On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 08:42:01AM -0700, Andrew Raibeck wrote:
Is there also a way to use tsm to restore the file permissions without
doing a restore of all files?
No.
Suppose I recursively mess up the permissions of a directory, and that
directory is then backed up as part of e.g. dsmc
For now, I am afraid you are lost.
For future, should you mean this situation could repeat,
you may want to check Intensive Care Utilites under
http://www.liebsoft.com/index.cfm/server_products
Among other things,
this tool can export all access rights from your server or from your domain,
you
I once did an audit on the library within ACSLS, and it took about 3
minutes.
Is there a special audit that I need to perform?
Thanks!
Dave Zarnoch
Nationwide Provident
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W 302-452-4197
C 302-462-8703
Gerald Michalak
[EMAIL
Good morning all
Just trying to a point in time restore from a 5.2.3.12 Client that is
Unicode enabled. Now when I try to go back to 14 Jan at 06:00 I don't see
the files I want even though I am also displaying active/inactive files.
But, if I skip the point in time bit and just view
You seem to be under the false impression that permissions are stored
in TSM independent of the object data. Not. This is why when file
system object attributes are changed, the object itself gets backed
up again. (See backup candidate criteria details in the client
manual.) Object restoral gets
On Jan 27, 2006, at 7:01 AM, Farren Minns wrote:
Good morning all
Just trying to a point in time restore from a 5.2.3.12 Client that is
Unicode enabled. Now when I try to go back to 14 Jan at 06:00 I
don't see
the files I want even though I am also displaying active/inactive
files.
But, if I
Hi Richard
Well, looking at the dirs and files I can see the following :-
'Files' are bound to the following backup copy group.
Version Data Exists - 3
Versions Data Deleted - 1
Retain Extra Versions - 180
Retain Only Version - 60
'Dirs'
On Jan 27, 2006, at 8:36 AM, Farren Minns wrote:
Hi Richard
Well, looking at the dirs and files I can see the following :-
'Files' are bound to the following backup copy group.
Version Data Exists-3
Versions Data Deleted-1
Retain Extra Versions-
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 07:20:17AM -0500, Richard Sims wrote:
You seem to be under the false impression that permissions are stored
in TSM independent of the object data. Not.
No, that is not the impression I'm under.
I'm under the impression that this:
This is why when file
system object
Thanks Richard
I can confirm that the files and dirs are bound to the correct policy
values and that we do not have a DIRMc setting in place.
Thanks for your help and I'll have a look at that technote now.
Regards
Farren
Hi,
I had the same problem after reorganize my DB. Seems to be IC47516 fixed
with 5.2.7 . So I had do do an auditdb (with TSM-Support). Look at your
loaddb log : are there any bad database records reported ?
Best wishes
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Some lucky individual (me), was able to get TSM servers with 32 GB of
memory.
All the documentaiton/redbooks from IBM/Tivoli on that I could find,
indicates that BUFPOOLSIZE should be tuned so DB cache hit rate is 98
and of course, common sense indicates higher hit rates are bettter.
There also
Hi all
Can anyone tell me where I find information on setting up a client with two
different node names etc. I'm looking in the BA client manual but not
finding anything that looks relevant.
Many thanks
Farren
|-+---|
| Del
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:00:37 -0500, Allen S. Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 08:05:42 +1100, Allan Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Folks
I have 2 TSM servers and a couple of days ago remote db backups
started to fail the error message is below:
I have a PMR going about
Farren,
All you need to do is follow the instructions for setting up a client node
and just give it a different name and a different dsm.opt file. So for
example you already have abcdefg as a node name with a opt file called
dsm.opt. Create a second client called abcdefg1 with an opt file called
I saw something very like this. If I increase my bufpool size above
2GB, eventually TSM slows down to a crawl. I called IBM, and they tried
to send me to the performance group, so I just told them nevermind, I'll
put it back down to 2GB.
Matthew Glanville wrote:
Some lucky individual (me),
Don't know the location of this mechanism in the manuals, but here is an
example for AIX.
The idea is that the same notes-system makes the backups using different
nodenames.
The idea is to have to different dsm.opt files. 1 for the normal and 1 for the
longtime backups.
In the dsm.sys file
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 10:11:55 -0500, Matthew Glanville [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Unfortunately it appears that the TSM server, when using the database
buffer doesn't have very good method to find things in that buffer.
Thus searching through 30 GB of memory, or 10, or the class
Hi
So, I can have two nodenames pointing to one tsm sever i.e. pointing to the
same tcpserveraddress? In my example I assume I would want to do the
following.
SErvername DOMSRV1
Nodename DOMSRV1
COMMmethod TCPip
TCPPort
My student Solaris Domino servers have 19-stanzas / node names/definitions
(for 6-Domino instances) in /usr/bin/dsm.sys. 1-OS backup, 6-Daily
Incremental, 6-Weekly Selective, 6-Archive Logs !
Farren Minns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
01/27/2006 11:20
Oo, neat!
Do I understand you correctly to say that you've got 32G of memory and
a 4G database? If you've got core of a similar size to your DB, then
I suggest an experiment: instead of sticking it all in a buffer, make
some RAMdisk, and stick a third copy of your DB vols there, and see if
I think the discussion could use more details about the architecture
being used.
If you haven't already, see IBM Technote 1208540.
Richard Sims
You can use -servername option of dsmc, like
./dsmc -servername=DOMSRV1_ARCHIVE
Servername option should be the name given by SERVERNAME stanza on
your dsm.sys, it may be different of nodename.
Or, you can make use of two option files:
---
dsm.opt (content):
servername DOMSRV1
---
Hmm, I was going to suggest you look a the max_scratch value,
but at the end of the output, it looks like indeed you already have and
it looks OK.
I'm stumped too...
Ben
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Lee, Gary D.
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:05:54 -0500, Matthew Glanville [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
BUFPOOLSIZE when it is too large, which my guess is the point at
which a search through that much memory takes longer than a disk
read. The larger it it gets, the slower database reads get... This
mostly
I think the discussion could use more details about the architecture
being used.
If you haven't already, see IBM Technote 1208540.
Richard Sims
Ahh those details.
TSM server 5.3.2 on Solaris 9, 64 bit, 8 cpus' 32 GB ram.
DB size, 150 GB, 75% used
Current BUFPOOLSIZE 1 GB
My
On Jan 27, 2006, at 1:54 PM, Allen S. Rout wrote:
Sounds like that would make a fascinating chart.
And the recommended formula would have led you to something like 20G,
right?
With the really slow points, was the cache hit percentage good?
Something else that could be interesting is to set
Tsm v5.2.7
Solaris v2.8
IBMtape v4.1.2.6
Below find an abbreviated activity log to explain.
Set reclamation to 60%
Reclamation starts
Reclamation stops (insufficient space in storage pool)
Selects further down show that there is plenty of space.
I'm stumped. Any suggestions?
Try setting you migration thresholds higher than the utilization.
Andy Huebner
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ben Bullock
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 12:42 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Reclamation stopped
Well folks, a reboot cured the problem again.
Looks like 5.2.7 has some lurking problem.
Any other great ideas welcom.
Gary Lee
Senior System Programmer
Ball State University
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database:
If a file or image that you are migrating is larger than the available
target this messsage can also happen.
Jim Skinner
The University of Kansas Hospital
Westwood Campus
Information Technology Systems
2330 Shawnee Mission Parkway, Suite 201/068
Westwood KS 66205-2005
913-588-4787
[EMAIL
I am a bit confused now taking inventory of my tapes in our 3485lib I do q
libv. When I do q Libv and count the tapes does it already count for the tapes/
tape pools which are off site or it is the current physical tapes in the
library onsite excluding offsite tapes. We are trying to see
We've spent months working with a DATAMOVER, and now it's fairly
straightforward - sitting in an office and having full access to TSM. But
when we turn it over to the user, how does he get access? We've thought of
two ways: 1. Give them an ID on the server itself and let them use
DSMADMC with
I would have to agree there seems to be an issue. I just recently split my
enviroment to 2 tsm servers. I have exported over 1\2 the nodes and 55 percent
of the files to the new server. Before the split server a db size was 80 gb 91%
full. After the split server b's db is 20 gb and like I said
34 matches
Mail list logo
