Hi Guys,
I've been tinkering with the TSM Journaling engine for a few weeks now,
and wonder if anyone has come across this before:
TSM Server - Win2K Advanced Server SP3 - 2xPIII 1GB RAM - TSM Server
5.1.6.2
TSM Client - Win 2K Advanced Server SP3 - 4xPIV 4GB RAM - TSM Client
5.1.5.0
My TSM
I went through this not to long ago. My server is not quit as big as yours
about 1.7 million files. My problem was that I was using
resourceutilization=3. When I dropped it to 2 the backups started working
again.
---
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
What microcode level are you on? We had major problems
with 420 and 421. 427 seems to be working OK.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 3:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Lan-free and ACSLS
Importance: Low
Hello
I went through this not to long ago. My server is not quit as big as
yours
about 1.7 million files. My problem was that I was using
resourceutilization=3. When I dropped it to 2 the backups started
working
again.
Currently multiple journal based backup sessions aren't supported, so a
I'll try to answer/address your questions as best I can.
My TSM client is a file server, on its first full incremental backup
(with journaling turned on) stowed away nearly 9 million files on the
TSM server - a perfect candidate for the TSM journaling engine I
thought. However, the
I have a situation that is puzzling me and maybe some one here can enlighten me as to
why it is happening
I am running AIX 4.3.3 TSM 5.1.6.5 with a 3494 library with 4 3590B extended
drives(soon to be replaced with E)
when I am running the backup of my primary disc storage pool to tape, I
I was using the 5.2.? Client..
---
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Fax: (954) 985-1404
---
-Original Message-
From: Pete
I am currently setting up a LAN free environment on one of our AIX clients. Our
environment is as follows:
AIX 5.1.7.0 server
AIX client 5.1.5.10
The install and setup went well, but I am recieving the following error when trying to
mount a tape:
09/23/2003 16:20:21 ANR8779E (Session:
Hi Chris:
The format of the option is RESOURCETIMEOUT 180 and is placed in
dsmserv.opt. You can issue q opt res* to see your current setting. Note
that this didn't really help us at all.
We eventually split up our TSM server into 2 servers (not just because of
this) and we haven't had any
The device must be available in OS. Run the command:
lsdev -Cc tape
in order to check this.
Sergio Vázquez Vegas
Administración TSM
*: 104688 - 912134688
*: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Mensaje original-
De: Michael, Monte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: miércoles, 24 de septiembre
= On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:21:05 -0400, Bill Fitzgerald [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
when I am running the backup of my primary disc storage pool to tape, I use a
max process of 4. I make sure that there are plenty of scratch tapes available
and that the max scratch value for the copy pool is larger
And it still could be an element number mis-match as well.
Drives sometimes get detected as different serial numbers on the different
systems. Check the serial numbers for the drives with lscfg -vl rmt#...
and then match those to proper element numbers and what-not on the TSM
Server.
Also, the
Yes, it is in the Windows2003 TSM 5.2 client code. It utilizes the new
shadow copy services. But you need a TSM 5.2 server to take advantage of it.
From a previous post by Andy Raibeck:
In addition, the Windows 2003 system state/service backups use a different
transaction protocol that doesn't
What did I say in that second paragraph... Ahg. Drives sometimes get
detected as different rmt device numbers, not different serial numbers.
Compare serial numbers to make sure you have corresponding drives mapped out
in AIX and TSM path statements is what I meant to say. Ahhg.
Yes this is fixed for 2003 clients only - doesn't help with 2000 clients
-that is what the APAR was opened for. IBM has said maybe we'll fix this
for 2000 clients in a future release - but we'll see!
-Original Message-
From: Bill Boyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 24, 2003
Pete,
Thanks for your responses...
The error you are seeing in the journal daemon is probably caused
because the journal db has exceeded the supported
maximum of 2 gig.
I was watching the journal files, and the big one never went above
1.6GB... This was during the initial full backup. The
*smers
Company is still running ADSM 3.1
I have seen a single page error in their database. It has an ADSM mirrored
volume, so is able to read from that.
Do I have to break and then recreate the ADSM mirror to fix this from the
good volume or is there a command line prompt to let ADSM fix the
So that we don't have to have our network people run sniffer traces,
could you tell us what you set the MTU to? Is it something smaller than
the normal 1500? Was this on the client side or the TSM server side?
Thanks.
Andy Carlson|\ _,,,---,,_
Senior
Response to questions:
Okay, well, this was the first full backup of a 9 million file
filesystem, so would this cause a big journal file?
No. Journal entries are generated as the result of changes to the file
system, doing a
backup (journal based or not) never increases the size of the journal
I was using the 5.2.? Client..
The testflag which circumvents the problem is in 5.2 as well.
Pete Tanenhaus
Tivoli Storage Solutions Software Development
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tieline: 320.8778, external: 607.754.4213
Those who refuse to challenge authority are condemned to conform to
Hello guys,
I encounter problems in oracle recovery and I'd like to ask for some
suggestion what to check or change.
We have implemented TDP for Oracle. There is Oracle RAC. Backup entire
database succeed. Problems are if we try to make recovery. Restore process
goes ok, all dbf files are
This was about 2 years ago. If I remember correctly is was on 1 switch that
the setting was wrong Since then just about everything has changed. I
now have an M80 running gigabit our networking infrastructure has been
completely changed.
--
Bruce Kamp
Zlatko,
Thanks for the reply. No, we are not experiencing problems; rather, this
is for assurance before deployment. We will be migrating several W2K
clients, a number of which are load balanced, to TSM. I found plenty of
documentation regarding clustered clients, nut nothing regarding NLB
Another thing that you should do is go into tsmjbbd.ini and set NotifyBufferSize to be
a fairly large number. The default is 0x0010, or 1MB. That probably is not going
to be large enough for your server.
David McClelland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi Guys,
I've been tinkering with the TSM
Is anyone on this list using the ADIC Scalar DLC to partition their Scalar
library into multiple virtual libraries?
I would like to find out other people experience with this unit and how well
it works with TSM on AIX.
thanks.
This transmittal may contain confidential information intended
Hi guys. I will be attempting to restore TSM database to a test server
and run audit db. The question is if I backup up the db to disk, is it
possible for me copy the file over and restore the database?
TIA
Tae
Tae,
Yes, you can do this if you set up a FILE devclass for the output. When
restoring, use -volume=fullpathandfilename as an arguement to the restore
db command.
Bill Smoldt
STORServer, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Tae Kim
Hello everyone.
We are doing a new installation of TSM 5.2.0.0 on AIX 5.2 using a
StorageTek 9310 automated Cartridge library which will be controlled using
ACSLS 6.1.1. I was wondering if anyone has any experience running a similar
configuration. I have some ACSLS questions but StorageTek will
Hi TSM Friends,
Window 2003 Server - TSM 5.2.1.0
Windows 2000 Client TSM 5.1.5
I'm switching a client from one TSM Server to another and trying to
authenticate the password.
I start the GUI and it put in the password and it looks like all is well.
I stop the GUI and access it again and it asks
Here's the resolution to the problem.just in case you ever run across
it yourself..it's a treat.I assure you
Per TSM Level II Support:
It looks as though you may be running into the following APAR:
APAR= IC36737 SER=AB ABEND
INVALID ENTRIES IN
Yesterday I asked about a long Netware restore.
In playing around, we are tring to perform a restore of the
backupset that we created.
The backup set looks like:
4 tapes (IBM 3590)
Size: 240gb
Files: 938,617
Backup from: NW5.1 SP3
Restore to: NW5.1 SP3
TSM client v5.1
When we start
*smers - (apologies if this comes through twice - rejected first time)
Company is still running ADSM 3.1
I have seen a single page error in their database. It has an ADSM mirrored
volume, so is able to read from that.
Do I have to break and then recreate the ADSM mirror to fix this from the
For this problem involving a Netware restore, I would like a
little more information. What is the platform type of TSM server here, and
what level of the code of the server? I am working several pmrs at the
moment with this type of setup, and I may be able to assist you.
At 04:28 PM
Greetings,
We just upgraded from TSM v4.x to TSM 5.2.0.1 under Windows 2000
server. The tape libraries are a Breecehill Q9.140 and a Q6.210
library, both with 3 DLT7000 drives. Ever since the upgrade, migrations
from the disk pool to tape have resulted in very poor utilization to
tape. Our
34 matches
Mail list logo
