I ran into the same problem. This is documented in the knowledge base as a known
error. If you run the domino server as a windows app instead of a service, this works
around the problem.
-Original Message-
From: Jozef Zatko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003
Hi
since summertime change (last week) i see different timestamps in logs:
BR280I Time stamp 2003-04-02 14.03.51
#ARCHIVE.. /oracle/D65/saparch/D65arch1_13355.dbf
#SAVED SAPD659D04021403
BKI0053I: Time: 04/02/2003 13:03:51 Object: 11 of 19 done:
/oracle/D65/saparch/D65arch1_13355.dbf with:
Ruud
You can't and you'll have to wait until the US switches to summertime.
It's a bug in TDP for SAP/R3 since version 3.2xx
See APAR IC32702 - Time Stamp
Jeroen
-Original Message-
From: Van Ruler, Ruud R SITI-ITDGE41 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 14:26
To:
I guess I was sleeping when I updated the previous 25 clients and didn't
notice, but I noticed this morning that all of the clients I updated the
code on yesterday were doing a full backup last night. I had already
changed the filespace to unicode, which would be the only thing of note
that was
On all of our database servers we run an archive nightly but instead of a
regular archive we run a command instead:
su - oracle /home/oracle/scripts/backup/db_backup.sh
this script handles all the processing of the database and calls a dsmc
archive command. on 97% of the servers it works
Anyone here has any experience with TSM on Red Hat Linux!?
Thanks in advance,
Roberto Godoy.
-
Yahoo! Mail
O melhor e-mail gratuito da internet: 6MB de espago, antivmrus, acesso POP3, filtro
contra spam.
I have master:/export/filesystem NFS exported to several client nodes
who all NFS mount it as master:/net/filesystem/. And I would want to let
the users archive and retrieve files in this filesystem on any of the
client nodes.
i.e. the users wants to be able to execute:
dsmc archive
Thank you for your always helpful recommendations/list.
No, I had not checked your list until now.
Richard Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
04/01/2003 05:54 PM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Is there an ftp site around that contains old fixes for older versions of
software. I am in the UK.
I'm looking for FIXTEST 1.1.1.01 for TDP Domino.
Thanks.
You did not say what platform.
Look here:
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/patches/agents/domino/
Marc Lowers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
04/02/2003 08:39 AM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To:
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/patches/agents/domino/
Is there an ftp site around that contains old fixes for older versions of
software. I am in the UK.
I'm looking for FIXTEST 1.1.1.01 for TDP
su - oracle /home/oracle/scripts/backup/db_backup.sh
this script handles all the processing of the database and calls a dsmc
archive command. on 97% of the servers it works fine. however, on just a
few of them... that dont appear to be any different, the script
immediately dies with a return
Regardless of the client level, you can open as many dsm windows and start
as many restores at once as you want.
That's the best way to go if you have multiple filesystems to restore, up
until you bottleneck your networks.
-Original Message-
From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [mailto:[EMAIL
Problem synopsis: How to do Archive/Retrieve on NFS client systems
The TSM Clients manual describes the conventional cross-node access methods, via
dsmc SET Access and VIRTUALMountpoint. Investigate the feasibility of those
relative to your needs.
Alternately, you might employ a meta script, as
Hello everyone!
I am having a situation at work and I could use input from other TSM
admin's. Hope someone can help! Here is my situation:
On 12/15/2003 I changed the domain of a client named HMCH1015. In the
process I deleted many archived files because the management classes didn't
exist
We are running server version 4.1.2.1 with TDP for Domino running on NT
servers v 1.1.1.
I'm having a bit of trouble finding it, so if anyone can point me in the
right direction feel free!
Thanks.
Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When you say, I had already changed the filespace to unicode ..., what
exactly do you mean? If you mean that you set autofsrename to yes, then
yes, this cause the old file spaces to be renamed and new unicode file
spaces to be created, which results in a full backup.
From an Admin client, do a
Hello,
I am still on TDP 1.?, but I think you have specify different file location in the
restore option if your directory structure are different between the two servers.
Yi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/01/03 01:30PM
SQL Version 7
TDP Version 2.2.1
Trying to restore SQL Database onto another SQL
Joni, I'm not sure I follow all of this, but the bottom line is this:
changing the domain for node x does not impact node y in any way, shape or
form.
With that said, I can not figure out what is meant by this:
The user is saying that because they now archive
the same files to the HMCH1015
It appears that TSM 4.2 has reached end of support on 4/15/03.
Is this for Clients AND Server?
Are most people planning on upgrading to 5.1?
What are the implications of staying at 4.2 or lower?
Is there any additional cost to upgrade?
Are there any major issues with 5.1???
My system uses the -c option of the su commmand
su - oracle -c /home/oracle/scripts/backup/db_backup.sh
Amazing what a missing flag will cause.
Conko, Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 04/02/2003 05:25:07 AM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:
we couldnt get it to work with the -c ... most all servers work fine without
it.
-Original Message-
From: Joe Pendergast [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 9:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: problem with a su script
My system uses the -c option of the su
make sure ur not logged into the system in the same shell which started the
tsm scheduler when the backup runs if it's started by the tsm scheduler of
course. Setup the COMMANDs schedule to execute on the tsm server side,
then goto the client system and restart the client scheduler (dsmc sched)
or
I had changed all the clients by a
upd node * autofsrename=yes
and renamed the none-unicode filespaces to _OLD
Node Name Filespace FSID Platform Filespace Is Files- Capacity
Pct
Name Typepace(MB)
Util
From: Marc Levitan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It appears that TSM 4.2 has reached end of support on 4/15/03.
Is this for Clients AND Server?
Are most people planning on upgrading to 5.1?
What are the implications of staying at 4.2 or lower?
Is there any additional cost to upgrade?
Are
From: Steve Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have two objections to backupsets. The first is that API
data is not covered. The second is that you are not supposed
to make new backups for a node whilst the backupset is being
created - this could cause horrendous scheduling difficulties
From: Jozef Zatko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The problem was that, when I used TDP GUI or command
line for backup I always got couple of the following error
messages for various databases:
04/02/2003 08:38:53 Backup of admin4.nsf failed.
04/02/2003 08:38:53 This database is currently
I currently have my migprocess=3 which works fine and mounts 3 tapes when
migrating data from my primary disk pool. When I run the backup stgpool
primarytapepool offsitedrpool maxprocess=2 command, TSM on the remote site
immediately requests the mounting of the same tape twice. Of course only
one
I am going to start posting the FAQ as a text attachment. I keep getting
funky reformatting of the text when I send it as an in-line text
message.
If there are a sufficient number of complaints/problems with this, I'll
try to figure out something else.
Remember: this is a plain-text message. No
Here's an example of a restore that relocates/renames the database and log
pieces:
tdpsqlc restore ServiceCenter3 full /into=ServiceCenterTemp /replace
/relocate=ServiceCenter1_Data,ServiceCenter1_Log
/to=g:\mssql7\data\servicecentertemp_data.mdf,g:\mssql7\data\servicecenterte
mp_log.ldf
The
The AUTOFSRENAME option in the client options file is effective only when
the node setting on the server is AUTOFSRENAME=CLIENT. If you set the
nodes to AUTOFSRENAME=YES, then the renames should have occurred
automatically... and yes, it was a real option for 4.2 clients.
See the AUTOFSRENAME
I mean media wait not session wait in my previous message. What's even
weirder is that setting maxprocess=2 kicks off 2 Backup Storage Pool
processes which each both create new virtual volumes. It just doesn't make
any sense to me that on the remote TSM system, it still asks for the same
volume
I browsed the archives and could not find direct answers to my questions.
These are relatively short answered questions. Could someone reply?
ADSM: Dist
Stor ManagerTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc:
Are most people planning on upgrading to 5.1?
We are
What are the implications of staying at 4.2 or lower?
No Official IBM /Tivoli Support
Is there any additional cost to upgrade?
If you have up to date paid maint no. See your sales rep
Are there any major
Is this for Clients AND Server?
Are most people planning on upgrading to 5.1?
What are the implications of staying at 4.2 or lower?
Is there any additional cost to upgrade?
V4 clients are supported with the v5 server but you will want to
upgrade to the v5 client to take advantage of the bug
Are there any major issues with 5.1???
I missed this one.
No more so than with any other version.
David
Folks,
Management would like to know what kind of impact we would have on the volume
of data we have stored in TSM if we were to lower the retention periods. They are
expecting something like if we lower the 'retain only version' from 180days to 60
days we will free up X GB of
It appears that TSM 4.2 has reached end of support on 4/15/03.
Is this for Clients AND Server?
Yes - they are all part of the product known as TSM 4.2, which has
been announced thusly. You can refer to definitive web page
http://www-3.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/eos.html
for
V4 clients are supported with the v5 server but you will want to
upgrade to the v5 client to take advantage of the bug fixes and new
features.
Just to clarify: V4.2 client are supported/compatible with the V5 server
(not V4.1).
Also, it should not be inferred that the combination of V4.2
Its only your changed or deleted data that goes inactive so you first
need an estimate of how much of your data is changed/deleted.
IBM suggested that after we upgrade to the base 5.1 that we go to the client
patch level 5.1.6.3 and they gave me the following link.
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/patches/serv
er/NT/5.1.6.3/
When I go there I get another folder with all of the folders as the
It appears that TSM 4.2 has reached end of support on 4/15/03.
Is this for Clients AND Server?
Yes.
Are most people planning on upgrading to 5.1?
We cannot, as we still have Novell 4.11 clients (that are already
not supported) and apparently will not work with 5.1 [Coats,
Could you send my your scripts?
-Original Message-
From: Chetan H. Ravnikar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2002 10:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New and probably a simple question
Micheal
here is what I do, I have about close to 55 filers and I
OS 390 MVS 2.10 TSM Server V4.2.0
Server NW6 (5.60) TSM Client V5.1.0.0
Just upgraded the Novell Server on 03/29/03 and have been getting the
following messages ever since;
03/30/2003 19:40:43 (TSA600.NLM 6.0 291) An invalid path was used.
03/30/2003 19:40:43 PrivIncrFileSpace: Received rc=104
Does anyone have a release date for this?
I was ordering some v5.1 manuals, and happened to see there is a v5.2
manual (Admin. Ref. for Windows), GC32-0783-01.
URL: http://publibfp.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/c3207831.pdf
5.2 anyone??
Ken Sedlacek
AIX/TSM/UNIX Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Never mind, it's working now. How's that for production?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Bertrand
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 11:22 AM
To: 'ADSM: Dist Stor Manager'
Subject: RE: End Of Support V4.2
IBM suggested that after we upgrade to the base 5.1 that we go to the client
patch
As discussed on this List in the past, you can't get client file sizes
from server queries, so there is no way therein to sum the savings of
changing retention policies. You could approach it on the basis of
client queries on Inactive files. Another approach is proportion: if
you have a good
As stated previously, TSM will not give you the original file size OR the
real size after compression on the back end. So all you can look at is file
counts.
Another possible approach to the file counts is sampling
When I had to do this, I actually pulled ALL the entries from the backup
table
This request is a statistical nightmare - don't promise results to be
identical to what you come up with...
You're missing single quotes around 'INACTIVE_VERSION', so the statement
looks like:
select * from backups where node_name='TSMHOST6' and
filespace_name='/export/home' and
First, thanks to everyone for their suggestions/help with my previous
question of improving restore performance.
Unfortunately, even with all suggestions taken into account, and hoping
everything works, there are still too many wildcards that could effect the
process.
At the current restore
Shannon,
You don't say just when you get these errors, should we assume the are when you
are running a backup?
What level of the tsa's are you running, that is often an issue. Also, is this
only with the Server Specific Info or for any data?
Sorry to pepper you with questions, not answers!
I thought the syntax to have a specific command executed required the -c
option, i.e.
su - oracle -c /home/oracle/scripts/backup/db_backup.sh
Jack Coyle
Rex Healthcare
--
From: Conko, Steven[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Sent:
I got a Sneak Peek of ITSM 5.2 which said June 2003 - subject to
change.
Ken Sedlacek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
04/02/2003 01:52 PM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:ITSM
Anyone here has any experience with TSM on Red Hat Linux!?
Yes, we run it on many Linux machines here with no problem.
Note that TSM clients prior to 5.1.5 do not have native support
for ext3 filesystems. However, you can get around that by
using a VIRTUALMOUNTPOINT statement in your dsm.sys
Hi,
TSM 5.1.6.2 running on AIX 5.1
I retired a server several months ago and now I wanted to use the same name for
a new server to be backed up by TSM. I generated a backupset for that server
and then deleted all the filespace of this old server. When I tried to
do 'remove node oldserver', it
Sorry for sending this here but I know there are a lot of AIX folks out
there listening so I thought I'd ask here. The TSM server is mine, along
with the AIX O/S. Been to a few classes to get some knowledge but still
learning to say the least.
By deafult how is mail set up on AIX after an
Gill-
There was a recent security bulletin about sendmail vulnerabilities on unix
platforms-- so some shops are removing it and relying on FTP and other
utilities. I think on AIX it is a default part of the install-
John
From: Gill, Geoffrey L. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ADSM: Dist Stor
For a definitive answer,
would it be possible to restore the TSM database on a test server? Then change your
retentions, run expiry then audit occ. After that, Q occ should give you the numbers
you seek.
Regards
Steve Harris
AIX and TSM Admin
Queensland Health, Brisbane Australia
[EMAIL
Anyone have information on TSM V5.2 z/LINUX support?
Thanks,
Bernie Survoy
Consulting Systems Engineer
Phone: 216 615-9324
Cell: 330 321-3787
StorageTek
Information made Powerful
I had the same problem not to long ago. I found the solution by looking in
the list.
Tom Kauffman wrote;
It's unicode, and you have to indicate that on the delete (stupid software!)
Delete filespace itgc2ashare \\itcf2ashare\c$ nametype=unicode
The implication on the 'help delete
Hi all,
on GSE/Europe they (IBM) told us that the ITSM 5.2 will be released in May or June.
An there should be a new ITSM-Server for Linux z/Series too ;-)
--
regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen
Joachim Stumpf
Datev eG
Nuremberg - Germany
- Original-Nachricht folgt
Hi!
I have talk to Tivoli in Norway and Sweden. And they say that it´s pland to
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 02:34:12PM +0200, PAC Brion Arnaud wrote:
For big storage pools that can take quite some time, and especially if
running at the same time as expiration or other DB heavy activity.
In my case, the storage pool size is approximatively 1,4 TB, would it
make sense for
63 matches
Mail list logo
