I have used only IBM LTO1 tapes in my 3584 Fibre drives.
I did have a few (3 or 4 in a year or so.) As I slowly
gathered over this time, there were two problems.
1. The cases on early LTO 1 tapes didn't have the halves
welded together. Therefore if when loading, the leader
pin was pushed in
Hi,
Forget SNMP support on a Windows based TSM server. Some time ago, when a major
security-flaw was discovered in almost all SNMP implementations, it seemed like IBM
decided not to update the required component for Windows - together with a statement,
that SNMP v1 is insecure. I don't know
We use Fujifilm LTO1 in our Dell SAN attached PV136T library and haven't have any
problems with them, we've been using them for the last two years at least. Maybe it's
just a bad batch of tapes? We also use HP LTO's with no problems either, we have been
warned by Dell not to use Imation LTO's
I have the IBM Tivoli Storage Manager AIX 5.1 64-bit
product and would like to use the client API to
develop a client program, but I cannot find the
documentation referenced in the README.api. The
README.api references the Tivoli Storage Manager
Using the API (SH26-4123) and Tivoli Storage
I have the IBM Tivoli Storage Manager AIX 5.1 64-bit
product and would like to use the client API to
develop a client program, but I cannot find the
documentation referenced in the README.api. The
README.api references the Tivoli Storage Manager
Using the API (SH26-4123) and Tivoli Storage
Daniel Sparrman wrote:
The only tape libraries from IBM that has gone out of support is the
3575-series of libraries.
where is that info from? I didn´t find anything about eos in the IBM pages
searching for 3575. In fact it only quotes having to use the IBM driver
starting 5.1. I hope it´s just
Hi Markus
IBM is no longer developing drivers for the 3575-series of libraries.
However, the old drivers are still supported. Thats why you can use it on
AIX, SUN and HP/UX(which your link states).
However, try running it with for example Linux, and you'll find out that
the Atape driver for
Well, you *can* use Servergraph to send SNMP traps to TEC or OpenView, etc.
It's nice because your TEC people don't have to figure out which of the
3,000
error messages they need to handle - Servergraph only sends 220 or so
different
messages, with suggestions as to how to handle each one.
Hope
Just started receiving these messages. The are repeating every time
automatic reclamation kicks in, i.e. hourly.
07/05/04 18:16:56 ANR0102E afcreate.c(1943): Error 1 inserting row in
table AF.Bitfiles.
07/05/04 18:16:56 ANR1181E aftxn.c220: Data storage transaction
0:731266990 was
http://www.adsm.org
Rajesh Oak
- Original Message -
From: P G [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 18:13:13 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Where are the TSM API docs???
I have the IBM Tivoli Storage Manager AIX 5.1 64-bit
product and would like to use the client API
Maybe you need to include the -subdir=yes option on the RESTORE command.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The only dumb question is the one
Stefan
Try this:
dsmc restore -pick=yes -subdir=yes -fromnode=szent063
\\szent063\c$\dsmsched.log c:\nobackup\
Bill
Stefan Holzwarth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
06/07/2004 15:17
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To:
Sorry no success for
dsmc restore -pick=yes -subdir=yes -fromnode=szent063
\\szent063\c$\adsm32\baclient\dsmsched.log c:\nobackup
ANS1302E No objects on server match query
And
dsmc restore -pick=yes -subdir=yes -fromnode=szent063
\\szent063\c$\dsmsched.log c:\nobackup
ANS1302E No objects on
...
I tried for example: dsmc restore -pick=yes -fromnode=szent063
\\szent063\c$\* c:\nobackup\
Result: ANS1302E No objects on server match query
Using TSM-Gui i have no problems doing cross-restores.
Because being inside the GUI during the operation does not expose you
to shell expansions...
If you run
dsmc query access
from the machine whose node is szent063, what is the output? Does it
indicate that node pc7802 has been given access?
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL
Ditto here. We even opened a DCR a couple of years back to get this
changed to an exception status so at least a q ev * * ex=yes would show
them, but it was turned down. What we were told, basically, was that TSM
is 'client-based' and in order to know whether a backup completed
successfully we
Richard, the shell expansion is not an issue on Windows.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The only dumb question is the one that goes
Andi, you are right!
In TSM GUI i used my admin account for authentication - so i missed the
grant access thing for nodenames!
Thanks a lot!
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Andrew Raibeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Juli 2004 16:48
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re:
Don't know if anyone can help me on this one.
We're getting ANR8302E errors on our 9840C tape drives during RSR (reverse
space record) requests. These typically occur during reclamation and move
operations on all drives.
A pvr trace shows the following:
12:27:30.205 [26][pvr.c][11487]: PVR I/O
I've got it working on TSM 5.2.2.2 Win2K server and Openview.
Is this your first attempt with SNMP on Windows, or is your problem specific
to 2003?
If not, maybe I can help. Better email me directly, there are a lot of
steps..
Wanda Prather
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I/O, I/O, It's all about I/O
Yes, we also change the description of In Progress to something
meaningful!
I think the ? was more meaningful - in our case the sessions are never
In Progress when we get this status.
It would be interesting to know if anybody actually gets a status of In
Progress when there is actually a
Tim,
How did you change the description of In Progress?
Rushforth, Tim wrote:
Yes, we also change the description of In Progress to something
meaningful!
I think the ? was more meaningful - in our case the sessions are never
In Progress when we get this status.
It would be interesting to
In our custom reports that we send to users.
-Original Message-
From: Timothy Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: July 6, 2004 12:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Node just sitting In-Progress
Tim,
How did you change the description of In Progress?
Rushforth, Tim wrote:
Hot Diggety! David Longo was rumored to have written:
I have used only IBM LTO1 tapes in my 3584 Fibre drives.
I did have a few (3 or 4 in a year or so.) As I slowly
gathered over this time, there were two problems.
1. The cases on early LTO 1 tapes didn't have the halves
welded together.
I have had that clip installed in all the drives, so I am pretty sure that
it is a tape problem. I am sending the tapes off to Fuji for them to
investigate.
Thanks,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Dan Foster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 2:31 PM
To: [EMAIL
Hi,
Need you help!
I online restored db2 database. Erverything is good when I restore the database and it
told me that the recovery is successful. After that, I check the database, but it
did't change anything. it still is the same as before recovery. I don't know why.
thanks
Andy
Je serai absent(e) du 05.07.2004 au 16.07.2004.
Je répondrai à votre message dès mon retour. Voir avec GAD si besoin.Merci.
Andy
Suggest you try a DB2 forum. I don't think you have a TSM problem.
Now, did you do a restore and then apply the logs? Because if you did you will have
recreated the same error that you are trying to back out from.
Steve.
Steve Harris
AIX and TSM Admin
Queensland Health, Brisbane,
28 matches
Mail list logo
