Thanks for the thoughts
Yes, all of the basic stuff had been checked.
Richard Sims kindly pointed me in the right direction.
It was the directories that were wanting to go to tape, not the files. I
had several management classes in the same domain with the same retonly
value. Apparently TSM
Can someone point me towards a query that I can use to discover how much of my
storage capacity is used up by .pst files? I suspect it's a lot but need some
hard figures to wave at authority.
Thanks
Angus
Hi,
If you Google tsm ubuntu you will see that many folks have gotten it to
work using varying methods, such as alien. Here is an example
http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/unclug/2007-August/000404.html
We re-package the TSM client for our environment, including packaging
it for our
Peter, Howard and Zoltan,
thanks again for your excellent information and support
Michael Malitz
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Peter Jones
Sent: Mittwoch, 16. April 2008 11:13
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Data Protection for Exchange does not officially
support Windows Server 2008 yet. IBM is currently
testing Data Protection for Exchange 5.5 with Windows Server 2008.
The *target* is to have it completed in 2Q08, with a PTF,
namely Data Protection for Exchange 5.5.1.
As always, this is a target
I'd say businesses are migrating in all kinds of directions. I'd think
that you'd see some migrating from other products to TSM as well,
however, it would be interesting to see current numbers.
See Ya'
Howard
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dsmc q backup -nodename=NODE_NAME '{FILESPACE_NAME}\*.pst' -subdir=yes
-inactive -detail C:\Output.txt
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Angus Macdonald
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 2:18 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Query to
That's got me started. Many thanks
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Thorneycroft, Doug
Sent: 16 April 2008 15:08
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Query to list .pst files
dsmc q backup -nodename=NODE_NAME
Maybe it has something to do with IBM's recent audit of TSM licensee's.
I know our management is seriously thinking of abandoning TSM due to
cost.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Howard Coles
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 10:19
Well, I would have to say as a recent victim of that process it did
suck, (and yes I am toning it down). If IBM wants to audit the customer
that's fine, but make sure the company you outsource that to has a clue
and is customer oriented and not hostile!
The original imbecilic person who started
When an automated tape library is shared between TSM instances, do
the library manager and the library client(s) necessarily see all the
tapes in the library? Is there a configuration that will restrict a
library client to seeing and using only a specific range of vol-
sers? We prefer to share
To the point below, Twin Cities have been going from NBU to TSM...
There's a shortage of TSM talent in the state on MN
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Remeta, Mark
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 9:43 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Unfortunately, even with the configuration recommended in number 3, we have
problems with locale on Debian Sarge. Upgrading to Etch, it worked fine.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 6:13 AM, Peter Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
If you Google tsm ubuntu you will see that many folks have gotten it
Deduplicating VTLs fit better into NBU sites. TSM's progressive
incremental methodology already reduces the data stream, making deduping
VTLs less of a win, though it can still be beneficial. My point is that
VTL vendors may not look as positively on TSM as they do on other
less-efficient backup
We are still trying to get our minds around the crap we were sent by the
auditors. What we were told in meetings and what actually happened
turned out to be 180 out, and basically must have had the same
experience. The good news here is some idiot already has brought in NBU,
which has caused all
I have been configuring a new TSM server since last November. At first
I wanted a VTL. But when I learned from the Oxford symposium
presentations
that TSM would have its own dedup in version 6,
and considering the cost of the vtl, I ditched it and ordered a lot more
of SATA arrays for less
The VTL can compliment a TSM installation where you have a real tape
library (RTL) manager and RTL clients. Adding a LAN-Free agent to a RTL
client is greatly simplified when the RTL client is also attached to
it's own VTL. The RTL client can be the library manager for the VTL and
share the
Actually VTLs can still serve a good purpose with TSM. The ability of
some to emulate a 3584 makes setup and management very easy, and some
use disk MUCH more efficiently than TSM would just doing file class
devices. Also the mount, and seek times are virtually eliminated on
VTLs (if properly
Is Version 6 going to be released this Year or Next?
regards
Colwell, William F. wrote:
I have been configuring a new TSM server since last November. At first
I wanted a VTL. But when I learned from the Oxford symposium
presentations
that TSM would have its own dedup in version 6,
and
Timothy,
I don't remember where I heard it and of course IBM can change it,
but I heard it is scheduled for late this year.
- bill
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Timothy Hughes
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 2:19 PM
To:
It is slotted to be released Jan 2009.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Timothy Hughes
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 2:19 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?
Is Version 6 going to be released this
An IBM TSM person told me that TSM v6 will have db2 for its database and
they are shootng for an announcement in October. Yeehaw!!
Regards,
Nicholas Rodolfich
Network Administrator (AIX)
East Jefferson General Hospital
504-883-6955 (office)
228-223-1187 (mobile)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
I have scheduled a presentation in our offices (Seattle) on TSM 6.1
soon, but here is what the sales folk are saying:
As a matter of fact there are some significant changes 'scheduled' to be
incorporated with TSM 6.1. Let me know if you would like a more formal
and comprehensive look at some of
I have a 5.4.3.0 TSM server running running on Windows 2003 server.
My client in Windows 2000 sp2 server with ba client 5.2.4.0
My schedule SQL_SERVER_SCHEDULE fails because I get an ANS1512E error in my
dsmsched.log file.
However when I review the log file, it appears that everything was
Nothing obvious in the dsmsched.log file how about dsmerror.log?
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Product Development
Level 3 Team Lead
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IBM Tivoli Storage Manager
anything in the dsmerror.log?
are you running Pre or post schedule commands?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
James Choate
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 3:52 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: ANS1512E error on Windows 2000sp2 client
26 matches
Mail list logo
