and get satisfied with what they have bought
Martin,
This is exactly the point ! Are you satisfied with the ISC /AC combination so
far ? If yes, I'm very happy for you, but
from my readings of this list, lots of users are not, and so am I.
I really would like to hear why IBM decided to drop a
Arnaud,
This is exactly the point ! Are you satisfied with the ISC /AC
combination so far ? If yes, I'm very happy for you, but
from my readings of this list, lots of users are not, and so am I.
I really would like to hear why IBM decided to drop a CPU and
storage inexpensive / ergonomic /fast
Hi *SM-ers!
We are using virtual libraries (EMC DL-series) in our TSM environment
and we will migrate to a new model soon.
I would like to do this without ending up with new names (stgpool,
devclass, library names) in TSM.
Storagepools can be renamed, so I rename the old pool and give the new
one
Hi all
I know I asked this question before but I still have not found a clear answer.
Is there a list of the required OS patches to run TSM 5.5 on Solaris 9?
I have found all the other information I need, but not that bit.
Regards
Farren Minns
TSM backs up files even if the only change is security. I know there
is a skipntpermissions option but besides that is there any plans
to separate the files from the security within TSM and be able
to merge them back later on if needed. We are attempting to
standardize on AD groups as security as
Hi
I know only TSM client patch requirements:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=1019context=SSSQWCcontext=SSGSG7q1=solarisuid=swg21318605loc=en_UScs=utf-8lang=en
Usually during server installation process you will see required patches.
Efim
2009/6/5 Minns, Farren - Chichester
Hi Robert,
Just change you browser prefered language to french (temporily) and you'll have
the ISC/AC in French.
--
Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي
Erwann SIMON
- Mail Original -
De: Robert Burton robert.bur...@rbc.com
À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Envoyé: Mercredi 3 Juin 2009
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:59:06 -0400, David E Ehresman
deehr...@louisville.edu said:
Do can a TSM Admin verify that the rman clients are deleting their
old TSM for Oracle backups?
No. :)
We have to go through a manual (in our case) delete obsoletes process
every few weeks to get old stuff
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 12:11:20 +0200, Stephan Boldt
stephan.boldt+ads...@gmail.com said:
Hello everybody,
[ ... I understand HSM, but the windows HSM product doesn't behave
as I expect ...]
Why is this so? What do I have to do to get rid of the deleted file in the
archive?
Search the
I do a lot of TSM implementations for new customers.
While I usually use the command line myself, I have to say that for NEW
users, the ISC (in the 5.5 or 6.1 version, not the first 2 releases) is
actually much better than the old web GUI when it comes to creating
libraries, drives, and paths,
I was told by an IBM insider that ISC was written by someone who's daddy
at IBM didn't have anything better for him to do.
Buddy Howeth
Computer Operations Specialist
Information Systems
Pacific Coast Producers
Corporate Offices
631 N. Cluff Ave
Lodi, CA 95240-0756
(209) 367-8800 - Main#
(209)
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 15:12:03 -0700, Clark, Robert A
robert.cl...@providence.org said:
It seems that many of us have a parental relationship with the
product. In any other case, we would likely have severed the
connection some time ago. Code quality wandering all over, price
going up,
We too tried the ISC, 3-times. Everyone was frustrated/confused with it.
Gave up and purchased TSMManager. We bought it 2-3 years ago and love it.
My operations staff could not fully manage TSM without it.
From:
Grigori Solonovitch g.solonovi...@bkme.com
To:
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
And for all you old timers on the list, there was the same discussion when
IBM did away with the original administration Windows application in favor
of the Web admin interface. Everybody hated it and wanted the Winders app
back. Now people hate the new admin facility and want to Web admin
I agree with Remco and do believe IBM listened. The 6.1 ISC/AC is a lot
faster and better organized.
We haven't tried ISC/AC since v5.4 where we gave up on it. But, I did like
some of the things it did. Even thought we are still on v5.4 (upgrading
to v5.5 later this year), we are going to try
May I infer then that you have no nodes running recent versions of
windows server?
I realize that it take two to tango, and MS has become prodigious at
shitting the bed with broken WMI writers, SNP bugs, setting the default
VSS provider to whatever a third party product installed last and
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:20:24 -0700, Clark, Robert A
robert.cl...@providence.org said:
May I infer then that you have no nodes running recent versions of
windows server?
You may. My TSM servers run on AIX, all the way. I'll include only
by reference my long-term antipathy towards MS
Sorry for the broken quoting.
May I infer then that you have no nodes running recent versions of
windows server?
You may. My TSM servers run on AIX, all the way. I'll include only by
reference my long-term antipathy towards MS products. The price
advantage is gradually making me
On 5 jun 2009, at 23:32, Clark, Robert A wrote:
TSM server 6.1 supports Windows server on x32 Intel, Linux on x32
not so
much? I just wish the x345 I picked up on CL was 64bit.
For some reason, very early in the project support for 32 bit linux
has been dropped. I know there was at one time
I am license for TSM server on z/OS. Since there is no 6.1 server
available, I can't see how to order just the 6.1 client piece on
shopzseries and not get charge again.
Normally for TSM clients you license to run the client but not a specific
version. So one would not thing that you would be charged again. In the past
one was able to connect a z/os client to a non-z/os server.
The more interesting question is there a 6.1 z/os client. If not will there be
21 matches
Mail list logo
