LTO2 drives are back compatible with LTO1 media. Ensure that the atape
driver version is at the required level to support gen II.
Put all the tapes physically to read only, to ensure there is no
potential way of writing over the DR data.
_
Ian Smith
SAN/TSM
Hi,
Read about it after the my first Windows 2003 cluster server, with mounted
disks, as ITSM back-up client. Normal clusters I had done that before, so I did
the standard config:
- Install BA client on the cluster controlers;
- Setup the back-up of the clustercontrolers (clusternode=no and
AIX5.x TSM5.2
ANR8301E I/O error on library 3494
AIX:
mtlib -l /dev/robert -qI q
...
UD0262 0190 00 20 00
UD0263 0190 00 20 00
UD0264 0190 00 20 00
...
UD0498 0190 00 20 00
UD0499 0190 00 20 00
UDO500 FF00 00 20 00
UDO501 FF00 00 20 00
UDO502 FF00 00 20 00
UDO503 FF00 00 20 00
UDO504 FF00 00 20
On May 11, 2006, at 6:51 AM, Birgit Sievers wrote:
AIX5.x TSM5.2
ANR8301E I/O error on library 3494
...
There's vital information missing here: the message is supposed to
have tail-end operation, sense, and condition code data. If for some
reason the message actually appeared incomplete,
Look VERY closely at the volume serial numbers.
The UD volumes that are less than the 500 series have a zero '0' in the
third position. Ie UD0499.
The UD volumes that are in the 500 series have an oh 'O' in the the
third position. Ie UDO500.
Guess you have two choices. Correct the labels or use
The first thing the TSM server will want to do after bringing it up
following ad TSM db restore is to do a TSM db backup. If you only have
gen 2 dirves you'll want at least one gen 2 scratch tape.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/10/2006 8:39:25 PM
We currently have a 3584 library with lto Gen 1 tape
All
I'm a little confused by what I'm seeing here and I'm hoping someone can
shed some light on this..
TSM Server 5.2.4.0
AIX 5.2
Atape 9.6.0.0
We have a shared 3584library with 12 LTO1, 15 LTO2 and 3 LTO3 drives all
fibre attached.
The mountlimits in my devclasses are set as follows
LTO1 12
Did you verify that the PATHs are online?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/11/2006 8:28:33 AM
All
I'm a little confused by what I'm seeing here and I'm hoping someone
can
shed some light on this..
TSM Server 5.2.4.0
AIX 5.2
Atape 9.6.0.0
We have a shared 3584library with 12 LTO1, 15 LTO2 and 3 LTO3
Hi David
As I put in my post, I've checked that the paths are correct and online.
Both drive34 and drive 35 have been used today by other processes.
I've checked they are definitely empty with the 3584 web interface.
There are no entries in the AIX errpt for them.
Regards
Chris
Not really. First, the backup is strongly suggested, but not required.
Second, Gen 2 drives can read and write Gen 1 tape. I have 16 Gen 2
drives and ALL my offsite copies are written to Gen 1 tapes.
Tom Kauffman
NIBCO, Inc
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL
Chris - Perform a SHow LIBRary, which may shed light.
Waiting for mount point indicates that TSM believes all available
drives to be in use. If not done already, do 'Query MOunt' and see
if TSM believes a tape is (endlessly) dismounting, or the like. You
might also try experimenting with a
Hi Richard
Q mo showed nothing out of the ordinary really, no retry dismount
failures or such like.
I ran show library but didn't exactly know what to look for. It
confirmed the three drives are LTO3 and that the two drives were empty
and drive36 had a tape mounted.
However, the process that
I had a problem about a year ago when I installed a single LTO3 drive in my
3583 with 3 other LTO1 drives. I created a new devclass
and specified FORMAT=ULTRIUM3C and the original devclass for the LTO1 drive I
changed to FORMAT=ULTRIUMC. Everything worked just
find until I had to try to copy
William..
Thanks for your response, sounds like I'm having a similar problem to
what you experienced. The reclamation job isn't cross device classes
though. I guess the other LTO3 drive was in use by an LTO2 process which
could be confusing it.
Regards
Chris
-Original Message-
From:
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 05/11/2006
08:08:51 AM:
However, the process that was using DRIVE36 (with an LTO2 tape) just
finished. As soon as it finished the reclamation started and mounted two
tapes in DRIVE34 and DRIVE35...
That says to me that the tape that had
I am trying to share a 3494 tape library between two TSM servers. The
TSM Library Manager server has storage agents defined to it but I would
like to define storage agents on the TSM Library Client server. With no
drives defined on the TSM Library Client server is it possible to define
storage
Background:
TSM Ver 5.3.2.2
Op Sys 5.3
NO HSM
Just confirming from the admin guide..
Once I run a delete filespace node_name filespacename t=a command. The
data is deleted from primary and copy pools.
The only way I would get that data back would be in a TSM db
restore...right?
Nancy
Right.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Nancy L
Backhaus
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Mai 2006 19:10
An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Betreff: [ADSM-L] Delete Filespace Command Question
Background:
TSM Ver 5.3.2.2
Op Sys 5.3
NO HSM
Just setup the Storage Agents as you normally would. The only exception is
that you create the paths on the TSM Library Manager. Then the TSM Library
Client will pass the mount requests to the Library Manager without any
special configuration.
Gerald Michalak
Certified TSM V5.3 Admin.
ADSM:
Right. The only way back from a Delete Filespace is a DB restore (AND
that's assuming you have REUSEDELAY set appropriately for your storage
pool so the tapes don't get recycled before the DB restore!)
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
I need to export some nodes from one TSM server to another to balance
the load.
I tested the command 'export node1 filedata=all toserver=serverb
mergfilespaces=yes' and got a data rate of about 16GB an hour. The 2nd
run of the exact same command finished in 1/4 of the first run time and
moved no
TSM 5.2, AIX servers
I'm a little unclear about the intricacies of using more than one
copypool with a storage pool. There are allusions in the 5.2
Administrator's Guide to problems restoring files when no copypool has a
complete copy of a storage pool's contents. I'm a bit unclear how such a
What happens during a copy is that any data that has not been copied is
copied. So, for your example, the second copy on Tuesday morning will
copy all files that have changed since the copy ran on Monday. Think of
it more as a sync up than an incremental. For example, if a copy pool
tape gets
Nick,
The two copy pools behave completely independently.
Each command backup stgpool primary copy will compare the files in both
storage pools and copy the data that are in the primary pool and not yet in
the copy pool.
best regards,
Kurt
Van: ADSM: Dist
Yes we here at Duke have mover over 14 TBs of data with this method
And we were able to move about 1 TB per day with our environment.
From: TSM Server: AIX 5.3 IBM, 7026-H80 4 GB memory 450 MHz CPU
To: TSM Server: AIX 5.3 (P630) IBM, 7028-6C4 4 GB memory, 1.2 GHz CPU
Have to make sure that your
That's a relief. I suppose when we get to a current level, I'll submit a
readers' feedback form about the topic and the lack of clarity.
Thanks,
Nick
Kurt Beyers wrote:
Nick,
The two copy pools behave completely independently.
Each command backup stgpool primary copy will compare the files
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 09:47:08PM +0200, Kurt Beyers wrote:
The two copy pools behave completely independently.
Each command backup stgpool primary copy will compare the files in both
storage pools and copy the data that are in the primary pool and not yet in
the copy pool.
I presume that
hi
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Um... Hi?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
tsm agk
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 3:30 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: hi
hi
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the
Hello
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ben Bullock
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 4:46 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: hi
Um... Hi?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
--- Dave Mussulman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 09:47:08PM +0200, Kurt
Beyers wrote:
The two copy pools behave completely
independently.
Each command backup stgpool primary copy
will compare the files in both storage pools and
copy the data that are in the primary
wat up yo!
:)
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
tsm agk
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 5:30 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: hi
hi
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the
Client v 5.3.0 on Windows 2003 server. Is there a bug out there (that I
can't find so far) that speaks to number of objects reported as being
backed up not being correct?
I know for a fact that more than 979 objects were backed up...
Sorry for any redundancy on this question.
Matt
Karel,
How do you deal with the fact that the mount point name changes when the
cluster groups moves from one node to another? We were thinking about having
two seperate dsm.opt files. Each would have the domain statments that list the
mount point names based on the server name. Then we were
On Thu, 11 May 2006 15:59:23 -0500, Dave Mussulman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
For example, a disk and a tape primary pool and a tape copy pool.
The file is created on the disk pool, and copied to the tapecopy
pool. Later, that file is migrated from the disk pool to the tape
pool.
When the
36 matches
Mail list logo
