hi,
is there a way to start a backup schedule via tsm central scheduler
right after some script on the host has ended ?
i know about prescript option but what if this is not an option ?
is there another way to do that ? does anyone has some experience
with issue like that ?
thanks in advance
Net start SERVICE at the end of the host script? And for the *ux
clients something alike.
Regards,
Karel
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
goc
Sent: dinsdag 14 februari 2006 12:36
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: clint scheduler
Hi there,
We have the venerable IBM 3584, and I created a devclass dbtape with a
prefix of TDB. I then printed a set of barcodes TDB001L2 ... TDB015L2.
Checked in the tapes as scratch, labels=b, etc. q libvol shows them.
When I went to backup db devc=dbtape, it picked a scratch tape with
a
Hi Jim,
As far as I know the PREFIX does not do anything if you have barcode
labeled tapes. The PREFIX is used only for non-barcode labeled tapes.
Mind you, if you have a library with a barcode reader, you always should
use barcode labeled tapes.
Met vriendelijke groet, With kind regards,
Hello all,
I set up a script to run every hour. with the following commands in the
script. When I run the script I receive a invalid parameter error for
the wait parameter.
/* This script queries the backuppool stgpool then stops migration on the
backuppool stgpool*/
run test_query_script
Wait=yes option is not valid with run command.
This can be used along with BACKUP/MIGRATE/RECLAIM STGPOOL commands.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy
Hughes
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 9:06 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
The 3494 tracks where a tape is and TSM depends on the library manager
to do the right thing. While the 3584 knows which slot a tape is in (see
the 3584 library specialist), TSM also tracks the tape's location. With
a 3584, a TSM 'q libvol f=d' has the home element filled in with the
tape slot
Physical CPU's/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/13/06 11:56 PM
I have been told that TSM licensing is done by number of CPU's not
number of servers.
If we have a number of virtual servers on VM Ware systems, is the TSM
licensing calculated by the number of physical CPU's or the number of
virtual CPU's?
The PREFIX controls what is written on the internal label as a dataset
name.
From the 'help def devclass' output:
PREFIX
Specifies the high level qualifier of the data set name that the
server
writes into the sequential access media labels. For each
sequential
access volume
I think that if you want to run two scripts, and , one after the
other, starting at a scheduled time, you need to:
- have an admin schedule kick off script
- at the end/bottom of script , put a 'run ' command
Or, if you want some delay between the end of script
Scan the list archives for the past couple of weeks looking for serial and
parallel. The newer versiions support serialization of commands within a
script.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/14/06 9:05 AM
Hello all,
I set up a script to run every hour. with the following commands in the
script. When I
I am trying create backupset from TSM for few nodes. Where do I keep track of
tape serial number for corresponding node's backup ?
Following command I am using
generat backupset node1 node1 * devc=3494dc scr=yes ret=60
Regards
Muthu
202-458-8340 - Work
Thanks again everyone!
Hi Bill,
Actually, it would be three scripts so I am going try what you suggested
right now I have one global script that is kicked off using the admin
schedule.
regards!
Bill Kelly wrote:
I think that if you want to run two scripts, and , one after the
Instead of using wait=yes on the run commands, use that in the commands
within the individual scripts. ie:
run script1
run script2
run script3
run script4
If script1,2,3,4 all have TSM commands that run in the foreground either
by design or using wait=yes, then those scripts will run
Hi All,
Sorry to drag this back up but I don't see a final answer. I have just
added an additional frame to my library containing 3592 (Jaguar) drives.
I added an additional devclass to support the new drives. I defined the
new drives and paths. Both drives and paths are online. When I try to
John, Thanks for your response also!
Regards
John Monahan wrote:
Instead of using wait=yes on the run commands, use that in the commands
within the individual scripts. ie:
run script1
run script2
run script3
run script4
If script1,2,3,4 all have TSM commands that run in the
I recommend a service call to IBM. Just last month I saw an issue with
TSM 5.2.7.0 performing the same activity with the same result. There is
a fixtest at 5.2.7.x addressing the 'No drive available in library'
scenario.
Best of luck!
John G. Talafous
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
I just upgraded my AIX TSM server from 5.2.3.2 to 5.2.3.3 (the problem
with REPAIR STGVOL deadlock has bitten us 3-times in the past week).
After the reboot, we noticed this error message:
ANR8227E Fileset devices.common.IBM.fc.hba-api is not at the
required level.
My guess is that the
I use a SQL query to match the tape number from volhist and the backupset names
in backupsets like
SELECT
VOLHISTORY.VOLUME_NAME,BACKUPSETS.BACKUPSET_NAME,BACKUPSETS.DATE_TIME,BACKUPSETS.DESCRIPTION
FROM VOLHISTORY,BACKUPSETS WHERE VOLHISTORY.TYPE='BACKUPSET' AND
Paul Dudley a écrit :
I have been told that TSM licensing is done by number of CPU's not
number of servers.
If we have a number of virtual servers on VM Ware systems, is the TSM
licensing calculated by the number of physical CPU's or the number of
virtual CPU's?
Regards
Paul
Paul Dudley
ANL
Richard,
We just heard from EMC that the 4 x n +1 optimization is a myth...
being spread by their technical support staff, field service techs, and
training instructors. Their engineers say that Clariion will provide
optimum performance with any reasonable drive count.
We use RAID-3 on ATA for
Andy,
Others have already pointed out that 3 km might be too close, but consider
this additional info:
* After Katrina hit us, the entire - flooded - parish was closed by the
local govenment, so our safely protected tapes were inaccessible for three
weeks. Thankfully we had gotten to the point
There is no way to contact/feedback on this without being logged in.
Could someone send feedback indicating that [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] are having this problem?
ADSM.ORG isn't sending me reset passwords or confirmations of new account
creations.
I've set to multiple different
You'll want to use the command SERIAL at the end of each of the other
scripts. In theory, this is supposed to be implied.
Ignoring the reasons why I'm migrating before backing up,
here's an example of what I use:
TSM:q scr backmig_STG f=raw
* SCRIPT BACKMIG_STG to backup and migrate storage
Other options include:
*use WAIT=YES and it should dump the relevant actlog messages to
your admin session, including which tapes were mounted
*specify VOLumes=m1,m2, etc
On 06.02.15 at 07:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:26:42 +1100
From:
Have you seen this?
--
Problem
Procedure to add a new 3592 tape drive on 3494 library
Solution
This can be necessary when 3590E drives are correctly defined on AIX and
TSM as well, however new 3592 tape drives are to be added to the 3494
library. These are configured in the
If you're also backing up with TDPMSEXC then shouldn't you be excluding
these files?
-josh
On 06.02.13 at 15:56 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:56:16 +0100
From: goc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject:
Depends entirely on your server. There's no chart based on the overall
load incurred; however, the extra I/O is all actlog. If your DB
performance has room to spare, then it shouldn't be a problem.
You could always turn it on for a day and compare your expiration
performance the next day with:
OK, I set it to NO and things did speed up quite a bit.
But there's a rub: The GUI client on Mac behaves as though the default
were NO. If you un-check the Use memory-saving algorithm checkbox,
then it should place the MEMORYEFFICIENTBACKUP NO option into the User
Preferences File. But it
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Chris Pasztor
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 12:27 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Backupset question
I use a SQL query to match the tape number from volhist and the
backupset names
in
Goord morning,
Windows 3K SP1
TSM-Server 5.2.4.3
have anybody seen this error/warning befor ?
Any idea what's wrong ?
kind regards
Michael Garnebode
02/14/2006 13:28:17 ANR2017I Administrator ADMIN issued command:
IMPORT NODE *
preview=yes devclass=dlt
31 matches
Mail list logo
