Hi guys, I dont know if this is a stupid question but I cant find this
anywhere.
Im running low on space and want to split my Tapepool across more than 1
TapeDevice, is this possible?
Cheers
Louw Pretorius
___
Informasie Tegnologie
Stellenbosch Universiteit
Hi to all
I want to keep a backup version for 1 year. How i must define the
management class below:
Policy Domain NameSVCY185_POLICYDOMAIN
Policy Set Name SVCY185_POLICYSET
Mgmt Class Name CY185MGMT
Copy Group Name STANDARD
Versions
Hi,
It depends on what you really want? Keep all versions 1 year, versions =
nolimit. See below.
//Henrik
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Nicolas Savva
Sent: den 9 december 2005 11:09
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Backup
Eric Winters wrote:
Dear All,
Cannot seem to find a way to delete db volumes in a lightly used TSM db.
Environment is as follows;
TSM Server 5.3 on Windows.
q db
Available Assigned Maximum Maximum Page Total
Used PctMax.
SpaceCapacity
Allen S. Rout wrote:
I would think that the importance of contiguous placement would be very
strongly correlated with the disk tech. If I go to FILE devclasses on my SSA,
I would think preallocating would be indicated. If I were deplying on
something more abstracted (shark, netapp, etc) I
Be careful with this one. We just purchased a VTL ourselves.
We are running TSM 5.2.3. We are currently waiting for a fix
with the vendor in order to configure TSM.
In TSM V5.3, the code seems to have loosened up. Verify that
the TSM version, o/s version, device drivers (o/s or TSM), the
type
Hi Allen and Andy,
Here is my thinking. From what
I gather about scratch volumes, they are
opened, filled with what data they are recieving, and closed
- but not
allocated full size.
Yep, that's correct with FILE vols -
I'm watching it happen right now here on one of my servers.
Perhaps
2005/12/8, Victoria Ortepio [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Can anyone provide me with assistance / steps
required for the migration of Tivoli Storage Manager
server from off of AIX to LINUX?
Why Linux?
No, I like Linux, but everyone tell me that AIX is better solutions.
Price is not answer.
We use
We'd rather AIX...more reliable...IBM supports their hardware for
a greater amount of time, usually 10 years.
Was wondering if there was an easy way to
migrate the TSM database / data, other than EXPORT / IMPORT.
Is there anyone that has had negative experience with running
TSM on LINUX? Also,
We have move the TSM database when they were on SSA disks by connecting the SSA
disk to the new server.
We have also moved the TSM database by backing up to a flat file, copying that
to a new server and using:
* dsmserv db restore db devc=ADSMDBBK vol=/var/tsmdbbk/06902830.dbb,
There may be technical issues, but from what I can tell it is a
religious issue for AIX vs Linux. Both are good solutions. Even a well
configured Windows solutions works, but it is not my preferred solution.
IMHO, a best fit solution for TSM is probably an AIX solution. But if
you have no AIX
I haven't had the time to fully disect the system -- so I took the
sleazy approach up front. I did the full install on my documentation
server and added a link from my webpage to the eclipse server.
If you really want to tear into things -- unpack the download (or CD) to
a work directory. Then,
I know that the recommendation is to use as many physical volumes as
possible. In the near future, volumes are going to become available to
me to use as many as 15 volumes per database instance.
Here is what I am wondering. It seems that, if I create a 5GB volume
per disk, for a total of 75GB
People discuss performance, and striping will certainly give up much
better performance than Jbod.
However, the comfort of not losing the database or having to retreat to
the last backup that
will not reflect the current status of the drive contents led us to
simply create a raid5 set and
define
2005/12/9, Jack Coats [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There may be technical issues, but from what I can tell it is a
religious issue for AIX vs Linux. Both are good solutions. Even a well
configured Windows solutions works, but it is not my preferred solution.
I'm not a Windows expert. AIX v. Linux is
We're beginning to look into VTL and I'd be interested in what systems /
vendors your considered and then which one you are going with. Running
TSM 5.3 with AIX 5.2ML 5 on RS6000 P650.
LTP
San Clemente, California
Victoria Ortepio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
The VTLs, are either 'standalone' or 'integrated'.
With a standalone, TSM will maintain control over
the creation of offsite (copypool) tapes. In integrated,
the VTL has the control, via it's software. TSM would
never know of the copypool data. To us, that's just another
point of failure.
Hi to all
The Resourceutilization option can be used in the TDP for Domino
I can generate multiple sessions ?
Thank you
On Dec 9, 2005, at 3:35 PM, TSM User wrote:
Hi to all
The Resourceutilization option can be used in the TDP for Domino
I can generate multiple sessions ?
Thank you
See:
http://www.mail-archive.com/adsm-l@vm.marist.edu/msg56829.html
TDPs are based upon the TSM API, where
Hi guys, I dont know if this is a stupid question but I cant find this
anywhere.
Im running low on space and want to split my Tapepool across more than 1
TapeDevice, is this possible?
Cheers
Louw Pretorius
___
Informasie Tegnologie
Stellenbosch Universiteit
Take also a look at Technote Ref# 1114638
http://www.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support//IBMTivoliStorageManagerforMail.html
Eduardo
TSM User [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
12/09/2005 04:35 PM
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To
Hi Pretorius.
no, you can't directly spread a tape pool across multiple libraries,
if that is what you are asking.
You have two choices,
The first is to split the hierarchy into multiple node - diskpool -
tapepool streams. Data is directed into one or the other streams
using different
What I always wanted to try, but didn't have a system to play with, was to
change the target pool for migrations, each in a different library. One
day nextpool is TAPE1, the next it's TAPE2 - easy enough to update along
with the migration thresholds. On a restore, the data would be split
between
Andrew Carlson wrote:
I know that the recommendation is to use as many physical volumes as
possible. In the near future, volumes are going to become available to
me to use as many as 15 volumes per database instance.
Here is what I am wondering. It seems that, if I create a 5GB volume
per
24 matches
Mail list logo
