TSM for Linux on non-IBM hardware

2004-03-09 Thread Chris Young
Is anyone using TSM on Linux on non-IBM hardware? I am trying to run this on a Dell machine using SuSE 8 and have been unsuccessful in finding a way to stabilize the system. If so, please would you provide me with details about what version of Linux you are using and on what hardware platform?

Re: Poor TSM Performances

2003-03-06 Thread Chris Young
Ruddy, In a test that I did on a client site, average file size can account for huge performance differentials when using LAN-Free. In one case, I ran a test that compared transfer times of a 276480 byte file to a 2146435072 byte file, the resultant transfer rate was .032 MB/sec. for the small

Re: ACSLS or Native TSM manager

2003-03-04 Thread Chris Young
types. This is valid for all TSM levels. - Chris Young -Original Message- From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 7:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ACSLS or Native TSM manager We run AIX 4.3.3, have gone from TSM 3.1 to 3.7 to 4.1

Re: ACSLS or Native TSM manager

2003-03-04 Thread Chris Young
StorageTek 9310 tape libraries are only controllable via ACSLS or LibStation. This is due to the fact that it only supports a TCP/IP (IEEE 802.3, 10baseT, half-duplex), RS423 or 3270 robotic control interface. - Chris Young -Original Message- From: Hart, Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Shared Storagetek L180 library

2003-02-19 Thread Chris Young
To the best of my knowledge, the STK L180 does not support ACSLS. It is pure SCSI based library control. However, what you probably could would be to use Tivoli's native library sharing functionality, introduce a SCSI multiplexer (since the TSM server would need visibility to each of the drives in

Integrating Legacy Systems with TSM

2002-10-30 Thread Chris Young
I have several legacy systems (VMS and VME) that I am hoping to integrate into my TSM environment. However, TSM does not provide clients for these platforms. Has anyone else experienced this difficulty either with these platforms or other platforms like this? If so, how did you resolve this

Re: ACSLS connection

2002-04-16 Thread Chris Young
Association of Contract Employees (P.A.C.E.) San Jose, CA (408) 257-3037 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Chris Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 6:45 AM Subject: Re: ACSLS connection Craig, If you are using a single TSM server

Re: ACSLS connection

2002-04-02 Thread Chris Young
required as it is when using LAN-Free clients. You can obtain more information on EDT-DistribuTAPE from www.gresham-software.com/storage/products/distributape.htm. Chris Young -Original Message- From: Murphy, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 9:05 PM To: [EMAIL

Re: TSM client for AIX5 on 32 bits system

2002-02-20 Thread Chris Young
Michel, It has been my experience that it is possible to use the TSM 4.2.1 client for AIX 4.3.3 on an AIX 5.1 machine so long as you have the necessary patches applied. This should also allow you to overcome the 64-bit issue as well. Chris Young -Original Message- From: Meilink

Re: TSM support of STK library in SAN environment

2002-02-15 Thread Chris Young
John, To respond to your questions, please see responses below: Christopher Young -Original Message- From: John Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TSM support of STK library in SAN environment Greetings,

Re: Version 3.1 client on HPUX 10.2

2001-11-16 Thread Chris Young
I am aware of a site where the individual is running v3.1 clients on HP 10.20. However, they are using Autosys to initiate the backup operations. They have not had any problems with this configuration as far as I am aware. Chris Young Gresham -Original Message- From: James healy

Re: LAN free backup for NT

2001-11-02 Thread Chris Young
A requirement for LAN-Free is that you are running TSM server version 4.2.1 or later. Christopher S. Young Senior System Engineer Gresham Enterprise Storage www.greshamstorage.com Office: 303.413.1799 x 205 Mobile: 303.717.2745 -Original Message- From: Leijnse, Finn F SITI-ISES-31

Re: ACSLS, library sharing and SAN

2001-10-29 Thread Chris Young
Dmitri, To answer your questions: Q: Why is Gresham's EDT product required as part of the Storage Agent/LAN-Free solution? A: Gresham's EDT product was selected to handle tape resource brokering between TSM and ACSLS/LibStation. In particular, EDT-DistribuTAPE enables TSM to use a single

Re: Strange behaviour????

2001-10-26 Thread Chris Young
Jerry, I have seen this problem in the past but it isn't really a problem. I believe Tivoli would refer to it as a security feature. What happens when backups are performed is that directories, not files, are bound to the management class with the longest retention period. If you look at

Re: SAN Environment

2001-10-24 Thread Chris Young
throughput for each tape drive (3 in parallel). I hope, IBM/Tivoli can resolve this issue soon. Joerg Nouvertne http://home.wtal.de/the_swordsman -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Young Sent: Dienstag, 23. Oktober 2001 21:37

Re: SAN Environment

2001-10-23 Thread Chris Young
One other thing that is interesting to note...If you are using LAN-Free, you can create a management class that points to a disk pool and a management class that points to a tape pool and then make entries in the incl/excl list to include these management classes. By doing this, you can direct

Re: Mixed drives in STK library

2001-10-19 Thread Chris Young
If you are employing StorageTek's ACSLS or LibStation, you can add EDT-DistribuTAPE to the mix to support both tape drive types in one library. The interface with TSM is via the external library manager (ELM) component. In essence, you would create two library definitions in TSM, one for DLT and

Re: storage agent?

2001-10-18 Thread Chris Young
When/If TSM implements 3rd party copy, they will be capable of Serverless backup because the metadata will be routed via the SAN to the server opposed to being transferred over the LAN. LAN-Free, on the other hand, employs the StorageAgent, which sends the metadata over the LAN while physical