Hello,
I am running TSM Server 5.1.6.1, TSM Clients 4.2.1.32 and TDP Exchange 2.2.
For some clients, including Exchange TDP, I am getting the following error
messages :
TDP Exchange
02/22/03 23:21:50 ANRD asvolut.c(1825): ThreadId44 Invalid parameters
- storage pool Id 4, volume Id 1715.
Hi,
our server run for 4 years without auditdb or unload/load db.
We have some inconsistency object in our db's.
The support can't fix this problem with any of
unsupported commands. That the reason to do a auditdb
regards
Michael Garnebode
Diplom-Informatiker
Schmitz Rz Consult GmbH
Bachstr.1
There is a clone functionality in RMAN I think it would be quite easy to get
RMAN to restore a database on a different system. the trivky bit is getting
TDP to act like the other node I guess you would need to change the dsm.sys
node name and rerun the password program. Then it's restore database.
Hi List,
I saw a (broken) link to this guide in a previous post, then tried to find this
masterpiece on the new IBM-Tivoli website, without luck :-(
Was somebody better than me in that hunt ?
Thanks in advance !
Arnaud
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
| Arnaud Brion,
Hi all,
I noted next messages in dsmsched.log on W2K BA client:
24-02-2003 10:38:43 --- SCHEDULEREC QUERY BEGIN
24-02-2003 10:38:43 --- SCHEDULEREC QUERY END
24-02-2003 10:38:43 Next operation scheduled:
24-02-2003
10:38:43
24-02-2003
Hi Arnaud,
I found it at
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/software/tivoli/technical-brief/tsm-tuning.pdf
starting at page
http://www-3.ibm.com/software/tivoli/library/technicalbriefs/
Hope this helps
Thomas
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: PAC Brion Arnaud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet:
http://www-3.ibm.com/software/tivoli/library/technicalbriefs/
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/software/tivoli/technical-brief/tsm-tuning.pdf
Regards,
Jiri
Jiri Polata
Tivoli Consultant
AG COM, a.s., namesti Miru 22, 503 03 Smirice
tel.: +420 495 421 312
fax.:??? +420 495 421 108
e-mail: [EMAIL
Hello,
I just watched a incremental db backup running. My db is 81 GB in size of
which about 70 GB are used. The log is set to rollforward mode and about 7,5
GB in size. At the moment the backup started the log usage was 85% with 37
MB data in the db changed. From the start of the process until
Thanks Del.
Problem with MAXMUMMP. Fixed now.
However I now get the following:
24-02-2003 13:23:50 ACO5456W The backup is corrupt and is not fully
restorable.
24-02-2003 13:23:50 Processing will continue.
24-02-2003 13:23:50 ACO0302E A failure occured on stripe number (3), rc =
428
24-02-2003
Rizwan,
This means that some of the data objects needed for the restore
cannot be found in the TSM Server database. If the restore
worked prior to the migration to tape, the backup must
have been good. And so, something must have happened
that caused some of those objects to be deleted or
Thanks for your help Del.
We have tested with 4 stripes and we restored at around 28-31MB/sec
previously from tape (3590E XL).
I'll call IBM.
Thanks again.
Rizwan
Rizwan Shamim
Central Backup Service (CBS)
Merrill Lynch Europe PLC
Tel: 020
At 12:08 PM +0200 2/23/03, Zlatko Krastev/ACIT wrote:
- HSM client sends the data in a storage pool. That storage pool can be
backed up to a copypool. If this is a storage hierarchy within the server
(diskpool migration to tapepool), backup the diskpool first then backup
the tapepool to same
Murphy, Craig wrote:
Hello
I'm trying to label a tape using dsmlabel but with the ACSLS now having
volume access control I can't access any tapes in the library.
dsmlabel -drive=/dev/rmt/2mt,0,0,9,3 -library=acsls,0 -keep
Comes back with ANR9759E unsuccessful ACSAPI response,
Hi all,
I have db volumes on Netapp filer and it is mounted as NFS from AIX point of
view.Recently I migrated db volumes to this mount point on 100mbps /sec on
its NAS interface.
But later migrated to 1GB Network interface ,i.e netapp interface which is
also on 1GB interface connected to AIX p
Hi,
I checked up ACSLS manual and quick ref guide which I use and I did not find
any command on labeling tapes.I get labeled tapes!
Thanks
Balanand Pinni
-Original Message-
From: Murphy, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 10:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi list,
I would like to use the ODBC driver delivered with TSM Windows client, in conjunction
with an Access 2002 database, but when I try to issue following query : SELECT
SUMMARY.START_TIME, SUMMARY.END_TIME, SUMMARY.ACTIVITY, SUMMARY.ENTITY, SUMMARY.BYTES,
[end_time]-[start_time] AS
Hello guys,
Can you help me please with following problem?
I have TSM server v.4.1.1 on Win NT 4.0 SP6i (I know it is quite old)
Recently (about two weeks ago) my server started to crash.
Here is output from my activity log:
02/23/2003 18:32:26 ANR0987I Process 5 for EXPIRATION running in the
It looks like your server is running out of memory. Some of the threads
are crashing, and message reading threads can't get started, therefore you
are seeing the Message number errors.
I had simular problems with this on AIX, when we were doing server to server
communications. Restores
Hello TSMr's
I have a question, I am running out of physical space on my 3583
library, and I was wondering if there is a way of making the 12 slots on
the I/O station (Bulk), part of the regular tape slots.
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Camilo Marrugo
--
Camilo A. Marrugo
Data Storage
AIX 4.3.3, TSM 4.2.3.3.
Since a couple of days expirations runs, but deletion stops after an error:
02/21/03 14:44:10 ANRD imutil.c(5570): ThreadId100 Bitfile id
0.496165168 not found.
02/21/03 14:44:11 (100) Generating Database Transaction
For those of you who also are responsible for Storage Management in addition to
Backup-Restore,
Does your organization set user quotas on network storage?
What size limits do you set?
How long do you allow a file to sit on a system before it is migrated, archived
or
deleted?
Hello Arnaud,
I am the developer who works on the ODBC driver, and I am unfamiliar with
this particular problem. Can you please open up a problem with support on
this, as it may require an APAR? You can give the support people my name,
tell them I said this should go to Level 2, and that they can
Thanks a million. I will find out.
Balanand
-Original Message-
From: Chris Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 11:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Performence question on Network and switch w.r.t NFS AIX.
Now my question is:
1.Is it sufficient just
Since a couple of days expirations runs, but deletion stops after an error:
02/21/03 14:44:10 ANRD imutil.c(5570): ThreadId100 Bitfile id
0.496165168 not found.
Henk - Possibly: You could do a Select search on your Backups or Archives
tables for that
Look at section Logging Events to the Tivoli/Enterprise Console in TSM
5.1 Administrator's Guide.
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Dan Carlo Freitas Peres [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
17.02.2003 11:16
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Hello, I have 2 sched logs below to show you from a Archive I created a
while back. This was an additional backup to a RMAN for ORACLE/UNIX.
They have taken for ever to run . These are on Unix machines with a
Oracle Data Base that we run a PRE and Pos command to bring down the Db.
From here , we
Someone could help with this?
thanks
02/24/2003 15:24:34 ANR0609I LABEL LIBVOLUME started as process 2.
02/24/2003 15:24:34 ANR0405I Session 43 ended for administrator ADMIN
(WebBrowser).
02/24/2003 15:24:35 ANR8323I 001: Insert LTO volume A0B000 R/W into entry/exit
First I would make sure that slot-256 was empty by doing an AUDIT LIBRARY.
Could be there's a tape in there that TSM doesn't know about.
Bill Boyer
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Humberto Gsmez Lspez
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003
There seems to be h/w problem.Check if ur drive is online ?
I feel ur drive is offline.
Thanks
Balanand
-Original Message-
From: Humberto Gómez López [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 1:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM and LTO again...
Someone could
I am wondering if there is still a link out there that will allow us to
figure out licensing costs. Sure it's changed a half million times and
Tivoli has been consolidated into IBM but maybe someone knows where it is. I
am assuming it would not be advisable to just bring up another server
without
We have a TDP-Domino incremental backup schedule on our TSM Server that
occasionally produces this message in the client log:
Tivoli Data Protection for Lotus Domino - Version 1, Release 1,
Level 1.0
.
.
Backing up database mail\WXY12345.nsf, 1
I get this occaisonally, It has always worked fine the second time. -Doug
-Original Message-
From: Humberto Gómez López [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 2:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM and LTO again...
Someone could help with this?
thanks
Henk - Possibly: You could do a Select search on your Backups or Archives
tables for that OBJECT_ID, to identify the filespace object involved,
and perhaps via Contents determine what tape volume it is on, then do an
Audit Volume Fix=Yes ?
Richard, I know which filespace is involved (i.e.
Does this command work in a 3494 environment? Does there have to be any conditions to
use it.
The last time I tried to run it, I didn't have very good success. I could have been
doing something wrong.
checkin libvol 3494vts vol status=scratch
Tommy Templeton
Senior System Administrator
Since v5.1 licensing is based on processors - no matter are they server or
client. Having 10 processor licenses you can have 1 server and 9 clients
or 10 servers for the same price. The price for maintaining these 10
servers
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Gill, Geoffrey L. [EMAIL
I do it every day. I think you need to have the 'devt=3590' option for
the 3494.
checkin libv libname volname status=scratch devt=3590 checkl=no
or
checkin libv libname search=yes status=scratch devt=3590 checkl=no
bob
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 04:01:21PM -0600, Tommy Templeton wrote:
Does
You need DEV=tape or whatever.
At 04:01 PM 2/24/2003 -0600, you wrote:
Does this command work in a 3494 environment? Does there have to be any
conditions to use it.
The last time I tried to run it, I didn't have very good success. I could
have been doing something wrong.
checkin libvol 3494vts
It looks like you're trying to check in a single volume. In that case,
you'll need to specify the devtype parameter in your checkin command.
This is what we do to checkin a single tape: checkin libvol 3494A vol #
devtype=3590 status=scratch
I'm assuming your 3494 has 3590 drives in it.
Kason
Hi all;
I'm having all kinds of problems and am hoping someone can assist me with this
setup...as I'm all confused at this point.
Environment:
AIX 51 ML3
TSM Server 5162
TSM (ba) Client 510 (64 bit)
TSM (api) Client 4210 (32 bit)
TDP (oracle) Client 2210 (32 bit)
Oracle Enterprise Server 817
We have 3590e tapes and I'm trying to incorporate this command into those
server command scripts on the TSM server.
I'm trying to put together an offsite backup process. We've been
doing our offsite process all wrong and I'm trying to correct it. I guess I
need to put another script in to do a
I find that even when I ask a 'simple' licensing question if nt VAR (i.e.
what is the cost of a NT client license), they are told they must go back to
TSM to ensure the configuration for a client license (also delaying any
quote I want from 24 to 72 hours ro so). ... So currently, the answer is
I forgot to include my system information:
Environment:
Server: RS/6000-AIX5.1 TSM V4.2.1.9
Client: NT4-SP6,
Win2k-SP1,
SP2-AIX5.1 TSM V4.2.1.9
- Original Message -
From: Tommy Templeton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday,
I did a 'q vol acc=unavailable' and found 4 tapes in my little 3583 library.
Each tape showed errors, 9, 9, 216, and 1 respectively.
Then I did a 'q vol acc=destoyed' and found 2 tapes, with 53 and 0 errors
reported respectively. These two tapes show that
some files are on them.
I really have
Coats, Jack wrote:
snip
Reciently I heard from my VAR, that TSM NT/2K and Novell clients are all now
priced on a per processor basis. Where previously on these the client was
for up to 4 processors, and after that you went to a different teir of
pricing.
Now a single processor client cost more
Can anyone explain how having more than one processor in a server has
anything to do with how much it costs to back it up?
Indeed. And it may get more complicated as Hyperthreading can make one
processor look like two to any software running in the Intel system.
Richard Sims, BU
We
The tsmscsi that is in 5.1.6.2 for Linux32 is not working for us:
We are running Redhat 7.2:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a
Linux tsm2 2.4.9-31 #1 Tue Feb 11 14:43:37 PST 2003 i686 unknown
The 5.1.6.2 tsmscsi executable prints the following strange message:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]$ ./tsmscsi
I would like to ask the group a question. Do any of you
have thoughts about the maturity of the product, as it
stands now? My boss is questioning whether we should
hold at 4.2.whatever on our four servers, or go ahead
and upgrade to the 5.1.x.y available now. My experience
has been that it is
Gill, Geoffrey L. wrote:
I am wondering if there is still a link out there that will allow us to
figure out licensing costs. Sure it's changed a half million times and
Tivoli has been consolidated into IBM but maybe someone knows where it is. I
am assuming it would not be advisable to just bring
Can anyone explain how having more than one processor in a server has
anything to do with how much it costs to back it up?
Sure, it's how IBM can change more for a product that lives on the
higher end of the food chain. They figure that if you spend money on
SMP based systems, then you can
Hi,
What are the parameters/Steps needed to Estimate the Bandwidth for
connecting to TSM Console Remotely from one location to another.
Thanks and Regards,
Srini
I upgraded 4.1.6 - 5.1.5 -5.1.6.0 -5.1.6.2 I don't remember the version
for the ITSM device driver as I went back but it was the latest available
on the tivoli server. But there was something peculiar : when I issued an
update all with the 5.1.5 cd, the devices were not updated and I had to
51 matches
Mail list logo