I will be out of the office starting 02/26/2008 and will not return until
02/29/2008.
The change that you made should not be causing the
ACN5241E The Microsoft Exchange Information Store is currently not
running.
message. ACN5241E means that DP/Exchange tried to contact the local
Exchange Server (or the cluster Exchange server if you are using
/EXCSERVER=server-name)
and was not
Apparently the Exchange Admin 's command was trygin to a restore with
the toserver set to the renamed server... Not the active server restore
target.
-Original Message-
From: Hart, Charles A
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 11:45 AM
To: 'ADSM: Dist Stor Manager'
Subject: Restoring a
I'm wondering if there are filesystem fragmentation issues when using
devclass=file on an NFS mounted DD volume. Filesystem fragmentation is an
issue when using devclass=file on most filesystems that I'm aware of. How
long have you been running this way on the DD?
At 06:22 PM 2/26/2008, Ben
Hmm, good question. I'm not sure of the answer. We have only been
running it for about 30 days so far.
Under the covers it the appliance runs a customized Linux 2.6 kernel,
but customers only have a limited login shell, so I'm not sure what the
underlying filsystem type is.
Ben
-Original
Hello All,
Thanks for your hep!!
We have a WIndows 2003 server running the 5.4.0.2 TSM client. The nightly
scheduled backups have been failing due to the following error.
ANS1378E: The snapshot operation failed. The SNAPSHOTCACHELocation does not
contain enough space for this snapshot
To me it sounds like a protocol difference between the tape drive and
the HBA.
You probably have tried all of these, but you never know what will
trigger the Oh yeah moment.
1. Is it always the same drives?
2. Have you tried power cycling just a tape drive instead of the
library?
3. Are all of the
Is there a limit to the number of TSM servers and/or reports that can be
configured for TOR? I'm running 5.4.2.0 on a Windows2003
server, 7 TSM servers are defined with multiple reports/monitors for each.
Nothing runs! The service is running, the
reports/monitors are activated, but I don't get
Stop and start the service through the report services tab. I've had
this hang up from time to time.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Boyer
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 11:45 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: TOR
Tnx's.fyi we did not have any of these drive problems with the
fourteen LTO2 tape drives.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Andy Huebner
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 11:31 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L]
Hi Bill,
Don't know what the limit is, but it isn't 7 - I've gone to 8
On 2/27/08, Ochs, Duane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stop and start the service through the report services tab. I've had
this hang up from time to time.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
How about the number of reports? I've split out the hourly monitor in to
individual monitor reports so that the email notification
has the report title in the subject instead of the generic Hourly Monitor and
the TSM server name. So I actually have about 9
monitor for each of those 7 TSM
Thanks Jacques and Bob!
Bob -
It was true that the backdelete was not set to yes. I did change that now but
db2 does not recognize that old data. When there are deactivated backups that
db2adutl does not seem to be able to delete.
Jacques -
I can see hundreds of files out there for the
Sorry, don't know about the monitors.
I've got one customer that is generating the max number of reports off 1 TSM
server; I can't remember exactly what the max is, but I think it's in the
50's.
On 2/27/08, William Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about the number of reports? I've split out
Hi everyone!
I have another issue that I haven't run across previously. I have seen threads
on it in the listserv but not with the resolution I need to find.
ANR8443E CHECKIN LIBVOLUME: Volume C01861 in library
3494LIB4 cannot be assigned a status of SCRATCH.
This is a library that is
We're about to upgrade from TSM server 5.3.3.0 to 5.4.1.1 on 2 TSM
servers. I've read through the upgrade procedure. It looks simple
enough. We're already running 5.4.1.1 on another TSM server with no
problems, so I'm not too concerned about that. I've looked through the
listserv archives and
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Anker Lerret
We're about to upgrade from TSM server 5.3.3.0 to 5.4.1.1 on 2 TSM
servers.
I would suggest you go all the way to 5.4.2.0. Going to a patch level is
rarely a best practice unless you're trying to fix a specific
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Nicholas Rodolfich
We have a WIndows 2003 server running the 5.4.0.2 TSM client. The
nightly
scheduled backups have been failing due to the following error.
ANS1378E: The snapshot operation failed. The SNAPSHOTCACHELocation
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Collins, Brenda
It was true that the backdelete was not set to yes. I did change that
now
but db2 does not recognize that old data. When there are deactivated
backups that db2adutl does not seem to be able to delete.
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Collins, Brenda
I have another issue that I haven't run across previously. I have
seen
threads on it in the listserv but not with the resolution I need to
find.
ANR8443E CHECKIN LIBVOLUME: Volume C01861 in library
Try running a del vol on the volumes and see what happens. If you know
there is no valid data on any of them add the discarddata=yes. That is
if the label volume doesn't work. If TSM thinks the volumes are valid it
will not relabel them.
See Ya'
Howard
-Original Message-
From: ADSM:
Probably the library has it assigned a category other than insert or
scratch.
Use your mtlib command to query the tape...
mtlib -l/dev/lmcp# -qV -VC01861(where # is the proper lmcp1 or lmcp2
etc... that your library is as found via aix command lsdev -Cctape)
Look for the category data...
I've gone from 5.3.4 up to 5.4.1 and then up to 5.5.0 without issues.
I've also gone from 5.3.4 straight up to 5.5.0 without issues.
I also went to the latest Atape and atldd at the same time.
Atape.10.7.3.0.bin
atldd.6.5.5.0.bin
The installp commands associated with the Atape atldd
I would like to know if you guys have ran into any problems, issues,
etc
Thanks!
Ricardo Ribeiro
TSM Architect (Distributed Storage Group)
Charles Schwab Co., Inc
BlackBerry 623-217-4139
Phone 602-977-4629
If the label dosen't work, first do the following to remove it from the
volhist on the lib mgr.
Delete Volhistory Todate=TODAY Type=REMOTE Volume=volser FORCE=YES
Neil Strand
Storage Engineer - Legg Mason
Baltimore, MD.
(410) 580-7491
Whatever you can do or believe you can, begin it.
Boldness
I would suggest you go all the way to 5.4.2.0.
Thanks for the comment, Mark. Usually I'd agree with you. In this case,
we want to match the level we have on our third TSM server. We like to
keep as few variations of maintenance inhouse as we can, and that level
has worked flawlessly for us.
We went from 5.2 to 5.3 to 5.4.0.0 to 5.4.1.2 and hit a rare bug that
crashes the server during reclamation, we were forced to 5.4.2.0. One
of our two servers hit the bug.
May yours go better than ours.
Andy Huebner
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL
Has anyone tried to install IBMtape with a kernel newer than 2.6.9-42? I've
upgraded my kernel to 2.6.9-67.0.4 and can no longer get IBMtape to install. I
can't find a IBMtape version newer than IBMtape-3.0.5-2.6.9-42. Is that the
latest?
Thanks,
Johnny Lea CNE
Data Center Manager
Johnny Lea wrote:
Has anyone tried to install IBMtape with a kernel newer than 2.6.9-42? I've
upgraded my kernel to 2.6.9-67.0.4 and can no longer get IBMtape to install. I
can't find a IBMtape version newer than IBMtape-3.0.5-2.6.9-42. Is that the
latest?
I'm using IBMtape with
Folks,
IBMtape has been replaced by lin_tape, which can be found here
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/devdrvr/Linux/RHEL4/Latest/
lin_tape is open source driver, but it's essentially the same driver
as it shares most of its code with IBMtape. Even the kernel module it
installs is still called
30 matches
Mail list logo
