If you want to redistribute data on previously uncollocated storage pool to
collocated media, I would recommend doing MOVE DATA instead of MOVE
NODEDATA. MOVE DATA can be stopped and restarted, and will move data from
tape following collocation rules.
Regards,
Tomasz Hubicki
Wiadomość
Hi Tomasz,
Thank you for the response. Can you use the move command to move only
specific data from a volume or can you only move the entire content from
one volume onto another?
The reason I ask, is that we are only planning on collating certain
servers not all.
Kind regards,
William
No, move data will move _all_ the data from the volume. If you want to move
only some nodes' data move nodedata will be better, but remember that if you
start move nodedata, then cancel it, and start again it will start moving
data to a scratch tape, not to the one it used in first move. That was
Hi
You can use any userid defined on the TSM server. You will get the
Authority Level defined for that userid on the server (like system,
analyst, operator) in the TSM Administration Center.
If the userid/possword is incrorrect, you will see the message:
Your ID and password are not valid for
Hello,
I must be having some other type of issue with the ISC then... I keep
getting the message: The administrative API encountered an internal error
while processing this request. See the Administration Center section of
the Problem Determination Guide for more information.
When I went to the
On some of my SQL servers rights have been taken away from the local system
account to SQL. In the documentation I found that I can add the username
password to a user that has rights to backup SQL to the command file to run
the backup. The problem with this is that it is in clear text so
It may not be the best way around, but in this situation I have set up a cmd
backup script (fashioned after sqlfull.smp) that ran under SQLServerAgent,
and set it to run under the same account that held sway over SQL Server. My
errors ceased.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor
On Apr 24, 2007, at 3:23 PM, Orville Lantto wrote:
Has anyone else observed that TSM only reads from COPY1 of a db
volume mirror pair during DB backup?
Why do you believe it should do otherwise? As exposited in the Admin
Guide manual, mirroring is for disk failover purposes. You can
Reads should be safe from mirrored volumes and are commonly done in operating
systems to load balance. Not taking advantage of the available IO resource is
wasteful and puts an unnecessarily unbalanced load on an already IO stressed
system. It slows down db backups too.
Orville L. Lantto
On Apr 25, 2007, at 10:55 AM, Orville Lantto wrote:
Reads should be safe from mirrored volumes and are commonly done in
operating systems to load balance. Not taking advantage of the
available IO resource is wasteful and puts an unnecessarily
unbalanced load on an already IO stressed system.
I don't believe you can change the devclass of a stgpool.
(after all, a stgpool contains media, and that media has already been written -
the device type can't be metamorphosed on the fly.)
But, you can change the devclass to point to a different library.
Sorry I should have been more
Bruce,
If you want to use SQL Server authentication. i.e.
/SQLAUTHentication=SQLuserid
Did you try to use the GUI--- Utilities --- SQL Server Login Settings
to set your SQL Server login id and password?
Then, stop the DP/SQL GUI... and try this command:
TDPSQLC QUERY SQL
What I was trying to use was a windows AD account. I wanted to use this
because this going to become a standard in my organization.
Thanks,
---
Bruce Kamp
Senior Server Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bruce,
In that case... you simply need to set the Log On As account
for the scheduler service to the Windows userid that has been
given permission on the SQL Server. Userid and password
on the command-line are only meaningful for
/SQLAUTHentication=SQLuserid.
Thanks,
Del
I wanted to verify what folks thought this message means. It looks to me
like it is a memory resource problem on the client node. What have folks
recommended to resolve this type of issue?
04/24/2007 23:16:29 ANSE ntrc.cpp(928): Received Win32 RC 1450
(0x05aa) from FileRead():
On Apr 25, 2007, at 1:35 PM, Gill, Geoffrey L. wrote:
I wanted to verify what folks thought this message means. It looks
to me
like it is a memory resource problem on the client node. What have
folks
recommended to resolve this type of issue?
04/24/2007 23:16:29 ANSE ntrc.cpp(928):
Richard,
I would say you can do it good (TSM) or better as suposed by Orville.
I do not see any reason why TSM should not take advantage of the mirrored
disk's for db reading.
Regards
Stefan Holzwarth
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Performance is the issue. As tapes get faster and faster, trying to get a db
backup without shoe-shining the tape drive gets harder. Using storage
sub-system mirroring is an option, but not the recommended one for TSM.
Perhaps there is a sound technical reason that db reads cannot be made
Is anyone running TSM over 10 Gbit ethernet? Is there any question
that it would be supported?
We have two data centers about 60 miles apart. We are planning to
send backup files from each data center to a 3584 ATL in the other
via a 10 Gbit ethernet link. The server hardware would be HP DL585-
If it was't a dream, I remember reading something about this issue. It
stated that this behaviour was by design, because reading blocks from both
copies of a mirrored volume cancelled all gains obtained with controllers and
disk subsistems read-ahead algorhythms.
I even remember reading
Hi,
I'm trying to setup the Windows BA client on a Microsoft Internet Security
and Acceleration Server 2006 and I am unable to complete. The install goes
normally, but when I try to finish the install and create the dsm.opt file
it gives me a TCP\IP error, and I have to cancel. The administrator
Well,
On the IBM SP we ran backups over the internal switch which was
17GB(yte) if I recall.
And we currently have fibre attachements to drives, so I don't know why
the speed of
the NIC should be a concern. The operation of the NIC is under the OS,
not TSM.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/25/07 4:41 PM
Can 10 Gbit Ethernet go 60 miles? How are you writing to the remote tape
devices?
Orville L. Lantto
Glasshouse Technologies, Inc.
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Lawrence Clark
Sent: Wed 4/25/2007 15:12
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re:
Hi All,
I have tsm client 5.2.0 and Tsm server 5.2.2. I am getting following
errors in the dsmerror.log file.
4/25/2007 23:10:49 gtUpdateGroupAttr() server error 4 on update SYSTEM
STATE\SYSFILES
04/25/2007 23:10:55 ANS1802E Incremental backup of '\\vgaaunsw014\e$'
finished with 0 failure
24 matches
Mail list logo
