-Original Message-
From: Paul Zarnowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 20:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LTO versus 3590
At 01:32 PM 2/7/2001 +0100, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM wrote:
...
the LTO start/stop characteristics are something to take
-Original Message-
From: Verellen, Luc [NCSBE] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 16:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LTO versus 3590
Hello,
We're in the process of configuring a new TSM server in an offsite location,
and we need to decide on the tape technology
At 01:32 PM 2/7/2001 +0100, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM wrote:
...
the LTO start/stop characteristics are something to take in consideration.
Data on a 100 GB. volume can (and will) be scattered across the tape, so
when you are restoring a lot of data, you will see long seek times. We
choose for 3590
Hello,
We're in the process of configuring a new TSM server in an offsite location,
and we need to decide on the tape technology that we're going to use.
Some information on our backup mechanism : we do use collocation, and use
incremental forever (we never take full backups). Some of our file
