Ang: ANR0361E Database initialization failed

2010-09-07 Thread Daniel Sparrman
Hi Lance I'm not sure that the APAR you have linked is actually connnected to your problem. Your issue is that after the extend, a DB backup is triggered which fails to read the database, while the APAR fails immedadiatly upon format. The first APAR you linked is also about volume size over 250

New Zealand based TSM user group

2010-09-07 Thread Xav Paice
Some members of the list might find this of interest: Please join the next New Zealand IBM Storage User Group meeting which will be held on Sep 14th in Auckland, and 15th in Wellington at 3:30pm. This meeting will address: TSM, TPC, XIV and SVC. The agenda for this meeting is as follows: TSM 6.

Re: Ang: Re: Ang: 50Mb restored in 4.18h....

2010-09-07 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Hi Daniel, It took a while before this email got published on adsm.org... However, I read the message and I wanted to address the specific issue not the general one with people are complaining about restore times, which they often do. To me the key sentence was "The server has a lot of files, a

Re: monitor client restore?

2010-09-07 Thread Richard Sims
Keith - With a CLI interactive session, messages are written to the invoking terminal; and at least in Unix, that output can be redirected to a file, or pipe to the 'tee' command. Client sessions invoked via the scheduler (as via Define Clientaction and Schedmode Prompted) gain the added benefit

ANR0361E Database initialization failed

2010-09-07 Thread Lance Nakata
I'm running Tivoli Storage Manager for Solaris x86_64 Version 5, Release 5, Level 4.2 on a Sun X4540 "Thor". I was at 79.8% DB utilization: tsm: TSM1>q db Available Assigned Maximum Maximum Page TotalUsed PctMax. Space Capacity Extension Reduction

Re: New server - 6.1.4.1 or 6.2.1.1?

2010-09-07 Thread Remco Post
I've not yet had the pleasure of upgrading from 6.1 to 6.2. The installer (deployment engine) is supposed to take care of everything, but I also know from experience that the DE is not IBM's best product. Now, as for new installs, or upgrades from version 5, please skip 6.1, and avoid at least

Re: New server - 6.1.4.1 or 6.2.1.1?

2010-09-07 Thread John D. Schneider
Remco, If TSM 6.1 is dead, and everybody should just go to 6.2, then please respond to the user's posted problem. He was running 6.1 and tried to upgrade to 6.2.1.1, and had such a miserable failure that he ended up wiping out all his efforts and starting over. How does he get to 6.2 if the up

Ang: Re: Ang: 50Mb restored in 4.18h....

2010-09-07 Thread Daniel Sparrman
Hi there Henrik I asked a few questions to try to get a pointer. Concerning my point on TSM performance, Nicklas was the one saying he had the organisation complaining on TSM for poor performance. Perhaps you should read his first message, and you'd understand why I said as I said. Scroll down

monitor client restore?

2010-09-07 Thread Keith Arbogast
I'm having a bad memory day. How does a client admin monitor the progress of a restore run from the command line? Are messages written to a TSM client log during a restore? Thank you, Keith Arbogast Indiana University

Re: New server - 6.1.4.1 or 6.2.1.1?

2010-09-07 Thread Remco Post
Repeat after me: TSM 6.1 is dead! :) Really, 6.1 is never a good choice, always go straight to 6.2. -- Gr., Remco On 7 sep. 2010, at 20:39, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU wrote: > I am putting up 2-new Linux based 6.x servers that will eventually replace > older 5.5.x boxes. > > My issue/question is...

Re: Ang: 50Mb restored in 4.18h....

2010-09-07 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Hi, I am sure everything is configured correct at Niklas site. Test classic vs nqr restore and you will be suprised. //Henrik -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Daniel Sparrman Sent: den 7 september 2010 09:40 To: ADSM-L@vm.mar

New server - 6.1.4.1 or 6.2.1.1?

2010-09-07 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
I am putting up 2-new Linux based 6.x servers that will eventually replace older 5.5.x boxes. My issue/question is should I go with 6.1.4.1 or 6.2.1.1? Part of the reason for asking this is due to my bad experience with trying to upgrade a test server from 6.1.3.4 to 6.2.1 - total failur

TDP for Exchange single mailbox restore failure

2010-09-07 Thread Stackwick, Stephen
Like the post says, I'm trying to restore a single mailbox from an Exchange 2007 server. Everything up-to-date: client 6.2.1, TDP 6.1.2. I'm pretty sure I got all the pre-reqs down for a restore, but here's the thing: I can restore a mailbox in my AD OU, but not in a child domain. TDP restores t

Re: Webport defaults

2010-09-07 Thread Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,IT
The port is random unless you define it. You need to allow the program to listen, once it is allowed to listen it will tell the TSM server what port to use. Try this on 2008 and 2008 R2: (use at your own risk, but it is what I use) netsh advfirewall firewall add rule name="IBM Tivoli Storage Mana

Re: experiences backing up NetApp metrocluster with TSM

2010-09-07 Thread Remco Post
Metroclusters, nothing more than two netapps... nothing special if you want to do NDMP, just zone your tape drives to both nodes in the cluster. On 7 sep 2010, at 17:03, Paul Zarnowski wrote: > If anyone has any experience backing up a NetApp metrocluster, I would be > interested in talking to

Re: Webport defaults

2010-09-07 Thread Efim
Hi The defaults is webport 0 0 - random ports, so use webport 1552 1553 and if you use CAD open only 1552 port from server to client and 1500 (default) from client to server. -- Efim

experiences backing up NetApp metrocluster with TSM

2010-09-07 Thread Paul Zarnowski
If anyone has any experience backing up a NetApp metrocluster, I would be interested in talking to them. Thanks. ..Paul -- Paul ZarnowskiPh: 607-255-4757 Manager, Storage Services Fx: 607-255-8521 719 Rhodes Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-3801Em: p...@cor

Webport defaults

2010-09-07 Thread Lee, Gary D.
What are the default ports for the webport option? Tcpclientport is 1501. I am running into problems on win 2008, and need to know what are the defaults so as to open up the firewall. Thanks for the help. Gary Lee Senior System Programmer Ball State University phone: 765-285-1310

Re: SV: [ADSM-L] 50Mb restored in 4.18h....

2010-09-07 Thread Efim
Hi try to disable NQR (-disablenqr=yes) It will help. -- Efim

Re: SV: [ADSM-L] SV: [ADSM-L] 50Mb restored in 4.18h....SOLVED, but some questions

2010-09-07 Thread Henrik Vahlstedt
Good! Instead of trying to explain this properly in an email I refer to the author of adsm quickfacts plus the BA client guide, Classic restore vs No Query restore. :) //Henrik -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Niklas Lundstr

SV: [ADSM-L] SV: [ADSM-L] 50Mb restored in 4.18h....SOLVED, but some questions

2010-09-07 Thread Niklas Lundström
Thanks to Henrik Wahlstedt this got solved. Henrik, tack för hjälpen och telefonsamtalet, jag har faktiskt inte fått nåt mail från dig... Restore processing finished. Total number of objects restored: 137 Total number of objects failed: 0 Total number of bytes transferred: 59

Re: SV: [ADSM-L] 50Mb restored in 4.18h....

2010-09-07 Thread Remco Post
Hi, I'm sorry, but you are wrong, duplex mismatch Does cause the speed to drop to Aboutaleb 5K/s. I've Deen Thissen on numerous occasions. -- Gr., Remco On 7 sep. 2010, at 08:02, Niklas Lundström wrote: > I actually restored the files to my workstation, and the network settings are > fine

Re: SV: [ADSM-L] SV: [ADSM-L] 50Mb restored in 4.18h....

2010-09-07 Thread Stefan Folkerts
There is a ~30minute delay between the start of the restore and the first mount, did you have drives free for this restore? 09/04/2010 11:34:42 -> 09/04/2010 12:07:32 -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] Namens Niklas Lundström Verzo

SV: [ADSM-L] Ang: 50Mb restored in 4.18h....

2010-09-07 Thread Niklas Lundström
Directories are on a dirmc diskpool. Actually I only restored few directories, and the files were all in the last sub-directory. On this particular server that is big the data isn't collocated. We collocated by group and this server isn't in any group. There were only 3 tapes involved, and alth

SV: [ADSM-L] SV: [ADSM-L] SV: [ADSM-L] 50Mb restored in 4.18h....

2010-09-07 Thread Niklas Lundström
It's Jaguar 3 drives, so the problem isn't there... -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] För Mark Blunden Skickat: den 7 september 2010 08:56 Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Ämne: Re: [ADSM-L] SV: [ADSM-L] SV: [ADSM-L] 50Mb restored in 4.18h

Ang: 50Mb restored in 4.18h....

2010-09-07 Thread Daniel Sparrman
Hi there To begin with, TSM as a product has no issues with fast restores. If the data isnt placed correctly, restores might slow up though. - Did you restore files or files and directories? - Are you storing directories on tape or in a dedicated diskpool using DIRMC? - Considering it was only