There were a few patch levels of the TSM client 5.4.1 that would work on
Win2000 machines, but the client was actually operating at 5.3 levels despite
the 5.4 label.
IIRC, 5.4.1.6 was the latest patch level that did this.
--
Mark Stapleton
System engineer, CDW
-Original Message-
Dear Duane,
i'm running the server version 5.5.1 and looking in my nodelist there're
lots of WinNT-5.0 Client (Win2k?) running 4.1.1.0 / 4.2.1.0
TSM-Clients, they seem to work ;-)
there're also some HP-UX 10.20 boxes running a TSM client version 3.1.0.8.
well, TSM does not really matter the
I've had multiple customers running TSM client version 3.1.0.8 on SCO
Openserver and *BSD servers, against TSM servers from 5.3 to 5.5. No bells and
whistles on the clients, to be sure, but they run fine.
--
Mark Stapleton
System engineer, CDW
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor
Hello all,
Unfortunately when i came in office today the other guy rebooted the server
and now its ok.So the problem is resolved but i dont know how could we have
solved it without reboot.
Well thanks everyone for your suggestions!!
On 2/12/09, ashish sharma ashishsharm...@gmail.com wrote:
I have an old url for the generator. Would you please send me the new
location. I would like to test it in my shop.
Respectfully,
Lisa Seay
850/487- ext. 2059
PLEASE NOTE: Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written
communications to or from state officials regarding
We ran into something similar yesterday.
The DBA tracked down and fixed the permissions on the log file, and we
were still seeing trouble.
A helpful command to issue to check is the tdpoconf shownenv which
sits in the bin64 directory. In our case, tdpooconf showed we were also
missing the
I'm looking for an SQL SELECT that will display a list of what tape is
mounted on each drive, and which session or process it's mounted for.
I've looked at SHOW ASMOUNTED, SHOW ASVOL, SHOW MP and they don't really
do it.
I'm dealing with a drive-constrained system and no budget to add
drives, so
Have you considered the SUMMARY table. The is are columns for ACTIVITY
(Session or Process) and VOLUME_NAME. I have not tried to build
anything like that, but it could be interesting.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Roger
We use this for sessions. It ought to be easy to add processes.
select client_name as Client,session_id as
Session,substr(output_vol_access,3,6) as Tape Volume from sessions -
where output_vol_access is not null and substr(output_vol_access,3,6) in
(select volume_name from volumes where
Roger,
I have a script called 'qdr' to show the drives and the tapes on each.
The script also
executes scripts in the library manager client servers to get details of
the usage.
The scripts and sample output are in the attached file.
Hope this helps,
Bill Colwell
Draper Lab
-Original
Steve,
Thanks to you and the others who took a crack at our problem. After remounting
the LOG with the dio flag, EXPIRATION has dropped from 6-8 days to 15 hours.
But nothing we've tried has had any effect on the lag on DB backups. Whether
FULL or INCR there is still a lengthy delay between
Yes, some of the earlier 5.4 levels let you install the client on Windows
2000, but just to make it clear for others who might wonder about Windows
2000 support: 5.4 was never officially supported on Windows 2000, as stated
in the summary of changes in the 5.4 manual:
All,
I have a W2K3 SP2 32bit server whose brand new TSM 5.5.1 client install is
behaving peculiarly. The GUI hangs at Initializing (though it does start
after a *LONG* time), the command line hangs at an open window, likewise.
The usual suspects: this is not a cluster, and the admin sez he tried
Sounds like it could be having an issue communicating with the TSM server.
Test you network connection, verify duplex and look for MS patch KB948496.
Andy Huebner
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Steve
Stackwick
Sent:
This sounds more like it's having a difficult time finding the TSM server. Have
you checked networking speed/duplex settings? What's the CPU/IO/network
interface usage during the login?
--
Mark Stapleton
System engineer, CDW
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
As Andy says, The command line is your friend. It can be used for
comparison testing, starting with basic interactions such as 'dsmc
query session', and working upward to B/A operations as needed. You
mention the command line hanging, but then also talk about opening a
window, so are you really
The offload patch is on (I guess we should always check for that from now
on) but, really, this is a brand new install, so it's just trying to start
the wizard, right?
steve
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,IT
andy.hueb...@alconlabs.com wrote:
Sounds like it could be
Thanks, Richard:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Richard Sims r...@bu.edu wrote:
As Andy says, The command line is your friend. It can be used for
comparison testing, starting with basic interactions such as 'dsmc
query session', and working upward to B/A operations as needed. You
dsmc
-Steve Stackwick wrote: -
I have a W2K3 SP2 32bit server whose brand new TSM 5.5.1 client
install is behaving peculiarly. The GUI hangs at Initializing
(though it does start after a *LONG* time), the command line hangs
at an open window, likewise.
The usual suspects: this is not a
This is *before* trying to contact a server. This is starting the client
after an install, before a dsm.opt is even created. But, I did create one
just for grins, with the same result: hang. But my manual creation uses IP
addresses, not DNS.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Thomas Denier
Note that, on the same machine, I just installed the SQL Server TDP and it
works just fine, connects to the TSM server, backs up, etc. This has got to
be a client bug.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Thomas Denier
thomas.den...@jeffersonhospital.org wrote:
-Steve Stackwick wrote: -
My guess is that the slow startup is VSS-related.
Try adding this to your options file:
traceflags service
tracefile c:\somefilename
(you can name the trace file whatever you want, enclose in double quotes if
the file name contains blanks)
Then start dsmc and wait for the prompt to
Thanks, Andy.
I've done as you said and started the GUI. Interestingly, I've installed the
TDP for SQL and, using the dsmcutil tool, a service for the BAClient and the
SQL Server TDP. They both installed and contacted the server OK, so maybe
I'll get backups even if I can't run the client tools
Steve, no, these are not Java apps.
Of course, until there is a trace to see where the delay comes from, I
cannot say for sure... but one of the things that the backup-archive client
does, that the other components do not do, is initialize VSS and build the
VSS exclude list (files that VSS says
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Andrew Raibeck stor...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Steve, no, these are not Java apps.
Of course, until there is a trace to see where the delay comes from, I
cannot say for sure... but one of the things that the backup-archive client
does, that the other components do
I have read announcement letter 209-004 multiple times and was looking
at the server documentation that was available and there were no mention
of TSM version 6 for z/OS server. There were documentation for z/OS BA
client and API. Is this a subtle hint that TSM version 6 for z/OS
server is not
Having been a V6.1 beta tester (now that it has been released I guess I
can speak about it), I can confirm that as of the last update I have not
seen anything for zOS other than s390 Linux.
Also, they will not be supporting Linux NON-x64, which causes me issues
since 2 of my RH Linux server are
On 13 feb 2009, at 04:02, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU wrote:
Having been a V6.1 beta tester (now that it has been released I
guess I
can speak about it), I can confirm that as of the last update I have
not
seen anything for zOS other than s390 Linux.
be ware that TSM on z/OS has been at about ADSM
Hello,
Remco Post wrote:
On 13 feb 2009, at 04:02, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU wrote:
... cut for clarity ...
Also, they will not be supporting Linux NON-x64, which causes me
issues
since 2 of my RH Linux server are not x64 capable and will require
replacing/upgrading/merging with another
Hi Lisa,
It is there : http://tapelabels.librelogiciel.com/index.html
Cheers.
Arnaud
**
Panalpina Management Ltd., Basle, Switzerland,
CIT Department Viadukstrasse 42, P.O. Box 4002 Basel/CH
Phone: +41 (61) 226 11
30 matches
Mail list logo
