Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 8:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Possibly OT: How to diagnose 3494 ATL communications failures
Recently, my TSM AIX server has been reporting issues communicating with
our 3494 ATL (plain jane
Recently, my TSM AIX server has been reporting issues communicating with
our 3494 ATL (plain janeno VTS).This is not a new connection. Has
been working for years.
TSM has started to notice the issues.
I contacted IBM, who says they couldn't find anything wrong. We checked
the network
Thanks for the feedback.
What I would first pursue, per analogous ADSM QuickFacts entry:
Query operation Error - Library is Offline to Host.
In response to something like 'mtlib -l /dev/lmcp0 -qL' means
that
there is no access because the 3494 is itself offline. Go to
Once again, I am looking for help/confirmation/suggestions on how to make
this seemingly impossible configuration of Library Manager/Library
Server/TSM server behind firewall.
This is what we are attemptingsorry about the repeats for those folks
who have been living through this mess, with me
it's inventory with the
library's inventory. When you add the CHECKL=B parameter, no tapes will be
mounted, unless a barcode is unreadable.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 14
-
From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 8:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: To Audit or Not to Audit...that is the question !
Thank you for the feedback/information.
I must have a messed-up library. I start the audit when I got your
message
Speaking of training, Tivoli Technical Exchange has some more seminars on
Performance Tuning, in July.
Go here:
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/supp_tech_exch.html
Richard Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
05/13/2004 10:28 AM
Now that I have 3-TSM servers sharing 2-Tape Libraries, I need to get into
the issue of Vault Management.
So, the questions are starting to flow..
Since you normally vault a storage pool and the tapes are associated
with the storage pool of the library client (LC) TSM server, do I need
Thanks to everyone for their suggestions on how to address this issue.
Still waiting for Group Collocation :-) !
Richard Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
05/04/2004 07:49 PM
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
[EMAIL
The subject pretty much covers it.
I need to communicate between TSM servers, one behind a firewall (tape
Library Client), the other not (tape Library Manager which communicates
with the 3494 which has the SAN FC attached drives)...
It would be nice if the two servers always kept the connection
Can someone give me some suggestions on how to deal with these errors.
We are having lots of problems backing up 2K3 servers. Usually get errors
about the WMI file.
Yes, I have the latest, 5.2.2.10 client. The server is 5.2.1.3.
Is there something special I need to configure if ShadowCopy is
I thought the same thing. So why are the 2003 servers/TSM trying to back
it up ?
Richard Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
05/05/2004 10:18 AM
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
Re: Problems
Any one have any idea on what the target is for this much needed feature ?
I thought it was originally targeted for 5.2.2 (unless I missed it
somewhere !).
I have 125 tapes with less than 10% used, due to collocation and a bunch
of small nodes and I really need to reduce that number !
-collocated tape pool.
Joerg Pohlmann
604-535-0452
Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2004-05-04 07:54
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:What ever
If you would check the ADSM-L archives, you would see that this topic has
been discussed numerous times in the past.
Everyone has their opinions/likes/dislikes/needs/budgets/etc, which are
often factors in what software is purchased.
I use TSMManager and think it is fantastic. The developer is
I would also encourage folks to get 8.4.6.0 of Atape. The first entry in
the readme says it all:
8.4.6.0 Fix excessice retry when configuring smc device for long boot
problem
Add mtlib utility for 3494 and SCSI Medium Changer Libraries
We were seeing 30-minute boot times until we
I can concur on this. I also called IBM TSM on zOS support, back a while
ago, about performance issues.
He told me the default maxquick value is 4% of allocated/available
REGION. For us, we bumped it to 20M. He also said there is a usermod
that will zap TSM to make it default to 10% (or
Anyone seen these kind of error messages and/or suggest what to do about
them ? This is on a 2K3 server going to an AIX TSM 5.2.1.3 server.
The client is at the latest, 5.2.2.9 !
04/25/2004 20:33:40 sessRecvVerb(): Invalid verb received.
04/25/2004 20:33:40 sessRecvVerb(): Invalid verb
To answer the various responses related to my question:
Yes, I personally physically labeled the tapes (both sticky external and
electronic internal). These tapes were not pre-labeled, AFAIK.
While I have run the physical diagnostics from the control panel, I have
not run the tapeutil tests from
This is really becoming annoying. I need to figure out if I have a
hardware issue, or not ! I just got these errors, again. They seemed to
follow th dismounting of the tape. These are brand new tapes !
Do I have defective tapes or a defective drive ?
Has anyone else seen anything like this ?
Thank you for the explaination.
However, what does it all mean ? Why do I get error message that try to
address 20-different possibilities of reasons for some failure, that I am
not sure I am having ?
What does it all mean to me ?
Should I just call IBM and have them come figure it out ?
Have you looked here:
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/patches/client/v5r2/Windows/Win32/v522/
Robert Ouzen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
04/19/2004 12:24 PM
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not sure if this will help, but I found a reference to a Novell TID that
talks about Backup applications that are not Cluster enabled.
It is: 10065605
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/19/2004
09:58:17 AM:
Every question seems to relate to Novell when I am on here...We
My AIX TSM server (5.2.2.3) just spewed the following error messages.
Talk about schizophrenic/indecisive !!
What gives ? All I was doing is a DB backup. Just inserted and
initialized this tape. The init went fine.
This is an IBM 3583-L72 with 2-LTO2 drives.
Recently, we have been reconfiguring/locking down a lot of the TCPIP ports
in use by the TSM servers and clients, attempting to control/route TSM
traffic across a private subnet versus the more heavily used public
network.
However, we have been having some TSM scheduler communications, due to
-routed subnet for our clients, but
the clients are required a second NIC connected to the private,
non-routed subnet.
H. Milton Johnson
Voice: (210) 677-6728
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Sent: Tuesday
and no amount of port opening, aliasing, etc. can get
your traffic to flow to and from 192.168.20.44.
H. Milton Johnson
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 12:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
I never stop my TSM server to add volumes. I just let the TSM server
format the volume. Define the cluster using standard IDCAMS as you have
and then just define the volume to the storage pool. TSM does the rest.
Or, I just have a dummy copy of the opt file to perform the standalone
formating.
I have a client reporting these kind of errors errors:
04/02/2004 23:04:02 PrivIncrFileSpace: Received rc=164 from
fioGetDirEntries: /
04/02/2004 23:04:04 ANS4023E Error processing '/': file input/output error
04/02/2004 23:04:04 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'UCSMCV.DAILY' failed. Return
code = 12.
I have always wondered about this but could not find a difinitve answer.
Who controls/manages the 3590 tape drive cleaning, in a 3494, when the
library is shared between z/OS/MVS and TSM on AIX and the drives used by
the AIX system are FC attached and installed as open systems drives ?
I ask
Is this a workable configuration ?
So far, all of my attempts at making this work, say it isn't.
The major problem is that as soon as I enable the 3494/3590E1A drives on
the Windows box (2003), I start getting drive inaccessibilty failures on
the AIX TSM server. The SAN connection is via Qlogic
-Original Message-
From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 1:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Windows TSM server and sharing 3494 ATL across SAN
Is this a workable configuration ?
So far, all of my attempts at making this work, say it isn't.
The major
INSTEAD of the TSM SCSI driver with
a
TSM 5.2 server.
It's documented in the Getting Started guide for Windows TSM 5.2.
If you're still on 5.1, forget I mentioned it...
-Original Message-
From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 2:38 PM
To: [EMAIL
Has anyone else noticed that the TSM 5.2.2.5 client on Windows 2000, does
not remove itself from memory after shutting it down, properly ?
I have noticed this twice now.
Robert Ouzen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
04/01/2004 05:16 AM
Please respond to
, right?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 11:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Library sharing
Well, in this case, it isn't, sortof...
I don't have *ANY* path statements
Found this in the readme for the 5.2.2.3 Netware TSM client: Looks like
your problem !
Novell NetWare Incident: 2928395
Failing NetWare OS Version: NW6.5
Failing SMS/TSA Modules Version: tsafs.nlm
Failing Service Pack/TSA up Level: NW6.5
FIXING SERVICE
showed you
how to
get the serial number, but the WWN can be gotten with 'lsattr -El rmtx'
command.
Bill Boyer
DSS, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 8:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Trying to get ATL library sharing working between two TSM AIX servers.
I think I finally got the definitions correct..at least they seem to
function.
However, I can't get the library client (capella) to use the drives. Every
time it does, I get these errors in the activity log:
: Library sharing
Hi,
From my experience with 3584 Library, the rmt devices should be
The same on both machines e.g. server_1 /dev/rmt1 /dev/rmt2 etc...
And also on the library client /dev/rmt1 ...
AH
-Original Message-
From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
lto2 srctype=server desttype=drive library=3584
device=/dev/rmt4
Clear as mud, right?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 11:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Library sharing
Well
We are configure our new Lotus Domino servers and have some questions
about the TSM client (Windows 2003 server) and how and how much memory it
will/can use.
These servers are going to be big, with 4-6TB of disk storage, to support
20-30K accounts. Nightly backups will probably be in the 100's of
Just did a query of the NODE table of my TSM AIX 5.2.1.3 and noticed
something weird.
The TCP_NAME and TCP_ADDRESS fields from one node has been overlayed onto
a completely different nodes entry.
Checked the DSM.SYS (both of these boxes are AIX systems) and they are
correct/haven't changed for a
Let me add a few things gleaned from my (and others) experience with this
process.
1. It is best to get the 5.2.2.3 patch release. It addresses memory-leak
issues in 5.2.2.0.
2. While the recommendation of running the backup from the server that
holds the master replica is probably OK in
In your DSM.OPT on the client (this is from the book):
Tcpclientaddress
The tcpclientaddress option specifies a TCP/IP address if your client node
has more than one address, and you want the server to contact an address
other than the one that was used to make the first server contact.
My understanding of TCPCLIENTADDRESS
is different. We use it for multi-homed boxes that have a separate NIC
that connects to a private, internal, GIGE subnet so that the backups are
pushed across it versus the public subnet.
To verify this, when I check the details
for a TSM node (on the TSM
FWIW, I found this sentence in another TSM book:
The value of the tcpclientaddress option must be the service IP address.
This is the IP address used for primary traffic to and from the node.
Wholey, Joseph (IDS DMDS) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When you do a Q VOL 00025-L1 F=D, what does it say is the
LOCATION/STATUS and such ?
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/18/2004
01:17:00 PM:
I'm trying to recover from a bunch of hardware errors on our tape
library,
and issued the following to get a good backup for DRM:
I seem to recall someone asking this question but I don't recall them
getting an answer.
I am looking at the Passport downloads for Tivoli products.
The TSM entries are labeled as either Non-AP eAssemby or AP eAssemby.
What does this mean ?
Hi,
is the removable storage service on the w2k3 box disabled?If not do so.
Not sure. I turned the box off and haven't had any more problems. I will
restart and disable it.
Have you configured the library to use the tsmscsi.sys driver? Not the
Microsoft
driver.
As I mentioned, it dosn't see
I am in the middle of a large, multi-TSM, shared-library, different OS,
different platform configuration process. Here is the layout:
Current Configuration
---
1-3494 ATL which consists of 8-3590B, ESCON attached drives (uses
exclusively by our z/OS system) and
I checking the TSM Concepts book, there is a link to a zipped/tarred file
that contains a bunch of worksheets:
ftp://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/SG245416
Also, IIRC, the Implementation/Planning Guide book also has some
appendixes with sample forms to ask questions of clients.
ADSM: Dist Stor
Not sure if this message got lost and now that I am having some issues, I
am reposting..
Yesterday, I installed TSM on the 2K3 system (described below). Now, my
original TSM AIX system is starting to experience problems like this:
3/9/2004 2:50:27 PM ANR8779E Unable to open drive /dev/rmt0,
Not sure if it matters, but I code SCHEDLOGR 14 D, the last value being
Days !
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/08/2004
01:53:58 PM:
Anyone else having problems with the dsmsched and dsmerror log not
truncating
dsm.sys:
Schedlogretention 14
Errorlogretention 14
but are you ettin useful entries
in the AIX error
log?
Many thanks
Andy Wilcox
UNIX Systems Administrator
Aquila Networks
-Original Message-
From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Yep. Already checked all of these.
Yes, the library is online. Checked with both the web/RMU and physically.
Even power-recycled the box.
Yes, I am doing a define of the PATH to the LIBRARY, not the drives.
TAPEUTIL can't talk to the library, either.
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My Windows person has been updating the clients on 2K3 boxes (since we
have been seeing some of the issues addressed in this patch level).
Now, all of those boxes with MS-SQL TDP clients, are screwed/not backing
up. Here is her message:
all the boxes with the sql tdp i upgraded to 5.2.2.5 have
Thank you and Richard for showing me the way.
However, this is a still royal pain !
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/05/2004
09:59:28 AM:
Zoltan,
This is a known problem.
Go to:
www.ibm.com
Search for:
ACO0004E
You will see a KB article about how to resolve
Installing TSM 5.2.2 server on a new AIX system (7028-6C4) - 4GB RAM.
Is there any real advantage/reason to installing the 64-bit version of the
TSM server ?
Opinions ? Thoughts ?
I have spent hours and hours trying to get TSM server 5.2.2.0 on AIX 5.1
to define the PATH to the above tape library.
Every time I click on defining the PATH (/dev/smc0) to this library, TSM
goes off and spins for a while, eventually coming back with some kind of
error about being unable to
Is the TSM Windows 5.2.2 server supported on Windows 2K3 ?
When I check in Passport for what I can download, it says:
IBM Tivoli Storage Manager V5.2.2 Windows Server, Multiplatform,
Multi-Language
Platform(s)
Windows 95,Windows NT,Windows 98,Windows 2000
I thought it was a little odd that
We have never used crontab to perform the backups for Oracle, MS-SQL or
Domino/Notes.
We always use the scheduler to run the COMMAND on the client.
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/18/2004
06:50:47 PM:
Anyone using the Client schedular to backup oracle databases/logs
via
Any idea what the following error messages might be trying to tell me ???
These are coming from an SGI client (latest 5.1.x version available - SGI
support seems to be dropping/dieing)
02/11/04 23:19:07 tryOnTap: undefined descriptor!
02/11/04 23:19:07 tryOnTap: undefined descriptor!
Have you tried here:
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/patches/client/v5r2/Linux/LinuxAMD64/v522/
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/12/2004
12:32:32 PM:
We have a new Redhat Linux Advanced Server 3 Workstation AMD64 client,
but
I can't seem to
Thanks. That was kinda what I figured. No harm in asking !
Any plans to improve upon this ?
We are currently working on expanding our Domino systems to handle 25K+
students/staff. There will be over 30K Notes users to backup, nightly !
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on
I can't speak for your exact situation, but I can sympathize.
TSM does not do a very good/complete job when it comes to handling Netware
servers (NO IMAGE backups, NO SNAPSHOT, NO OPEN FILE SUPPORT).
Yes, we use it for our few Netware servers.
Can't speak for Veritas.
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Have you looked at the Open-File-Support option ?
This works as long as you have another drive/partition to point the
SNAPSHOTCACHELOCATION to. This bit me on a server that is only configured
with *1* partition/drive..Any chance of a feature to get around this
issue ???
In this same vein,
U
You don't have a choice !!! Like I said, I have some systems with a
single partition.
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/11/2004
02:19:51 PM:
From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In this same vein, can someone tell me what
Are Notes/Domino backups effected by the MAXNUMMP/RESOURCEUTILZATION
tuning values ?
The daily backups are starting to get tight on time and I would like to
try to speed things up.
Network is not the issue (private GIG-E) and neither is TSM server CPU
utilization/disk.
PASSPORT ADVANTAGE is what is used to download base versions.
You must be authorized and have an account management id.
Chandrashekar, C. R. (Chandrasekhar) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
02/09/2004 08:25 AM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
We are working on expanding our TSM systems with additional TSM servers,
libraries, etc.
Here is what we have right now and where we are heading
(1) TSM on ZOS using IBM 3494 ATL
(2) TSM on AIX sharing the 3494 but using its own 3590E1A drives attached
to a SAN via FC
New system #3
TSM on
Have you looked at the JOURNAL feature ???
Troy L. Minter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
02/09/2004 03:05 PM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:
I got a tsm question for you. I
not
be
enough for TWO systems of indeterminate size. You may need to go to the
3584.
OK, somebody else shoot it down...
-Original Message-
From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 1:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Configuration
Also, ITSM folks had various Technical Exchange web seminars. Many of
them addressed Performance Tuning in both the SERVER and CLIENT areas,
including recommended settings for things like TCPIP !
I saved the PPT/PDF files from these sessons, if you or anyone is
interested in them. Some of them
I agree on the speed issue.
Adobe Acrobat 6 is a joke. The FIND processes is ridiculous, making you
have to use the mouse, whether you like it or not (under V5, you used to
be able to repeatedly do a CTRL-F to either find again or change the
search value. Now a CTRL-F brings up the annoying find
to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Viewing PDF manuals online
Try ctrl-g for find again.
-Original Message-
From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu
We are having problems getting a Linux client to perform backups (see my
earlier message that has not been responded to...yet !).
What do the numbers after the DNS name mean and how are they relevant ?
Sometimes the numbers are 4-digitsother times 5 ??
2/4/2004 10:36:48 AM ANR0406I Session
/2004 11:18 AM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: What do these numbers mean ?
TCP portnumber.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: woensdag 4 februari
A user of mine just install the 5.2.2 client on a new RedHat 9 system.
The symptom is: The back starts and immediately hangs/just sits there.
Yes he remembered to: (you need to install the compat-gcc-c++-7.3-2.96.122.i386.rpm)
The server is TSM 5.2.0 on AIX 5.1.
The only this we see on the
What platform ?
My TSM server on AIX at 5.2.0.0 is working just fine. In fact, I am
really glad they addresses the problems their code caused when using
MOZILLA !
Yiannakis Vakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
02/02/2004 08:31 AM
Please respond to ADSM:
Try here:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/tividd/td/StorageMangerforSysback5.6.1.html
Lawrence Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/29/2004 01:44 PM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Take a good look at TSMMANAGER. It does all the reporting/managing we
need. I live in it, daily.
It is well worth the cost, which, IMHO, is very resonable/inexpensive for
everything it does !
Kevin Godfrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/26/2004
Well then, IBM needs to revisit their own technical documents. From a
recent Technical Exchange series on TSM Performance Tuning:
OS Platform Specific Recommendations - UNIX
Use raw logical volumes for best TSM server performance
AIX:
mklv -ae -t tsmdb -y db1 volgrp1 64 hdisk4
mklv -ae -t
As for the AIX perspective, we too converted everything TSM related, to
RAW versus JFS (we went through the IBM Technical Exchange seminars,
especially the ones that covered PERFORMANCE).
From what we can tell, things seem to have become worse. We have not seen
any drastic (or just really
I goofed and forgot to set DELETE BACKUPS = YES on a TDP SQL client (now
corrected)
So now, there are 1/2 Terrabyte of garbage SQL backups.
How do I get rid of them ?
I was hoping that EXPIRE INVENTORY would clear them out since I corrected
the setting, but it has not.
to eliminate garbage like this.
maybe it also exist for the SQL Agent?
regards
joachim
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Januar 2004 14:56
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Flushing out old TDP SQL backups
I goofed and forgot to set
Yes, that is the setting I was refering to (badly). When I checked the
node error logs, I saw the messages about the setting being set to NO.
We just don't understand why occupancy for this node is 1/2 terrabyte when
the whole box only has 12GB used space
Oh well, back to digging for some
Just started doing NDS/eDirectory backup and restore testing via the TSM
5.2.2 client on Netware 6.0 SP3 boxes and I have a few questions.
1. The NDS backup seems to *ALWAYS* backup *ALL* entries in NDS/tree
(the TSM server is idle). Is this the way it is or did I miss something ?
2. How
I need to backup a Netware 6.0 SP3 server with eDirectory (NDS + LDAP).
Do I need to code anything special in the DSM.OPT / INCLUDE or is this an
automatic thing ? If it is automatic, how can I tell ? Is it part of the
server specific stuff ?
Also plan to do a test recovery of this server to
Do you have the NSS patches installed ?
There have been some major problems with NSS. Currently the post SP
patches are still in beta but every comment I have seen is to install
them, asap. Some of the fixed address data corruption issues, especially
from compression.
Curt Watts [EMAIL
Just installed and ran a backup with my first 5.2.2.0 client on a W2K box
and have the following issues/questions:
ANR0440W Protocol error on session 18813 for node () - invalid verb
header received.
Any clue what causes this and why ?
01/08/2004 12:58:21 ANS4987E Error processing
Upgraded my AIX TSM server to AIX 5.1 and TSM 5.2.1.3, about 3-weeks ago.
I get an email from a user about the TSM server not responding, during the
holidays.
I checked the server Activity Log and here is what I found for the time
frame in question:
01/02/04 01:33:24 ANR0403I Session 12878
Have you tried the 5.2.2.0 client ?
I just pulled them and they list Netware 6.5 as supported while 5.2.1.x
does not !
Go here:
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/client/v5r2/Netware/v522/
Bill Fitzgerald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor
This seems to be a hot topic, so let me add another log to the fire.
We recently upgraded our test TSM AIX server to AIX 5.1. Then we upgraded
the TSM server to 5.2.0.0.
Unfortunately, I missed the part about having to upgrade ATAPE to 8.2.x
(it was still at 7) *BEFORE* upgrading TSM.
Yes we did. Rebooted numerous times. AIX says the drive is configured and
available.
David E Ehresman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12/12/2003 11:02 AM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Started getting these error messages, recently:
12/05/03 10:48:45 TransErrno: Unexpected error from GetFSInfo:statvfs64,
errno = 145
12/05/03 10:50:16 TransErrno: Unexpected error from lstat, errno = 145
12/05/03 10:50:16 PrivIncrFileSpace: Received rc=131 from
fioGetDirEntries: /
12/05/03
Thanks for the help, Richard.
Will look into the NFS issue.
Richard Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12/05/2003 11:32 AM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: SGI client
The EXPORT command does it. I am currently running an EXPORT NODE TO
SERVER to move the data from one TSM server to another. This is the
command I used/the WEB GUI generated. What you are looking for is the
FILEDATA=ALL (or you can choose Backups, activebackups, archives, etc.)
EXPORT NODE
In my experience in various attempts at IMPORT/EXPORT, the numbers *NEVER*
matched. Always seemed to be a small (1-10 bytes) difference.
Sung Y Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12/02/2003 04:27 PM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To:
Have you thought of creating/using BACKUP SETS ?
Pasquale, Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/18/2003 11:07 AM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Catalog Size and large
We have an AS/400 system we would like to backup with TSM.
We read that the OS/400 we have is downlevel so we have ordered and
scheduled an upgrade of the OS.
However, now there is the issue of BRMS !Is is absolutely required ?
When I read through some of the readme files, the only software
901 - 1000 of 1285 matches
Mail list logo
