs to me that the AutoVault product may do what you want
here
check the adsm.org banners for their site (maybe www.coderelief.com ?)
-
Mr. Lindsay Morris
Lead Architect, Servergraph
www.servergraph.com http://www.servergraph.com
859-253-8000
We have also see similar hangs both with the Journal and the timeouts in
general. Have idletime set to 60 minutes. Found that a stop and restart of
the Journal service would get the Journal going again but eventually
it(Journal service) hangs again. Also we have not been able to get past 10
drives
Hello,
on our site SQL Backtrack is in production for nearly two years. Now I have to
compare both solutions. We are running 50+ SAP systems on HP and SUN Solaris
systems with Oracle 64bit databases.
Has anyone draw a comparison of this two products? Are there major benefits in
one of the
There is a registry hack that fixes this problem, we had the same thing, opened an
issue with Tivoli, and they provided the fix. I need to find that info again and will
let you know what it is.
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Magura, Curtis [mailto:curtis.magura;LMCO.COM]
Sent: Friday,
I posted the information on this the other day.
You do not have to login. Just select the ADSM-L archives in that left bar
area. It will take you to the search engine area.
I have found that Netscape 4.76 does not work with this site.
However, search.adsm.org does look like a better choice.
I have worked on this problem a LOT, and as far as I know there is nothing
in TSM, DRM, or Autovault that deals with the situation you describe,
We also do a lot of tape movement due to vaulting, and there is inevitably a
case where someone bring back tape ABC221 instead of ABC211, etc.
The
We used to run SQL Backtrack and we now run TDP for SAP R/3. In my opinion
here are the differences
SQL Backtrack
Benefits
- great compression ratio
- seems to handle well large databases
Disadvantages
- licenses are based on size of database if you grow alot (which we do) you
spend alot of
Hello All,
I'm running TSM BA Client 5.1.1 on WIndows NT 4.0 server. I was trying to do a restore
of a shared directory with sub-dir and files. I did choose Restore to original
location, data came back fine but share was not restored, only file permissions were
retained. This was performed
At 2:04 PM -0400 10/25/02, Prather, Wanda wrote:
I guess the other thing you could do, would be to take the list of tapes in
VAULTRETRIEVE status, generate commands to check them in as PRIVATE , THEN
compare the list of LIBVOLS against the list still in VAULTRETRIEVE to make
sure they all got
The reason your share permissions are gone is because Microsoft does not
store share info within the directory structure. Share info is kept in
the registry. The only way to get the share settings back is to restore
the entire registry. This is fine if you are restoring to the original
server,
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is for the intended
addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the information, or copying of
this message is prohibited. If you are not the intended addressee, please notify the
sender immediately and delete this
Hi everyone.
I've just been going through the documentation on image backups (Windows,
specifically) and had a couple of questions for anyone using it.
In the Windows client doc (pp53), it states The file system can have no previous full
incremental backups produced by the incremental command.
Here is what we found from IBM on this issue, hopefully it will apply to your
situations..
if you are using Norton Antivirus 7.51 you should add
DWORD entry in the NT Registry and change a parameter in the tsmjbb
ini file, from the TSM client v5.1.0.1 Readme file:
.
Dean, et al.
Talk about mixed results! There are three nodes in the test cluster here, each hosting
at least one NSS
volume. I've run backups on two of these using the domain all-local and/or the domain
all-local nds:
statement. One node backs up nds:, sys: and nss volume just fine. The other
Paul,
I haven't had any problems with the site, however, it is not very intuitive.
Regards, Joe
-Original Message-
From: Seay, Paul [mailto:seay_pd;NAPTHEON.COM]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: adsm.org unusable
I posted the information on
We are about to set up a 2nd server running Linux.
My main issue, so far, is I/O related.
I haven't been able to find anyone running sustained high I/O on a IA32
box (except for a NUMA-Q).
The new vendor offerings look promising but they have only been able to
supply database TPC style stats,
I think order of operations is important here.
This is what I do for tape returns:
1. Tapes that are in 'vaultretrieve' state are requested back.
2. Those tapes are changed to 'courierretrieve' state.
3. Daily, and prior to our offsite run, we run a checkin with search = yes
and status =
Jim,
Can you please send me the script for the report? My guys would love to
have it.
Thanks.
-Michael
-Original Message-
From: Jim Taylor [mailto:jtaylor;ENLOGIX.COM]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 3:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: drm operator scripts
I think order of
AFAIK, you can always check in a tape as PRIVATE, regardless of vault
status.
I think it makes sense, but I haven't tried to do that.
It may be easier to wait for all checkins to complete, then compare the list
of LIBVOLS to the list of tapes you moved to COURIERRETRIEVE than it is to
watch each
We currently expect desktop Windows PC users to store documents on file
servers, and back up the file servers but not the desktop systems with
TSM. While this arrangement protects files created by PC users, a lot
of registry keys and configuration files containing preferences and
settings will
Greetings,
I have a customer who is laying out the disk storage pool for a new
TSM server, running 5.1.5, under AIX 5.1, on a pSeries 670 (eat your
hearts out!).
Anyway, the disk Storage pool is a FAStT700 storage server, with
four drawers of disks. We had 10 - 73GB disks available in each
Chetan H. Ravnikar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
anyone seen this error, when I am trying to backup an NFS directory on a
client I get this error. Is there a limitation within TSM w.r.t
length of file-names
I am on 4.2.20 client (solaris-2.8) talking to a 4.2.20 server (sol-2.8)
Any info is helpful
• If your Tivoli products were purchased Via PPA
• Ensure our Site Technical Contact (STC) list you as an authorized
user before you register
– This will allow you to submit PMRs
• Know your IBM Customers Number (ICN) before your register
• Fill in all
The best way with the 3494/3590 is:
use the mtlib command to mount tape in the drive that you want to
overwrite
use the batch facility of tapeutil to open, erase, unload, the tape
use the mtlib command to dismount the tape
The nice part about this is it eats no system or
66 matches
Mail list logo