Hi,
We are currently using two backup solution TSM 4.2 (1300 Clients,
upgrade to 5.1 planned) and Atempo Time Navigator 3.6 (40 Clients). We
plan to migrate TiNa to TSM.
But TINA is used to backup NetApp with NDMP over IP (Module Tape
Server). Does someone knows it is possible to do the same
I had such a bad experience with Dell firmware on the 136T that I sent
it back.
I suggest you do the same and buy another box. Both the Adic scalar 100
and the IBM 3583 are the same box, with different firmware and work
fine. (the IBM one has IBM drives)
In my experience, Dell's firmware updates
ITSMers,
We've got a TDP 2.2 client (NT4 sp6) backing up to a TSM server (AIX 4.3.3,
TSM 4.2.2) which is failing as below.
02/09/03 23:30:43 ANR2579E Schedule JUNO_SQL in domain JUNOSQL for node
SQLJUNO1032_TDP failed (return code 418).
The TSM error message isn't
Hi All
Following on from the previous mails regarding journaling and pipes, thanks
Pete, I am getting the following scenario on a win2k client, TSM client
5.1.5.2
The incremental starts and uses the journal. I then get loads of NpPeek : No
data messages and the backup does not finish. The
Has TSM 5.2 allready been announced? I can't find any info on the TSM
website.
Gerhard
---
Gerhard Rentschleremail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regional Computing Center tel. ++49/711/685 5806
University of Stuttgart fax: ++49/711/682357
Allmandring 30a
D 70550
Stuttgart
Germany
Hi
Tivoli/IBM is already developing their own BMR software, called ITSM
System Recovery. It will be based on IBM SysBack, and the latest I heard
is that it will support AIX, Solaris, HP/UX, XP and .NET.
System Recovery for AIX is already available, and Solaris and HP/UX should
be out soon. I
No, but there will probably be a V5.2 pre-announcement update at Share in
Dallas February 24-28.
BMR has been mentioned as part of their intended product plan, but no
commitments on when. The issue is Veritas BMR is fine for like
configurations, but not disaster recovery where the configurations
Christian, you have been sending mail regarding Christie PC-BAX, marketing
it as a BMR software for TSM.
I have some considerations when it comes to PC-BAX(which I have installed
both at customer locations, and in our own demo environment):
1. Does PC-BAX support AIX, Solaris, HP/UX and other
Hi Everyone!
What Tivoli has done and going to do is
Unix :
Sysback who
Hi Christian
1. Does PC-BAX handle the TDP? Or does
PC-BAX do its own, off-line backup of SQL, Exchange and so on? As far as
I know, PC-BAX doesnt support restoring SQL and Exchange using Tivolis
TDP.
2. I would really like to know who you
have been talking to in Sweden regarding the NEW
It´s nice to see a cat fight with two local (Swedish) consultants... Oops
now its time for real work again...
//Henrik
Daniel Sparrman
Bruce,
When doing a full backup, Data Protection for Exchange will inactivate
any previous incrementals that exist.
I would guess that your policy settings are set up in such a way that
those incrementals are still being retained.
From the policy section in the User's Guide:
-
Incremental
Matt,
RC=418 means that there was a TSM API error.
Look in the tdpsql.log and/or dsierror.log to find out the cause.
You are correct, all of the returns codes
are not currently documented. We are working
to get these into the documentation in the future.
Thanks,
Del
Hi,
we use 5.1.5.9,
René LAMBELET
NESTEC SA
GLOBE - Global Business Excellence
Central Support Center
Information Technology
Av. Nestlé 55 CH-1800 Vevey (Switzerland)
tél +41 (0)21
Can any damage be caused by changing this value? In other words,
could it make a client unable to restore older versions of files? ...
...
sudo dsmc restore -se=lorenz -pick /home/staff/tks/lps/Mail/myub /tmp/
No - the absence of the -INActive operand on the dsmc command line does that.
Hi, be carefull, we got severe password issues doing a servername change, we
had to re-initialise all password on all clients (NT at least),
René LAMBELET
NESTEC SA
GLOBE - Global Business Excellence
Central Support Center
I am now wondering if TSM is confused, as /home used to be a filesystem,
and now, /home/staff/tks/lps is on root.
Get into the habit of putting braces {} around the filespace portion of
the path to make that unambiguous to TSM in servicing the query.
Hi Daniel!
Our software CBMR (Old name PC-BaX) does support more then only TSM.
My TSM server is at 4.2.3.0 and we want to upgrade to
5.1.x of TSM. But we have over 50 million orphaned SYSTEM
OBJECTS that we have been trying to delete via the CLEANUP
BACKUPGROUPS command. We tried to upgrade with the
orphans and after 72 hours we backed out. Now we are
tryng to delete the
Not so strange considering how TSM client makes a registrykey like this
(under which the password is stored);
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\IBM\ADSM\CurrentVersion\BackupClient\Nodes\MYNOD
E\TSMSRV001
where the last is the name of the TSM server (TSM servername). Updating alot
of clients can be done
Dumb question, what version is the CLEANUP BACKUPGROUPS in? I ask because there is no
output from h CLEAN BACKUPGROUPS on 4.1 or 5.1.5
Thank You!
-Original Message-
From: Dameon White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 8:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
This is the management class I'm using for Exchange:
Policy Domain Name EXCHANGE_AGENT
Policy Set Name STANDARD
Mgmt Class Name EXCMGMTCLASS
Copy Group Name STANDARD
Versions Data Exists 3
Versions Data Deleted 1
Retain Extra Versions 60
Retain Only Version 120
Copy Mode MODIFIED
Copy
Tyring to get a general survey of how TSMers managing large scale deployments of TDP
for Oracle.
Since it's a client driven process (in our environment), the success or failure is
difficult to monitor.
Also, TDPOSYNC requires information only the DBAs would know.
e.g.Catalog user name
I receive the following errors referring to the WMI Databse. WMI
directory has been excluded in the options file... Anyone else have this
problem and maybe a resolution?
2/03/2003 01:14:51 ANS1228E Sending of object
'\\hyperion\c$\ADSM.SYS\WMI\WMIDBFILE' failed
02/03/2003 01:14:51 ANS1448E An
Another dumb question...what is Orphaned system objects
Regards
Niklas Lunström
Swedbank
-Original Message-
From: Hart, Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: den 13 februari 2003 15:31
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: System Objects and Cleanup Backupgroups
Dumb question, what
I think the doc is in the readme for the 4.2.3.x server releases. It
recommends going to the latest 4.2.3.x patch to get all the fixes. I ran
mine originally on a 4.2.3.2 server level and it all worked fine. Took
14-hours, but then it's a small server. We have since moved to 4.2.3.3 patch
level
Platform: W2k, TSM 5.1.6, San Data Gateway 2108 R03.
I keep getting this on actlog after submitting audit lib, could anyone help on
this?
40:04 ANR0609I AUDIT LIBRARY started as process 5.
02/13/2003 09:41:30 ANR8941W The volume from slot-element 4098 in drive
Laura,
Do a query inclexcl on the client to see whether the exclude is actually doing
what you think
I receive the following errors referring to the WMI Databse. WMI
directory has been excluded in the options file... Anyone else have this
problem and maybe a resolution?
Did you run help clean or help cleanup?
Kyle
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Hart, Charles
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 8:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: System Objects and Cleanup Backupgroups
Dumb question, what
Bill,
How would you pass this info on the command line as it prompts you for it when
you execute TDPOSYNC.
Catalog user name
Catalog Password
Catalog Connect String
-Original Message-
From: Bill Boyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 9:52 AM
To: [EMAIL
I am now wondering if TSM is confused, as /home used to be a filesystem,
and now, /home/staff/tks/lps is on root.
Get into the habit of putting braces {} around the filespace portion of
the path to make that unambiguous to TSM in servicing the query.
Cool. That works. I looked around in
Could someone in IBM/Tivoli fix this gross error...
The front of each TSM manual says to send feedback to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I tried that twice this morning and got:
... while talking to smtp2.tivoli.com.:
RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed
sorry... i tried to search for this but i cant seem to get connected to
adsm.org. any idea what is happening with these errors?
TSM V4.2.2 running on AIX 4.3.3 ML10 connected to 3494 Library with 3590
Tape drives
we have seen this error before... this time happens to be during a backup
stgp
Server is AIX 4.3.3 TSMServer is 5.1.5.2.
Been doing a bunch of things and just ran a q act, via the web, to look at
the last 60 minutes. It's 7:40 AM now and q act shows me the log from 6:48
to 7:02. The time on the server is Thu Feb 13 07:44:17 PST 2003. Seems to be
ok through the cli
Richard, I've forwarded your note to the pubs folks.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (change eye to i to reply)
The only dumb question is the one
Steven,
I am os390 TSM 4.2.2, but I think this problem extends to AIX 4.2.2 as well
When I queried it with IBM, they referred me to APAR PQ61001 and suggested I
needed to audit the
database to resolve. as you can imagine I wasn't very happy to do that, well I
read the apar and replied
I have
We have tsm server 4.2.1 running under solaris 2.8 on a sun 3500.
Had plenty of memory (2gb) and a reasonable amount of disk. However, performance even
with a gigabit ethernet was less than adequate.
Acting on a couple of replies received from this list, I modified the vfstab and
changed the
yep
tsm: MSPSTG5help clean
CLEAN Command
CLEAN Command
Use the CLEAN DRIVE command to clean a drive in a SCSI library for Storage
Manager.
CLEAN DRIVE (Clean a Drive)
tsm: MSPSTG5help cleanup
ANR2306E No help text could be found for this command/subcommand: CLEANUP.
ANS8001I Return code
Can I delete the SYSTEM OBJECT filespaces
all together and gamble that I won't have to restore the
registry that day? Will deleting the good system
objects help with the orphans?
There is a less draconian version of this strategy that some
sites have used successfully. Execute 'rename
Windows-BMR Announcement for TSM 5.2
was restricted to Windows versions XP and higher,
as far as I now.
regards
Juraj Salak
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. Februar 2003 13:59
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: TSM 5.2
Needed to go back a few hours to find some things so I just changed the
Begin Time on the WEB interface to NOW-3:00. It's 8:55AM and the query only
returned info from 6AM to 7AM.
Very strange.
Geoff Gill
TSM Administrator
NT Systems Support Engineer
SAIC
E-Mail:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
since upgrading to 5.1.5.4, one of our AIX TSM server (only one of the 4
having been upgraded) gives strange migration messages:
02/13/2003 15:36:20 ANR1001I Migration process 552 ended for storage pool
BACKPOOL.
02/13/2003 15:36:20 ANR0986I Process 552 for MIGRATION running in the
Hi!
Do everyone know that Legato is fore Sale?
If you want to avoid the gamble, just RENAME the SYSTEM OBJECT filespace to
something else.
After the next client backup, you'll have a new, clean SYSTEM OBJECT
filespace.
After a couple of days, delete the old one.
Or if you have a disaster in the meantime, you can rename ithe old SYSTEM
OBJECT
Hi,
Has anyone had the following troubles?
On a large restore (1.3 TB) SAP database using TDP for R/3.
First issue - session with a SendW wait time that continues to increment
until the CommTimeOut is reached then terminates the connection? The byte
count never increases and the tape drive and
Hello All, many thanks to all who responded to my inquiry. It looks like
Mark's response, item #2, was the answer. I had my region size at 1280M and
TSM was running just awful. I had a phone conversation with Mark and
afterwards, I tried his suggestion of REDUCING the region size. Note the
Hi,
Thanks for the info, what about logging for file systems ? does it
impact on the performance ?
Marco.
Lee, Gary D. wrote:
We have tsm server 4.2.1 running under solaris 2.8 on a sun 3500.
Had plenty of memory (2gb) and a reasonable amount of disk. However, performance even with a
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 10:44:12AM -0500, Richard Sims wrote:
553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1)
This obviously needs to be investigated by Tivoli, both to fix it and find out
what procedures are awry to allow such a thing to happen.
They will probably
Hi,
We seem to be experiencing symptoms similar (identical?) to Alan's.
We're at z/OS 1.2, running on a 2066-002 w/ 8GB of memory and virtually no
paging; TSM is at 4.2.3.0.; database is 55% of 106 GB. Network
connectivity is via GB ethernet. Disk pool is 190GB on an ESS. Nightly
backup load is
As mentioned, NpPeek messages in the b/a errorlog indicates that the b/a
client didn't receive an expected response from
the journal daemon, and if the backup didn't complete it probably means
that contact with the journal daemon was lost for
some reason (and possibly that the journal daemon
Does anyone have a x-ref of Windows OS level to TSM's OS
level in the node table. I think NT 4 is oslevel=4.0 and
win2k is oslevel=5. How about xp,98, or 95?
Thanks for your help.
Dameon
Hi Bill,
Another thing that came up in our discussion was that the DB
buffpoolsize should not exceed 131072 (128K). You might want to try that was
well. Sounds like you have little to lose, like I did when I tried reducing
the region size. Another observation. My cache hit ratio has
A few weeks ago I sent an email asking if anyone could give me some
directions on how to restore WINNT on different hardware. Thanks to
everyone who responded. I was able to accomplish the restore. It is a
little tricky but not hard.
If anyone else likes to know the process, please send me an
NT4.0is 4.00
95 is 4.00 (To a 3.7.4.0 server)
98 is 4.10 (don't know if regular or SE edition)
W2K is 5.00
All above except Win95 viewed from 4.2.2.10 TSM server.
David Longo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/13/03 03:41PM
Does anyone have a x-ref of Windows OS level
XP will show 5.01.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (change eye to i to reply)
The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line
Win95 will show client_os_level of 4.00; Win98 will show 4.10, and WinMe
will show 4.90.
These match the versions of the OS as shown by the VER command. (You may
need to look at the computer properties to see this version info for 9x,
but for the NT platform, VER will work.)
Regards,
Andy
Andy
I would like to ask for some expert opinions from this group. We use MiraPoint's
e-mail appliance for our student e-mail. We would like to back it up using ITSM.
MiraPoint has said that it intends to qualify with TSM. They want us to push
IBM/Tivoli for 3-way NDMP support in TSM. I have no idea
We are currently running TSM 5.1.5 on Win2k with an IBM Mammoth-2 drive for
offsite copypools. We have had problems with both our onsite M2 and offsite
M2 drives at our disaster recovery center. IBM has replaced the drive more
than a dozen times in the last two years and Exabyte has replaced
TSMers,
Is there anyway people know of to estimate how large a backupset is going
to be? I have close to 700 nodes I want to generate backupsets for and I
want to know
what sort of space I will be using up with them. I am assuming it will be
some sort of SQL statement looking at active files, but
Hi,
I'm attempting to setup a shared 3494 library between linux boxes. I'm
running 5.1.5.4 on all the boxes. Drives are Fibre channel 3590s.
I've defined server to server communication etc., the library and drives
on the manager, and the library on the clients.
However, when I go to define the
I would like to ask for some expert opinions from this group. We use MiraPoint's
e-mail appliance for our student e-mail. We would like to back it up using ITSM.
MiraPoint has said that it intends to qualify with TSM. They want us to push
IBM/Tivoli for 3-way NDMP support in TSM. I have no idea
What is the underlying database?
Are you restoring over the SAP instance created or cloning one instance into another?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 14/02/2003 3:56:37
Hi,
Has anyone had the following troubles?
On a large restore (1.3 TB) SAP database using TDP for R/3.
First issue - session with a
Colby,
We have been using the Exabyte M2 drives and tapes for a couple of years
now. We did have lots of problems and wore out several drives before we
found out that that running our four drive library on one 29160
interface was causing the drives and tapes to wear out. We reconfigured
and now
Graham, an estimate is the sum of (capacity * percent utilized) for the
filespaces for a given client if you are including all filespaces in your
GENERATE BACKUPSET. Realize that if you are using a tape device class, the
minimum amount of media is one tape cartridge per backupset. So, for small
Bruce,
Are both log backups and full backups going to this same
management class? If so, that explains it.
Since logs are uniquely named, once DP for Exchange
marks them inactive, they abide by the
Retain Only Version rule... which you show below as 120 days.
So that means they will stay around
Hi Jason,
I may be wrong, but have you set up the path to the drives for the client on the
LIBRAY MANAGER, if not do so
Markus
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kopie:
Don't forget that you are not supposed to backup your client while creating the
backupset.
This limits their usefulness IMO
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 14/02/2003 12:37:05
Graham, an estimate is the sum of (capacity * percent utilized) for the
filespaces for a given client if you are including all
67 matches
Mail list logo
