The problem with the listserv get command is that it blocks me at 16 MB
a day. At this rate, it's going to take a few weeks to get the archive.
Can anyone help speed up the process?
---
W. Curtis Preston
Author of O'Reilly's Backup Recovery and Using SANs and NAS
VP Data Protection
GlassHouse
On May 1, 2007, at 4:18 AM, Curtis Preston wrote:
The problem with the listserv get command is that it blocks me at
16 MB
a day. At this rate, it's going to take a few weeks to get the
archive.
Can anyone help speed up the process?
In the big picture, what is it you are trying to accomplish?
We are having discussions about upgrading to TSM v5.4. The question of
compatibility of server-to-server communications came up, and whether
we have to upgrade all tsm instances at the same time or can we
roll through them upgrading one at a time. In researching
this, I became confused (common
We went thru this recently. Do the LMS first. The rest can be done
whenever. In our case, the LMS has no clients, and the last server was
upgraded 6 weeks after the LMS.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Rhodes
Sent:
Curtis,
Richard has a good point--but I can understand your frustration, we
created our own archive for performance and technical reasons, and have
put it on the web (we integrate it into our Web 2.0 ITSM quality
management and performance web services).
There is a web interface that allows
I always use a move data to move data off of readonly tapes to ensure that
the data is indeed readable.
David
Avy Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/30/2007 3:35 PM
Hello,
When volumes are done auditing with fix=yes completed with success
but status remain 'private', should I have the volume
Shawn,
If the ADSM-L search at: http://backupinsight.com/219.0.html does not
meet your needs, please let me know, spent more than a few hours on it.
--David Moring
www.backupinsight.com (A Division of Applied Autonomics LLC)
512-782-HELP
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shawn Drew wrote:
Ah, looks like
Hi all
I'm looking for a red book or red paper that explain all the changes and
new features in TSM 5.4
Is there any documentation on that ??
Thanks
Luc Beaudoin
Administrateur Réseau / Network Administrator
Hopital General Juif S.M.B.D.
Tel: (514) 340-8222 ext:8254
On May 1, 2007, at 1:45 PM, Luc Beaudoin wrote:
Hi all
I'm looking for a red book or red paper that explain all the
changes and
new features in TSM 5.4
Is there any documentation on that ??
Hi, Luc -
IBM is a bit behind on that...
There is
Hello All!
I am considering turning client compression on for our Lotus Notes Domino
and Oracle servers. What should be looked at/considered before client
compression is turned on? How do you monitor the impact of turning client
compression on? Any ideas/suggestions are appreciated! Thanks!
The first question I would ask is why are you doing this? If you hope
to reduce the amount of TIME it takes to do a backup, you won't. If you
hope to reduce the amount of DISK SPACE in your disk pools, you will,
but at what cost.
In almost all cases (I don't say all because words like all or
Joni,
You should be taking some how an online backup of the Notes nsf files and the
Oracle databases.
The nsf files won't compress at all, so you won't gain any reduction in used
space on the disks/tapes where the backups end up.
And with an olnine backup of Oracle, either directly to TSM
There's actually a number of reasons. The first is that the phpbb forum
method of threading topics is far superior (IMHO) to anything I've ever
seen in any mailing list archive, including the rather nice one that
David Moring has. All messages related to a given thread are available
in a single
I am going to weigh in on this one. Client compression can work great,
depending on the kind of problems you are trying to solve, and if you do
it right. Here was our situation:
I recently took on responsibility for a TSM environment with 1 shared
library with 14 tape drives, 6 TSM AIX servers,
One issue I had was that the all words search does not appear to work.
If I put two words in there, I get any messages that have either word.
---
W. Curtis Preston
Author of O'Reilly's Backup Recovery and Using SANs and NAS
VP Data Protection
GlassHouse Technologies
-Original Message-
Skimpy? Really? I think that the ability to collocate active data is
the coolest new feature I've seen since collocation. A user who can buy
enough SATA disk to hold all their active files should get a HUGE
benefit from this feature. Don't you think so?
(This is why it's funny that someone on
On May 1, 2007, at 7:35 PM, Curtis Preston wrote:
Skimpy? Really? ...
Yes, very. Compare that Web page to its predecessors, where the
authors of the previous pages expended effort to provide some modicum
of information beyond the few simple bullets on this page.
Considering the programming
Curtis, If you had read the context more carefully, you would see that
Richard's skimpy comment referred *not* to the TSM 5.4 enhancements
but rather to IBM/Tivoli's documentation of those enhancements:
Is there any documentation on that ??
I found the lipstick on a pig analogy
My first thought after reading this goes back to what the main goal should
be in any TSM environment: How are your restores affected? Will you
still be able to meet your SLAs for restore times (especially a full
restore)? That is an area that is often overlooked until it is too late.
IMO, too
Something else to be aware of when using client compression:
When client compression is used, tape volume utilization might appear low.
This is because the data is already compressed by the time it gets to
tape. Hence the tape utilization will probably appear closer to the tape's
native capacity
Curtis,
Fixed, search now takes a list of space delimited words. That was a
good catch, the form said words but the SQL routine was for
word...thank you. --d
Curtis Preston wrote:
One issue I had was that the all words search does not appear to work.
If I put two words in there, I get any
21 matches
Mail list logo
