The only issues that I can think of would be Windows ACLs and SIDs. Was the NT
server upgraded to W2K3? Or was the data moved from one machine to another? If so,
there may be a SID issue because you're laying down files on a different system. At
any rate, there are documented MS caveats for
Hi John!
There is no OS/390 client and there never has been, to my knowledge. I guess
you're referring to the Linux390 client. You can find the latest version
(5.2.0) at:
ftp://ftp.storsys.ibm.com/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/client/v5r2/
Linux/Linux390/
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM
IF you want to know on node/filespace level you can look at the volumeusage table.
For example:
select distinct node_name, stgpool_name, volume_name
from volumeusage
order by node_name, stgpool_name, volume_name
I have this
John,
You need Tivoli Storage Manager S/390 edition Backup Archive Client. We
order this client directly from IBM I don't think there is a download
upgrade on the Tivoli web site. Contact your MVS system programmer perhaps
they can help you get this client upgraded.
- Brian
Brian L. Nick
Actually you might looking for the Unix System Services (USS) client for
OS/390. This is a Unix based client.
Brian
Loon, E.J. van
- SPLXM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:
...
the output of query dbv gives only four volumes:
db1a, db2a, db3a, db4a and theirs copies (miroring) : db1b, db2b, db3b, db4b
(all have LV STATE = open/syncd ).
I wonder why volumes db5a,6a,7a,8a and db5b,6b,7b,8b (LV STATE=closed/syncd)
don't appear in the output of the command query dbv
Hi Wolfgang,
I'd recommend looking into the following parameters for AIX/TSM in your server
options file:
AIXASYNCIO YES
AIXDIRECTIOYES
MIRRORWRITE DB PARALLEL
Good luck-
John
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Has anyone run into conflicts between Tivoli Storage Resource Manager and TSM on Win2K
systems? I'm evaluating TSRM and have an agent installed on one of my Win2K file
servers. This system runs TSM client 5.2.0 with the journal service enabled. For the
past few days I've noted that the
Yes, this client runs under OMVS and backs up the Hierarchical File System.
So, do I want the Linux390 client?
John
**
PLEASE NOTE: The above email address has recently changed from a previous naming
standard -- if this does
Morning Geoff,
-pitdate= -pittime=should be the two options to get you where
you want to be.
The only thing I can think of that would result in more allocated space
being restored than the file system can handle would be if there was a lot
of HSM migrated data from the file system and
Turns out after talking to the tech who did the restore, the the tech that
built the new 2K3 server and filesystems had created a skeleton directory
structure on the G: drive with the incorrect permissions. The tech that did
the restore figured it was a clean filesystem and didn't replace them.
From: Coats, Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Curious, I am generating a backupset. Is the time it takes to generate a
backupset roughly the same amount
of time it would take to restore an entire client?
Backsetup generation is usually slower than a full restore.
--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL
On Thursday, Dec 4, 2003, at 07:35 Australia/Sydney, Michael Prix wrote:
Paul Ripke:
This is exactly the scenario we have with one of our TSM servers. With
client initiated actions (backups/restores) the address/name
configured
in dsm.opt does specify the path of data taken to the server. Then,
Hi all and thank you in advance for your help
We hace a volum group named tsmvg dedicated only to TSM (Database, Recovery log and
sorage Poolls.
the output of the command : lsvg -l tsmvg gives:
tsmvg :
LV NAME TYPELPs PPs PVsLV STATE MOUNT POINT
db1ajfs
I will be out of the office starting 12/03/2003 and will not return until
12/08/2003.
Je serai absent du bureau au cours de la période du 03 au 07 décembre 2003;
De retour lundi le 08 décembre 2003.
Look at the define dbvolume and define dbcopy commands. It looks like
you haven't defined the volumes for use by TSM yet or if you did you got
some kind of error during the processing of the commands.
Jim Sporer
At 03:08 PM 12/4/2003 +0100, you wrote:
Hi all and thank you in advance for your
Hi Everyone!
I'm stumped on this problem. The tape in question, 474599, is a magstar
3590. It has a device class tape unit of silom for all of the magstar
tapes used for tsm. This is running on a tsm server on the mainframe at
5.1.6.2. I am receiving errors on this tape that a copy cannot be
Did you check the thumb wheel on the cartridge?
Madison Gas Electric Co.
Operations Analyst - Data Center Services
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
ANR1144W Move data process terminated for volume 474599
storage media inaccessible.
...
This is the essence message. Whenever you get one like this you need to
check the status of the tape as the library records its status. The tape
is probably stuck in a drive. This is where
If I take a copypool volume and insert it into my tape library and run the checkin
process and check it in as a private volume will the DRM Manager update the status of
the volume?
What I am trying to do is figure out the best way to move data that is in the copypool
from J type tapes to K
Sounds like it would work, however, why not set the reclaim stgpool to a pool of the
new type K tapes. Then just set the reclamation on your copypool to 0, and watch the
fun.
Do you really want to pull a copypool tape in from offsite! In terms of
Disaster Recovery there may be some exposure in doing that...
-Original Message-
From: Bill Fitzgerald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DRM and
Im am in process of moving a client node from one server to another. I
have already exported the client and the policy. Now I want to export
the client node's data. How would I go about doing this? From looking at
the admin guide the way to go would be export server command. But this
command does
The EXPORT command does it. I am currently running an EXPORT NODE TO
SERVER to move the data from one TSM server to another. This is the
command I used/the WEB GUI generated. What you are looking for is the
FILEDATA=ALL (or you can choose Backups, activebackups, archives, etc.)
EXPORT NODE
We are now running TSM 4.2 on an AIX box. Not only is the TSM level
unsupported, so is the AIX level. And the box is running on empty, plus we
are really tight on storage, both disk and tape.
We are looking for a new solution. A TSM upgrade is obvious. Platform is
not.
One thought is to get a
On Thursday, Dec 4, 2003, at 13:26 Australia/Sydney, Richard Sims wrote:
...
Dec 3 21:10:17 twcsds001 Parity Error
Dec 3 21:10:17 twcsds001 scsi: [ID 107833 kern.warning] WARNING:
/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/QLGC,[EMAIL PROTECTED],1 (isp2):
We have replaced all the Ultra SCSI III
Have you consider TSM on Linux on Intel?
I just assisted a university change from AIX with 3590 to Linux (cant
remember the IBM model of server) with 4560 (2 x 4560/LTO1 with 4 drives).
This Uni is probably smaller than you guys - but non the less they are
quite happy with the change...
...deon
I'm just doing this sort of stuff in reverse
We have a 3494 with mixed J and K tapes that is bursting at the seams (750 slots
about 1400 tapes). Being government, the wheels turn extremely slowly and our 3592
upgrade won't happen until February, but because its going to happen we can't spend
28 matches
Mail list logo
