Perfect, tnx!
Christian Svensson
[EMAIL
A recent version of Atape is required for dual path support. We use
Atape 8.3.1.0.
You also need to enable alternative pathing support on the rmt device which,
I think is set to off by default:
i.e. chdev -l device -a alt_pathing=yes
Then when you make the devices available to the host you will
Hi All.
I have got to run a new proyect to my company: An alternative site to
recover all machines in case of disaster.
My TSM Server run actualy over hpux 11.0 64 bits on a A Class machine,
connected by fibre channel ( Tachyon cards ) to IBM 3584 library.
The other site outsite the build is
*SM Stalwarts,
I *really* like the 'summary' table in TSM - it's great for pulling out
historical data about how your backups, restores, processes etc have
been performing. However, I've an instance at the moment where I'd like
to be able to know the status of a backup *whilst* it's still going.
Dear all,
since our upgrade from Netware5.1 PS6 up to Netware6 the following schedule
does not work properly.
The archive is not the problem. The option to delete the archived files is!
E.g. file to delete: EUFILE200311181238.TXT (perhaps filename to long ???)
Schedule
Schedule Name
try sh session
Christian Demnitz
www.witzeserver.de
--
Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Wenn
Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben,
informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese
This looks like a great resource but for some reason when I click on one of the Topics I get the following error;
There was an error opening this document. This viewer cannot decrypt this document.
The viewer being referred to is ACROBAT READER 4.0.
Any ideas?
Thank you for making this
A lesser-known information source for registered IBM customers is
found in the Tivoli Field Guides - yet another area in the amazing
information store created and maintained by IBM. Here you can find
explorations of various topics such as HSM, Windows cluster service
database backup and restoral,
Hi Shannon!
Yep! You are using a rather down-level reader. You should use Acrobat Reader
5.0 or higher. Look at http://www.adobe.com/support/techdocs/28966.htm
http://www.adobe.com/support/techdocs/28966.htm for more information.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
Anyone have problems of this sort? The client
level is 5.1.0.1 (I know..upgrade!)
Yes, you inadvertently answered your own question :-)
This could be APAR IC33389 that you are experiencing. You can go to
http://www.ibm.com and search on the APAR number for details. Fixed in
5.1.5 and up (I
running tivoli storage manager for mvs version 5 release 1 level 6.2 tsm
client running on suse sles8 service pack 2 Backup/Archive Client
Interface - Version 5, Release 1, Level 5.5 error in tsmerror.log :
all the linux clients get the following error.
11/06/03 14:40:20 Attempt to free unknown
Christian,
Yeah, I've looked at the 'show session' output, but I'm not sure I understand the
output. As 'show session' output might look like this:
...
...
Session 81: Type=Node, id=NODE-NAME
Platform=WinNT, NodeId=105, Owner=
SessType=4, Index=5, TermReason=0
RecvWaitTime=0.000
There are months worth of these 10MB EDBx.LOG files. Is there an easy
way to remove them? I can upgrade the client today to 5.1.6.7. Will the next
backup cause AD to remove these old log files?
Bill
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
We are having a similar problem and 5.1.6.7 did not resolve the problem.
We are currently testing 5.2.0.3 on one of our problem Domain
Controllers. So far so good.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Boyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 8:45 AM
To: [EMAIL
Thanks!
Shannon
Hello,
you need Acrobat Rreader 6.0.
Bye
Rainer Tammer
--Original Message Text---
From: Shannon Bach
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 07:54:14 -0600
This looks like a great resource but for some reason when I click on one of the Topics
I get the following error;
There was an error opening this
We multiple file servers with large amounts of files. We would like to
perform a full-incremental backup everyday with full backups every month.
We found that with the large amount of small files, the TSM catalog size can
grow exponentially, especially if full backups are done every month. Is
And use the archive option to do long term data management (= not the same
as oh lets archive everything once a month)..
Regard,
Karel
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: David E Ehresman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: dinsdag 18 november 2003 17:04
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Re:
Full backups are required because of retention requirements set by
government regulations, so the incremental forever philosophy is NOT a
solution.
-Original Message-
From: David E Ehresman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 11:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Does anyone know if there are any problems with TDP Domino 5.1.5 running
with Lotus version 6??
Windows 2000 client.
Thanks+
Doesn't the archive option insert an entry into the TSM catalog for each
file?
-Original Message-
From: Karel Bos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 11:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Catalog Size and large number of files
And use the archive option to
Hi TSM-ers,
How do you backup your server based Windows user profiles?
I have to backup a W2K server with a 160GB disk where the Windows XP
User profiles are stored
- about 1.5 million files and 20GB.
These files have spread over a lot of tapes - a restore of a user
profile just took 4 hours due
We have a similar scenario
For short term retention (5 years or less), we use dual node names Node_ARC
and send their data to a backup management class that functions for an
incremental archive. The downside is our database and dirmc size will
continue to grow for 2 years.
For long term
Have you thought of creating/using BACKUP SETS ?
Pasquale, Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/18/2003 11:07 AM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Catalog Size and large
The windows and netware 5.2 clients have patch levels 6 and 3
respectively available but I can not find a patch level directory for
AIX, just the 5.2.0 code under the maintenance directory. Does this
indicate a failure on my part to find the AIX patches or are there no
AIX 5.2 64 bit client
How can 20Gb be spread over a lot of tapes? If your tapes are really
that small consider a hardware upgrade.
an option to consider is image backup (when you have bigger tapes) this
will not help you with single file restores but in case of total
disaster it will be time saver (and job maybe).
one
In that case, zip or tar the data up into a single file and archive that
file.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/18/2003 11:07:52 AM
Full backups are required because of retention requirements set by
government regulations, so the incremental forever philosophy is NOT
a
solution.
-Original Message-
It should but its an and + and story. And you have to get control of you
back-up data (lowering # versions and #days) and still meet long term data
storage requirments.
So, if for some reason, you have to have day/month/year requirments than I
would take a look at:
- Storing daily back-ups as
Hi,
we are in the middle of testing, will let you know how it goes
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards
Markus Veit
No known problems, just make sure you run TDP Domino 5.1.5.1
Eduardo
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/18/2003
08:08:18 AM:
Does anyone know if there are any problems with TDP Domino 5.1.5 running
with Lotus version 6??
Windows 2000 client.
Thanks+
We didn't, and stopped the back-up of user profiles permantly.
Regard,
Karel
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Thomas Rupp, Vorarlberger Illwerke AG
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: dinsdag 18 november 2003 17:11
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Backup User profiles
Hi TSM-ers,
How
Just let the back-ups run over time to a non-collecated storage pool with
quiet a lot of clients and you will see. It will spread over all the tapes
in a storage pool.
Regard,
Karel
(Seen on LTO1 tapes)
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Otto Schakenbos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden:
I sent a message to Bill Boyer yesterday, but not sure if he got it or not. Here is
the message again:
I don't have the problem but I am backing the SYSTEM OBJECTS without any problems on a
W2K DC. My client option.dsm has the exclude for ntds dir, which is recommended by TSM
guide. My SYSTEM
Thanks for your reply,
How can 20Gb be spread over a lot of tapes?
A User profile is restored as an entity. It's spread over so
many tapes because some files in a profile change daily and some never do.
On the tapes the profile data is mixed with the rest of the drives data
(the user profiles
Thomas wrote Node Collocation is enabled
so i asumed it should be on only one tape
Otto Schakenbos
PC-Support
TEL: +49-7151/502 8468
FAX: +49-7151/502 8489
MOBILE: +49-172/7102715
E-MAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TFX IT-Service AG
Fronackerstrasse 33-35
71332 Waiblingen
GERMANY
Karel Bos wrote:
Just
then you can
- partion your disk (or buy new disk) and create a different filespace.
or
- create a second node on your client. With nodeA you backup all files
except the profiles and with nodeB you only backup the profiles.
(different node , different tape) It doesn't even cost anything. ( well
a
Strange problem. AIX 4.3.3, TSM 5.1.5.4.
Im trying to run reclamation on our copy storage pool. There is only one
tape left, and reclamation continually starts and ends successfully for it
without moving any data and no time passing:
11/18/03 06:53:26 ANR0984I Process 2215 for SPACE
Thats right. Eventually, given time, to do a full system restore,
we have to mount basically all the tapes. So a full system restore
is a pain.
TSM was built on the concept that we mainly back it up. Restore
must be reliable, but speed of restore is not the primary goal.
longwinded analogy
I
How can 20Gb be spread over a lot of tapes? ...
Perhaps a lot of active files and insufficient Reclamation.
For the below to work, the book says that the devices have to be directly
attached to the HBA's. Has anyone tried configuring alternate path
support for SAN attached 3590-H's? The book says that it is not
supported.
A recent version of Atape is required for dual path support. We use
Atape
The problem is with the disk layout (not done by myself).
The 160GB disk (seen by TSM as one filespace) is filled with
20GB of profiles and 140GB of programs and other files.
We keep this files for 4 months so now this data is spread over
88 3590 cartridges.
So I think the only solution to save
We have an AS/400 system we would like to backup with TSM.
We read that the OS/400 we have is downlevel so we have ordered and
scheduled an upgrade of the OS.
However, now there is the issue of BRMS !Is is absolutely required ?
When I read through some of the readme files, the only software
We have defragged AD, and it does not reside on the boot partition. I
am checking now to see if virus scanning is hitting the NTDS directory.
-Original Message-
From: Khan, Khalid B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 10:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
Audit vol J00840 fix=yes
That usually clears these issues up.
Al
Alan Davenport
Senior Storage Administrator
Selective Insurance Co. of America
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(973) 948-1306
-Original Message-
From: Conko, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 11:53
The MS KB issue documented in 272425 is the reason why we specify the
following info in our readme and website
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=663context=SSGSG7q=uid=swg21052221loc=en_UScs=utf-8lang=en+en
under Client Requirements for Microsoft Windows that Windows 2000
The desktop.ini files in the locations you indicate should have been
restored with the hidden attribute set. As Andy Raibeck indicated
there's an APAR in the works for that problem. You don't need to delete
the files. You can hide the files again via attrib +h or the properties
tab of the
Our 3590H's are dual attached to our TSM server via separate FC switches.
It does work as described below. I checked the atape manual . . . it
describes exactly what we've implemented.
Rick
Steve Roder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL
Our 3590H's are dual attached to our TSM server via separate FC switches.
It does work as described below. I checked the atape manual . . . it
describes exactly what we've implemented.
Ok. Cool. But, I am looking at Pub GC35-0154-11 (IBM TotalStorage Tape
Device Drivers Installation and
My sentiment, as well.
Backup set is made from the data already on the server, you don't have to
transmit it again.
Downside, it is more difficult to restore a single file from a backup set.
You could also
1) Use a different node name for the monthly archive
2) Run the full backup to that node
Also, (and I've forgotten from the beginning of this thread what client type
is involved here)
for AIX or Windows you can make an IMAGE backup of the filesystem.
Manage the image backups with a different management class, even a differen
storage pool so that tapes can be removed from the library
Could you provide me with the direct link to this manual? I can't seem to
find it... I'm using Google, but I'm not having any luck. Thanks!
***
Joni Moyer
Highmark
Storage Systems
Work:(717)302-6603 **New as of 11/1/03
TSM 5.1.6.2 running on AIX 5.1
Hi,
I recently had a bad tape. I was able to restore the volume successfully from
the offsite-copy tapes. The bad tape was marked 'Destroyed' subsequently.
From what I read, I thought this tape would be removed by TSM after the data
was restored to other volumes,
Did you restore the volume by update the volume and setting the access=destroyed, and
then performing a restore volume?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How to remove a 'Destroyed'
This function is not supported for devices that
are attached through an IBM San Data Gateway.
I have a feeling that a SAN data gateway is an extra piece of equipment
that is used only for server-free data movement. A SAN switch is something
different, and is the normal way to connect drives to
A San Data Gateway is a device that converts SCSI protocols to fibre
protocols.
For example, if you have SCSI LTO1 tape drives in your 3583, and you want to
connect them to your SAN, they gotta go through the gateway to get to a SAN
switch.
So if your devices are fibre already, the SGD isn't
Hi all,
Here is my problem; I need to change retention policies for data for
some of the nodes already archived in a specific management class but leave
the rest of the data in that same management class unchanged. Is this
possible, Any help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Thank
Yes, I updated it to 'Destroyed' before I proceeded to restore the data, but
finding out that the restore process would also update the tape to destroyed
before restoring data.
Chuck
Quoting James Choate [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Did you restore the volume by update the volume and setting the
HI,
Does TSM Server 5.1 support client ADSM 3.1? what is the lower nivel of
client supported by TSM servir 5.1?
thank you
JL
TSM 5.1, 2K server, overland neo 4100 with 2 X LTO2 drives.
I'm trying to find a select or query statment that will tell me what
volume is in a drive. The only thing close is the drive_state in the
drives table, but that only tells me if it is loaded or not, whereas I
need to know what volume is
Try
query mount
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Lazarevich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 3:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: what tape is in a drive?
TSM 5.1, 2K server, overland neo 4100 with 2 X LTO2 drives.
I'm trying to find a select or query
If its only 20GB, why not run a selective backup once per week/fortnight/month on just
that directory?
That will give you an extra copy and may push old inactive versions into the bit
bucket, but you get a single consolidated tape.
Steve Harris
AIX and TSM Admin
Queensland Health, Brisbane
Hi,
I was just able to that bad volume by doing delete volume x
discarddata=yes.
Thank you.
Quoting James Choate [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Did you restore the volume by update the volume and setting the
access=destroyed, and then performing a restore volume?
-Original Message-
From:
Thanks !!!
Himanshu Madhani
Tivoli Storage Manager - Device Driver Development
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel : (408) 256 6120 T/L : 8 276 6120
Fax: (408) 256 4183 T/L : 8 276 2513
Zoltan
As I understand it you need either BRMS or Robot/Save (a third part product) to
connect to TSM.
The problem with BRMS is that it treats TSM as a virtual tape drive, so a lot of TSM
facilities are bypassed. In particular BRMS can do incremental backups, but TSM can
only expire the
Could you provide me with the direct link to this manual? I can't seem to
find it... I'm using Google, but I'm not having any luck. Thanks!
As documented in http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.QuickFacts :
IBM TotalStorage Tape Device Drivers: Installation and User's Guide,
(GC35-0154) (a
How about using query mount?
-Ted
At 04:15 PM 11/18/2003 -0600, you wrote:
TSM 5.1, 2K server, overland neo 4100 with 2 X LTO2 drives.
I'm trying to find a select or query statment that will tell me what
volume is in a drive. The only thing close is the drive_state in the
drives table, but that
We have what appeared to be a simple problem, we installed a new DB2
server and the backups (API) are slow, like 27 hours to backup a 100GB
database. We have been backing up this database for years from a
different server in less than two hours. The main difference between the
two servers? The
67 matches
Mail list logo
