Hi,
Volume is already checked in on the library manager and has the correct
owner ship? (just to confirm).
What about performing an audit library on the client?
Doing this audit on the library client will sync its status about
volumes in use with the library manager thus freeing this already
Afternoon
We had similar issues sometime ago now, when we had non IBM
carts in our library and the picker drive was an LTO1 path.
We have since removed all non IBM carts especially EMTEC and moved the
picker drive to a LTO2 drive.
Touch would it has been stable.
Regards
Boris,
Officially, Data Protection for SQL only supports
the x64 version while running on an x64 operating system and
the x32 version while running on an x64 operating system.
I am still trying to understand why you would want to
run SQL Server 32-bit on a 64-bit OS.
Thanks,
Del
We will be upgrading our server and clients to tsm server version. Has
anyone experienced any issues with it or should watch out for?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Del Hoobler
Sent: 2008, September, 10 8:53 AM
To:
Hi Del,
I can see a point in that. Maybe there is a Application that only works with
SQL 32-bit?
Best Regards
Christian Svensson
WW Support: +44-1453-84 7009
U.S. Support: +1-866-832-2267
Cell: +46-70-325 1577
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: cristie.christian.svensson
Hi Del and Christian,
thanks for your answers. I can't answer why our dba admins uses the 32 bit
database on the 64 bit operating system. I'm only the TSM admin. I will ask
them.
Best regards,
Boris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im
We have been running 5.5.0.3 for a long time with no issues.
However there is a pretty critical problem with 5.5.0.x that is resolved
in 5.5.1 so it is suggested you go to that level after upgrading to base
5.5 (you did not say what level you are coming from).
Hi,
Do not upgrade to 5.5.0 because you got critical issues in 5.5.0
We have upgrade many servers to 5.5.1 and that works much better so upgrade to
5.5.1.
Best Regards
Christian Svensson
WW Support: +44-1453-84 7009
U.S. Support: +1-866-832-2267
Cell: +46-70-325 1577
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A customer of mine requested to use the TSM GUI interface. I am running
Linux on zSeries, SUSE LINUX Enterprise Server 9 (s390x) and have the TSM
Client Version 5, Release 5, Level 1.0 installed. I ran
/opt/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmcad and then went to
http://9.63.10.116:1581/ . When I click
Greetings,
We are running TSM 5.4.3.0 server on AIX 5.3ML5. The Lan-free VCB
proxy is running TSM client 5.5.0.6.
We are getting an unexpected result with our VMWare Consolidated
Backups. We are just starting to run these in volume, and we are
getting frequent messages:
09/10/08
Either increase the maximum allowed mountpoints or put a line in the
client DSM.OPT along the lines of
resourceutilization 5 (5 works well with 2 mountpoints allowed)
See Ya'
Howard
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Schneider,
Hi,
One of our two TSM servers hit with TSM table locking at 5.5.0 with
performing a long running restore. We upgraded to 5.5.1 and have been in
a steady state since.
TSM OS AIX, 5.3
Tivoli Storage Manager Extended Edition 5.5.1.0 currently
However, our second TSM server which backs up to
Yes, use YOUR admin id, replacing the one that pops up by default.
Never use the server id that comes up. IF you change the password for
the server's ID then you'll have to do so by re-running dsmc and setting
the password there, then restarting all the dsmc processes on the
client.
See Ya'
Copypool simultaneous write?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Schneider, John
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 9:35 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] How does VCB backups handle resource utilization?
Greetings,
We
Good question, but we aren't using copypool simultaneous write.
Best Regards,
John D. Schneider
Phone: 314-364-3150
Cell: 314-750-8721
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Conway, Timothy
Sent: Wednesday,
Howard,
But resourceutilization is 4 now. It should give me fewer mount
points, not more. So why I am overrunning the client's maximum mount
points of 2 when resourceutilization is 4?
The reason I can't just increase the client's maximum mount
points until the message goes away
It's late and it's long ago, but I seem to remember something about
these mount point and resourceutil things in the line of:
Resource 4, # mountpoint
- 1 admin session
- 1 mountpoint for diskpools
- 2 mountpoint max for tape mounts
So in you case, going directly to tape, you will get a max of 3
I did a full DB backup on my old AIX server. I tried to restore this DB backup
on Linux, but it doesn't work. IBM says this is not supported. They told me to
do a server export / import.
I setup a server to server export / import but I can't seem to get my storage
pools and volhistory to come
Did the storage pool definitions come across, but not connectivity to
the pools themselves?
--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
CDW Berbee
System engineer
7145 Boone Avenue North, Suite 140
Brooklyn Park MN 55428-1511
763-592-5963
www.berbee.com
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist
You are going to run into problems just simply because of hardware
platform changes. The 64bit RS/6000 platform uses a different endian
than the 32/64bit Intel based platforms that you would normally run SUSE
on.
Before you proceed make sure that you'll be able to access the data you
have on
Thanks for your responses!
None of the storage pools definitions came across.
For the import / export I'm connecting over the network. When I did the DB
backup, I was able to read the tape. This is what I was getting trying to do a
DB restore:
ANR8328I 001: LTO volume 000431L3 mounted in
Tell us the exact export command you used.
--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
CDW Berbee
System engineer
7145 Boone Avenue North, Suite 140
Brooklyn Park MN 55428-1511
763-592-5963
www.berbee.com
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Export server won't define your stgpools, devclasses, libraries, drives,
etc.. It exports all the things the server needs to manage the clients
the exporting server has.
Make sure you have the space, and then run your export server. By
default, all you'll get is schedules, client definitions and
Ok, now we are getting down to the nitty gritty. Your example
completely contradicts what is in the Performance Guide, which provides
a table which I reproduce below. I hope email doesn't mess up the
columns. It looks correct to me, I assure you. :-)
RESOURCEUTILIZATION valueMaximum
Boris,
I have recently setup TDP Backups for SQL 64 bit.
Not sure about SQL x32 on windows x64.
My setup:
TSM B/A Client x64 v5.5.1.0
TSM TDP x64 v5.5.0.0
SQL Server 2005 x64
windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise x64 Edition SP2
Backup Method: Legacy
Regards,
Ankur Patel
TSM Administrator
I ran the following commands:
export server toserver=NASCTSM filedata=all
export server toserver=NASCTSM fromdate=10/02/2002 filedata=all
mergefilespaces=yes
I get everything except the storage pools and volhistory. Is there another way
to get this information over to my new server?
Thanks,
Well, now you've confused me, as well...
When I set RESOURCEUTILIZATION 10, I get 8 sessions, but 4 are producers and
4 are consumers - so how did you get 8 tape mounts?
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Schneider, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Ok, now we are getting down to the nitty gritty.
Go to 5.5.1
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Killam,
Perpetua
Sent: Wednesday, 10 September 2008 8:57 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM 5.5 (CLIENT/SERVER)
We will be upgrading our server and clients to tsm server
Hmmm
I'm willing to admit I may be talking through my hat here but...
Doesn't the VCB backup process use PROXYNODE? So then all the backups are
funnelled through the one node, even though they have the id of another,
and so the MAXNUMMP of that node would be the limit?
Steve.
Steven Harris
The RESOURCEUTILIZATION parameter will accept numbers higher than 10, they're
not supported, of course.
Orville L. Lantto
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Wanda Prather
Sent: Wed 9/10/2008 18:16
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] How does
Hi,
I have problem on implementing TSM 5.4.0 in Linux RHEL 4 Kernel 2.6.9-67.
The Tape Device doesn't able to connect to TSM using the standard device
provided by this Operating System. We have looked for the match driver
provided by IBM, unfortunately we found only one that support the RHEL 4
31 matches
Mail list logo
