Hello everybody,
When you upgrade the firmware in your drive and/or library, is it necessary
to (under AIX) 'rmdev -dl' the library and drives and (in TSM) 'delete
drive' and 'delete library' after updating the firmware?
The drives went from 22T4 to 25D4 and the library went from 2.72.0012 to
It ought to be not necessary. Do you have any problem?
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Jurjen Oskam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12.12.2002 12:21
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:
no it is not necessary. i just halt TSM server (not machine just tivoli storage
server ,server)
then i restart after upgrade
regards,
Burak Demircan
CEO / ITT
MERCEDES-BENZ TURK A.S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel:+90 212 482 35 00 (4676)
fax :+90 212 481 11 54
hi!
AIX 4.3.3 server memory 4GB pagingspace 8GB 4 processors 750Mhz
tsm client 4.1.2
tsm server adsm 3.1
I'm trying to restore a 26 GB progress database which is devided into parts
of 2 GB each.
the restore is from one AIX 4.3 server to another TSM client version is 4.1
server version is adsm
Hi,
Not at all. The devices just have to be reset, ie you do a rmdev -l
followed by a mkdev -l for the appropriate devices. After, you should
confirm with lscfg -v -l that the new firmware level is correct.
Bye Lars
On 12.12.2002 11:21:38 ADSM: Dist Stor Manager wrote:
Hello everybody,
When
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 12:23:44PM +0200, Zlatko Krastev/ACIT wrote:
[rmdev/delete drive/delete library on firmware update]
It ought to be not necessary. Do you have any problem?
We are currently doing an initial DR-test, and received an RS/6000 and 3584
library with four drives to do
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 12:01:11PM +0100, Lars Bebensee wrote:
Not at all. The devices just have to be reset, ie you do a rmdev -l
followed by a mkdev -l for the appropriate devices. After, you should
confirm with lscfg -v -l that the new firmware level is correct.
Thanks everybody for the
Hi guys and girls,
I am currently busy testing a TSM server (5.1.5.4) under Linux (RH7.2). I
have a 3590-B11 attached to the machine. The only device that shows up in
/proc/scsi/scsi is:
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 05 Lun: 00
Vendor: IBM Model: 03590B11 Rev: A429
Type:
most of those problems we had on 3583 library were due to magazines. after
firmware upgrade and
changing of magazines to Revision B everything went ok.
regards,
Burak Demircan
CEO / ITT
MERCEDES-BENZ TURK A.S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel:+90 212 482 35 00 (4676)
fax :+90 212 481 11 54
...No I've tried doing it all at once (which is of course ridiculous) and
it crashed on being out of memory.
Specific error messages always help us to help you.
You did not say if you had boosted or unlimited your Unix Resource Limits
in undertaking the AIX-based restoral. You must ALWAYS be
BUT tdp/r3 doesn't use the backup copy group of the management class, it
uses the archive copy group.
the reason for 4 (or more) is so if you go straight to a tape drive... like
this...
Storage Device EstimatedPctPct High Low Next Stora-
Pool NameClass NameCapacity
and if you've ever had a notch tab fall out and get lost...in a pinch you
can (for a K tape) get the bottom one from a J tape and the top one from a
cleaning tape. The colors will be all out of whack but the slots will be
proper :-)
Dwight
-Original Message-
From: Seay, Paul
Servergraph
Storserver
Tivoli ISRM (includes 300 reports from Trellisoft) and new reporting
functionality in TSM 5.2 is coming in q22003
From: Justin Bleistein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tsm server monitoring products
I just deleted a 2GB DB volume. It took 2 hours to complete.
The deleted volume resided on an SSA disk. The server CPU is not a
bottleneck. Can anybody tell me why it is taking so much time? I first hoped
it would do some DB reorg on the fly. But it obviously doesn't.
Best regards
Gerhard
---
The other day I had to replace one of the drives in my 3584 library because
a tape was jammed in it. This tape was being written to by a migration
process when it jammed (during daily processing). The procedure went on to
complete successfully, but a q libvol shows that the tape is still in the
Gerhard,
If you delete a db volume that has data on it TSM has to move all the data
to another volume. 2 hours seems way to high for me for 2GB though.
Bottleneck on that is usually the disk and no, TSM does indeed no reorg on
the DB.
regards, Manuel
- Original Message -
From: Gerhard
Roger,
Many thanks for the reply I have been down with 'flu so was not able to
reply earlier!
Cheers
Tony
-Original Message-
From: Roger Deschner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 December 2002 09:32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bocada .v. Servograph/TSM .or. alternatives??
For this reason we run a backup stg from the primary disks to copytape pool
before we do migration. If the copytape is damaged by a tape drive, the
data is still on disk. If the primary tape is damaged during or after
migration then there is the good copytape.
So the question is do you have a
Hello all,
We have a SQL Backtrack process that invokes a TSM retrieval and has been
aborting with the error: ANS1314E (RC14) File data currently unavailable
on server. To remedy this we created a management class that would move
this data directly to our primary diskpool instead of pooling up
You know, there seems to be a similar issue with filespace naming with the
new Netware cluster aware client.
We're awaiting a server upgrade to pursue it further. Seems as it the
'getservername' API call is at the heart of this.
Yes, it seems TSM is not savey of any cluster soloutions except
I basically need to know what procedures / commands need to be executed once
a tape has been destroyed...
Become familiar with the Administrator's Guide, whose guidance is invaluable
in proceeding with server guardianship.
The topic Recovering a Lost or Damaged Storage Pool Volume most
Blatant self-serving advertisement follows.
===
CNT offers a TSM Reporting Tool as part of our TSM Consulting Services.
Interested parties can contact me or John Duffy for more details.
Except from collateral:
Key elements of TSM Monitoring Service
The
Is there a reason not to set maxscratch high say for all storage
pools,
One reason not to set maxscratch high is that if you set it
realistically (based on the number of tapes you have minus a cushion),
you can use the storage pool percent utilized figures to let you know
when you are going
tsm help restore volume
Matthew Large
TSM Infrastructure Engineer
Lavington Street
Int: 7430 4995
Ext: +44 207 902 4995
-Original Message-
From: Thach, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 December 2002 13:26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Procedures to follow after a drive with a
Hi *SM'ers,
All is in the title : I would like to find all management classes that where used by a
node for making either backups or archives. I suppose I could make it while querying
the backups table, but maybe there is a faster way !
TIA
Arnaud
I have the volumes necessary to restore the destroyed volume onsite. I
checked them into the library using the command:
checkin libvol ibm3584a search=bulk status=private checklabel=barcode
They checked in okay, but I started my restore volume and it still says they
are unavailable or offsite.
what is the result of:
lslpp -L bos.rte.\*
I suspect you are at AIX 4.3.3ML9 which had a memory leak in fclose().
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Michelle Wiedeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12.12.2002 12:42
Please respond to ADSM: Dist
I need help, please:
Can me tell somebody to solve the problem described in the following
example?
begin example
assumption: I have 2 backup_versions
time: day_00
The 1st time I create a backupset, all 1000 active backup_versions are
consolidated on tape_01 {bds000.1,bds001.1, ...
Is this kind of like the hyperjump they demonstrated at the end of the
movie, SuperNova? Does the tape end up pregnant?
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon Inc.
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Cook, Dwight E [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002
Update the volumes access to READO. They are probally maked as
access=offsite.
Thanks,
Robert Rippy
From: Thach, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 12/12/2002 11:25 AM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Procedures to follow after a
Are you aware of a fix for this problem?
William Wells
AIX Systems Administrator
Atos Origin
Work# +1-817-264-8560
Cell# +1-817-233-9479
Pager# +1-817-432-2062
-Original Message-
From: Zlatko Krastev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 10:22 AM
To: [EMAIL
We are looking at ways to reduce tape consumption in our 3494 library- which
is being managed by 2 AIX TSM 4.2.2 servers. In general- we want to write
archive data (separate management classes and storage pools) to disk and
then directly to a tape copy pool, and then eject the media out of the
Hi, John.
First, if you don't have copies, you risk losing data if a tape goes bad.
Second, you can define a primary pool to be managed by DRM with:
set drmprimstgpool primarypoolname
Then you can get those ejected for you and put them in a closet, and you
have your copypool to send offsite.
Hello all,
Does anyone know the best way (if any) to run multiple image backups
from one client at once? We have 8 drives available to us, but we can
only seem to get one image (raw device) backup to kick off at a time.
Meanwhile there are 7 drives sitting idle. Any assistance would be
greatly
Yes, it seems TSM is not savey of any cluster soloutions except
Microsoft's.
That an HACMP.
--
Joshua S. Bassi
IBM Certified - AIX 4/5L, SAN, Shark
Tivoli Certified Consultant -ADSM/TSM
eServer Systems Expert -pSeries HACMP
AIX, HACMP, Storage, TSM Consultant
Cell (831) 595-3962
[EMAIL
Alex- Thanks- you make some great points and this helps-- Cheers, John
From: Alex Paschal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BackupSet: Is there an efficient method to generate backupset
s
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 10:46:48
Hey gang,
I'm thinking about using the TSM web client for a customer of mine. I
understand how to set up the 1581 port and what not. The only thing I'm
confused about is the following. On this one server they have two oracle
databases which we back up with two different server instances and
What have you set resourceutilization in the dsm.opt and mount point to for
the node?
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon Inc.
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: J D Gable [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 1:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Trying to restore Exchange to another server with same node name
Getting error:
AND1245E (RC122) Format Unknown
What is this message telling me?
Pleas help.
Thanks
Mehdi Amini
LAN/WAN Engineer
ValueOptions
12369 Sunrise Valley Drive
Suite C
Reston, VA 20191
Phone: 703-390-6855
Fax:
Hi Jin,
Something similar to what we've done - except we didn't go
the LAN-Free route. We installed the 32Bit Windows client
for netware - mapped the Netware volumes to 2000, and then
did a TSM Lan backup to our TSM server. I'm not too sure
if the storage agent on Windows will be able to work
Hi Paul,
I agree with you on the small files and LAN-Free - BUT - we have
a few Netware servers with large btrieve databases - so I'm sure
there is a need for Lan-Free on Netware - bringing me to the
2nd part of Netware and backups - the unfortunate thing with Netware
and small files is this:
You
41 matches
Mail list logo
