Hi *SM-ers!
I noticed that the 5.3.3.0 client code has been made available on the
FTP server!
Request to Andy Raibeck: could you ask the FTP owner to update the
/LATEST subdirectories too? They all still contain the 5.3.2.0 code...
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
Hi all,
I my big issue is to backup 3 FS on AIX Machine with more that 37,000,000
files, I cant take snapshots because those files are the images storage of
the Content Manager(its all tiffs),
I manage to run the Journal Based Backup on AIX, but only on 32Bit machine
with jfs, not jfs2, my prod
Hi Allen,
Hmn, interesting - I was just going on information from the README file
too:
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance
/client/v5r3/AIX/v533/TSM533C_README_enu.htm
What's new in the IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Version 5.3.3 Clients:
JBB is supported for
Good morning Roger
Thank you so much for that information. Backing out wasn't a big problem
for me as the old server was still left as it was so all I had to do was
connect the drives and lib again and bring it back up (phew).
This is a very annoying problem though. Surely TSM should be able to
Did you make any changes to mountlimit or format on the device classes? When
you recreated the drives and paths after the migration did you bind them to the
correct device class/device type?
After the migration did you audit the library?
_
Ian Smith
SAN/TSM
Morning all
Regarding my problem with this, does anyone know what the following devices
are ? There are just two 3590s fibre attached to this new server so I don't
know where the other two came from or what they are. If it wasn't for them,
the drives would still have the same /dev/rmt/
Hi Ian
I only deleted and recreated the library, drives and paths, but I did not
touch the 3590 Device Class. Do I need to remove and recreate that too? If
I do this, how will it effect the tapepool copypool that this device
class specified?
I actually printed screen dumps of the drives etc
Hi,
The Backup-Archive GUI on a client has disappeared and I am left with the
Backup-Archive cmd. line.
The scheduled backups run OK.
I have journalling enabled.
If I reinstalled the Backup-Archive client,
would I get a full backup at the next backup ? (which I don't
really want)
Try running the audit library lib name checklabel=barcode to refresh the
library inventory in TSM from the library itself.
Check the help for the specifics associated with your library.
_
Ian Smith
SAN/TSM Specialist
IT Infrastructure
Rabobank International
Thames
Thanks Ian
Sadly I wont be able to do that until I try this upgrade again (possibly
this coming weekend). That's what is such a pain with this as I need to get
as many ideas together before I can even attempt it again :-(
Farren
Of course I have another problem with this. I only have 1 frame of a
3494 and not many free slots. If I set all the filling tapes to readonly,
after the next backup TSM will grab 36 brand new tapes (as I have
collocation on in the library, 1 for each client).
So realistically I would have to
Hi
I gotta be missing something here, so any help is appreciated.
Scheduled backup runs fine and puts some information about skipped files
in dsmerror.log. But when the TSM Schedule service is restarted it
clears all messages in dsmerror.log. Adding SET
DSM_LOG=C:\UTILS\tsm\baclient doesnt change
According to Henrik Wahlstedt:
Hi
I gotta be missing something here, so any help is appreciated.
Scheduled backup runs fine and puts some information about skipped files
in dsmerror.log. But when the TSM Schedule service is restarted it
clears all messages in dsmerror.log. Adding SET
On Mar 27, 2006, at 5:58 AM, Bill Dourado wrote:
...If I reinstalled the Backup-Archive client,
would I get a full backup at the next backup ?
No - that has nothing to do with backup candidacy.
After the reinstall, double-check your options files for remaining
intact (which they
On Mar 27, 2006, at 1:56 AM, Rainer Wolf wrote:
Hi,
Roger Deschner wrote:
3. The Full tapes should reclaim themselves normally. However,
reclamation will not select any tape that is still marked as
Filling, so
you've got to reclaim them manually yourself with MOVE DATA. Might
take
a while,
Andrew Ferris wrote:
snip
Good luck with IBM and could you let us know if they find the bug?
No fix yet but an APAR has been opened:
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IC48918
Andrew Ferris
Network Support Analyst
iCAPTURE Research Centre
University of British Columbia
snip
Trying to run TSM 5.1.6.2 on Solaris 2.9
IBMtape version - 4.1.2.6
Hi All
As this isn't strictly a TSM question I will understand if it gets ignored,
but does anyone know how (or if it is even possible) to get Solaris to only
use the IBMtape device drivers and not to also use the default
Are there procedures for migrating a TSM server over a period of time from
one tape library system to another? Can two libraries coexist on one TSM
server? How is the 3584 defined to the server?
Thank you.
DISCLAIMER:
This communication, along with any documents, files or attachments, is
Hello Everyone,
I have run the following select statement, but I would like to run it from
the command-line and as tabdelimited so that I can import it into a
spreadsheet. How can I format the last_write_date column so that I can see
the date time? When I do run this as tabdelimited it cuts
There is (or should be) a file IBMtape.conf in /usr/kernel/drv.
See the manual IBM SCSI Tape Drive, Medium Changer, and Library Device
Drivers. GC35-0154-05.1
Look in the Solaris chapters 26-29.
Basically you define which lun's IBMtape will see. There is a file in
the same directory named
Richard Sims great TSM Quickfacts say:
Redirection character in the server
administrative command line interface,
if at least one space on each side of
it, saying to replace the specified
output file. There is no escape
character to render this character
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 19:10:31 -0700, Andrew Raibeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Allen, can you point me to the specific README file (link) and the
specific line of text to which you refer?
Well, no, now that you mention it. When I download the 5.3.3 client
now I see something different than I
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:21:20 +0100, David McClelland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Hmn, interesting - I was just going on information from the README file
too:
[...]
No, it isn't lying to you. Evidently, I was. Though I was doing it
convincingly, because I believed it myself.
- Allen S. Rout
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 19:10:31 -0700, Andrew Raibeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Allen, can you point me to the specific README file (link) and the
specific line of text to which you refer?
Ahh, I've found whence cometh the egg on my face.
The version that had advertised, but did not deliver,
Guys,
Could someone explain what is going here ? I downloaded the latest ML on
last Tuesday from here :
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintena
nce/client/v5r3/AIX/v533/
While openeing the archive, there is a tivoli.tsm.client.jbb fileset,
and the readme says :
We found the limit. There are some posts in this forum from the first
of the year about the problem we ran into.
Andy Huebner
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Park, Rod
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 6:45 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
We have a client trying to configure the TDP for Hardware with TDP for ERP and
is trying to determine if there is a secure
alternative to using rexec for TSM TDP for SVC flashcopy. clientname does
not allow unprotected rexec (unencrypted password in
the clear), and flashcopy requires it to be
We are running a mainframe Linux TSM server that is nearly out of
CPU capacity. We would very much like to move to a code level with
the fix for APAR IC47731, which causes a major waste of CPU capacity
in mainframe Linux environments. At the moment, all levels with that
fix suffer from the open
Hi Laura
The 3584 is defined as a scsi library. Its all fairly straightforward.
There is no reason why several libraries cannot coexist. Just remember that
tapes that were written in one library can't easily be moved to another
library, even with the same drive type, when they have data on
Yes two libraries can be connected and configred to a single TSM instance at a
time.
Typicall you configure both and setup all your disk storage pools and mgmt
classes to use the new library. Then over time you run move data commands to
get the data from the old library to the new
Hi there;
My client would like to setup online mirroring for the hardware and system
on their site. The problem is the have one TSM system with STK Powderhorn
library; all the diskspool in Hitachi Disk (SAN). It that possible for us to
setup the mirroring for the TSM; as I believe we can mirror
Hi,
The TSM database and recovery log can be software mirrored by TSM too.
Mirroring your library is where a copy storage pool comes into play. It is a
backup of the backups that can be stored offsite or in another library in case
of a disaster or the loss of a primary storage pool volume.
I have never seen reclamation take a Filling volume. I thought the Big
Idea ever since the product was called WDSF was to fill up the Filling
volumes until they are Full, let expiration gradually eat holes in them,
and then reclaim them. What's the point in reclaiming a tape that isn't
full yet?
Hi Thomas!
APAR IC47731 was fixed in patch level 5.3.2.3 and IC45931 was fixed in
5.3.2.1. The most recent patch level is 5.3.2.4 and your version can be
downloaded from
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/patches/ser
ver/Linux/5.3.2.4/s390x/
IBM just released a new client
34 matches
Mail list logo
