Hi again all,
Why do you think this drive is very very stubborn? I make it online and it
becomes offline automatically ... 4 times already ... i ask my hardware
technician to look at it and he replaced the drive with a spare drive ... and
asked me to do
rmdev -l rmt2 to make it DEFINED
is that possible and how , thanks in advance ...
On Nov 29, 2004, at 3:10 AM, Hashim, Shukrie BSP-ISM/116 wrote:
Why do you think this drive is very very stubborn? I make it online
and it becomes offline automatically ...
That's a common condition when the drive is defective - I have a drive
doing that currently.
Your posting does not indicate
Hi Daniel,
That was what I expected. I was only wondering if I missed something.
But I also found this article:
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=663context=SSGSG7q1=restore+dbuid=swg1IC43394loc=en_UScs=utf-8lang=en
Tivoli Storage Manager only supports restoring a database using the
Adam,
If you haven't already done so... go to this URL:
http://www.ibm.com
and search for:
ACN5238E
There is one article that discusses the permission issue
and how to resolve... as well as hotlinks to Microsoft
support pages to describe this.
Thanks,
Del
Shukrie,
Couple months ago at my shop we have bad microcodes and systems keep
marking a lot of tapes private/ unavailable
AND
vary drives off-line.
So have your IBM/CE checks the microcodes.
Good luck.
Hoa.
Hashim, Shukrie BSP-ISM/116 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Until know, we expect that everybody in the world (except TSM
developers) know that data in Summary table is not reliable at all.
Andy??? (True or False)
As a blanket statement, I'd have to answer false.
I am not personally aware of any problems in current code (and this
doesn't mean that,
Another alternative is to identify the owning application and see if *it*
can read some, if not all, of the data. Perhaps that application has a
feature that allows it to copy data from the file to another file,
affording the opportunity to rescue as much of the data as possible.
Regards,
Andy
- Original Message -
From: Richard Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004 2:50 PM
Subject: Re: read failure !
...
ANS1228E Sending of object '/intermail/mss_db/mbox/18/db' failed
Read Failure
...
ok, the file is obviously corrupt on file system and we
What is the most recent Tivoli client release for SCO Openserver 5.0.5?
Many Thanks,
=Adrian=
Hi again all,
Why do you think this drive is very very stubborn? I make it online and it
becom
es offline automatically ... 4 times already ... i ask my hardware
technician to
look at it and he replaced the drive with a spare drive ... and asked me to
do
rmdev -l rmt2 to make it
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davis Adrian
What is the most recent Tivoli client release for SCO Openserver 5.0.5?
Version 3.1.0.8, found at
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/adsm/fixes/v3r1/sco.
--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Berbee Information
Given a tape library and multiple different policies for data
storage, is there a simple (resource non-intensive) way to tell
how much storage (the size of) active files and how much
storage is used for inactive files? It is being discussed to
get a VTL and I'm thinking this should be sized
Hi,
We have a 3583 library with two LTO2 drives. For some reason one drive became
unavailable (TSM server running on Linux). Since a reboot of both the server
and the library didn't help I deleted the path and the drive from TSM.
I then tried to define a new drive with the following command:
== In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Given a tape library and multiple different policies for data storage, is
there a simple (resource non-intensive) way to tell how much storage (the
size of) active files and how much storage is used for inactive files? It is
On Nov 29, 2004, at 12:24 PM, Mike wrote:
Given a tape library and multiple different policies for data
storage, is there a simple (resource non-intensive) way to tell
how much storage (the size of) active files and how much
storage is used for inactive files? It is being discussed to
get a VTL
Can someone help interpret this error we are receiving when trying to
backup, via the MS-SQL TDP:
11/29/2004 14:34:02 ANE4991I (Session: 74857, Node: TEAM.UCC.VCU.EDU) TDP
MSSQL Win32 ACO3000 Data Protection for SQL:
Starting
full backup of database
It has also been discussed several times that TSM doesn't appear to be a
good fit for a VTL. May want to search the archives to find out more on the
subject.
Bill Boyer
Life is not about how fast you run,
or how high you climb
but how well you bounce. - ??
-Original Message-
From: ADSM:
Zoltan,
You need to examine the log file or output of Data Protection for SQL.
RC=1912 means a VDS creation error. This happens when
Data Protection for SQL has asked to create a VDI connection
to the SQL Server in order to perform a backup or restore,
and the creation failed. The VDI error log
I have a partial resolution to my export/import problem. I eventually
discovered that we had lost IP connectivity between the Linux TSM
server and the TCP/IP address space used by the z/OS TSM server.
Once the network configuration was fixed I was able to do the
exports.
I would not expect the
I am having an issue with EXPORT TO SERVER.
This is a z/OS TSM server. Currently at 5.2.3.4. I am trying to export
this node to an AIX TSM server, also at 5.2.3.4.
I have already exported thedefinitions and adjusted them for the proper
storage-pool names, etc.
But, I can not get the
Any word on the availability of the TSM 5.2.3.5 patches?
David
i have problem in understanding the time manipulation
in tivoli for schedule.
i synchronize my server for this reason last month,
still i'm having problem.if i define schedule for some
node at 19.00.58
it's executing in differnce of 5 hrs affter.
any one please explain this one.
some points i
Using other than IBM tapes (and possibly with them), it seems
that
cleaning each drive AT LEAST once per week is imperative, rather than
waiting till the drive says it needs cleaning. The IBMs do seem to
leave
lest 'dust' or residue on the heads.
You're cleaning LTO drives once a week?
Same here.
LTO1 just never seems to need cleaning (these drives aren't under a very
heavy load, though).
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David E Ehresman
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 3:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LTO
It has also been discussed several times that TSM doesn't appear to be
a
good fit for a VTL. May want to search the archives to find out more on
the
subject.
Has anyone heard of good experiences with TSM on a virtual tape
library? Can this ever be a good thing?
My $0.02.
I guess if you are doing a whole bunch of LAN Free stuff or NDMP backups
it can be nice since you can just define the drives as you need them and
not worry too much about drive contention (the throughput requirements for
such a large LAN Free environment would make me skeptical about
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of chithirai selvan
i have problem in understanding the time manipulation in
tivoli for schedule.
i synchronize my server for this reason last month, still i'm
having problem.if i define schedule for some node at 19.00.58
it's
Connectivity is not the problem.
I was able to successfully EXPORT the definitions but it refuses to do any
data. I let it sit for 24+ hours. Could not kill it. Had to kill the
sending MVS TSM server.
I think it has something to do with the node being Novell Netware.
Thomas Denier [EMAIL
On Nov 29, 2004, at 3:37 PM, chithirai selvan wrote:
i have problem in understanding the time manipulation
in tivoli for schedule.
i synchronize my server for this reason last month,
still i'm having problem.if i define schedule for some
node at 19.00.58
it's executing in differnce of 5 hrs
Thanks, Del. I figured you would have the answer.
This is a new server, so the problem probably is the permissions..
I am passing this on to the person who is setting up the server !
Del Hoobler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/29/2004 03:12 PM
Please
My original LTO-1 library went back to the leasing company after three
years of use, averaging about 2 TB of data per DAY across 10 drives. In
that time period, we clocked 11 uses of one cleaning tape. All eleven
were manually triggered from the operator panel (move tape from slot to
drive) to
Hello TSMers
We are planning to finally update the AIX version on our RS6000 that is
running our TSM server. Currently we are at AIX 4.3.3 ML 10 and we are
planning to install AIX 5.2. The TSM server on this box is sitting at
TSM 5.1.5.4. Can we simply upgrade to AIX 5.2 and leave the TSM
Well, the HELP for ANR0781E indicates this:
ANR0781E Export/import command: Process aborted - server sign on failed.
Explanation: The server export/import process encounters an internal
error
in establishing an intermemory communications session with other server
components.
System Action:
Best info I have is maybe some time this week. So I would guess it is
close.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The only dumb question is the
On Monday 29 November 2004 22:25, Kauffman, Tom wrote:
My original LTO-1 library went back to the leasing company after three
years of use, averaging about 2 TB of data per DAY across 10 drives. In
that time period, we clocked 11 uses of one cleaning tape. All eleven
were manually triggered
On Monday 29 November 2004 23:26, Peter Hadikin wrote:
Hello TSMers
We are planning to finally update the AIX version on our RS6000 that is
running our TSM server. Currently we are at AIX 4.3.3 ML 10 and we are
planning to install AIX 5.2. The TSM server on this box is sitting at
TSM
37 matches
Mail list logo
